On Sunday 24 July 2011 10:13:30 R P Herrold wrote:
#!/bin/sh
#
CANDIDATES=pix1.jpg pix2.jpg pix3.jpg
for i in `echo ${CANDIDATES}`; do
HASH=`echo $i | md5sum - | awk {'print $1'}`
echo $i${HASH}
done
I know it absolutelly has nothing to do with
On Sunday, July 24, 2011 05:29:23 AM yonatan pingle wrote:
...
lately the server is under-preforming and load averages are high,
mysql service keeps crashing and the server is hitting max memory
usage ( so i added ram .. ) ,
after looking into the website folders, i have found one folder which
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Marc Deop wrote:
It's more than twice as fast than the previous sh script.
In part this is /bin/sh v /bin/bash and using 'bashisms'
matter, but yes, I did not seek to optimize a teaching
throwaway
1- m5sum the file we need
... actually the NAME of the file, to make it
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I have a rather annoying issue on going with one of my centos virtual servers.
the server hosts a website using apache and mysql ,there are three
persons involved with keeping the site up and running.
and i am his root due to the fact
Am 24.07.2011 13:03, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com:
uploads]# ls | wc -l
3123
I assume that you are using ext3 or ext4 filesystems? Both ext3 and
ext4 slows down, if there is too much files in same directory.
XFS-fs is solution to fix this
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
Am 24.07.2011 13:03, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com:
uploads]# ls | wc -l
3123
I assume that you are using ext3 or ext4 filesystems? Both ext3 and
ext4 slows down, if
yonatan pingle wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
Am 24.07.2011 13:03, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com:
uploads]# ls | wc -l
3123
I assume that you are using ext3 or ext4 filesystems? Both ext3 and
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:52 AM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Alexander
good suggestions, ill monitor I/O and mysql code, sounds like a code
related issue and not a centos issue after all.
it runs on ext3 ,i could only guess how to code deals with the dir,
as it seems
Do you have cahcing turned on in CMS? That could help.
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe
Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
RHCT | RHCSA | CCNA1
If you are using phpMyAdmin the status page will aid you in tuning
mySQL. Look for values in red. The description will usually tell you
what to adjust to improve performance.
Ryan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
im good with mysqltuner.pl,
as it seems there are slow queries on mysql and i have adjusted all
values in my.cnf according to the application needs.
looks like it's all in the code and the way the CMS handles the
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
im good with mysqltuner.pl,
as it seems there are slow queries on mysql and i have adjusted all
values in my.cnf according to the
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 03:53:46PM +0300, yonatan pingle wrote:
Yes Ryan, that exactly what i have done.
he will get the log shortly and i will get some not free beer.
While I'm all for mysql optimization it's clearly evident from an
earlier posting that your disks are thrashing with insanely
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com:
there is no caching system, its a home made CMS.
You can use an accelerator too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHP_accelerator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PHP_accelerators
Please, make a big backup before this! (I nevever had a
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:
the coder is not tech savvy as one might expect, so it's
really hard for me to explain the issue of having lots of
files in one folder to the site owner or to the coder.
I do not expect coders to remain 'not tech savvy'
If the coder is not willing
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 4:02 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 03:53:46PM +0300, yonatan pingle wrote:
Yes Ryan, that exactly what i have done.
he will get the log shortly and i will get some not free beer.
While I'm all for mysql optimization it's clearly
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:13 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:
the coder is not tech savvy as one might expect, so it's
really hard for me to explain the issue of having lots of
files in one folder to the site owner or to the coder.
I do
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:13 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
then, we look to the leading letter of the hask, to design our
egg carton bins. We place pix1.jpg in directory: ./f/ and
pix2.jpg in directory ./1/ and pix3.jpg in directory
./b/ and so forth -- if the
On Sunday 24 July 2011 22:48:23 Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:13 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
then, we look to the leading letter of the hask, to design our
egg carton bins. We place pix1.jpg in directory: ./f/ and
pix2.jpg in directory ./1/
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote:
If the pictures are named sequentially, why not store then at a 100 per
directory structure something like this
/pix/0/00/pix1.jpg
/pix/0/26/pix02614.jpg
/pix/6/72/pix67255.jpg
Go read Knuth
One does not do that because then one is
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
level dispersion of files to the destination directories
Not followed the whole thread, but a SQL database index of
the actual
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 16:33 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote:
If the pictures are named sequentially, why not store then at a 100 per
directory structure something like this
/pix/0/00/pix1.jpg
/pix/0/26/pix02614.jpg
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Keith Roberts wrote:
By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
level dispersion of files to the destination directories
Not followed the whole thread, but a SQL database index of
the actual
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:50 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Keith Roberts wrote:
By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
level dispersion of files to the destination directories
Not
Greetings,
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:59 PM, yonatan pingle
yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
after looking into the website folders, i have found one folder which
from my point of view is one of the causes for the server loads.
hmm... does mount dir -noatime -noadirtime help speed it
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:38:33AM +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
hmm... does mount dir -noatime -noadirtime help speed it up?
Just an FYI:
noatime is a superset that includes noadirtime.
John
--
You can safely assume you've
On 7/24/11 4:08 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
level dispersion of files to the destination directories
Not followed the whole thread,
27 matches
Mail list logo
