I tought of that, and I will be needing something like this, since I have
some services that need to be restarted in the event of them dying or being
killed.
But I'm not that much confortable scripting a modification of the initab to
activate / deactivate services on a server-by-server
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:39:15PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 11/11/2010 03:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
put the job in a loop like...
while true; do
your stuff
sleep 60
done;
Sure, but you also need to start the loop and make sure it doesn't die.
From: Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca
while true; do
your stuff
sleep 60
done;
Sure, but you also need to start the loop and make sure it doesn't die.
Put in /etc/inittab
ms:2345:respawn:/path/to/my/loop_script
(where ms is
On another note, on the same subject (xServes being disontinued), one
feature we use heavily on our os-x server is the ability to load / unload
periodic jobs with launchd.
With it we're able to schedule jobs let's say every 5 minutes, and so on.
One could say I could do something like */5 * *
On 11/11/2010 2:32 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
On another note, on the same subject (xServes being disontinued), one
feature we use heavily on our os-x server is the ability to load / unload
periodic jobs with launchd.
With it we're able to schedule jobs let's say every 5 minutes, and so on.
One
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010, Nicolas Ross wrote:
On another note, on the same subject (xServes being disontinued), one
feature we use heavily on our os-x server is the ability to load / unload
periodic jobs with launchd.
With it we're able to schedule jobs let's say every 5 minutes, and so on.
One
On 11/11/10 12:32 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
We even have a job that is scheduled to run every 60 seconds, but can take 2
hours to complete.
Is there any scheduler under linux that approch this ?
don't even really need a scheduler for that.
put the job in a loop like...
while true; do
On 11/11/2010 03:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
put the job in a loop like...
while true; do
your stuff
sleep 60
done;
Sure, but you also need to start the loop and make sure it doesn't die.
You could use a script like this to repeat a script and then wait:
Sure, but you also need to start the loop and make sure it doesn't die.
You could use a script like this to repeat a script and then wait:
---
#!/bin/sh
delay=$1
shift
$...@}
at now + $delay EOF
$0 $delay $...@}
EOF
---
Run repeat.sh 5m /path/to/whatever -args. The script
On 11/8/10 6:29 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Did you look at Nexentastor for this? You might need the commercial
version for
a fail-over set but I think the basic version is free up to a fairly large
size.
12T, IIRC.
That's not exactly great IMO.
You get that with a RAID10 over two
On 11/09/2010 12:13 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion of
your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
Good point Joshua,
I was reading this thread and wondering how come no one brought up the
fact that you
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 11/09/2010 12:13 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion of
your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
Good point Joshua,
I was
On 11/09/2010 12:13 PM, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion
of
your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
Good point Joshua,
I was reading this thread and wondering how come no one brought up the
fact that
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 at 9:36pm, Nicolas Ross wrote
Thanks for the suggestions (others also), but I don't beleivee it'll do. We
need to be able to access the file system directly via FC so we can lock
files across systems. Pretty much like xSan, but not on apple. xSan is
really StorNext from
On 11/09/2010 12:40 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
I was reading this thread and wondering how come no one brought up the
fact that you can achieve the entire desired feature set just using the
components already included in CentOS-5.
But there is no GFS for OSX, IIRC.
The last comment
KB, I think the OP is looking for a nice set of userland tools which
was included in xServer
Pretty much.
Since we were about to purchase about 8 new xserve to build a new xSan on
top of an active raid 16 1 tb disk enclosure as our new production
environement, we are exploring other
On 11/9/10 2:53 AM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Did you look at Nexentastor for this? You might need the commercial
version for
a fail-over set but I think the basic version is free up to a fairly
large
size.
12T, IIRC.
That's not exactly great IMO.
You get that with a RAID10 over
On 11/9/10 2:53 AM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Did you look at Nexentastor for this? You might need the commercial
version for
a fail-over set but I think the basic version is free up to a fairly large
size.
12T, IIRC.
That's not exactly great IMO.
You get that with a RAID10 over two
Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion of
your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
I've spent better part of the last day to read documentation on gfs2 on
redhat's site.
My god, that's pretty much what I'm looking for... To the point that
On 11/09/2010 08:32 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
The documentation is very technichal, I'm ok with that, but it seems to miss
some starting point. For instance, there's a part about the required number
of journal to create and the size of those. But I cannot find suggested size
or any thumb-rule
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 15:32 -0500, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion of
your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
I've spent better part of the last day to read documentation on gfs2 on
redhat's site.
My
On 11/9/2010 2:32 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Have you looked at Red Hat's GFS? That seems to fit at least a portion of
your needs (I don't use it, so I don't know all that it does).
I've spent better part of the last day to read documentation on gfs2 on
redhat's site.
My god, that's pretty
Cost is per TB. Would kill me here when one user occupies 150TB just
themselves.
- Original Message -
| On 11/8/10 6:29 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
|
| I have a solution that is currently centered around commodity
| storage bricks (Dell R510), flash PCI-E controllers, 1 or 10GbE (on
The linux-cluster mailing list is super friendly, has both developers
and consumers of the entire RHCS associated packages - and CentOS
friendly :) I seriously recommend anyone looking to do any sort of work
with this toolchain should be on that list.
Thanks, I'll surely make a visit
The linux-cluster mailing list is super friendly, has both developers
and consumers of the entire RHCS associated packages - and CentOS
friendly :) I seriously recommend anyone looking to do any sort of work
with this toolchain should be on that list.
Thanks, I'll surely make a visit there.
On 11/07/2010 03:33 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Is there any other solution for building a SAN under linux ?
None of my customers use a SAN right now. I have some friends who speak
pretty highly of their Dell SAN gear (re-branded EMC CX300) with Qlogic
HBAs.
Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill?
http://freenas.org/features
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 11/07/2010 03:33 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Is there any other solution for building a SAN under linux ?
None of my customers use a
On 11/09/2010 12:58 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill?
http://freenas.org/features
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Gordon Messmeryiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 11/07/2010 03:33 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Is there any other solution for building a SAN
On 11/08/2010 04:06 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 11/09/2010 12:58 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill?
http://freenas.org/features
How about openfiler: http://www.openfiler.com/
I don't believe either of those support exporting volumes over Fibre
Channel. You could do
- Original Message -
| On 11/09/2010 12:58 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
| Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill?
|
| http://freenas.org/features
|
|
| Sent from my iPhone
|
| On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Gordon Messmeryiny...@eburg.com wrote:
|
| On 11/07/2010 03:33 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
On 11/08/10 4:29 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
You then need a method for dealing with the high availability aspect. You
need to be able to fence the storage while a fail-over is taking place. You
need to (maybe) move MAC addresses and other storage IP bits. This is the
hard part! Getting
On 11/8/10 6:29 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
I have a solution that is currently centered around commodity storage bricks
(Dell R510), flash PCI-E controllers, 1 or 10GbE (on separate Jumbo Frame
Data Tier) and Solaris + ZFS.
So far it has worked out really well. Each R510 is a box with a
Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill?
http://freenas.org/features
Thanks for the suggestions (others also), but I don't beleivee it'll do. We
need to be able to access the file system directly via FC so we can lock
files across systems. Pretty much like xSan, but not on apple. xSan is
really
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote:
Perhaps FreeNAS would fit the bill?
http://freenas.org/features
Thanks for the suggestions (others also), but I don't beleivee it'll do. We
need to be able to access the file system directly via FC so we can lock
Thanks,
On 11/05/2010 04:34 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Now with this said, I am searching for documentation on operating a SAN
under linux. We are looking at Quantum StorNext FS2 product for the SAN
itselft.
I'm not sure how much help you'll get from the community. StorNext is a
On 11/07/10 3:33 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Thanks,
On 11/05/2010 04:34 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Now with this said, I am searching for documentation on operating a SAN
under linux. We are looking at Quantum StorNext FS2 product for the SAN
itselft.
I'm not sure how much help you'll get from
Nicolas Ross wrote:
Thanks,
On 11/05/2010 04:34 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Now with this said, I am searching for documentation on operating a SAN
under linux. We are looking at Quantum StorNext FS2 product for the SAN
itselft.
I'm not sure how much help you'll get from the community. StorNext
On Nov 5, 2010, at 7:34 PM, Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote:
Hi !
As some of you might know, Apple has discontinued it's xServes server as of
january 31st 2011.
We have a server rack with 12 xserves ranging from dual G5's to dual
quand-core xeon lastest generation, 3
On 11/05/2010 04:34 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
Now with this said, I am searching for documentation on operating a SAN
under linux. We are looking at Quantum StorNext FS2 product for the SAN
itselft.
I'm not sure how much help you'll get from the community. StorNext is a
proprietary product
39 matches
Mail list logo
