iptables will process rules until a match. If the match is -j
ACCEPT/REJECT/DROP, it will end processing there. If it's -j
another_chain, it will jump to the other chain. If it matches a rule
in the other chain with -j ACCEPT/REJECT/DROP, it will stop processing
there. Otherwise, if no rules in
On 5/24/08, Dennis McLeod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should really look into the Samba Mailing list..
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Following your thread, you likely need to add the server to the hosts and
lmhosts files on your XP boxes, as was already mentioned
On Saturday 24 May 2008 10:25:41 Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2008 21:31, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Actually I have written a small tutorial on iptables, but I haven't
translated it into english. I'll let you know when it's done. Hopefully
it will be useful for others.
Please have
On Saturday 24 May 2008 12:05:30 Fred Noz wrote:
Responding to a question posted earlier this month, Centos 5.1 includes
configuration files for enabling the read-only root filesystem.
Actually, all filesystems can be mounted read-only with particular files
and directories mounted on a
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Saturday 24 May 2008 10:25:41 Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 23 May 2008 21:31, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Actually I have written a small tutorial on iptables, but I haven't
translated it into english. I'll let you know when it's done. Hopefully
it will be useful for
On Saturday 24 May 2008 15:57:51 Ned Slider wrote:
There is already an iptables tutorial on the Wiki:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/IPTables
Rather than reinventing the wheel, perhaps you would like to take a look
at that and consider contributing and/or helping to improve it if you
Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-22-2008 9:58 PM Bahadir Kiziltan spake the following:
You need at least 6 drives for RAID5. I don't know if Perc 4e/Di
allows configuring the RAID5.
Where did you get this bit of information? You can create a raid 5
with 3 or more disks.
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
I'm not a fan of RAID 5 at all since it can only tolerate one failure at
all. Go with raid 10 or something like that which is able to handle
more than one failure. Intermittent, uncorrectable sector failures
during rebuilds are becoming an increasing problem with today's drives.
Rudi Ahlers
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Dennis McLeod wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David chong
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 3:21 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] samba question
Hi,
I am running Centos5.1, trying to configure
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 19:58 -0700, Mark Pryor wrote:
--- Juan C. Valido [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a small annoying problem with Ati video
driver, when Centos 5.1
starts and gets to the login screen the resolution
is too high for my
monitor (better than out of range) and it's
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Joseph L. Casale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Appreciate the help, but I think I am still unsure of that last point.
If the default policy for INPUT is DROP, and a rule allowing traffic
is not matched, once it gets to the end it performs the default policy
action
On Friday 23 May 2008 11:03, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thursday 22 May 2008 22:30:29 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have a dual homed server in an install for someone who is very cost
sensitive. This server originally is being setup as an Asterisk server,
but now the simplest thing for me to
after this latest centos 5 kernel update, i am seeing 40 second delays on
automount points. nothing in the rpm changelog looks obviously related to
autofs and the autofs module seems to be the same as the previous kernel.
i'm starting to do some strace'ing and other debugging, but nothing has
On Sat, May 24, 2008 12:47 pm, Joe Pruett wrote:
after this latest centos 5 kernel update, i am seeing 40 second delays on
automount points. nothing in the rpm changelog looks obviously related to
autofs and the autofs module seems to be the same as the previous kernel.
i'm starting to do
- Original message -
From: Joe Pruett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 09:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [CentOS] 40 second delay on automounts with 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5
kernel
after this latest centos 5 kernel update, i am seeing 40 second delays
on
automount
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Guy Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, i respect Open Source (and your opinion) very much but your comparison
imply that you had access to Adaptec's code! Maybe you really had access, i
don't know. If it's the case, then thanks you for having shared this
My main system is a CentOS 5.1 64-bit desktop with gobs of disk and a
couple of printers attached that work just fine. I have it set up
with samba so my VMWare guest Windows XP can access most of the files
and the printers.
But, when I try to connect to the printers from a remote machine that
On Sat, 24 May 2008, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
What type(s) of filesystems are you experiencing this with? I am seeing
no additional delays with CIFS filesystems after the upgrade.
for nfs mounts. i am using a centos 4 nfs server, but from running strace
and enabling -d for automount, the
I have an external USB drive, and when mounted, it was /media/usbdisk.
When I recently tried my rsync backup, a usbdisk1 had been created...I
guess by the auto-mounting (when the disk is turned on).
Is there a way to remove the usbdisk1 and set it up so that the
auto-mounting will use
I'm going to have to resize a partition (shrink it) to make room for
more swap space. This is actually not too big of a deal, since we're
not talking about a system partition (/, /var, /usr, etc), but one
where an application resides. So I won't even have to go to rescue
mode to do this. I can
I'm going to have to resize a partition (shrink it) to make room for
more swap space. This is actually not too big of a deal, since we're
not talking about a system partition (/, /var, /usr, etc), but one
where an application resides. So I won't even have to go to rescue
mode to do this. I can
Dag Wieers wrote:
I guess the default really should be text search for most users.
If I can make the mistake anyone can, right ? :)
Agreed.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 12:19:11PM +0900, TAIRA Hajime wrote:
Thanks.
I think this step should be a bit more verbose, telling people to
replace 'sda' with the actual disk device.
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/ReinstallGRUB
I added verbose information about disk device. Please
24 matches
Mail list logo
