But second, if I was to configure it myself, the syntax is
alternatives --install link name path priority... and other
optional stuff
Looking at other examples, I'm not clear on the difference between
link and path in this command
Thanks,
Tony Schreiner
Boston College
I've installed java-1.6.0-openjdk (from EPEL) on a CentOS 5.2 x86_64
system and see that it has not registered itself with alternatives.
First, is there a reason I should know about that it does not set
itself up as an alternative?
But second, if I was to configure it myself, the syntax is
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote:
I've installed java-1.6.0-openjdk (from EPEL) on a CentOS 5.2 x86_64
system and see that it has not registered itself with alternatives.
First, is there a reason I should know about that it does not set
itself up as an alternative?
But
3 matches
Mail list logo