Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:40PM +, Richard wrote: > On the linked-to help page: > > > > they show fedora-21[+] as supported. If I remember correctly, > RHEL/CentOS-7 is based against fedora-19. Actually, in two places on that page they

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Richard
> Date: Friday, December 18, 2015 08:34:36 -0500 > From: Jonathan Billings > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:40PM +, Richard wrote: >> On the linked-to help page: >> >> >> >> they show fedora-21[+] as supported. If I

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Fri, December 18, 2015 7:34 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:40PM +, Richard wrote: >> On the linked-to help page: >> >> >> >> they show fedora-21[+] as supported. If I remember correctly, >> RHEL/CentOS-7 is

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread zep
On 12/18/2015 08:34 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:40PM +, Richard wrote: > "Ubuntu 12.04+, Debian 7+, OpenSuSE 13.1+, or Fedora Linux 21" No plus > (+) after the 21. I assume it must be a typo, since f21 left support > on the 1st of this month. The fact that

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 09:55 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I guess we all are divided into two categories > > 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my > choice, the hell with that crap (and google itself). > > 2. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I guess we all are divided into two categories > > 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my > choice, the hell with that crap (and google itself). > > 2. If google [something] doesn't work on the

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Fri, December 18, 2015 10:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> I guess we all are divided into two categories >> >> 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my >> choice, the hell with that crap (and

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 10:49 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > Indeed, the first thing that happens, UNIX IT heads of institution are > being replaced with Windows brew ones. Then, most of the central services > are outsourced to external companies. Then all central IT everything is > converted

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Richard
> Date: Friday, December 18, 2015 13:02:37 -0500 > From: m.r...@5-cent.us > > Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Fri, December 18, 2015 10:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: This item, which I opened, seems to be getting *way*

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Alice Wonder
On 12/18/2015 10:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Yep. There IS NO REASON for *any* logfile (or configuration file, for that matter) to be XML. Logs - if your machine is borked, cat or more may work, when no other way to view it does. Configuration... XML is for GUI. If the GUI's already hiding

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread m . roth
Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Fri, December 18, 2015 10:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>> I guess we all are divided into two categories >>> >>> 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my >>> choice,

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-17 Thread Alice Wonder
Ouch I don't know. Awhile back I was successfully running midori on CentOS but I stopped because it was a PITA to keep porting Fedora spec files to CentOS to get it to work, as Fedora diverged more and more. Maybe there should be a SIG or whatever to maintain webkit browsers for CentOS for

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-17 Thread Alice Wonder
Current midori builds in mock, I just tried, but the BuildRequires appear to be wrong because not all the extensions are built resulting in not all extensions found in %files section being there. I'll look at the build log and maybe see if there is a way to make it work and file bug report

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-17 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:37:32PM +, Richard wrote: > > I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome > 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: > >This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates >because this Linux system will no longer

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-17 Thread m . roth
Alice Wonder wrote: > Oh and sorry for the top posting, is there a way in Thunderbird for > CentOS to change that default? That's odd, Alice - my t-bird at work, and at home, both set me for bottom posting. Even in the config editor, I don't seen anything that looks like that setting to top

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-17 Thread Fred Smith
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:28:01PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:37:32PM +, Richard wrote: > > > > I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome > > 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: > > > >This computer will soon stop

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-17 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:28:01PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: > I suggest providing feedback to Google, perhaps they might consider > dropping RHEL7/CentOS7 support ... Err... I mean consider *NOT* dropping RHEL7/CentOS support. -- Jonathan Billings

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-17 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Thu, December 17, 2015 4:18 pm, Fred Smith wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:28:01PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:37:32PM +, Richard wrote: >> > >> > I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome >> > 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit))

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-17 Thread Alice Wonder
Nevermind, it wasn't an extensions issue. The issue looks to be related to the spec file thinking I was running Fedora < 19 Given fedora < 19 is EOL removing those conditionals may fix it. Oh and sorry for the top posting, is there a way in Thunderbird for CentOS to change that default?

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-17 Thread Richard
> Date: Thursday, December 17, 2015 16:28:01 -0500 > From: Jonathan Billings > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:37:32PM +, Richard wrote: >> >> I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome >> 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: >> >>

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-17 Thread Fred Smith
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:34:00PM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, December 17, 2015 4:18 pm, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:28:01PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:37:32PM +, Richard wrote: > >> > > >> > I'm seeing the following