I had promised to weigh in on my experiences using ZFS in a production
environment. We've been testing it for a few months now, and confidence
is building. We've started using it in production about a month ago
after months of non production testing.
I'll append my thoughts in a cross-post
On 11/30/2013 06:20 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
Hey,
http://zfsonlinux.org/epel.html
If you have a little time and resource please install and report back
any problems you see.
Andrew,
I want to run /var on zfs, but when I try to move /var over it won't
boot thereafter, with errors about
Grub only needs to know about the filesystems that it uses to boot the
system. Mounting of the other file systems including /var is the
responsibility of the system that has been booted. I suspect that you have
something else wrong if you can't boot with /var/ on ZFS.
I may be wrong, but I don't
On 1/6/2014 3:26 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
Grub only needs to know about the filesystems that it uses to boot the
system. Mounting of the other file systems including /var is the
responsibility of the system that has been booted. I suspect that you have
something else wrong if you can't boot
On 12/04/2013 06:05 AM, John Doe wrote:
Not sure if I already mentioned it but maybe have a look at:
http://code.google.com/p/lsyncd/
We checked lsyncd out and it's most certainly an very interesting tool.
I *will* be using it in the future!
However, we found that it has some issues scaling
On 04.12.2013 14:05, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 04.12.2013 14:05, John Doe wrote:
From: Listsli...@benjamindsmith.com
Our next big test is to try out ZFS filesystem send/receive in
lieu
of
our current backup processes based on rsync. Rsync is a fabulous
tool,
but is beginning to show
On 04.12.2013 14:05, John Doe wrote:
From: Listsli...@benjamindsmith.com
Our next big test is to try out ZFS filesystem send/receive in lieu
of
our current backup processes based on rsync. Rsync is a fabulous
tool,
but is beginning to show performance/scalability issues dealing with
the
On 05.12.2013 22:46, Chuck Munro wrote:
On 04.12.2013 14:05, John Doe wrote:
From: Listsli...@benjamindsmith.com
Our next big test is to try out ZFS filesystem send/receive in
lieu
of
our current backup processes based on rsync. Rsync is a fabulous
tool,
but is beginning to show
From: Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com
Our next big test is to try out ZFS filesystem send/receive in lieu of
our current backup processes based on rsync. Rsync is a fabulous tool,
but is beginning to show performance/scalability issues dealing with the
many millions of files being backed
On 04.12.2013 14:05, John Doe wrote:
From: Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com
Our next big test is to try out ZFS filesystem send/receive in lieu
of
our current backup processes based on rsync. Rsync is a fabulous
tool,
but is beginning to show performance/scalability issues dealing with
Andrew,
We've been testing ZFS since about 10/24, see my original post (and
replies) asking about its suitability ZFS on Linux in production on
this list. So far, it's been rather impressive. Enabling compression
better than halved the disk space utilization in a low/medium bandwidth
(mainly
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey,
http://zfsonlinux.org/epel.html
If you have a little time and resource please install and report back
any problems you see.
A filesystem or Volume sits within a zpool
a zpool is made up of vdevs
vdevs are
12 matches
Mail list logo
