On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Bob Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 09:56 -0400, Erek Dyskant wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:19 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Bob Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 09:56 -0400, Erek Dyskant wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 20:55 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
I was doing a yum update today.
It downloaded all the packages.
was doing the next part and my remote connection was lost.
so ssh session was killed.
When I logged back in I am not sure if the update is done or not. I
presume not.
I
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
was doing the next part and my remote connection was lost.
so ssh session was killed.
When I logged back in I am not sure if the update is done or not. I presume
not.
This is a very good reason to use 'screen' ;).
--
I was doing a yum update today.
It downloaded all the packages.
was doing the next part and my remote connection was lost.
so ssh session was killed.
When I logged back in I am not sure if the update is done or not. I
presume not.
I presume it died with my remote session.
I do a yum update
I do a yum update now and it returns as if there is nothing to update.
last I saw it was 30 out of 312 in the installation section.
What next?
Check /var/log/yum.log and look at the time/dates of what was/was not done.
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I just did a yum update. It pulled in a number of updates including the
latest firefox and davfs2.i386.
Then I watch the following show up during the cleanup phase of yum
(/var/log/messages):
Mar 28 15:42:18 nc2400 Erased: jdk
Mar 28 15:42:25 nc2400 Erased: jre
Mar
I just did a yum update. It pulled in a number of updates including the
latest firefox and davfs2.i386.
Then I watch the following show up during the cleanup phase of yum
(/var/log/messages):
Mar 28 15:42:18 nc2400 Erased: jdk
Mar 28 15:42:25 nc2400 Erased: jre
Mar 28 15:42:31 nc2400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, we run approximately 400 Centos servers at our company. We use
cfengine for configuration management.
I am looking for some documentation to do patching including kernel
patches. I was thinking of just having each host run yum update via
cfengine but not sure if
Hello, we run approximately 400 Centos servers at our company. We use
cfengine for configuration management.
I am looking for some documentation to do patching including kernel
patches. I was thinking of just having each host run yum update via
cfengine but not sure if there are any gotchas
Is there any formal mechanizism by which after a yum update , and
kernel change
that drivers can automatically be recompiled and a service restarted?
Do I need to make my own?
Thanks,
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Jan 29, 2008 10:14 AM, Jim Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 12:55 PM, Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any formal mechanizism by which after a yum update , and
kernel change
that drivers can automatically be recompiled and a service restarted?
Do I need to
Foe a while now, yum update has been failing on the perl-gettext
package with:
Transaction Check Error:
file
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Locale/gettext/gettext.so
from install of perl-gettext-1.05-1.el5.rf conflicts with file from package
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Googling for this feature, I saw reports from the yum developer that it
wasn't yet implemented. This was in mailing list posts from a year or
more ago. Did it ever make it into the yum code?
I want to start downloading
Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Googling for this feature, I saw reports from the yum developer that it
wasn't yet implemented. This was in mailing list posts from a year or
more ago. Did it ever make it into the yum code?
I
On Jan 8, 2008 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Googling for this feature, I saw reports from the yum developer that
it
wasn't yet implemented. This was in mailing list posts from a year or
more
Harry Sukumar wrote:
Could not retrieve mirrorlist
http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5arch=i386repo=extras error was
We had some problems with the mirrorlist.centos.org servers. All should
be back to normal now ...
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpEJJnkq6LLe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Googling for this feature, I saw reports from the yum developer that it
wasn't yet implemented. This was in mailing list posts from a year or
more ago. Did it ever make it into the yum code?
I want to start downloading the updates for a server
Dear All,
Quick question: I am currently having issues with yum, I recently
updated centos 5 server using the command
# yum update
Yum was working fine till, before the update,
When I try to use yum now I am getting the following error,
On Jan 6, 2008 9:37 PM, Harry Sukumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
Quick question: I am currently having issues with yum, I recently updated
centos 5 server using the command
# yum update
Yum was working fine till, before the update,
When I try to use yum now I am getting the
] On
Behalf Of Akemi Yagi
Sent: Monday, 7 January 2008 3:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum-update error
On Jan 6, 2008 9:37 PM, Harry Sukumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
Quick question: I am currently having issues with yum, I recently
updated
centos 5 server using
Googling for this feature, I saw reports from the yum developer that it
wasn't yet implemented. This was in mailing list posts from a year or more
ago. Did it ever make it into the yum code?
I want to start downloading the updates for a server going from 5.0 to 5.1
and then do the actual
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Googling for this feature, I saw reports from the yum developer that it
wasn't yet implemented. This was in mailing list posts from a year or
more ago. Did it ever make it into the yum code?
I want to start downloading the updates for a server going from 5.0 to
5.1 and
Hi,
Yum update is failing for missing dependency for package
'libdts.so.0'.I tried excluding the package
'yum update --exclude libdts' but the same error,also tried after
cleaning up the metadata ,but all in vain.
I tried to locate the package,and found it already there
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
Saurabh Sharma wrote:
livna 100% |=| 1.9 kB00:00
livna does el5?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Saurabh Sharma wrote:
Hi,
Yum update is failing for missing dependency for package 'libdts.so.0'.I
tried excluding the package
'yum update --exclude libdts' but the same error,also tried after
cleaning up the metadata ,but all in vain.
open a support resquest with the place you get your
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Saurabh Sharma wrote:
Hi,
Yum update is failing for missing dependency for package
'libdts.so.0'.I tried excluding the package
'yum update --exclude libdts' but the same error,also tried after
cleaning up the metadata ,but all in vain.
open a support resquest with
On Dec 12, 2007 9:06 AM, Matt Hyclak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't terribly clear. By newer, I only mean in the eyes of RPM. You
could take foo-0.0.0.0.1beta, give it an epoch of 1 and foo-99.9pro with
the
default epoch of 0, and RPM would think the 0.0.0.0.1beta was newer.
I'm not sure
Mhr wrote on Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:45:34 -0800:
If that's true, doesn't it break some kind of unwritten rule to supersede
newer software from an OEM source with older software that has been rebuilt?
I'm just reading by but if I understood you correctly you installed a
32bit rpm of the 2.3
On Dec 13, 2007 6:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mhr wrote on Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:45:34 -0800:
If that's true, doesn't it break some kind of unwritten rule to
supersede newer software from an OEM source with older software that has
been rebuilt?
I'm just reading by but if I
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 07:07:12PM -0800, MHR alleged:
On Dec 13, 2007 6:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mhr wrote on Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:45:34 -0800:
If that's true, doesn't it break some kind of unwritten rule to
supersede newer software from an OEM source with older
--- MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is probably a dumb question, but I'll ask
anyway (I do that - you all
know... :-).
Due to a bug I found in OOo 2.0, I moved to using
OOo 2.3, back when I was
still running CentOS 5.0.
Now that I have upgraded to 5.1, yum wants to update
my OOo
On Dec 11, 2007 1:27 PM, Steven Vishoot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that I have upgraded to 5.1, yum wants to update
my OOo from 2.3 BACK to 2.0.
Is it possible to get yum to recognize that 2.3 is newer than 2.0, or
should
I just exclude OOo from
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:13:10PM -0800, MHR enlightened us:
--- MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that I have upgraded to 5.1, yum wants to update
my OOo from 2.3 BACK to 2.0.
Is it possible to get yum to recognize that 2.3 is newer than 2.0, or
should
I just exclude OOo from
On Dec 11, 2007 2:17 PM, Matt Hyclak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:13:10PM -0800, MHR enlightened us:
Please note: the version number listed in the rpm -qa is 2.3.0, but the
version number listed in the yum update confirmation is 2.0.4.
rpm -qa --queryformat
fred smith wrote:
So there's been a change since Centos 4, then. (I'm fine with that, I
just didn't know it...). From my Centos4 box at work:
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 4.5 (Final)
Said machine was instaleld at Centos4 and kept updated with YUM.
yup, bit of a
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 01:07:19PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
fred smith wrote:
# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1
check your syslog, it will indicate what was installed and when.
Probably I was further confused by /etc/redhat-release:
# cat /etc/redhat-release
Karanbir Singh wrote:
yup, bit of a change with the upstream people adopting this whole
z-series thing, wherein they will now maintain branches for 5.1 even
when 5.2 is released.
over the next day or so, I shall try and get a document that explains
this whole thing.
Before CentOS 5 x86,
On Dec 5, 2007 5:24 AM, fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I don't remember getting a huge bolus of updates, which is what I would
have expected to constitute a 5.0==5.1 transition.
For a minimal install, there were surprisingly few new packages for
5.0 = 5.1. Looking at my
Ioannis Vranos wrote:
Before CentOS 5 x86, I was using Scientific Linux 4 and they were
keeping 4.x trees (e.g. 4.0, 4.1 etc) and for having an upgrade to the
latest tree automatically, we were using a plug in or something
neither redhat nor us at CentOS intend to follow the sort of process
I have read multipe messages here from people upgrading from 5.0 to 5.1,
presumably using yum update to do the deed.
When I do yum update on my (I think) fully updated Centos 5 system I get no
updates.
Am I just being impatient (i.e., the updates haven't yet been pushed out) or am
I
somehow
fred smith wrote:
I have read multipe messages here from people upgrading from 5.0 to 5.1,
presumably using yum update to do the deed.
When I do yum update on my (I think) fully updated Centos 5 system I get no
updates.
Am I just being impatient (i.e., the updates haven't yet been pushed
I updated my centos 4.5 server to centos last week and I am now getting
errors when I attempt to do a yum update:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum update
Loading installonlyn plugin
Plugin fastestmirror uses deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE.
Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead.
Loading fastestmirror
On Nov 15, 2007 2:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I updated my centos 4.5 server to centos last week and I am now getting
errors when I attempt to do a yum update
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/__init__.py, line 313, in
This line right here looks very suspicious to me, as centos
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 15:04 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007 2:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I updated my centos 4.5 server to centos last week and I am now getting
errors when I attempt to do a yum update
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/__init__.py, line 313, in
Didn't like the fastest mirror plugin. Thanks for all the help.
Aron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fabian Arrotin
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 12:56 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum update fails
On Thu, 2007
I have a local yum repository for CentOS4, and from time to time I add
new (custom) kernel RPMS.
However, when I run 'yum update' on an SMP box, yum 'installs' the new
kernel, kernel-devel and kernel-smp packages, but 'updates' the
kernel-smp-devel package.
i.e. I end up with multiple
James Pearson wrote:
I have a local yum repository for CentOS4, and from time to time I add
new (custom) kernel RPMS.
However, when I run 'yum update' on an SMP box, yum 'installs' the new
kernel, kernel-devel and kernel-smp packages, but 'updates' the
kernel-smp-devel package.
i.e. I
James Pearson wrote:
What do I need to do to get the kernel-smp-devel RPMS to 'install' instead
of 'update'?
See yum.conf(5) and search for installonlypkgs.
Cheers,
Ralph
pgp8GohNGwkpS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
Johnny Hughes wrote:
James Pearson wrote:
I have a local yum repository for CentOS4, and from time to time I add
new (custom) kernel RPMS.
However, when I run 'yum update' on an SMP box, yum 'installs' the new
kernel, kernel-devel and kernel-smp packages, but 'updates' the
kernel-smp-devel
User Karl R. Balsmeier wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cobbler check
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/cobbler, line 18, in ?
import cobbler.cobbler as app
ImportError: No module named cobbler.cobbler
it looks like Python error; simply module cobbler.cobbler
isn't installed;
Hi,
I'm running Centos 5 on an IBM x3550 series server with kernel version
2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP, dual xeon, 9GB ram system.
When I run yum update, I get this error:
-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Dependency: libevent-1.1a.so.1()(64bit) for package:
nfs-utils
-- Finished
401 - 452 of 452 matches
Mail list logo
