On 7/14/10, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:
On 7/14/2010 1:16 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Googling up a really old 2005 newsgroup thread says some people had 24
physical NIC (6x 4quad) in a system before and one person vaguely
remembers a hard 256 limit
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
2010/7/14 William Warren
hescomins
- Brian T. Brunner bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical
On 7/14/2010 1:16 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 7/14/10, William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com
wrote:
ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and
been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a
linux system.
- Brian T. Brunner bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eero Volotinen
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical
] On Behalf Of Tim Nelson
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 10:35 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
- Brian T. Brunner bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:51:51AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
Even if the limit were lower, such as 10 physical interfaces as mentioned
before, I have to imagine that the host system would have issues dealing
with the number of interrupts needed to *PROPERLY* service all of those
interfaces in
On 07/14/2010 08:17 AM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 09:51:51AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
Even if the limit were lower, such as 10 physical interfaces as mentioned
before, I have to imagine that the host system would have issues dealing
with the number of interrupts needed
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:52:02AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
Filed some bug reports, and it was evident from the response that very, very
few Linux users ever go 4 eth's on a system. Thus the lack of properly
debugged IPv6 support for that then. Fortunately I don't (yet) need IPv6.
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 08:52 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I've got six machines with 6 Gb interfaces (two on motherboard, 4 on a
card) right now (the design called for 3 bonded pairs on separate nets
for redundancy). I haven't tried IPV6 on them. I had 'issues' with
bonding and VMs
On 07/14/2010 10:30 AM, JohnS wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 08:52 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I've got six machines with 6 Gb interfaces (two on motherboard, 4 on a
card) right now (the design called for 3 bonded pairs on separate nets
for redundancy). I haven't tried IPV6 on them. I
On 07/13/2010 05:51 PM, William Warren wrote:
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
interfaces in the Kernel?
Most of the limits on the number of any device come from the major/minor
numbers on
2010/7/14 William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com:
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
interfaces in the Kernel?
can you really create hardware with huge number or real
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2010/7/14 William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com:
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
interfaces in
On 7/13/2010 9:11 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotineneero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2010/7/14 William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com:
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the
On 7/14/10, William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:
ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and
been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a
linux system.
Googling up a really old 2005 newsgroup thread says some
16 matches
Mail list logo
