On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 10:52 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive DOT com wrote:
snip
hda3 and hda9 are your Linux LVM partitions, maybe they belong to one
volume
group, I don't know (your fstab would tell more,
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 18:37 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
On 5/12/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive DOT com wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
10696956 4597688 5547128 46% /
/dev/hda3 102486 22174
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
wrote on Tue, 13 May 2008 12:53:21 -0500:
LV Name/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
LV Size10.53 GB
And the output of pvdisplay.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pvdisplay
--- Physical volume ---
PV Name
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 21:11 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
wrote on Tue, 13 May 2008 12:53:21 -0500:
LV Name/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
LV Size10.53 GB
And the output of pvdisplay.
[EMAIL
On 5/8/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive DOT com wrote:
snip
hda3 and hda9 are your Linux LVM partitions, maybe they belong to one volume
group, I don't know (your fstab would tell more, there's also a graphical
frontend for LVM in your desktop).
From your grub.conf we know that it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive DOT com wrote:
snip
hda3 and hda9 are your Linux LVM partitions, maybe they belong to one volume
group, I don't know (your fstab would tell more, there's also a graphical
frontend for LVM in your desktop).
From
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500:
Mount it and have a look at that partition, does it contain the same stuff
as
your /boot partition?
And this question?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
Ross S. W. Walker wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 10:52:16 -0400:
The proper location of the grub.conf is:
/mnt/hda8/grub/grub.conf
right, if that is the boot partition, there won't be a boot directory.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rcpt-To: centos@centos.org
wrote on Mon, 12 May 2008 08:51:46 -0500:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
10696956 4597688 5547128 46% /
/dev/hda3
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 01:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
snip
No, surely not. Windows installs only to one partition, the one you selected
for installation. The other three are only NTFS partitions and can be used by
Windows, but unless your wife installs something on them or puts data on them
On 5/7/08, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive.com wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:58 -0500:
Kai: I am not using Windows Boot Manager. Grub comes up, as on the 2
boxes, where things are working properly.
Just to be sure, it's really grub? You get a somewhat blueish screen
wrote on Thu, 8 May 2008 09:39:15 -0500:
Ah. This is where the problem on her box probably comes from! Last
November, when I installed Windows XP, in English, my native language,
I did not understand something in Microsoft's English. There were four
(4) partitions for Windows (C,D,E,F) and
On 5/7/08, Ralph Angenendt ra+cento AT br-online.de wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Scott: Great! If I can locate kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 and
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 I can use the rpm -e command to remove them
and then yum update again and that should update the kernel in her box.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP Thu Mar 15 19:57:35 EDT
2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
After rebooting the box, it is still on the original kernel, rather
than on the new kernel.
I just installed
wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 05:27:25 -0500:
I just installed kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 again. Was that
correct or not?
As you removed it earlier, yes. There doesn't seem to be any dependancy
for it. AFAIK it's not necessary for operation, anyway, it's only
necessary if something has to
Michael Simpson wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 12:15:35 +0100:
do you have any mention of the new kernel in /etc/grub.conf?
Note, this is only a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf !
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On 5/7/08, Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 05:27:25 -0500:
I just installed kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 again. Was that
correct or not?
As you removed it earlier, yes. There doesn't seem to be any dependancy
for it. AFAIK it's not necessary for
wrote on Wed, 7 May 2008 08:53:01 -0500:
-rw--- 1 root root816 May 7 05:08 grub.conf
got changed 5:08 today. Are you sure you booted after that? What does uname
-a show now?
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,2)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title CentOS (2.6.18-53.1.14.el5)
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 18:30 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
-rw--- 1 root root816 May 7 05:08 grub.conf
got changed 5:08 today. Are you sure you booted after that? What does uname
-a show now?
Kai: Yes, I rebooted, very early this morning. I just tried it again. My
wife had been using MS
Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 13:13:13 -0500:
On
compaq1300, I do *not* have the three boot options (original kernel,
latest kernel and Windows XP). I have two (2) options, if I interrupt
grub: (a) the original kernel (b) other, which is Windows XP
Ok, that explains it. I bet you
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 21:38 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 13:13:13 -0500:
On
compaq1300, I do *not* have the three boot options (original kernel,
latest kernel and Windows XP). I have two (2) options, if I interrupt
grub: (a) the original kernel (b)
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I woke up about 430 this morning and I realized that rpm can
locate the file by itself. :-)However, I want to learn how to
use find that Mark (mhr) mentioned!
Lanny (offlist):
Thanks - I really did mean that in a good
Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:58 -0500:
Kai: I am not using Windows Boot Manager. Grub comes up, as on the 2
boxes, where things are working properly.
Just to be sure, it's really grub? You get a somewhat blueish screen that
says booting centos in x seconds, press any key to
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 00:19 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:58 -0500:
snip
You will need to make a list of all partitions. Not sure what the best way
to do this would be. Probably fdisk. Run fdisk, then type p (for
printing the partition table), then
On 02 May 2008, Michael Simpson mikie.simpson at gmail.com wrote:
__
On 5/2/08, Lanny Marcus lannyma at gmail.com wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command
On 02 May 2008, Erek Dyskant erek at blumenthals.com wrote:
__
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command again,
*Have* you verified that you are not already on the latest kernel?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 03 May 2008, Kai Schaetzl maillists AT conactive.com wrote:
Message: 61
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 13:31:14 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Have* you verified that you are not already on the latest kernel?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP Thu
On 5/2/08, Lanny Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command again, and there is a response that no updates
are available. Her box is a Compaq Evo D300v Celeron. During the past
couple of days, when I did yum
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command again, and there is a response that no updates
are available.
Check /etc/yum.conf and see if there's an exclude=kernel line
Regards,
Erek
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 09:56 -0400, Erek Dyskant wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command again, and there is a response that no updates
are available.
Check
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Bob Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 09:56 -0400, Erek Dyskant wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's box. It did not update the
kernel. I ran the command
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:19 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Bob Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 09:56 -0400, Erek Dyskant wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 08:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
This morning, I did yum update on my wife's
34 matches
Mail list logo
