Re: [CentOS] Test

2019-07-07 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 09:37:36AM +0100, Lucian (n...@li.nux.ro) wrote: > Just testing, sorry for the noise. Sorry for highjacking this. I do not receive any of my emails sent to the list although I have ticked "receive you won posts" in the mailman interface. I am trying to trace this problem

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-27 Thread Andreas Benzler
Am Dienstag, den 27.06.2017, 11:08 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes: > On 06/27/2017 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > The only exception: if the CentOS team introduced a bug in our > > rebuild > > that is not present in RHEL source code, we will not fix it. That > > is > > just what CentOS Linux

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-27 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 06/27/2017 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The only exception: if the CentOS team introduced a bug in our rebuild > that is not present in RHEL source code, we will not fix it. That is > just what CentOS Linux is. I obviously meant if we introduced the issue, and it is NOT an issue in RHEL,

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-27 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 06/26/2017 02:02 PM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Sorry Hughes, > > got some questions. > > I have the feeling that I do a lot wrong. Today I sent a mailing post > at fedora where it is also about btrfs under fedora. > > In time when i write the mail i forward it my patch for fedora 25 >

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-26 Thread Andreas Benzler
Sorry Hughes, got some questions. I have the feeling that I do a lot wrong. Today I sent a mailing post at fedora where it is also about btrfs under fedora. In time when i write the mail i forward it my patch for fedora 25 pretransaction & snapper.yp, with the hope of feedback.

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hello Hughes, Had experimental my gst-test installed ~ gstreamer 1.6.4 and there seems to be a hardware video playback function. By the wild gstreamer mix of course not stable. Have only proven that the compilate for intel ok on my laptop. Sincerely Andy Am Samstag, den 10.06.2017, 05:52

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 06/10/2017 08:47 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Hallo Hughes, > > thanks to let me know. It is good that you have a focus on LTS 4.9. > > Unfortunately it is so that the new graphics cards from amd to today are not > served in the opensource. > That's why I'm experimenting with the latest

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hallo Hughes, thanks to let me know. It is good that you have a focus on LTS 4.9. Unfortunately it is so that the new graphics cards from amd to today are not served in the opensource. That's why I'm experimenting with the latest stable versions and what is so. My laptop has done the

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 06/10/2017 05:17 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > > Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. > Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with > new kernel. > > linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (drivers, mesa, kernel)

2017-05-29 Thread Andreas Benzler
Today I confirm all drivers working propertly on HP Laptop skylake i5-7200U CPU, HD Graphics 620 (Kaby Lake GT2) Kernel 4.11.3, libdrm 2.4.81, xorg x11 2.99.917-21.20170418, libva 1.8.2, Mesa3D 17.1.1 (llvm 3.9.1) Tested World of warcraft with my old winehq. Totem Hardware decoded video

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (drivers, mesa, kernel)

2017-05-28 Thread Andreas Benzler
Forgotten so say I tested the opensource against the one from AMD. Both drivers works for me. The AMD Version can be used without my repo. I look forward to rework wine 2.8 on centos from the spec file of fedora 25. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Test

2017-01-18 Thread Fabian Arrotin
On 18/01/17 19:33, TE Dukes wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Hal Wigoda > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:18 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Test > > No. > > On

Re: [CentOS] Test

2017-01-18 Thread Mike McCarthy, W1NR
lf Of Hal Wigoda > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:18 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Test > > No. > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com> > wrote: > >> Is it working? >> >> __

Re: [CentOS] Test

2017-01-18 Thread TE Dukes
-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Hal Wigoda Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:18 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Test No. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com> wrote: > Is i

Re: [CentOS] Test

2017-01-18 Thread Hal Wigoda
No. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > Is it working? > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- - Hal Wigoda Chicago

Re: [CentOS] test builds on mesa

2016-05-11 Thread Andreas Benzler
Correct my self: libdrm version is 2.6.8 mesa 11.2 needs libdrm < 2.6.6, can be compile with the centos private-llvm 3.6.1 mesa 11.1 libdrm < 2.6.1 mesa 10.6.9 can build without external upgrades. Rebuild mesa, only needs cms4all-drivers. If you are use wine, you need it twice x86_64 and

Re: [CentOS] Test. Do Not Respond

2015-04-23 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On my mail list servers this is good enough reason for banning from any subscriptions... On Wed, April 22, 2015 10:35 pm, Chris Weisiger wrote: ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test, and H/W

2015-02-12 Thread m . roth
John R Pierce wrote: On 2/12/2015 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I finally talked to Dell, and was told, and I quote, ... three terabyte drives aren't supported the raid controller installed in this server, the SAS 6 i/r. the SAS 6/iR is a LSI SAS 1068E chip, kind of an old chip (the 1068

Re: [CentOS] test, and H/W

2015-02-12 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/12/2015 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I finally talked to Dell, and was told, and I quote, ... three terabyte drives aren't supported the raid controller installed in this server, the SAS 6 i/r. the SAS 6/iR is a LSI SAS 1068E chip, kind of an old chip (the 1068 stuff was long ago

Re: [CentOS] test

2012-10-31 Thread Frank Cox
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:22:44 + Nux! wrote: test Pieces of Nine! Pieces of Nine! (Parroty Error) -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] test

2010-07-06 Thread Larry Brower
mattias jonsson wrote: Failed, please study harder. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] test

2010-07-06 Thread mattias jonsson
I'm sorry for the test should not be repeted -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För Larry Brower Skickat: den 7 juli 2010 02:22 Till: CentOS mailing list Ämne: Re: [CentOS] test mattias jonsson wrote: Failed, please study

Re: [CentOS] test

2009-10-05 Thread Chan Chung Hang Christopher
Janez Kosmrlj wrote: testing mail delivery deliver failure: 550 Administrative Prohibition ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore

2009-01-02 Thread Vandaman
Anne Wilson wrote: blank Hi, Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for? Regards, Vandaman. --- Your average reporting time for spam is: 5 hours; Great! noob detector - 3 noobs top posting.

Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore

2009-01-02 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 02 January 2009 13:04:45 Vandaman wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: blank Hi, Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for? Hi, Vandaman. I had just made changes to my procmail system and needed a test. CentOS is the last filter, so if that worked correctly I knew I was OK. Sorry to

Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore

2009-01-02 Thread mouss
Anne Wilson a écrit : On Friday 02 January 2009 13:04:45 Vandaman wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: blank Hi, Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for? Hi, Vandaman. I had just made changes to my procmail system and needed a test. CentOS is the last filter, so if that worked correctly I knew

Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore

2009-01-02 Thread Anne Wilson
On Friday 02 January 2009 22:28:50 mouss wrote: Anne Wilson a écrit : On Friday 02 January 2009 13:04:45 Vandaman wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: blank Hi, Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for? Hi, Vandaman. I had just made changes to my procmail system and needed a test.

Re: [CentOS] test

2008-03-25 Thread Rudi Ahlers
J C wrote: hello everyone, i just signed up onto the mailing list, testing. nice to meet you all! JC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org