In article m3vdqkeflz@luke.xen.prgmr.com,
Luke S Crawford centos@centos.org wrote:
Have you tried memtest86?
No, but if that was the problem it wouldn't have failed the same
way each time.
I finally got some time to deal with this today. I tried several
more things and finally made it
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of MHR
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:20 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memory vs. Display Card
3) Some motherboards (many) will not accept different size DIMMs at
the same
In article f4e013870903082220s772af2d7o22c9686d6f134...@mail.gmail.com,
MHR centos@centos.org wrote:
2) Your answer above was not clear: did the 4GB work by itself without
the other 2GB? If so, the above is your problem. If not, you're in
deeper guano that you think, BUT:
The 4GB had the same
In article 12768.4492654682$1236586...@news.gmane.org,
Sorin Srbu centos@centos.org wrote:
If the motherboard supports dual-channel configs, one might want to take care
how one distributes the different mem-sticks in the banks. Eg the 2GB-sticks
in bank 1 and 3 and the 4GB-sticks in banks 2 and
On 09.03.2009 11:09, Rick wrote:
Well, yeah, of course. But even if I got that wrong, the 4GB alone did not
work in the same slots the 2GB sticks were in.
So, either the memory sticks are bad (one or two of them), or the memory
have bad timing in some way making them not compatible with the
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Rick
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 11:10 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memory vs. Display Card
If the motherboard supports dual-channel configs, one might want to take
care
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Morten Torstensen
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:14 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memory vs. Display Card
Well, yeah, of course. But even if I got that wrong, the 4GB
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:14 +0100, Morten Torstensen wrote:
On 09.03.2009 11:09, Rick wrote:
Well, yeah, of course. But even if I got that wrong, the 4GB alone did not
work in the same slots the 2GB sticks were in.
So, either the memory sticks are bad (one or two of them), or the memory
Rick wrote:
In article f4e013870903082220s772af2d7o22c9686d6f134...@mail.gmail.com,
MHR centos@centos.org wrote:
2) Your answer above was not clear: did the 4GB work by itself without
the other 2GB? If so, the above is your problem. If not, you're in
deeper guano that you think, BUT:
William L. Maltby wrote:
So, if you've got the leeway, try manually bumping the voltage for the
unit a couple of tenths. Risk is low, but it is there.
The OP said earlier he has an Intel D975XBX motherboard. Intel boards
are very conservatively engineered, and don't have tweaks for
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009, John R Pierce wrote:
...
ok, then you have the wrong 4GB (2x2GB?) sticks. You might review the
memory specs for your motherboard, not all DDR2 is the same.
http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/d975xbx/sb/CS-026567.htm
I usually go to the Kingston site to find
Rick wrote:
In article 12768.4492654682$1236586...@news.gmane.org,
Sorin Srbu centos@centos.org wrote:
If the motherboard supports dual-channel configs, one might want to take
care
how one distributes the different mem-sticks in the banks. Eg the 2GB-sticks
in bank 1 and 3 and the
Bill Campbell cen...@celestial.com writes:
I usually go to the Kingston site to find the proper memory for
specific main boards, and get most of our RAM from newegg.com.
http://www.kingston.com
http://www.newegg.com
I second this, except that I find Kingston often has the best
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 19:27 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Rick wrote:
In article 20090308031754.ga11...@bludgeon.org,
Ray Van Dolson centos@centos.org wrote:
That sounds pretty strange. Have you confirmed that removing the new
memory allows you to run in runlevel 5 again?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Louis Lagendijk lo...@lagendijk.xs4all.nl
wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 19:27 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Rick wrote:
In article 20090308031754.ga11...@bludgeon.org,
Ray Van Dolson
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Rick el...@spinics.net wrote:
Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB
to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to
run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system
froze. Is there a
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 09:16 -0400, Richard Karhuse wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Rick el...@spinics.net wrote:
Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2
GB
...
Forth, what (precisely) CentOS kernel are you booting?? Does it
support greater than 4 GB of
In article 20090308031754.ga11...@bludgeon.org,
Ray Van Dolson centos@centos.org wrote:
That sounds pretty strange. Have you confirmed that removing the new
memory allows you to run in runlevel 5 again?
Yes, that's how I'm running right now.
___
Rick wrote:
In article 20090308031754.ga11...@bludgeon.org,
Ray Van Dolson centos@centos.org wrote:
That sounds pretty strange. Have you confirmed that removing the new
memory allows you to run in runlevel 5 again?
Yes, that's how I'm running right now.
now, try taking out
In article 49b47e99.1090...@hogranch.com,
John R Pierce centos@centos.org wrote:
now, try taking out the OLD memory and putting in just the NEW memory.
see how it runs that way. if this works, try with the new 4GB as the 0
bank, and the old 2GB as the 1 bank.
Tried that before I posted and
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Rick el...@spinics.net wrote:
In article 49b47e99.1090...@hogranch.com,
John R Pierce centos@centos.org wrote:
now, try taking out the OLD memory and putting in just the NEW memory.
see how it runs that way. if this works, try with the new 4GB as the 0
bank,
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 03:00:59AM +, Rick wrote:
Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB
to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to
run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system
froze. Is there a way to
Rick el...@spinics.net writes:
Since memory has become quite cheap lately I decided to move from 2 GB
to 6. When I installed the memory every thing was fine until I went to
run level 5. At that point the screen turned to garbage and the system
froze. Is there a way to fix this so I can use
23 matches
Mail list logo
