On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have what appears to be a truly puzzling problem. I've got this P4
32-bit machine running CentOS 5.5 with XEN that has two NICs: one
onboard, an Intel Corporation 82540EM Gigabit and one on an expansion
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flatorder=ASCtopic_id=19571forum=40#forumpost73378
Looks like there is a whole special repo for this sort of drivers. Has
anybody used it? How is it?
Elrepo is
On 10/13/2010 09:28 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
What's happening is, it is showing up under one of the two MAC's:
either 00:0a:cd:1a:c1:71 or 00:00:00:00:c1:71. If you reboot it the
MAC stays the same; if you shutdown and do a full powerdown it seems
to change.
I would say the card is
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Benjamin Franz jfr...@freerun.com wrote:
On 10/13/2010 09:28 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
What's happening is, it is showing up under one of the two MAC's:
either 00:0a:cd:1a:c1:71 or 00:00:00:00:c1:71. If you reboot it the
MAC stays the same; if you shutdown and
On 13/10/2010 18:37, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Benjamin Franzjfr...@freerun.com wrote:
On 10/13/2010 09:28 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
What's happening is, it is showing up under one of the two MAC's:
either 00:0a:cd:1a:c1:71 or 00:00:00:00:c1:71. If you reboot it
On 10/13/2010 06:46 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
On 13/10/2010 18:37, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Benjamin Franzjfr...@freerun.com wrote:
On 10/13/2010 09:28 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
What's happening is, it is showing up under one of the two MAC's:
either
On 13/10/2010 19:00, Timo Schoeler wrote:
On 10/13/2010 06:46 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
I've tended to find that when a card is failing the MAC address starts
setting itself to FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF not 00:00:00:XX:XX:XX
FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF is broadcast.
Sorry... in order to qualify my statement
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
I just tried a full powerdown with NTP deactivated. The
system came up, the time is fine.
Not that the time on the motherboard should necessarily
affect the MAC on an expansion card, but that was a good test
2010/10/13 Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
I just tried a full powerdown with NTP deactivated. The
system came up, the time is fine.
Not that the time on the motherboard should necessarily
affect the MAC
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2010/10/13 Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
I just tried a full powerdown with NTP deactivated. The
system came up, the time is
2010/10/13 Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2010/10/13 Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
I just tried a full powerdown with NTP
Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/10/13 Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
2010/10/13 Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
snip
I'm
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:28:27PM -0400, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hi all,
...
Any idea what all of this mess could mean?
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4317
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B
On 10/13/2010 1:55 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
I just tried a full powerdown with NTP deactivated. The
system came up, the time is fine.
Not that the time on the motherboard should necessarily
affect the MAC on an expansion card, but that was a good test
nonetheless.
I'm suspicious (as
On 10/13/2010 1:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
But the ifcfg-ethX scripts don't run if the HWADDR entry doesn't match
the NIC MAC. How do you get the right name connected to the right nic
so you can even run ifconfig sensibly?
You don't *have* to use HWADDR in the ifcfg-* file. Just comment it
On 10/13/2010 3:16 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
On 10/13/2010 1:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
But the ifcfg-ethX scripts don't run if the HWADDR entry doesn't match
the NIC MAC. How do you get the right name connected to the right nic
so you can even run ifconfig sensibly?
You don't *have* to use
16 matches
Mail list logo
