Sent by: centos-boun...@centos.org
07/14/2010 01:39 PM
Please respond to
CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
To
centos@centos.org
cc
Subject
Re: [CentOS] GPT Partitions 2.2T with Centos 5.5
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
2010/7/14 Jens Neu jens@biotronik.com:
Dear all,
unfortunately I observe drastic drops in read- performance when I connect
LUNs 2.2T to our Centos 5.5 Servers. I suspect issues with the GUID
Partition Table, since it happens reproducibly only on the LUNs 2.2T and
goes back to normal
@centos.org
cc
Subject
Re: [CentOS] GPT Partitions 2.2T with Centos 5.5
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Jens Neu writes:
I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
Besides, I'm talking about a drop of 150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
when cracking the 2.2T size. This is clearly not in the ext3
I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
Besides, I'm talking about a drop of 150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
when cracking the 2.2T size. This is clearly not in the ext3 (or FS for
that
On Wednesday 14 July 2010, Jens Neu wrote:
I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
Besides, I'm talking about a drop of 150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
when cracking the 2.2T size. This is
6 matches
Mail list logo
