On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:59:47 -0300
Filipe Rosset rosset.fil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/25/2011 10:35 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I have pushed what I think are all of the SRPMS for os and updates.
Great, thank you!
Just to close this one off - I am now seeing all the SRPMS that I need
on
On 04/21/2011 06:41 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:30:37 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l]
*.src.rpm's. I strongly suspect that something's gone wrong - or
On 04/25/2011 09:16 AM, Filipe Rosset wrote:
On 04/21/2011 06:41 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:30:37 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l]
*.src.rpm's. I
On 04/25/2011 10:35 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I have pushed what I think are all of the SRPMS for os and updates.
Great, thank you!
--
Filipe
Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l]
*.src.rpm's. I strongly suspect that something's gone wrong - or
perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place -
Yes, you are right. Amongst the various tests, there is one that checks
for dupe
On 04/21/2011 12:47 AM, Don Krause wrote:
It doesn't appear to be me, as much as kernel.org. Their webpage
http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/5.6/os/SRPMS/?C=M;O=D
has nothing newer than Dec 14th either..
Something must be broke (or really slow) out there.
Broke yes, but in a good way. No
On Apr 21, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/21/2011 12:47 AM, Don Krause wrote:
It doesn't appear to be me, as much as kernel.org. Their webpage
http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/5.6/os/SRPMS/?C=M;O=D
has nothing newer than Dec 14th either..
Something must be broke (or really
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:30:37 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l]
*.src.rpm's. I strongly suspect that something's gone wrong - or
perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place -
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ). The rest
I'll move in first thing on Wednesday morning.
Hmmm - it's 10 days on
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ). The rest
I'll move in first
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:26:51 -0700
Don Krause dkra...@optivus.com wrote:
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
going public
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:26:51 -0700
Don Krause dkra...@optivus.com wrote:
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:23:51 -0300
Filipe Rosset rosset.fil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/13/2011 07:54 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
They are definitely in there, just slow.
- KB
Hi guys,
Still without SRPM's in 5.6/os/SRPMS/
They just started to appear this morning (UTC+1000) - but I
On 04/13/2011 07:54 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
They are definitely in there, just slow.
- KB
Hi guys,
Still without SRPM's in 5.6/os/SRPMS/
--
Filipe
Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/11/2011 06:58 AM:
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ).
More like 72 hours and still no 5.6/os/SRPMS/ in evidence. Did the valve
not get turned on?
Phil
On 04/13/2011 11:51 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/11/2011 06:58 AM:
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ).
More like 72 hours and still no 5.6/os/SRPMS/ in evidence. Did the
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/13/2011 06:54 AM:
They are definitely in there, just slow.
Must be vanishingly slow. :-)
Just checked half a dozen tier 1 mirrors and none has src.rpm files in
.../5.6/os/SRPMS/ There are some in 5.6/updates/SRPMS/.
Phil
On 04/12/2011 02:28 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
While I'm here - thanks to the whole CentOS team for a great effort on
5.6. I installed it on a laptop for the wife and she loves it!! For
myself - once I've the sources get here I can start our patch and
re-compile for our in-house discless clusters.
On 12 April 2011 13:48, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 04/12/2011 02:28 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
While I'm here - thanks to the whole CentOS team for a great effort on
5.6. I installed it on a laptop for the wife and she loves it!! For
myself - once I've the sources get here I can
On 4/12/11 7:48 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/12/2011 02:28 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
While I'm here - thanks to the whole CentOS team for a great effort on
5.6. I installed it on a laptop for the wife and she loves it!! For
myself - once I've the sources get here I can start our patch and
I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that
have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others
have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg
http://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/
Can
On 04/11/2011 12:46 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
Oh well, so much for that idea! According to the release notes
(http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.6) there is a list
of packages modified by centos - and that includes httpd. So the
absence of 'centos' in the release string does _not_
On 04/11/2011 05:53 AM, Tom Brown wrote:
I'm hazarding a guess here - that the os/{i386,x86_64}/CentOS/*.rpm's that
have 'centos' in the name have had changes made for CentOS. The others
have not and the sources are available from upstream at eg
Instead of removing the unwanted .repo files, replace them with empty files.
That way an upgrade should just result in a .rpmnew file being created.
because by removing them from the centos-release package and
rebuilding it they are not there in the first place.
Tom Brown wrote on Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:08:48 +0100:
because by removing them from the centos-release package and
rebuilding it they are not there in the first place.
Yeah, but you have to do that all the time (e.g. with each update).
Replacing with empty files is a one-time operation.
Kai
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 04/11/2011 12:46 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
Oh well, so much for that idea! According to the release notes
(http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.6) there is a list
of packages modified by centos -
I got frustrated with having to edit my repo files every time an update
came along to the release package, so I looked for a better way. What
I found was
http://www.gurulabs.com/goodies/YUM_automatic_local_mirror.php, which
gave me the clues I needed to have my local repositories added to the
On 9 April 2011 23:42, Tom Brown t...@ng23.net wrote:
Hi
Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
get my hands on the src for the centos-release package as i have to
rebuilt it to prevent the repo definitions from being included.
I see the src's for the updates
I added exclude=*releases for every repo that uses them (base/os,
updates, rpmforge, atrpms, elrepo, ) since I use my own local copy
of those repos. Yum just skips them.
Tom Brown wrote:
Hi
Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
get my hands on the src for
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I added exclude=*releases for every repo that uses them (base/os,
updates, rpmforge, atrpms, elrepo, ) since I use my own local copy
of those repos. Yum just skips them.
Just to be sure there is no misunderstanding. I add that line in any
*.repo file in
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:53:54 +0200:
Just to be sure there is no misunderstanding. I add that line in any
*.repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d/ folder, as an option for every
repository definition in those files where repository has releases rpms.
I don't understand the
Hi,
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:53:54 +0200:
Just to be sure there is no misunderstanding. I add that line in any
*.repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d/ folder, as an option for every
repository definition in those files where
Tom Diehl wrote on Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:47:04 -0400 (EDT):
I cannot speak for the other Tom but in my case I rebuild the centos-release
rpm and add my own repo files so that all of my machines pull from my local
repos. Yes, I know that the modified repo files do not get overwritten but
that
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Ah, I see now why you are doing this, I wasn't aware that the release package
contains those .repo files. *However*, as I said earlier (and unless you use
different filenames for your local repo) the new centos-release will *not*
overwrite your existing CentOS-Base.repo
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:42:41 +0100
Tom Brown t...@ng23.net wrote:
Hi
Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
get my hands on the src for the centos-release package as i have to
rebuilt it to prevent the repo definitions from being included.
I see the src's for
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:40:25 +1000
Bob Hepple bhep...@promptu.com wrote:
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:42:41 +0100
Tom Brown t...@ng23.net wrote:
Hi
Is there any ETA for the SRPM's from the base tree of 5.6? I need to
get my hands on the src for the centos-release package as i have to
36 matches
Mail list logo
