Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
On 16/09/11 08:22, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Based on what I'm seeing, I do not think that yum is downloading a
corrupt sqlite database, rather than it is creating a corrupt database
all by itself. I have however no definite confirmation of this and I
would like to have
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:15:23 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Has anyone in this thread - I may have missed some posts last night -
suggested yum reinstall yum?
This wasn't suggested yet, so I've tried it and it fails in the same
way (not unexpectedly, I would say):
[root@picard ~]# yum
sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:15:23 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Has anyone in this thread - I may have missed some posts last night -
suggested yum reinstall yum?
This wasn't suggested yet, so I've tried it and it fails in the same
way (not unexpectedly, I would
sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:15:23 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Has anyone in this thread - I may have missed some posts last night -
suggested yum reinstall yum?
This wasn't suggested yet, so I've tried it and it fails in the same
way (not unexpectedly, I would
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:18 AM, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
[snip]
So either several mirrors all have the same corrupted file, or my box
is generating a corrupted file each time. I would tend towards the
second hypothesis, since other people have successfully updated their
5.6
I've finally managed to update one of my boxes to 5.7. I did it in a
very roundabout way, which however confirms that at least in my boxes
there's something wrong in the way yum creates the sqlite databases.
I've basically followed the guide at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreateLocalMirror
Le 16/09/2011 17:26, sebasti...@datafaber.net a écrit :
Many thanks to all the people on the list who have suggestions and
advice, particularly to Alain Péan who pointed me in the right
direction.
You are welcome, but I don't know how my suggestions lead you to the
idea to setup a local repo
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of sebasti...@datafaber.net
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 11:27
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7
I've finally managed
Always Learning wrote:
Please try one thing for me
yum install httpd
It does not matter whether or not you have this already installed. I am
curious to know what type of response you get. You do not have to
install this. It is the reaction from yum that interests me, so you can
Keith Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.6K Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Vault.repo
Do you need CentOS-Vault, as it includes all the packages
from Centos 5.x upwards IIRC?
It's in there by default, since the first install on the box. All the
Craig White wrote:
make sure that there isn't any yum/rpm processes running...
ps aux|grep yum
ps aux|grep rpm
Once you've determined they aren't running, try...
yum clean metadata
yum clean dbcache
(those should be executed when you execute 'yum clean all' but maybe it ain't
gettin'
On 15/09/11 16:22, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
[root@picard yum.repos.d]# yum clean dbcache
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, priorities
0 sqlite files removed
[root@picard yum.repos.d]# yum update
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Kahlil Hodgson
kahlil.hodg...@dealmax.com.au wrote:
Perhaps your are downloading the same corrupted primary.xml.gz
from mirror.opendoc.net. Maybe try another mirror? Perhaps download
the file manually and compare?
Yeah could be. And if your corporate network
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:44:59 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Kahlil Hodgson
kahlil.hodg...@dealmax.com.au wrote:
Perhaps your are downloading the same corrupted primary.xml.gz
from mirror.opendoc.net. Maybe try another mirror? Perhaps
download
the file
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:01:23 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:35 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
[root@picard ~]# ll /etc/yum.repos.d/
total 20K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Base.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 631 Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Debuginfo.repo
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 08:22 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Craig White wrote:
make sure that there isn't any yum/rpm processes running...
ps aux|grep yum
ps aux|grep rpm
Once you've determined they aren't running, try...
yum clean metadata
yum clean dbcache
(those should be
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:10:50 +0200, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:44:59 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Kahlil Hodgson
kahlil.hodg...@dealmax.com.au wrote:
Perhaps your are downloading the same corrupted primary.xml.gz
from
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:18 +0200, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
Update: yum chose to use another mirror and it failed in the exact
same way.
Time for a file check on your disk.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:30:01 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:18 +0200, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
Update: yum chose to use another mirror and it failed in the exact
same way.
I could do that, but it is again extremely unlikely that 6 disks on 6
different boxes
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 05:57:02 -0700, Craig White wrote:
sounds like someone did some manual mucking in /etc/yum.repos.d
You probably want to start disabling some of the configured repo's
in /etc/yum.repos.d... 'enabled = 0' - I'd probably start by making
sure
that all non-CentOS repo's were
Stupid question.
Can we uninstall yum? And install again using manual rpm.
나의 iPhone에서 보냄
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:18 AM, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 05:57:02 -0700, Craig White wrote:
sounds like someone did some manual mucking in /etc/yum.repos.d
You probably want to start disabling some of the configured repo's
in /etc/yum.repos.d... 'enabled = 0' - I'd
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:42:42 -0700, Craig White wrote:
might be hard to run package-cleanup without having base enabled but
I would certainly recommend that you run 'rpm -Va [--nofiles
--nodigest]' to identify the broken dependencies - apparently
something that the base repository really
sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
The file /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz.sqlite is only 20KB,
whereas in the normal case I'd expect it to be 6.5MB. Somehow, yum is
you're not out of hard drive space on that partition, are you?
___
CentOS mailing
Le 15/09/2011 18:16, sebasti...@datafaber.net a écrit :
[root@picard ~]# ll /var/cache/yum/base
total 1004K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Sep 15 19:12 cachecookie
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1017 Sep 15 19:11 mirrorlist.txt
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K Jul 10 12:19 packages/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:33:39 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
The file /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz.sqlite is only 20KB,
whereas in the normal case I'd expect it to be 6.5MB. Somehow, yum
is
you're not out of hard drive space on that partition, are
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:36:10 +0200, Alain Péan wrote:
And here is the answer from Karanbir Singh :
unfortunately, you hit an issue that I did not think anyone would
see (
but was aware of... ). The issue originates from the fact that the
new
CR repo has no sqlite metadata store, its xml
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:16 AM, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:42:42 -0700, Craig White wrote:
might be hard to run package-cleanup without having base enabled but
I would certainly recommend that you run 'rpm -Va [--nofiles
--nodigest]' to identify the broken
Le 15/09/2011 18:37, sebasti...@datafaber.net a écrit :
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:33:39 +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
The file /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz.sqlite is only 20KB,
whereas in the normal case I'd expect it to be 6.5MB. Somehow, yum
is
Le 15/09/2011 18:44, sebasti...@datafaber.net a écrit :
You may be onto something, I've seen that the 5.6 base repo has the
sqlite metadata store while the 5.7 base repo hasn't it. But the 20K
sqlite file that yum generates on my boxes looks to have at least
something related to sqlite inside
Alain Péan wrote:
What if you delete (or save elsewhere) the primary.xml.gz.sqlite file ?
If it is corrupted, it would do no arm, and perhaps it is no more used
or regenerated if it missing ?
This doesn't work unfortunately, yum always creates the same corrupted file:
- here I use yum to
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:37 +0200, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote:
And there's also plenty of available space on the other 5 boxes which
exhibit the same issue.
Sorry if this has been suggested already - have you tried running with
all plugins disabled?
'yum --noplugins check-update'
I have
Craig White wrote:
mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
suspect that it will create a new 'copy' of that file if it fails to find it.
Unfortunately yum recreates the same corrupted file, even if I move it
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Craig White wrote:
mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
suspect that it will create a new 'copy' of that file if it fails to find it.
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:06 -0700, Craig White wrote:
post the output of...
It was the same as mine in Centos 5.6, now 5.7
Paul.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Craig White wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Craig White wrote:
mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
suspect that it will create a new 'copy' of that file if it fails to find
On 09/15/2011 02:45 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Craig White wrote:
mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
suspect that it will create a new 'copy' of that file if it fails to find it.
Unfortunately yum
Brian Miller wrote:
Sorry if this has been suggested already - have you tried running with
all plugins disabled?
'yum --noplugins check-update'
This wasn't suggested yet, but I did try it at some point. I've just
tried again and the result is the same:
[root@picard ~]# yum clean all
Loaded
Josh Miller wrote:
On 09/15/2011 02:45 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Craig White wrote:
mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
suspect that it will create a new 'copy' of that file if it fails to find
it.
On Sep 15, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Josh Miller wrote:
On 09/15/2011 02:45 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Craig White wrote:
mv /var/cache/yum/base/primary.xml.gz/sqlite /tmp
and try again I suppose - yes, that file is supposed to be much larger - I
suspect that it will
On 16/09/11 08:22, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Based on what I'm seeing, I do not think that yum is downloading a
corrupt sqlite database, rather than it is creating a corrupt database
all by itself. I have however no definite confirmation of this and I
would like to have one before filing a
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 23:56 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
I'm trying to update my CentOS 5.6 boxes to 5.7, and on every single one
of them yum is failing with a segmentation fault: the error happens when
yum is checking the 'base' repository.
Have you tried
yum clean all
On Sep 14, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
I'm trying to update my CentOS 5.6 boxes to 5.7, and on every single one
of them yum is failing with a segmentation fault: the error happens when
yum is checking the 'base' repository.
[root@picard yum]# yum update
Loaded plugins:
Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 23:56 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
I'm trying to update my CentOS 5.6 boxes to 5.7, and on every single one
of them yum is failing with a segmentation fault: the error happens when
yum is checking the 'base' repository.
Have you tried
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:26 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
Have you tried
yum clean all
followed by
yum update
?
Yes, I've tried it, with the exact same result:
[root@picard ~]# yum clean all
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror,
Always Learning wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:26 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Can you list, one line for each, the names of the repos
in /etc/yum.repos.d
[root@picard ~]# ll /etc/yum.repos.d/
total 20K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Base.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 631
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:35 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
Thank you very much for your help.
Please do not forget I am a Learner, not an expert :-)
Please try one thing for me
yum install httpd
It does not matter whether or not you have this already installed. I am
curious to know
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.6K Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Vault.repo
Do you need CentOS-Vault, as it includes all the packages
from Centos 5.x upwards IIRC?
Keith
-
Websites:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 00:35 +0200, Sebastiano Pilla wrote:
[root@picard ~]# ll /etc/yum.repos.d/
total 20K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.9K Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Base.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 631 Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Debuginfo.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 626 Feb 8 2011 CentOS-Media.repo
49 matches
Mail list logo
