Joseph L. Casale schrieb:
Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
I have been looking at this all morning. Is there
rsync already defaults to ssh as transport but with
$ rsync -e 'ssh -i keyfile'
you can use rsync with a ssh key.
Yes, that was what I had been doing, but I wanted to avoid the
use of ssh completely, the connection is secured over a vpn, silly
to incur the overhead of encryption, twice.
An rsync
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I didn't think unison was maintained any more - and I wouldn't expect
anything to beat rsync with the -z option on a slow link. I'd just use
the -P option and restart it when/if it fails. It wouldn't hurt to do
subsets first since they will be
Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
I have been looking at this all morning. Is there any way to auth with keys
or
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
I have been looking at this all morning. Is there any
On 1/14/2010 12:27 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
If you are running as root, rsync
Put them here:
http://rpms.linuxpowered.net/hpn-ssh/
All the usual disclaimers apply, I have these running on a few
dozen systems at different data centers running file transfers
24/7 for the past year now that I think about it.
Nate,
That's great! I am not convinced yet that an rsync daemon
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
For the sake of being ready Saturday, what is the most secure (not using
ssh) to
authenticate in a script with an rsync daemon? Looks like it only does the
user:pass
pairs (not really good for script) or host based wrapper style security?
If the IPs are static then
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
I have been looking at this all
Anyone got any actual comparisons between unison and rsync specifically related
to the performance of synchronization of large data sets over slow links?
I have a huge tree to start replication of Friday and know that if I sync the
root
paths it will take ages and with the lack of any overall
On 1/13/2010 5:54 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Anyone got any actual comparisons between unison and rsync specifically
related
to the performance of synchronization of large data sets over slow links?
I have a huge tree to start replication of Friday and know that if I sync the
root
paths
I didn't think unison was maintained any more - and I wouldn't expect
anything to beat rsync with the -z option on a slow link. I'd just use
the -P option and restart it when/if it fails. It wouldn't hurt to do
subsets first since they will be quickly skipped when you repeat from
the root.
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Looks like rf has 3.0.7, thanks for that tip. Frankly, I abhor the thought
of even using rsync for this, it's over a vpn so there is absolutely no need
for encryption but I don't know another tool that can transfer diffs only?
Check out HPN-SSH, I use it extensively to
：
主题： Re: [CentOS] unison versus rsync
I didn't think unison was maintained any more - and I wouldn't expect
anything to beat rsync with the -z option on a slow link. I'd just use
the -P option and restart it when/if it fails. It wouldn't hurt to do
subsets first since they will be quickly
Check out HPN-SSH, I use it extensively to transfer files over
ssh, it provides a null cipher which you can use to disable
encryption of data, while still maintaining encryption of
authentication credentials.
http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
I transfer over a terrabyte of data a
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I didn't think unison was maintained any more - and I wouldn't expect
anything to beat rsync with the -z option on a slow link. I'd just use
the -P option and restart it when/if it fails. It wouldn't hurt to do
subsets first since they will be quickly skipped when
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
That looks impressive, I would love to use that for other needs as well.
How exactly do you go about installing this under CentOS? I can
pretty well assume that patching the stock rpm would not work:)
For me I just built it from source and patched it, then
built custom
nate wrote:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
That looks impressive, I would love to use that for other needs as well.
How exactly do you go about installing this under CentOS? I can
pretty well assume that patching the stock rpm would not work:)
For me I just built it from source and patched it,
Am I missing something or does it only matter where you have a very high
bandwidth connection with some latency?
I would imagine, but I have a server that takes rsync/ssh connections from
multiple
windows boxes everyday for differential updates to copies of databases and the
load on that
Les Mikesell wrote:
Am I missing something or does it only matter where you have a very high
bandwidth connection with some latency?
That is why I use it, high bandwidth and some latency. I mentioned
it because it also has the none cipher which disables encryption,
might be more flexible then
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Nate, care to share those packages:)
Sure I can post them somewhere tomorrow probably, nothing
fancy..
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Am I missing something or does it only matter where you have a very high
bandwidth connection with some latency?
I would imagine, but I have a server that takes rsync/ssh connections from
multiple
windows boxes everyday for differential updates to copies of
22 matches
Mail list logo
