On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:21 -0700, compdoc wrote:
ECC allows for single bit errors to be corrected and multiple bit
errors to be noticed.
I know what it is and I've used it in the past, but I just don't see many
errors going on in desktop
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
But the accumulated costs of the higher end motherboard, memory,
shortage of space for upgrades in the same unit, the downtime at the
BIOS to reset the disabled by default ECC settings in the BIOS, and
the system monitoring to detect and manage
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:49 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
But the accumulated costs of the higher end motherboard, memory,
shortage of space for upgrades in the same unit, the downtime at the
BIOS to reset the disabled by
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Trust me, it's a pain in the keister in production. If the standard is
now enabled, good: I haven't had my hands inside a server in a year, I
admit it. (My current role doesn't call for it.) It *didn't* used to
be standard. Are you sure it is?
I
LinuxBoot is now CoreBoot at http://www.coreboot.org/
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Nico-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC
demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn in
the ssytem components on
On 2/14/2011 9:53 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
This system was initially commissioned after burn in, in late 2004 - An
Intel mb. It started with RH9, then went FC3, then CentOS5.
As mentioned the ECC memory has warned me when things are not well and
allowed me to take remedial action before anything
On 2/14/2011 10:53 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Nico-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampen
rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC
demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn
Anyway, it's an alternative method if you don't need hoards of
horsepower but if reliability is most important. As always, watch the
rating of any seller. I've had good luck over the years.
I really like Dell iDrac remote management and really good linux
support on hardware like omsa.
Fujitsu
Did somebody can give me some advises on hardware for building a Centos linux
server?
---
Michel Donais___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michel Donais said the following on 13/02/11 16:26:
Did somebody can give me some advises on hardware for building a Centos linux
server?
What will you put on that server?
Ciao,
luigi
- --
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\
I used to wish the universe were
On 02/13/2011 10:26 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
Did somebody can give me some advises on hardware for building a Centos
linux server?
Look for vendors that specifically list Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 as a
supported operating system. Most major vendors should offer servers with
this support.
If
what about looking in the archives? You are really not the first person
asking this.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Before any possible answer can be given, the first question must be: What
do you plan to do with it?
You'r right, but I have to begin somewhere.
This hardware is intended to be a terminal server for at least 40 users
driven with LTSP.for BBx Pro-5 and Bbj applications
Need fast and huge
2011/2/14 Michel Donais don...@telupton.com:
Before any possible answer can be given, the first question must be: What
do you plan to do with it?
You'r right, but I have to begin somewhere.
This hardware is intended to be a terminal server for at least 40 users
driven with LTSP.for BBx Pro-5
On 02/13/11 2:42 PM, Michel Donais wrote:
I checked recently for an ASUS S775 P5Q-VM G45 PCIE MOTHERBOARD with an
INTEL CORE 2 QUAD Q9550 2.83G/1333/12M/S775 with SATA hard disc no Raid
I doesn't seem to be a server board and I'm not shure of that choice.
thats desktop hardware. no ECC
undetected creeping bit errors due to lack of ECC would
be, in my book, unacceptable.
Where can one find info or studies on this sort of thing? I use non-ecc ram
in several servers, and of course most ppl use it in their desktops.
Wouldn't bit errors result in crashes or data corruption? Or
On 2/13/11 7:55 PM, compdoc wrote:
undetected creeping bit errors due to lack of ECC would
be, in my book, unacceptable.
Where can one find info or studies on this sort of thing? I use non-ecc ram
in several servers, and of course most ppl use it in their desktops.
Wouldn't bit errors
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:55 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
undetected creeping bit errors due to lack of ECC would
be, in my book, unacceptable.
Where can one find info or studies on this sort of thing? I use non-ecc ram
in several servers, and of course most ppl use it in their
ECC allows for single bit errors to be corrected and multiple bit
errors to be noticed.
I know what it is and I've used it in the past, but I just don't see many
errors going on in desktop computers and servers that use non-ecc ram.
___
CentOS
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:21 -0700, compdoc wrote:
ECC allows for single bit errors to be corrected and multiple bit
errors to be noticed.
I know what it is and I've used it in the past, but I just don't see many
errors going on in desktop computers and servers that use non-ecc ram.
I
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:01 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/13/11 2:42 PM, Michel Donais wrote:
I checked recently for an ASUS S775 P5Q-VM G45 PCIE MOTHERBOARD with an
INTEL CORE 2 QUAD Q9550 2.83G/1333/12M/S775 with SATA hard disc no Raid
I doesn't seem to be a server
On 02/13/11 7:06 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's also possible to save the budget, buy *two* similarly powerful
used systems with much lesser hardware specs, and have genuine
failover instead of the shared vulnerability of one expensive server
with high-availability components as you
: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
John R Pierce
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 7:17 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] server specifications
On 02/13/11 7:06 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's also possible to save the budget, buy *two
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:23 PM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote:
By doubling the hardware, you still do not overcome the potential corruption
that could occur with non-ecc memory. If this is truly a mission critical
application then it really does not serve much of a purpose to
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:23 PM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote:
By doubling the hardware, you still do not overcome the potential corruption
that could occur with non-ecc memory. If this is truly a mission critical
application then it really does not
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC
demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn in
the ssytem components on servers upon their first bootup...
On 2/14/2011 12:29 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampenrkam...@kampensonline.com
wrote:
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC
demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn in
the ssytem
28 matches
Mail list logo
