On 17/09/18 21:54, Chris Olson via CentOS wrote:
We have several small networks, some of which have only four systems
that are usually a mix of Windows 7 and CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 machines.
All of these systems are Internet connected and updated regularly when
yum finds packages available.
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 12:43 +, Always Learning wrote:
> Goeiemiddag Leonard,
Heh :) . I was just thinking yesterday, "lekker ananas" :-) .
> One could say the host name, 4-3-2-1-static.friendly-ip.com, is
> not absolutely required in the 1.2.3.4 virtual host file.
>
> Not knowing
On 01/09/2017 01:51 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 12:54 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote:
Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts.
Better fight with bits than
Goeiemiddag Leonard,
> On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 12:00 +, Always Learning wrote:
> > (4) The 'extra' Apache Virtual Host file contains
> >
> >
>
> Why do you add dummy.domain.com:80 here as the match is done on the
> ServerName?
>
> > DocumentRoot /prod/web/domains/dummy/
> >
Hello Paul,
On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 12:00 +, Always Learning wrote:
> (4) The 'extra' Apache Virtual Host file contains
>
>
Why do you add dummy.domain.com:80 here as the match is done on the
ServerName?
> DocumentRoot /prod/web/domains/dummy/
> ServerName 1.2.3.4
>
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 11:06 -0600, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:23:05PM +, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. One of my Apache defences is to redirect probes/hacks to
> > 127.0.0.1 :-)
>
> Would you be willing to share this rewrite rule with the list, please?
>
Always Learning wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 12:54 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> James B. Byrne wrote:
>> > On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts.
>> >
>> > Better fight with bits than blood.
>>
>> Yes, but...
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Valeri
> Galtsev
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 12:26 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue
> > One large list
On Mon, January 9, 2017 11:16 am, Albert McCann wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Always
>> Learning
>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 11:23 AM
>> To: Centos <centos@centos.org>
>> Subject
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Always
> Learning
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 11:23 AM
> To: Centos <centos@centos.org>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox Issue
> > On Thu, January 5, 201
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:23:05PM +, Always Learning wrote:
>
> Agreed. One of my Apache defences is to redirect probes/hacks to
> 127.0.0.1 :-)
Would you be willing to share this rewrite rule with the list, please?
Some may find it useful. Thank you.
On 1/9/2017 8:33 AM, Always Learning wrote:
Query: How did the Reds get into the Democrats computer systems ?
Hope it wasn't a Redhat/Centos system but an 'open Windoze' set-up.
primary attack was cracking a too easy password on Podesta's webmail
account, quite probably via phishing/human
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:33:01PM +, Always Learning wrote:
> recognise vulnerabilities and how to block them; too many self-declared
> "komputar xperts" haven't a clue about robust security.
Thank you SO very much for this. I am still laughing at the irony after
5 whole minutes. This made
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 12:54 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> James B. Byrne wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote:
> >>
> >> Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts.
> >
> > Better fight with bits than blood.
>
> Yes, but... attacks on the friggin'
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 11:08 -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> >
> > Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts.
> >
>
> Better fight with bits than blood.
Agreed. One of my Apache defences is to redirect probes/hacks to
James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>> Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts.
>
> Better fight with bits than blood.
Yes, but... attacks on the friggin' IoT could result in lots of blood. Or,
less so, what do you mean all the rail
On Thu, January 5, 2017 17:23, Always Learning wrote:
>
>
> Cyber attacks are gradually replacing armed conflicts.
>
Better fight with bits than blood.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:23:18PM +, Always Learning wrote:
> [...] The
> only method of preventing it compromising a site is to test the
> acceptable maximum length of the parameter (in this example '12345') and
> if exceeded block the IP address in iptables.
I'm honestly interested in what
On 1/5/2017 2:23 PM, Always Learning wrote:
SQL injection attempts, made by suffixing usually very long strings of
SQL coding to valid parameters such as domain.com/info.php?=12345,
has been popular with the Russians for at least the last few years.
SQL Injection is a server side issue,
On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 21:33 +, Chris Olson wrote:
> .. A Firefox browser on one system .
> Instead, a site located at the link https://gaibacoupontec.com
> was displayed with a message indicating that there was an urgent
> Firefox update required.
Firefox, like other web browsers,
Maybe is was an ad redirect. I get this a lot on my phone where people are
putting malicious js in ads that redirects me to advertisements for rock
hard erections whilst I'm reading articles. Its very noisome!
On 4 January 2017 at 22:33, Chris Olson wrote:
> Everyone is
> Instead, a site located at the link https://gaibacoupontec.com
> was displayed with a message indicating that there was an urgent
> Firefox update required.
Have you checked the user's Firefox profile for any unusual extensions? That
would be my first suspicion.
22 matches
Mail list logo