Keith Keller wrote:
I was looking at this bug which my machines are currently experiencing:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883905
The proposed patch is literally one new line in the XFS codebase. So
since the patch is so straightforward, I had a crazy idea that I would
build
On 2013-03-08, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
The only place the plus kernels are documented with up-to-date info
is the CentOS bug tracker:
CentOS-6: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586
At least for CentOS 6 it looks like the new centosplus kernel is out.
Thanks Akemi! I have it
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2013-03-08, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
The only place the plus kernels are documented with up-to-date info
is the CentOS bug tracker:
CentOS-6: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586
At
On 2013-03-08, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
The only place the plus kernels are documented with up-to-date info
is the CentOS bug tracker:
CentOS-6: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586
CentOS-5: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4100
That's perfect. It seems completely
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2013-03-07, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought about applying the patch to the centosplus kernel but
decided not to bother because it looked like a non-issue. But it you
think it's worth the
On 2013-03-08, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
I looked at the patch again -- it was apparently not for the 6.3
kernel and I was not 100% sure about applying it at that time. But now
with the 6.4 kernel, it cleanly applies.
While not serious, some users are finding this bug to be
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2013-03-08, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
I looked at the patch again -- it was apparently not for the 6.3
kernel and I was not 100% sure about applying it at that time. But now
with the 6.4 kernel,
Hi all,
I have what might be a foolish question about patching packages. I am
not sure exactly how to phrase the question, so please follow up if it
seems as though I'm not being clear.
I was looking at this bug which my machines are currently experiencing:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
Hi all,
I have what might be a foolish question about patching packages. I am
not sure exactly how to phrase the question, so please follow up if it
seems as though I'm not being clear.
I was looking at
On 2013-03-07, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
You may want to check this out:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6087
My understanding is that There is no side effect other than the load.
There are not performance issues with the ailds behaving like this.
Is this not the case ?
As far
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2013-03-07, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
You may want to check this out:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6087
My understanding is that There is no side effect other than the load.
There are
On 2013-03-07, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought about applying the patch to the centosplus kernel but
decided not to bother because it looked like a non-issue. But it you
think it's worth the fix, that can be done. It will be even better if
you supply the actual patch for the
12 matches
Mail list logo
