Under CentOS6, is it possible to get an interface to RUNNING state
without assigning a (dummy) IP address?
# ifconfig em2
em2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 78:2B:CB:67:3E:5C
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
Maybe you will like ethtool from now.
Banyan He
Blog: http://www.rootong.com
Email: ban...@rootong.com
On 3/21/2013 5:21 PM, isdtor wrote:
Under CentOS6, is it possible to get an interface to RUNNING state
without assigning a (dummy) IP address?
# ifconfig em2
em2 Link
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:58:34AM +1100, Nat N wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Nat N pheni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
I am running a x86_64 Centos server, after a reboot the network has decided
to
not work.. this particular machine has 8 eth ports eth0-7. eth0 and eth3
Hi List,
I am running a x86_64 Centos server, after a reboot the network has decided to
not work.. this particular machine has 8 eth ports eth0-7. eth0 and eth3 were
bonded (mode 1 ) after reboot the bond did not work. It came up OK but no
data was passing through it. all other interfaces on the
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Nat N pheni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
I am running a x86_64 Centos server, after a reboot the network has decided to
not work.. this particular machine has 8 eth ports eth0-7. eth0 and eth3 were
bonded (mode 1 ) after reboot the bond did not work. It came
From: Paras pradhan pradhanpa...@gmail.com
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Unless you are 100% sure the nics detection follow a sequential order that
matches the nics physical ports order, I think you will
On 15/10/2010 10:36, John Doe wrote:
From: Paras pradhanpradhanpa...@gmail.com
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Unless you are 100% sure the nics detection follow a sequential order that
matches the nics
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Have a look at the -p option to ethtool
/Peter
Thanks!
Paras.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Have a look at the -p option to ethtool
It
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 15/10/2010 10:36, John Doe wrote:
From: Paras pradhan pradhanpa...@gmail.com
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Unless you are 100%
Paras pradhan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Have a look at the -p
On 10/15/2010 11:44 AM, Paras pradhan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstromc...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
On 10/15/2010 12:44 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
On 10/15/2010 1:10 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 10/15/2010 12:44 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents
On 10/15/2010 12:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Paras pradhan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstromc...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port.
Yes I just tested like this..
What i did was:
ifconfig -a gives me logical names such as: __tmp1035166962 , ethX
and ethtool -p __tmp1035166962 makes blinking in the network port. My
problem is resolved.
Thanks a lot guys. Appreciate it.
Paras.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Bowie Bailey
From: Paras pradhan pradhanpa...@gmail.com
I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts.
Maybe try to have one and put:
ONBOOT=no
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
It looks like when there are no ifcfg-* files , then the kernel
assigns some default logical names ( don;t know how and why), but if
we create ifcfg-ethx files then it overrides it. That should be ok (?)
i think.
One more question:
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
Hi,
I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 ,
I don't see anything which i am assume is normal.
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:E8:44:DB:CC
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500
eth1 exists because the /dev device was found on boot (you have 2 or more
network interfaces).
eth12 does due to you not have 13+ nic's or did not map a network device to
be eth12.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Paras pradhan pradhanpa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my
I have eight nics as below
[pprad...@cvprd1 ~]$ ./lshw -short -class network
WARNING: you should run this program as super-user.
H/W pathDevice Class Description
===
/0/100/4/0/0eth4 network
On 10/13/10 3:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
Hi,
I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 ,
I don't see anything which i am assume is normal.
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
There are eight nics. But i don't get output of all of eth0 to eth7.
Paras.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:40 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 10/13/10 3:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
Hi,
I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
I do ifconfig eth1 I
On 10/13/2010 5:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
Hi,
I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 ,
I don't see anything which i am assume is normal.
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
Nothing in the dmesg except this:
Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v2.0.2 (Aug 21, 2009)
eth0: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) PCI-X 64-bit
133MHz found at mem e600, IRQ 16, node addr 0024e848f03d
eth1: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) PCI-X 64-bit
it is up now
why it shows RTNETLINK answers: File exists
# ifup eth0:2 up
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Thank you
--- Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
adrian kok wrote:
Hi all
How can I bring up eth0:2 only
ifconfig eth0:2 up is not
Hi all
How can I bring up eth0:2 only
ifconfig eth0:2 up is not working
I have to use service network restart
But it restarts all network interfaces that I don't
want
Thank you
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Hi all
How can I bring up eth0:2 only
ifconfig eth0:2 up is not working
I have to use service network restart
But it restarts all network interfaces that I don't
want
I believe you have to have eth0 up for that to work. You can add
ONPARENT=no to the other virtual interfaces to keep
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:19 PM, adrian kok adriankok2...@yahoo.com.hk wrote:
Hi all
How can I bring up eth0:2 only
ifconfig eth0:2 up is not working
wouldn't it be 'ifup eth0:2' ?
-Bob
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
adrian kok wrote:
Hi all
How can I bring up eth0:2 only
ifconfig eth0:2 up is not working
have you tried ifup eth0:2 ?
I have to use service network restart
But it restarts all network interfaces that I don't
want
Thank you
Send instant messages to your online friends
use
ifup eth0:2
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 02:59, Barry Brimer wrote:
Hi all
How can I bring up eth0:2 only
ifconfig eth0:2 up is not working
I have to use service network restart
But it restarts all network interfaces that I don't
want
I believe
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 11:19 +0530, gopinath wrote:
When i run a mii-tool
it displays no MII transcievers present !!!
if i run ifconfig it displays the eth0 its ip and Hwaddress
if i ping to the eth0 ip it pings.
if i ping to some other ip on Lan no response is coming.
This
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 01:49, gopinath wrote:
if i run ifconfig it displays the eth0 its ip and Hwaddress
if i boot to Centos 5.1 or Redhat 7.3 the pc is able to communicated to
everyone on the networks.
Please help me out.
How about check the configs against one another on all 3
When i run a mii-tool
it displays no MII transcievers present !!!
if i run ifconfig it displays the eth0 its ip and Hwaddress
if i ping to the eth0 ip it pings.
if i ping to some other ip on Lan no response is coming.
This all happens in Cent OS 4.2
if i boot to Centos 5.1 or Redhat 7.3
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us:
Graham Johnston wrote:
I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on
boot the system is attempting to
I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on
boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge interface before
it's bonded-vlan members have been created. What this means is that the
bridge is
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 18:20 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us:
Graham Johnston wrote:
I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces.
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 12:03 -0500, Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us:
Graham Johnston wrote:
I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that
Graham Johnston wrote:
I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on
boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge interface before
it's bonded-vlan members have been created. What this
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us:
Graham Johnston wrote:
I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on
boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge
40 matches
Mail list logo
