Re: [CentOS] redundant networked secure file system recommendation

I'm still exploring options for a similar situation and at the moment gluster seems to fit the requirements. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] redundant networked secure file system recommendation

Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote: We are currently running a NFS-based server centric setup. I would like to set up something where I can easily have more than one redundant server, security/authentication Have you considered an NFS cluster based on pacemaker/openais/corosync? See

Re: [CentOS] redundant networked secure file system recommendation

Am 19.07.2010 18:02, schrieb Boris Epstein: Hi all, We are currently running a NFS-based server centric setup. I would like to set up something where I can easily have more than one redundant server, security/authentication (this part seems a little flaky with NFS, at least did several years

[CentOS] redundant networked secure file system recommendation

Hi all, We are currently running a NFS-based server centric setup. I would like to set up something where I can easily have more than one redundant server, security/authentication (this part seems a little flaky with NFS, at least did several years ago), with the capability to easily add/remove