I was trying to do what the article at
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables%3C/blockquote%3E%3C/div%3E
suggested
My iptables rules are
Masry Alex wrote:
is there a way to completely disable ip_conntrack ?
without connection tracking, NAT simply won't work.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
John R Pierce wrote:
Masry Alex wrote:
is there a way to completely disable ip_conntrack ?
without connection tracking, NAT simply won't work.
With recent kernels, it is possible to do 1:1 NAT (mapping one private
address to exactly one public IP alias on the external interface)
without
On Friday 18 April 2008 12:23, Masry Alex wrote:
#that's what the mentioned article suggested..I'm not sure it's working!
*raw
-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j NOTRACK
Do you have a chain called NOTRACK? What is setup under it?
COMMIT
*filter
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Masry Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to do what the article at
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.performance.html#conntrack_filling_tables
suggested
My iptables rules are
#that's what the
5 matches
Mail list logo