[CentOS] Intel Sunrise Point-LP HD Audio doesn't work past kernel 4.18-0-240.22.1

As stated in the subject line, the last Centos kernel where Intel Sunrise Point-LP HD Audio works is version 4.18-0-240.22.1 Booting the computer with any later kernel makes the audio device not show up and the only audio device is "dummy output". -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

On Feb 3, 2021, at 5:28 PM, Lists wrote: > > I had the impression that MacOS' Rosetta II might do what I need That’s rather difficult when the x86 code in question is on the other side of a virtualized CPU. It’s a double translation, you see: real x86 code run on a virtual x86 CPU under your

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

On Friday, January 29, 2021 6:30:33 AM PST Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 20:12, Lists wrote: > > My Dell Precision M3800 running Fedora works great but is really starting > > to > > show its age, and I'm thinking about getting a new Mac M1-based laptop as > > it > > would

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

On Friday, January 29, 2021 3:19:21 AM PST Thomas Bendler wrote: > > The IP wanted "support IA64 based OS's and it *needs* to be an exact (VM) > > copy of production" which most likely means "x86_64" code (not really IA64 > > which is Itanium, isn't it?). Exactly right - I think I need to have

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

Am 29.01.21 um 18:22 schrieb Jack Morgan: On 1/28/21 5:11 PM, Lists wrote: My Dell Precision M3800 running Fedora works great but is really starting to show its age, and I'm thinking about getting a new Mac M1-based laptop as it would really be useful for Video production. But I really need

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

On 1/28/21 5:11 PM, Lists wrote: My Dell Precision M3800 running Fedora works great but is really starting to show its age, and I'm thinking about getting a new Mac M1-based laptop as it would really be useful for Video production. But I really need to have a IA64 CentOS 7/8 VMs running

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 20:12, Lists wrote: > My Dell Precision M3800 running Fedora works great but is really starting > to > show its age, and I'm thinking about getting a new Mac M1-based laptop as > it > would really be useful for Video production. > > But I really need to have a IA64 CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:42 AM Simon Matter wrote: > [...] > Most likely you're running an Ubuntu arch build then? > Yep, it's the Ubuntu aarch64 build. I haven't the time yet to try other builds as well. I just got the M1, but if I find some time I will also do some tests with other

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:06 AM Rainer Duffner > wrote: > >> [...] >> Apple’s M1 are (probably) great - but only if you want to run macOS on >> it. >> Anything else and the compromises will likely be even more severe than >> those that had to be made in the earliest days of running Linux on a

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

> Am 29.01.2021 um 10:27 schrieb Thomas Bendler : > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:06 AM Rainer Duffner > wrote: > >> [...] >> Apple’s M1 are (probably) great - but only if you want to run macOS on it. >> Anything else and the compromises will likely be even more severe than >> those that had

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:06 AM Rainer Duffner wrote: > [...] > Apple’s M1 are (probably) great - but only if you want to run macOS on it. > Anything else and the compromises will likely be even more severe than > those that had to be made in the earliest days of running Linux on a laptop. >

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

> Am 29.01.2021 um 02:11 schrieb Lists : > > My Dell Precision M3800 running Fedora works great but is really starting to > show its age, and I'm thinking about getting a new Mac M1-based laptop as it > would really be useful for Video production. > > But I really need to have a IA64 CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

You need a virtualization solution that is supported on the M1 (currently Parallels preview or QEMU as far as I know). Secondly you need a distribution that supports aarch64 (Ubuntu, CentOS and some others). This should be sufficient to start with. However, all of this is in an early development

Re: [CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

> On Jan 28, 2021, at 7:11 PM, Lists wrote: > > My Dell Precision M3800 running Fedora works great but is really starting to > show its age, and I'm thinking about getting a new Mac M1-based laptop as it > would really be useful for Video production. > > But I really need to have a IA64

[CentOS] Intel/64 CentOS VM running on a Mac M1?

My Dell Precision M3800 running Fedora works great but is really starting to show its age, and I'm thinking about getting a new Mac M1-based laptop as it would really be useful for Video production. But I really need to have a IA64 CentOS 7/8 VMs running locally for development as I'm often

Re: [CentOS] Intel RST RAID 1, partition tables and UUIDs

> On Nov 18, 2020, at 2:51 AM, hw wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 08:01 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >>> On Nov 17, 2020, at 1:07 AM, hw wrote: >> [...] >>> If you don't require Centos, you could go for Fedora instead. Fedora has >>> btrfs >>> as default file system now which has

Re: [CentOS] Intel RST RAID 1, partition tables and UUIDs

On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 08:01 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > On Nov 17, 2020, at 1:07 AM, hw wrote: > [...] > > If you don't require Centos, you could go for Fedora instead. Fedora has > > btrfs > > as default file system now which has software raid built-in, and Fedora can > > have > >

Re: [CentOS] Intel RST RAID 1, partition tables and UUIDs

> On Nov 17, 2020, at 1:07 AM, hw wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 18:06 -0500, H wrote: >> On 11/16/2020 01:23 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 07:49:09PM -0500, H wrote: I have been having some problems with hardware RAID 1 on the motherboard that I am

Re: [CentOS] Intel RST RAID 1, partition tables and UUIDs

On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 18:06 -0500, H wrote: > On 11/16/2020 01:23 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 07:49:09PM -0500, H wrote: > > > I have been having some problems with hardware RAID 1 on the > > > motherboard that I am running CentOS 7 on. After a BIOS upgrade of > > >

Re: [CentOS] Intel RST RAID 1, partition tables and UUIDs

On 11/16/2020 03:36 PM, John Pierce wrote: > the main advantage I know of for bios fake-raid is that the bios can boot > off either of the two mirrored boot devices.usually if the sata0 device > has failed, the BIOS isn't smart enough to boot from sata1 > > the only other reason is if you're

Re: [CentOS] Intel RST RAID 1, partition tables and UUIDs

On 11/16/2020 01:23 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 07:49:09PM -0500, H wrote: >> I have been having some problems with hardware RAID 1 on the >> motherboard that I am running CentOS 7 on. After a BIOS upgrade of >> the system, I lost the RAID 1 setup and was no longer able

Re: [CentOS] Intel RST RAID 1, partition tables and UUIDs

the main advantage I know of for bios fake-raid is that the bios can boot off either of the two mirrored boot devices.usually if the sata0 device has failed, the BIOS isn't smart enough to boot from sata1 the only other reason is if you're running MS Windows desktop which can't do mirroring

Re: [CentOS] Intel RST RAID 1, partition tables and UUIDs

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 07:49:09PM -0500, H wrote: > > I have been having some problems with hardware RAID 1 on the > motherboard that I am running CentOS 7 on. After a BIOS upgrade of > the system, I lost the RAID 1 setup and was no longer able to boot > the system. The Intel RST RAID (aka

[CentOS] Intel RST RAID 1, partition tables and UUIDs

I have been having some problems with hardware RAID 1 on the motherboard that I am running CentOS 7 on. After a BIOS upgrade of the system, I lost the RAID 1 setup and was no longer able to boot the system. Testdisk revealed that the partition tables had been damaged and because I had earlier

[CentOS] Intel Wireless 3160 adapter misbehaving

Hi folks I'm having some hard time troubleshooting a Wifi issue Centos7, fully up to date, with an Intel Dual Band 3160 Wireless adapter After the machine boots, the Wifi connects and runs ok for a few hours After this, the Wifi just stops [root@orbex ~]# lspci -v | grep Wireless 04:00.0

Re: [CentOS] Intel Vroc experiences?

> Hi, > > Has anyone had any experience with Intel Vroc[1]? I'm possibly having to > deal with a new server with such technology and can't find much (real > world) information about it. > Looking at the specs it's basically a glorified fake raid which usually > turns on my alarm bells. Has anyone

Re: [CentOS] Intel Vroc experiences?

On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:00:45 +0100 (BST) Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone had any experience with Intel Vroc[1]? I'm possibly having > to deal with a new server with such technology and can't find much > (real world) information about it. Looking at the specs it's > basically a glorified fake

[CentOS] Intel Vroc experiences?

Hi, Has anyone had any experience with Intel Vroc[1]? I'm possibly having to deal with a new server with such technology and can't find much (real world) information about it. Looking at the specs it's basically a glorified fake raid which usually turns on my alarm bells. Has anyone done any

Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake

Hello, There was a support issue with the Intel Skylake and CentOS 6.* where the graphics hardware was not supported. Intel have now come up with a software solution to support the AST2500 graphics hardware on the Skylake. Regards, Mark Woolfson MW Consultancy Ltd Leeds LS18 4LY United

Re: [CentOS] Intel Flaw

On 5 January 2018 at 12:53, Chris Olson wrote: > How does the latest Intel flaw relate to CentOS 6.x systems > that run under VirtualBox hosted on Windows 7 computers? Given > the virtual machine degree of separation from the hardware, can Supposedly a virtual machine

Re: [CentOS] Intel Flaw

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Chris Olson Subject: [CentOS] Intel Flaw >How does the latest Intel flaw relate to CentOS 6.x systems that run under >VirtualBox > hosted on Windows 7 computers? My computer is an much older AMD

[CentOS] Intel Flaw

How does the latest Intel flaw relate to CentOS 6.x systems that run under VirtualBox hosted on Windows 7 computers? Given the virtual machine degree of separation from the hardware, can this issue actually be detected and exploited in the operating systems that run virtually?  If there is a slow

Re: [CentOS] Intel Bluetooth problems - "Invalid request code (56)" - on CentOS 6.9

On 11/20/2017 03:33 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: > Hi, > > I have Lenovo laptop with an Intel wireless and Bluetooth adapter, > running CentOS 6.9. The wireless works just fine, but I can't seem to > get Bluetooth to work. When I try to force it up from the command line I > get > > # hciconfig hci0 up

[CentOS] Intel Bluetooth problems - "Invalid request code (56)" - on CentOS 6.9

Hi, I have Lenovo laptop with an Intel wireless and Bluetooth adapter, running CentOS 6.9. The wireless works just fine, but I can't seem to get Bluetooth to work. When I try to force it up from the command line I get # hciconfig hci0 up Can't init device hci0: Invalid request code (56)

Re: [CentOS] Intel turbo mode

Stephen John Smoogen writes: > On 3 October 2017 at 13:01, hw wrote: >> Stephen John Smoogen writes: >> >>> On 1 October 2017 at 11:34, hw wrote: Hi, is there a way in Centos to find out if the Intel

Re: [CentOS] Intel turbo mode

On 3 October 2017 at 13:01, hw wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen writes: > >> On 1 October 2017 at 11:34, hw wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> is there a way in Centos to find out if the Intel turbo mode will be >>> used? >>> >>> Using the 'stress'

Re: [CentOS] Intel turbo mode

Stephen John Smoogen writes: > On 1 October 2017 at 11:34, hw wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is there a way in Centos to find out if the Intel turbo mode will be >> used? >> >> Using the 'stress' utility and checking the frequency with cpupower >> tells me that a CPU

Re: [CentOS] Intel turbo mode

On 1 October 2017 at 11:34, hw wrote: > Hi, > > is there a way in Centos to find out if the Intel turbo mode will be > used? > > Using the 'stress' utility and checking the frequency with cpupower > tells me that a CPU is running at it´s maximum frequency as reported by >

[CentOS] Intel turbo mode

Hi, is there a way in Centos to find out if the Intel turbo mode will be used? Using the 'stress' utility and checking the frequency with cpupower tells me that a CPU is running at it´s maximum frequency as reported by cpupower --- and this frequency is less than the frequency it would run at if

Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake Server

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 07:38:58PM +0100, Mark (Netbook) wrote: > CentOS 6.9 has support for the Haswell processor which is a subset of the > Skylake. > > All Skylake server ancillary components work perfectly with CentOS 6.9. Note that there can be issues. My desktop is: Intel(R) Xeon(R)

Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake Server

14, 2017 5:37 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake Server When I try and load CentOS 6.9 the boot process hangs just as the Anaconda graphics is started for CentOS configuration. CentOS 6.9 kernel does not have support for Skylake processors, I believe

Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake Server

> > > > When I try and load CentOS 6.9 the boot process hangs just as the Anaconda > graphics is started for CentOS configuration. > CentOS 6.9 kernel does not have support for Skylake processors, I believe that there is an alternate arch SIG that "may" be able to compile 6.9 with a newer kernel

Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake Server

Hello, I have a pre-production Intel Skylake server using dual 8176 processors (28 core @2.1Ghz) I have loaded from the DVD distribution CentOS 7.3 and RHEL 7.4 with no problems. When I try and load CentOS 6.9 the boot process hangs just as the Anaconda graphics is started for CentOS

[CentOS] intel wireless 3165 and CentOS 7.3

I am trying to get wireless working on CentOS 7.3 with intel wireless 3165 ip link 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state

Re: [CentOS] Intel Xorg driver for Intel HD graphics

am not a contracting officer. I do not have authority to make or modify the terms of any contract. > -Original Message- > From: Jerry Geis [mailto:ge...@pagestation.com] > Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 10:20 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] In

Re: [CentOS] Intel Xorg driver for Intel HD graphics

> i915.preliminary_hw_support=1 Adding this to the boot - does not make it work on straight 7.2 I saw information about this - but it is mentioned on the page I included that this was no longer needed with the files listed in the link. The kernel 4.4 installs and runs fine on the NUC5C. Its

[CentOS] Intel Xorg driver for Intel HD graphics

I found this page: https://01.org/linuxgraphics/downloads/2015q4-intel-graphics-stack-release I have an Intel NUC5C with "Intel HD" graphics and I'm trying to use CentOS 7.2 I downloaded the files suggested: cairo-1.14.4.tar.xz libva-1.6.2.tar.bz2 mesa-11.0.4.tar.xz

Re: [CentOS] Intel Xorg driver for Intel HD graphics

What happen if you append i915.preliminary_hw_support=1 to the kernel argument? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Intel Xorg driver for Intel HD graphics

You haven't explained the problem you are trying to solve. I assume your hardware is not supported? Which version of which package does not support your hardware? At what version was support added? On 24/01/16 18:42, Jerry Geis wrote: > I found this page: >

Re: [CentOS] Intel Xorg driver for Intel HD graphics

On 1/24/2016 10:42 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: I found this page: https://01.org/linuxgraphics/downloads/2015q4-intel-graphics-stack-release I have an Intel NUC5C with "Intel HD" graphics and I'm trying to use CentOS 7.2 All intel embedded graphics is "HD", but there have been a lot of

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

On 18/11/2015 22:35, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 11/18/2015 09:51 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: strace -f -e open software_binary might help, but I have noticed that Centos is not really 100% binary compatible in some cases. CentOS Linux is not 100% bit for bit compatible with RHEL in ANY cases :)

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

It is in AHCI, never was changed On 19:26, Thu, Nov 19, 2015 Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/19/2015 12:54 AM, Birta Levente wrote: > > I tried today morning on RHEL too ... > > The ISDCT tool does not work on supported OS neither > > I think everyone focused on your

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

I assume you are using one of the boards described here? http://www.intel.com/support/services/smartconnect/sb/CS-033108.htm On 11/19/2015 10:43 AM, Birta Levente wrote: It is in AHCI, never was changed On 19:26, Thu, Nov 19, 2015 Gordon Messmer wrote: On

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

On 18/11/2015 22:35, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 11/18/2015 09:51 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: strace -f -e open software_binary might help, but I have noticed that Centos is not really 100% binary compatible in some cases. CentOS Linux is not 100% bit for bit compatible with RHEL in ANY cases :)

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

On 11/19/2015 10:43 AM, Birta Levente wrote: It is in AHCI, never was changed You reported that the tool didn't work in RHEL, either. If you have an install on a supported OS, I'd say that it's time to go back to Intel with the support request. If you arrive at a resolution, I'd be curious

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

On 19/11/2015 20:46, Alice Wonder wrote: I assume you are using one of the boards described here? http://www.intel.com/support/services/smartconnect/sb/CS-033108.htm Nope This is my server: http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1u/1028/sys-1028r-mctr.cfm and this is my board:

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

On 11/19/2015 12:54 AM, Birta Levente wrote: I tried today morning on RHEL too ... The ISDCT tool does not work on supported OS neither I think everyone focused on your problem with the vendor, who didn't support your OS, and ignored the fact that the tool worked when the drives were

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Birta Levente wrote: I have a supermicro server, motherboard is with C612 chipset and beside that with LSI3108 raid controller integrated. Two Intel SSD DC S3710 200GB. OS: Centos 7.1 up to date. My problem is that the Intel SSD Data Center Tool (ISDCT) does not recognize

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

I always tell vendors I'm using RHEL, even though we're using CentOS. If you say CentOS, some vendors immediately throw up their hands and say "unsupported" and then won't even give you the time of day. A couple tricks for fooling tools into thinking they are on an actual RHEL system: 1. Modify

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

strace -f -e open software_binary might help, but I have noticed that Centos is not really 100% binary compatible in some cases. -- Eero 2015-11-18 17:42 GMT+02:00 Matt Garman : > I always tell vendors I'm using RHEL, even though we're using CentOS. > If you say

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

On Wed, November 18, 2015 12:05 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Michael Hennebry wrote: >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Birta Levente wrote: >> >>> I have a supermicro server, motherboard is with C612 chipset and beside > that with LSI3108 raid controller integrated.Two Intel SSD DC S3710 > 200GB. OS:

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Birta Levente wrote: > >> I have a supermicro server, motherboard is with C612 chipset and beside that with LSI3108 raid controller integrated.Two Intel SSD DC S3710 200GB. OS: Centos 7.1 up to date. >> >> My problem is that the Intel SSD Data Center

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

On 11/18/2015 06:25 AM, Birta Levente wrote: My problem is that the Intel SSD Data Center Tool (ISDCT) does not recognize the SSD drives when they connected to the standard S-ATA ports on the motherboard, but through the LSI raid controller is working. Check your BIOS settings for

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

On 11/18/2015 09:51 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > strace -f -e open software_binary might help, but I have noticed that > Centos is not really 100% binary compatible in some cases. CentOS Linux is not 100% bit for bit compatible with RHEL in ANY cases :) CentOS and RHEL are built from mostly the

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

What is Intel SSD Data Center Tool (ISDCT) ? Does Linux kernel detect disk on sata ports? Supported usually means that they have tested it and they can say that it works.. Many of hardware still works as linux kernel support lots of drivers -- even they are not officially supported by vendor. --

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

On 18/11/2015 16:37, Eero Volotinen wrote: What is Intel SSD Data Center Tool (ISDCT) ? " This tool provides a command line interface for interacting with and issuning commands to Intel SSD Data Center devices. It is intended to configure and check the state of Intel PCIe SSDs and SATA SSDs

[CentOS] Intel SSD

Hi I have a supermicro server, motherboard is with C612 chipset and beside that with LSI3108 raid controller integrated. Two Intel SSD DC S3710 200GB. OS: Centos 7.1 up to date. My problem is that the Intel SSD Data Center Tool (ISDCT) does not recognize the SSD drives when they connected to

Re: [CentOS] Intel SSD

2015-11-18 16:48 GMT+02:00 Birta Levente : > On 18/11/2015 16:37, Eero Volotinen wrote: > >> What is Intel SSD Data Center Tool (ISDCT) ? >> > > " This tool provides a command line interface for interacting with and > issuning commands to Intel SSD Data Center devices. It

Re: [CentOS] Intel NUC haswell-ULT

list centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, 6 May, 2015 17:12:23 Subject: [CentOS] Intel NUC haswell-ULT I have one of those new little NUC's and installed Centos 7.1 on it. lspci shows 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Haswell-ULT DRAM Controller (rev 09) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller

[CentOS] Intel NUC haswell-ULT

I have one of those new little NUC's and installed Centos 7.1 on it. lspci shows 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Haswell-ULT DRAM Controller (rev 09) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Haswell-ULT Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) 00:03.0 Audio device: Intel

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

On 01/28/2015 03:30 PM, Frank Cox wrote: ... Having never used DisplayPort before, I'm wondering if this means that if I purchase the BenQ monitor above, or something similar, I can then reasonably expect to plug it in and have it just-work with my Centos 7 setup. I like the full-size

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

On Sat, January 31, 2015 12:22 pm, Frank Cox wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:21:07 -0500 Lamar Owen wrote: I like the full-size DisplayPort connector the best of any video connector I've dealt with, Thanks! I'm waiting to see if my current monitor actually dies. It's an Asus 1920x1200

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

On 01/31/2015 01:22 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:21:07 -0500 Lamar Owen wrote: I like the full-size DisplayPort connector the best of any video connector I've dealt with, Thanks! You're quite welcome. ... If this monitor actually does die, I'm thinking that I'll replace it

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

On 1/31/2015 10:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: I see that single link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 17 Hz (164 MHz) whereas dual link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 33 Hz with GTF blanking (2 × 159 MHz) those numbers seem wrong to me. nothing I've ever seen uses 17hz

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:34:32 -0600 (CST) Valeri Galtsev wrote: I see that single link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 17 Hz (164 MHz) whereas dual link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 33 Hz with GTF blanking (2 × 159 MHz) The manual for my motherboard states: The

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

On Sat, January 31, 2015 1:19 pm, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/31/2015 10:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: I see that single link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 17 Hz (164 MHz) whereas dual link DVI supports up to WQUXGA (3,840 × 2,400) @ 33 Hz with GTF blanking (2 × 159 MHz) those

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

As long as you have the DisplayPort connection on your computer and you have the proper cable to connect it to the monitor then it's no trouble. I had been using dual DP monitors on my last work machine. Also, note that sometimes the PC end is normal DisplayPort but sometimes it has a mini

Re: [CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 23:01:18 -0500 Jeremy Hoel wrote: As long as you have the DisplayPort connection on your computer and you have the proper cable to connect it to the monitor then it's no trouble. I had been using dual DP monitors on my last work machine. Also, note that sometimes the PC

[CentOS] Intel Displayport on Centos 7

Since my current monitor appears to be slowly dying, I'm looking for a replacement. I generally use hardware replacement as an excuse to get something bigger/better/faster than what I had before, so I'm currently considering something like a BenQ GW2765HT. The manual for my Intel motherboard has

Re: [CentOS] Intel NUC? Any experience

Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: david da...@daku.org To: centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, 8 January, 2015 19:32:17 Subject: [CentOS] Intel NUC? Any experience Folks The price point of Intel's NUC unit makes

Re: [CentOS] Intel NUC? Any experience

On 1/8/2015 3:40 PM, david wrote: Thanks for your comments. In the particular application, I used the word server only in the sense that GUI is only rarely used, and CPU speed isn't an issue. The data the server holds has other primary copies elsewhere, so if some corruption or damage

Re: [CentOS] Intel NUC? Any experience

On Thu, January 8, 2015 5:40 pm, david wrote: At 01:54 PM 1/8/2015, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/8/2015 11:32 AM, david wrote: The price point of Intel's NUC unit makes it attractive to use as a server that doesn't have significant computational load. In my environment, a USB connected hard-drive

Re: [CentOS] Intel NUC? Any experience

On 1/8/2015 11:32 AM, david wrote: The price point of Intel's NUC unit makes it attractive to use as a server that doesn't have significant computational load. In my environment, a USB connected hard-drive could provide all the storage needed. I wonder if anyone has had experience with it,

Re: [CentOS] Intel NUC? Any experience

At 01:54 PM 1/8/2015, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/8/2015 11:32 AM, david wrote: The price point of Intel's NUC unit makes it attractive to use as a server that doesn't have significant computational load. In my environment, a USB connected hard-drive could provide all the storage needed. I

Re: [CentOS] Intel NUC? Any experience

On 08/01/15 02:32 PM, david wrote: Folks The price point of Intel's NUC unit makes it attractive to use as a server that doesn't have significant computational load. In my environment, a USB connected hard-drive could provide all the storage needed. I wonder if anyone has had experience with

[CentOS] Intel NUC? Any experience

Folks The price point of Intel's NUC unit makes it attractive to use as a server that doesn't have significant computational load. In my environment, a USB connected hard-drive could provide all the storage needed. I wonder if anyone has had experience with it, and can answer: 1) Does

[CentOS] Intel Corporation 82801 SATA RAID Controller - Rebuild progress ?

Hi. I had to replace a disk that was part of a mirrored pare attached to Intel Corporation 82801 SATA RAID Controller At boot the raid bios says that the rebuild with take place within the OS. Bit disk activity seems very low. How can I tell the progress of the rebuild ? Thanks G

[CentOS] intel

I am in the process of getting multiple Desktops to run linuxfor Research and Development, at the moment am comparing the following intel chipset H81, Q87, Q77, H61...What is the difference?What would be best performance issue? ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] intel

http://ark.intel.com/compare/52806,64027,75007,75016 Does this comparison tool help? On 25 November 2013 17:54, madu...@gmail.com madu...@gmail.com wrote: I am in the process of getting multiple Desktops to run linuxfor Research and Development, at the moment am comparing the following intel

Re: [CentOS] intel

On 11/25/2013 9:54 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote: I am in the process of getting multiple Desktops to run linuxfor Research and Development, at the moment am comparing the following intel chipset H81, Q87, Q77, H61...What is the difference?What would be best performance issue? the ?8? chipsets

Re: [CentOS] intel

Can I say H61 Q77 Q87 H81 ? On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:24 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 11/25/2013 9:54 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote: I am in the process of getting multiple Desktops to run linuxfor Research and Development, at the moment am comparing the following

Re: [CentOS] intel

On 11/25/2013 10:49 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote: Can I say H61 Q77 Q87 H81 ? kinda hard to compare apples and pomegranates. FIRST, choose your CPU, *THEN* compare the chipsets that will work with it.If you're buying tires for a 2013 Mercedes, there's little point at looking at

Re: [CentOS] Intel 10G X520-2 and iscsi storage poor performance

Am 27.09.13 17:39, schrieb John Doe: From: Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de we have a storageserver (Centos 6.4) with a dualport Intel 10G X520-2 Adapter. A QSan P600Q-D316 Storage is configured with 8*SATA Drives raid 5 for test, connected trought a Cisco UCS

Re: [CentOS] Intel 10G X520-2 and iscsi storage poor performance

...@centos.org] Im Auftrag von Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator Gesendet: Freitag, 27. September 2013 16:01 An: CentOS mailing list Betreff: [CentOS] Intel 10G X520-2 and iscsi storage poor performance Hi, we have a storageserver (Centos 6.4) with a dualport Intel 10G X520-2 Adapter. A QSan P600Q

[CentOS] Intel 10G X520-2 and iscsi storage poor performance

Hi, we have a storageserver (Centos 6.4) with a dualport Intel 10G X520-2 Adapter. A QSan P600Q-D316 Storage is configured with 8*SATA Drives raid 5 for test, connected trought a Cisco UCS 6100 Series Fabric Interconnect 10G Switch. I formated the storage with ext4 defaults, one volume and got

Re: [CentOS] Intel 10G X520-2 and iscsi storage poor performance

From: Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de we have a storageserver (Centos 6.4) with a dualport Intel 10G X520-2 Adapter. A QSan P600Q-D316 Storage is configured with 8*SATA Drives raid 5 for test, connected trought a Cisco UCS 6100 Series Fabric Interconnect 10G

[CentOS] Intel 4600 Graphics (Haswell) in CentOS 6.4

Quick question that I haven't been able to find the answer to (and not for lack of trying, believe me): Is dual-monitor display for the new Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell, e.g. Intel E3-1200v3 family processors) supported in CentOS 6.4? In particular, I'm looking at a SuperMicro X10SAE;

Re: [CentOS] Intel 4600 Graphics (Haswell) in CentOS 6.4

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Glenn Eychaner geycha...@mac.com wrote: http://01.org/linuxgraphics/downloads http://www.x.org/wiki/IntelGraphicsDriver/ But the latest version of xorg-x11-drv-intel in ElRepo Extras was uploaded in March of this year, and I haven't found whether the upstream

[CentOS] Intel e1000e driver bug and 82574L controller

One of the more promising solutions I'm looking at for my dual-ethernet dual-monitor workstation contains an Intel 82574L Ethernet controller. I found a LOT of postings regarding a bug in the driver for this controller:

Re: [CentOS] Intel e1000e driver bug and 82574L controller

On 08/14/2013 01:40 PM, Glenn Eychaner wrote: One of the more promising solutions I'm looking at for my dual-ethernet dual-monitor workstation contains an Intel 82574L Ethernet controller. I found a LOT of postings regarding a bug in the driver for this controller:

  1   2   3   4   >