On 11/03/2009 12:09 AM, Todd Denniston wrote:
Is the extras version the version used by the upstream provider and thus the
CentOS team keeps it
around to do the matching builds?
The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the
only version we work with on the
Karanbir Singh wrote, On 11/03/2009 04:57 AM:
The mock in extras is what we use to build the distro against and is the
only version we work with on the buildsystems. depending on what you are
doing, that issue might or might not be relevant.
Thanks for yours and Mr. X's feedback.
Off to
Todd Denniston napsal(a):
I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and
so I was about to
install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras
and another in epel.
epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group
I am looking to be a bit more standard in the builds of my CentOS rpms, and so
I was about to
install mock but noticed that there is one provided in the centos/5/extras and
another in epel.
epel is obviously newer, but are there reasons/experiences in this group that
would suggest sticking
--- On Mon, 11/2/09, Todd Denniston todd.dennis...@tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil
wrote:
From: Todd Denniston todd.dennis...@tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil
Subject: [CentOS] mock, extras vs epel
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Monday, November 2, 2009, 4:09 PM
I am looking to be a bit more
5 matches
Mail list logo
