On 7/3/19 1:43 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS
> release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra-
> structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside.
>
> RedHat's "regular" binary and source
some light reading
https://www.redhat.com/licenses/Appendix_1_Global_English_20190625.pdf
Dan Pacek
> On Jul 3, 2019, at 11:11 AM, Mark Rousell wrote:
>
> On 03/07/2019 15:58, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> RHEL binary packages are only available to paid customers who are explicitly
>>
On 03/07/2019 15:58, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> RHEL binary packages are only available to paid customers who are explicitly
> prohibited to redistribute them.
For the sake of completeness, not everyone with legitimate access to
RHEL binaries is necessarily a *paid* customer. Red Hat provides a
On July 3, 2019 1:43:40 AM CDT, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS
>release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra-
>structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside.
>
>RedHat's "regular" binary
On Jul 3, 2019, at 12:43 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Are RedHat's binary RPMs "poisoned" somehow, making it impossible for
> CentOS to redistribute RedHat's *binary* packages without going to jail?
RHEL binaries are only available to those with a RHEL subscription. I don’t
see anything in
these artifacts.That said I am not a lawyer.
- Original Message -
From: "CentOS mailing list"
To:"CentOS mailing list"
Cc:
Sent:Wed, 3 Jul 2019 08:43:40 +0200
Subject:[CentOS] using RedHat binary packages?
Hi folks,
AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for buil
Hi folks,
AFAIK CentOS uses RedHat's source RPMs for building the next CentOS
release. I am not sure about the bootstrap procedure and the infra-
structure packages, so lets put these corner cases aside.
RedHat's "regular" binary and source packages are based on open source
(GPL2, GPL3, Apache
7 matches
Mail list logo
