:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank Cox
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 4:04 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:39:31 -0400
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I.e. if a business in Pennsylvania only does business in the lower 48
Alain Terriault wrote:
Hi,
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
have you considered using geo-blocking in concert with SpamAssassin
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:39:31 -0400
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I.e. if a business in Pennsylvania only does business in the lower 48
there isn't any need to accept port 25 traffic from Asia, Europe, Latin
America, etc...
Until something comes up and your users and/or customers are
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank Cox
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 4:04 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] sendmail and spam
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:39:31 -0400
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I.e
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:53 -0400, Alain Terriault wrote:
Hi,
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
Looking around I found new
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 00:23 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Alain Terriault wrote:
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
Thanks, This is a very useful mailing list and CentOS works like charm
on PowerEdge hardware.
Merci, alain
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then and
they are very interesting..
Alain Terriault wrote:
Hi,
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 16:53 -0400, Alain Terriault wrote:
Hi,
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
Looking around I found new
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Alain Terriault wrote:
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
We use a three-way combination (on a CentOS 5 base), in this order:
1. sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
2. clamav-milter
3. spamass-milter (milter-ized spamassassin)
Our server only handles about
Craig White wrote:
Those things alone and greylisting knock down most of it so spamassassin
has a much lighter load and MailScanner is awesome.
Since I set up milter-greylist we went from 90% spam daily to 10%, and
that part is easily handled by spamassassin. Load on the mail server is
way
Alain Terriault wrote:
What is todays most effective combination to filter spam ?
On my old Redhat 3 system I used Sendmail and Spamassasin .. it was
good, but with the current setup we are getting way to much spam.
Looking around I found new players, well some I did not know then and
13 matches
Mail list logo
