Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-07 Thread Dotan Cohen
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 19:35, Frank Cox thea...@sasktel.net wrote: For a few programs that don't seem to be (readily) available for Centos I just take some steps to create/compile my own rpm.  Sometimes all it takes is a simple rpmbuild --rebuild command on a Fedora rpm, sometimes it takes a

[CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Piscium
I have been using Fedora on my home desktop for close to an year, and I am happy with it, nevertheless I am considering switching to a slower-moving distro. CentOS + EPEL put together have less packages than Fedora. Moreover RPM Fusion has fewer packages for EL than for Fedora. I am wondering how

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Mathieu Baudier
I have been using Fedora on my home desktop for close to an year, and I am happy with it, nevertheless I am considering switching to a slower-moving distro. I followed the same path a few years ago, and I'm very happy with it. So, welcome! CentOS + EPEL put together have less packages than

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 6 Nov 2010 11:31:18 + CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: I have been using Fedora on my home desktop for close to an year, and I am happy with it, nevertheless I am considering switching to a slower-moving distro. CentOS + EPEL put together have less packages than

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Piscium
On 6 November 2010 12:00, Mathieu Baudier mbaud...@argeo.org wrote: I use CentOS + EPEL as a base and include specific packages from RPMForge, using  includepkgs in the /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmforge.repo file. For example my (very personal) package list from RPMForge: Thanks a lot for the

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Mathieu Baudier
In particular I had never heard of RPMForge, I will check it. Also check ElRepo for up to date drivers (e.g. NVIDIA): http://elrepo.org More generally the CentOS wiki is a very helpful resource, e.g.: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Piscium
On 6 November 2010 12:57, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: RPMForge has a lot of packages (but be careful!).  rpmbone has more. Careful about what? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Dotan Cohen
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 13:31, Piscium grok...@gmail.com wrote: I have been using Fedora on my home desktop for close to an year, and I am happy with it, nevertheless I am considering switching to a slower-moving distro. CentOS + EPEL put together have less packages than Fedora. Moreover RPM

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Mathieu Baudier
RPMForge has a lot of packages (but be careful!).  rpmbone has more. Careful about what? Third-party repos sometimes conflict. For example if you activate both EPEL and RPMForge fully, it is very likely that your perl-* packages will be a complete mess. That's why I personally followed the

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Piscium
On 6 November 2010 13:22, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote: Are there any specific applications that you need but are not available in the CentOS repos, or just in general? My experience is that I had to build Anki [1], as no current version was available for either CentOS or Fedora. I

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Piscium
On 6 November 2010 13:57, Mathieu Baudier mbaud...@argeo.org wrote: Third-party repos sometimes conflict. For example if you activate both EPEL and RPMForge fully, it is very likely that your perl-* packages will be a complete mess. That's why I personally followed the approach of enabling

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:15:20 + CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: On 6 November 2010 12:57, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote: RPMForge has a lot of packages (but be careful!).  rpmbone has more. Careful about what? Conflicts with EPel and 'interesting' dependency

Re: [CentOS] obtaining non-packaged software

2010-11-06 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:31:18 + Piscium wrote: So I wonder what do other CentOS users do in a similar situation? Is it possible to get a Fedora binary package and install it? What about getting a Fedora source package, building and installing it? Is there any other possibility? For a few