On 03/05/2014 06:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the
same rev with all the same
Lamar Owen wrote:
On 03/05/2014 06:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the
same rev with
On 03/07/2014 11:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
I'm using CentOS myself, but if you need that particular feature of SL
it may be the better choice for you.
Have you used yum-plugin-security?
Why yes, yes I have. It is not equivalent to the SL versioning for the
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On 03/05/2014 06:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
hundreds of systems ( desktop,
On 03/06/2014 12:27 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
I have some sympathy for Michael. There are organisations which are so
paranoid that they will not allow updates between eg 6.4 and 6.5, either
because they insist on rigorous (ie lengthy and time consuming) regression
testing of applications or
Am 06.03.2014 um 01:00 schrieb Michael Coffman michael.coff...@avagotech.com:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
locked down and it's
Thanks for all the thoughtful responses. I have learned a couple of things.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.comwrote:
Am 06.03.2014 um 01:00 schrieb Michael Coffman
michael.coff...@avagotech.com:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Bart Schaefer
barton.schae...@gmail.com wrote:
Before you update anything, I suggest you run
rpm -e --test gnutls
If this complains about refers to more than one package then use
rpm -e --test gnutls.i386 gnutls.x86_64
This will tell you what other
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Cliff Pratt enkiduonthe...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some sympathy for Michael. There are organisations which are so
paranoid that they will not allow updates between eg 6.4 and 6.5, either
because they insist on rigorous (ie lengthy and time consuming) regression
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Bart Schaefer
barton.schae...@gmail.com wrote:
rpm -e --test gnutls.i386 gnutls.x86_64
This will tell you what other packages depend on the gnutls library.
Wouldn't 'yum remove gnutls'
On 03/05/2014 03:19 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
see the updated source file here:
http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Cliff Pratt enkiduonthe...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have some sympathy for Michael. There are organisations which are so
paranoid that they will not allow updates between eg 6.4 and 6.5, either
because they insist on rigorous (ie lengthy and time
I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
see the updated source file here:
http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
http://vault.centos.org/6.4/updates/x86_64/Packages/
Where
On 03/06/2014 10:19 AM, Michael Coffman wrote:
I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
see the updated source file here:
http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:19:26 -0700
Michael Coffman wrote:
Where should I be looking for the updated package for 6.4?
yum update should bring your system up to the current Centos release which
includes the gnutls fix.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
On 3/5/2014 1:19 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
see the updated source file here:
http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
On 05.03.2014 22:19, Michael Coffman wrote:
I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?I
see the updated source file here:
http://vault.centos.org/6.5/updates/Source/SPackages/
But I don't see the correct version of the packages in the 6.4 tree here:
Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de
wrote:
On 05.03.2014 22:19, Michael Coffman wrote:
I am running centos6.4. Where do I find the updated gnutls packages?
I
see the updated source
On 3/5/2014 3:22 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself.
what? why???
yum update gnutls
*done*
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Michael Coffman
michael.coff...@avagotech.com wrote:
Thanks for the helpful replies. Guess I'll build it myself.
Why? 'yum update gnutls' will get it, bringing along only things
specified as having version-specific dependencies if there are any.
But it is
Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the
same rev with all the same packages. A large number of vendor packages
and
On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
hundreds of systems ( desktop, server and HPC systems) that are all the
same rev with all the same
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:44 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 3/5/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Coffman wrote:
Not sure what your environment looks like but the systems I manage are
locked down and it's typically difficult to get them changed. We have
hundreds of systems ( desktop,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman
michael.coff...@avagotech.com wrote:
so you're a year behind on any security fixes why are you worried
about this one, then?
This seems like it has more potentiol to impact users in my environment
that are using a web browser to access
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:12:49PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael Coffman
updated. I did not realize that once the OS was vaulted, there were no
more updates. Now I know so thanks...
No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yum
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 4:43:37 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] gnutls bug
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:12:49PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
No, what everyone has said is that there _are_ updates, and yum knows
how to get them, even selectively.
More to the point, 6.4 and 6.5 are just markers in the sand for
CentOS 6. 6.5 is basically just a rebasing of the
Before you update anything, I suggest you run
rpm -e --test gnutls
If this complains about refers to more than one package then use
rpm -e --test gnutls.i386 gnutls.x86_64
This will tell you what other packages depend on the gnutls library.
It's probably fewer than you think, because
I have some sympathy for Michael. There are organisations which are so
paranoid that they will not allow updates between eg 6.4 and 6.5, either
because they insist on rigorous (ie lengthy and time consuming) regression
testing of applications or because a third party package vendor specifies a
29 matches
Mail list logo
