Good Morning,
I want to update my CF-Microdrive for my router with CentOS (currently
there is Slacky on it). I have attached the microdrive to my notebook
using a pcmcia CF adapter. Within my CentOS installation the drive is
detected correctly as ide_cf and all partitions are shown.
But as the
David Lemcoe wrote on Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:12:33 -0400:
So wait, how do I fix my Blackberry for mailing lists? Does this
method work? I'm using the GMAIL app for Blackberry.
Yes, this message contains in-reply-to/references. The others did not.
Which means that there is no threading available
Tariq Ismail Dalvi wrote:
Hello everyone
I am using CentOS 5.2 and facing a browsing problem I had complete
system update of 71 applications recently and after the update
completed my system can receive emails but cannot send and cannot
browse get error domain not found, besides ftping is
David M Lemcoe Jr. wrote:
Let me clarify. When I install the web server packages on a Cent install.
You have to do that yourself. You know, do what a sysadmin does? :-)
Glenn
--Original Message--
From: Brian Mathis
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: CentOS Mailing list
Craig White wrote:
doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant
thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS
http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5
That mostly looks to be a waste of time to me, specially given that Red
Hat
From: Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com
Someone did a great job on the new graphic, but it is just not for me...
Same here.
New graphic looks nice but, for me, the high contrast on the right side
makes
the separation between (light) windows and a (dark) desktop less clear...
No body
David Lemcoe wrote:
So wait, how do I fix my Blackberry for mailing lists? Does this
method work? I'm using the GMAIL app for Blackberry.
as Kai already pointed out - it has the in-reply-to headers, so thats
one issue fixed. Would still be nice if you could trim your posts.
- KB
Dnk wrote:
Please reply off list as this is ot from CentOS.
... so you should use the [OT] tag in the subject line
- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Tariq Ismail Dalvi tariqda...@gmail.com
I am using CentOS 5.2 and facing a browsing problem I had complete
system update of 71 applications recently and after the update
completed my system can receive emails but cannot send and cannot
browse get error domain not found, besides ftping
After taking forever to update lists, it worked just fine :) thanks!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:56:54
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Issues with vsftpd install
Scott Silva wrote:
on 4-6-2009 6:50 AM John Doe spake the following:
Someone did a great job on the new graphic, but it is just not for me...
Same here.
New graphic looks nice but, for me, the high contrast on the right side
makes the separation between (light) windows and a
So now I know to use the GMail app for Blackberry. Nice to know.
On 4/8/09, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
David Lemcoe wrote:
So wait, how do I fix my Blackberry for mailing lists? Does this
method work? I'm using the GMAIL app for Blackberry.
as Kai already pointed out - it
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 01:43 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:30:44 -0500:
According to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg .. the file that actually gets updated on
x86
and x86_64 systems is /boot/grub/grub.conf
And as I already mentioned in my first posting this
I have heard rumours from some Red Hat employees that IPA will be
integrated into Spacewalk this was about 1.5 months ago which would
also make sense since Spacewalk is supposed to be their single point
of management tool.
But as I said it's rumours.
Regards
Per Qvindesland
--- Original message
Marcus Moeller wrote:
But as the installer does not ship the necessary modules for a pcmcia
ide installation i am searching for a way to either add these, or to
prepare the device from my box within a chroot environment.
What drivers / modules are these ?
- KB
David Lemcoe wrote:
When I went yum install vsftpd.i386, I get this:
TypeError: unsubscriptable object
From what I can see, this looks like an error with Python 2.4, but I don't
know what to do
Any help?
Run yum clean metadata and try again.
Ralph
pgpZAvzOQUJfE.pgp
Description: PGP
Marcus Moeller wrote:
Good Morning,
I want to update my CF-Microdrive for my router with CentOS (currently
there is Slacky on it). I have attached the microdrive to my notebook
using a pcmcia CF adapter. Within my CentOS installation the drive is
detected correctly as ide_cf and all
Blake Hudson wrote:
Google indicates Requested Range Not Satisfiable is actually an HTTP
error (not specific to yum). The description of the error indicates that
my browser (yum) requested a segment of the file that does not exist...
e.g, bytes 10-1000 of a 100 byte file. I'm thinking that
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 13:26 +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Craig White wrote:
doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant
thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS
http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5
which I'm not
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:24 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Craig White wrote:
doing some googling, this seems to be about the most current/relevant
thing I have found wrt to running freeipa server on CentOS
http://howtoforge.com/how-to-build-rhel-ipa-rpms-for-centos-5
That mostly
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Craig White schrieb:
Sure but that's not typically the realm I play in. My typical client is
50 users and having a server just for authentication is harder to
justfiy.
In that case, shelling out the 7-something grand
Hi,
I'm just wondering when centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.src.rpm will be
pushed out to the mirrors as it is currently missing.
Thanks,
Jeff
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Jeff Fisher wrote:
Hi,
I'm just wondering when centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.src.rpm will be
pushed out to the mirrors as it is currently missing.
Thanks,
Jeff
SRPMs are syncing to mirrors and some packages are still missing (for
example anaconda) ... they'll land on the mirrors very
Hi,
I have an HP MSA 2000i as SAN (iSCSI) and since I'm starting with SANs,
I'm seeking for advice. We are currently using HP Proliant 380 G5 + MSA
70 (SAS, direct-attached storage) for our production servers.
At first, I thought I'd be using the SAN only for non-critical
I tried it a year or so ago and had some luck building version 3.6, but was
having issues with the web admin bombing out trying to administer users.
What I remember from then was I pulled in a bit of the mono stuff from
fedora, pulling in dependencies as I found them from fedora or openSUSE (if
Doh,
I could not find the source code on the www.ifolder.com website for the
current version ... the only place I could find recent source code was the
opensuse build factory.
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dl9pf/openSUSE_10.3/src/
Anybody have a link to the sources they are
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Craig White schrieb:
Sure but that's not typically the realm I play in. My typical client is
50 users and having a server just for authentication is harder to
justfiy.
In that case, shelling
William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:01:43 -0400:
Hmmm... Maybe the *64 systems are different?
No, they are the same in this respect. I'm not seeing any difference.
There is a difference between systems (no matter which arch) when the
/etc/grub.conf symlink got created.
On all my
Dear Glenn,
This may be of interest to you: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/ManualInstall
I haven't gotten around to fixing up some of the remarks made by others, but
you should get the general idea.
Thanks for that. I am going to check and maybe fix some of the topics
if it's okay for you.
William L. Maltby wrote on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:39:27 -0400:
The installonlypkgs and installonly_limit keywords. The first, according
to man yum.conf, defaults to kernel, kernel-smp, kernel-bigmem,
kernel-enterprise, kernel-debug, kernel-unsupported and the latter to 3.
It seems to default to
Have you browsed the LDAP entries in ActiveDirectory to see if they
match similar entries for working windows hosts. Under the computer
entry, look carefully at dnsHostname and servicePrincipalName. For a
server, there are many many entries for these two variables. CIFS/x2,
HOSTx2, LDAPS?/,
I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is
giving me some grief. See errors below.
Googling for Package does not match intended download turns up a bunch
of hits, but none of them (that I've seen) offers any working solution.
Can someone suggest how to overcome the
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:52:27AM -0400, fred smith wrote:
I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is
giving me some grief. See errors below.
Googling for Package does not match intended download turns up a bunch
of hits, but none of them (that I've seen) offers any
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:10:08PM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply!
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:52:27AM -0400, fred smith wrote:
I've updated two 5.2 systems without a hitch. But this third one is
giving me some grief. See errors below.
Googling for Package does not
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
From: fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:37:57 AM
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:10:08PM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote:
Thanks for the
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:47:12AM -0500, Blake Hudson wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
From: fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:37:57 AM
On Wed,
: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090408/a436176a/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:45:16 +0300
From: Pasi Pirhonen u
Rob Kampen wrote:
I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA and
thought At Last something that brings together all the bits for the
little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the ball.
I have tried OpenLDAP and currently have a CentOS-DS running but am
Blake Hudson wrote:
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm:
[Errno -1] Package does not match intended download
Trying other mirror.
Do
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
From: fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:58:28 AM
but since the file appears to download fine, it wouldn't be a case of
Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I
build it it keeps failing here:
Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp
Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function
‘TrueCrypt::SharedPtrTrueCrypt::EncryptionAlgorithm
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 13:11 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA and
thought At Last something that brings together all the bits for the
little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the ball.
I have
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I
] build it it keeps failing here:
]
] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp
] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function
]
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I
] build it it keeps failing here:
]
] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp
] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function
]
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I've been watching the discussion and read the RHEL docs about IPA and
thought At Last something that brings together all the bits for the
little guy. Now it appears the RH is going to drop the ball.
I have tried OpenLDAP and currently have a CentOS-DS running but
Craig White wrote:
All of the networks that I have setup and maintain use LDAP for
authentication (Linux/Macintosh/Windows) and use a Samba PDC/BDC, DNS,
DHCP, etc. and in fact, use the same users $HOME directory regardless of
which OS they log into. I have also adapted automounts for Linux
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:36 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I don't have much interest in SME myself. FreeIPA seemed to have the
whole bundle.
The place where SME becomes interesting is where someone who doesn't
know Linux wants a server for a home or small office
Benjamin Karhan wrote:
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I
] build it it keeps failing here:
]
] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp
] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function
]
Benjamin Karhan wrote:
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
] Has anyone built and installed truecrypt 6.1a on CentOS 5.3. When I
] build it it keeps failing here:
]
] Compiling EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp
] Forms/EncryptionOptionsWizardPage.cpp: In member function
]
Alford, Seth wrote:
I'm looking for the anaconda source rpm. Yes, I know, it's
available from the upstream vendor.
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/12378998/com/anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm.html
this site seems to have it:
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
] thanks again.
] I installed wxWidgets 2.8.10 without apparent incident. I'll check
] around to see if there
] is a problem there.
i recompiled truecypt again (just to make sure it still works fine...
it did)... anyways, just FYI i pass the
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:19:42PM -0500, Blake Hudson wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
From: fred smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:58:28 AM
but
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 4-6-2009 5:55 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
My question is who updates those drivers, as the v173.08 Nvidia drivers are
now almost a year old? Would there be any other good repo with more current
drivers suitable
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM, fred smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
I finally, as someone else suggested, downloaded the desired kernel file
from one of the mirrors, did rpm -uvh on it followed by yum -y update
and it all applied without complaint.
Please do NOT install the
on 4-7-2009 2:16 PM Robert spake the following:
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Barry Brimer wrote on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:29:31 -0500:
/etc/grub.conf should be a symlink to /boot/grub/grub.conf. If for some
reason
it is not,
On Wednesday 08 April 2009, fred smith wrote:
...
Since the error says did not match intended download I'm guessing that
some of the metadata contains the sha1sum (or similar) and the downloaded
file had the wrong sum. I'm further guessing that it may be an error in
the metadata (if that's
Benjamin Karhan wrote:
A little birdy told me that Roger Wells said:
] thanks again.
] I installed wxWidgets 2.8.10 without apparent incident. I'll check
] around to see if there
] is a problem there.
i recompiled truecypt again (just to make sure it still works fine...
it did)...
snip
Has anyone looked at the version of ClarkConnect now in beta? This is
similar to SME but perhaps a more modern approach (and with separate
free/commercial versions...). The blurb claims that the initial setup
provides LDAP authentication for easy expansion. That's something I've
Michael Simpson wrote:
My fiance (who is the artistic one of the family) thinks the new
graphics are beautiful and i agree with her.
Me too! I checked the artwork when it was announced and I liked it
already then. Great work and thanks to all involved!
--
//Morten
Just wondering (I hate asking this, but in case they slipped by) if
there is an ETA on some missing updates (as newer ones are appearing)
including:
firefox-3.0.7-1.el5
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0315.html
thunderbird-2.0.0.21-1.el5 (the latest 5.3 RPM is 2.0.0.18 whereas the
2009/4/1 Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de:
Steve Snyder wrote:
It seems that the mirrors are now all sync'd with the binary RPMs, but
where are the source packages?
The source RPMs are available for the few packages updated since the
upstream 5.3 release, but the SRPMS for the release
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Michael Holmes
holmesm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Not to be Mr. Goody Two Shoes, but isn't that a GPL violation? Seeing
as you can make an RPM from an SRPM but not vice versa, and the source
is what the GPL focuses on.
Please read the first few messages in the
On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:32:36 +0100
Michael Holmes wrote:
Not to be Mr. Goody Two Shoes, but isn't that a GPL violation? Seeing
as you can make an RPM from an SRPM but not vice versa, and the source
is what the GPL focuses on.
I'm not any kind of a legal expert, but I suspect that the concept
Morten Torstensen wrote:
Michael Simpson wrote:
My fiance (who is the artistic one of the family) thinks the new
graphics are beautiful and i agree with her.
Me too! I checked the artwork when it was announced and I liked it
already then. Great work and thanks to all involved!
It
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:20:56PM +0200, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Wednesday 08 April 2009, fred smith wrote:
...
Since the error says did not match intended download I'm guessing that
some of the metadata contains the sha1sum (or similar) and the downloaded
file had the wrong sum. I'm
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:48:39AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:22 AM, fred smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
I finally, as someone else suggested, downloaded the desired kernel file
from one of the mirrors, did rpm -uvh on it followed by yum -y update
and
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote:
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm:
[Errno -1] Package does not match intended download
Trying other
Original Message
Subject: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
From: R P Herrold herr...@centos.org
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 3:58:09 PM
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote:
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
From: Blake Hudson bl...@ispn.net
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 4:12:25 PM
Original Message
Subject: [CentOS] Trouble with 5.2==5.3 upgrade
From:
R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, fred smith wrote:
Downloading Packages:
(1/1): kernel-2.6.18-128. 100% |=| 15 MB05:41
http://centos.mirror.nac.net/5.3/updates/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.i686.rpm:
[Errno -1] Package does not match intended
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Blake Hudson wrote:
Any reason these bad mirrors are not pulled out of the
rotation? I had no idea that a single old mirror would stop
yum in its tracks.
They are. The offending mirror was identified as stale by the
mirrorlist system, and has aged out at this point
I spend some time to create a more 'classic' CentOS theme.
Can we now not just ship that in an artwork update as a second theme for
people to use directly from their machines ?
- KB
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Dear Karan,
I spend some time to create a more 'classic' CentOS theme.
Can we now not just ship that in an artwork update as a second theme for
people to use directly from their machines ?
Have to talk to Ralph as he is responsible for the packaging process.
Best Regards
Marcus
Karanbir Singh wrote:
I spend some time to create a more 'classic' CentOS theme.
Can we now not just ship that in an artwork update as a second theme for
people to use directly from their machines ?
We have to put the backgrounds somewhere else, as the default-* stuff is
already taken by
Dear Ralph,
I spend some time to create a more 'classic' CentOS theme.
Can we now not just ship that in an artwork update as a second theme for
people to use directly from their machines ?
We have to put the backgrounds somewhere else, as the default-* stuff is
already taken by
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0377 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0377.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
92250f129f891e606526191b05dbc8a5
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0377 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0377.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
2972326d07d2fe644a8083cf44186466
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0408 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0408.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
2609a32892ed37fdaad370cc940f28ca
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0408 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0408.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
cc9a6e98408190018ba4cdac98f5def6
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0411 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0411.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
edfafd1c56e5a78029210fb384c8154e
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0352 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0352.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
49f41716f947d27d15f88018b04ae100
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0352 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0352.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
2a59484ca24a755eaa30258d517591eb
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:55 +0200, Arturo Limón wrote:
Me ocurre lo siguiente. Esto, por ejemplo, sale bien:
smbclient -L localhost
Password:
Anonymous login successful
snip
Pero si lo hago lo mismo con root:
smbclient -L localhost -U root%
session setup failed:
Hola a todos.
Estoy experimentando con el montaje de un PDC con LDAP y Samba.
Aparentemente está instalado y los daemos correspondientes corriendo, pero
algo no va bien.
Me ocurre lo siguiente. Esto, por ejemplo, sale bien:
smbclient -L localhost
Password:
Anonymous login successful
Cambié de Debian a CentOS pero resulta que al instalar CentOs 5.1 no
muestra el puntero del mouse.
atte
begin:vcard
fn:John Drummond Aravena
n:Drummond Aravena;John
org:ADM-Planning Consultores;Area Apoyo TI
email;internet:jdrumm...@adm-planning.cl
title:Analista Sistemas Computacionales
Échale un vistazo a este link espero te sirva
http://www.tail-f.com.ar/2008/12/23/sistemas-operativos/gnu-linux/instalar-bind-en-linux.html
El 8 de abril de 2009 7:43, Angel Daniel Martínez
daniel.marti...@maxcom.com escribió:
Buenos días.
Deseo configurar el chroot, para un usario que
Muchas gracias por tu correo BlackHand
Creo que con lo que me cuentas empiezo a aclararme.
Inicialmente, pasé todos los usuarios que había en /etc/passwd a LDAP
mediante los scripts de migración (migrate ...). Supongo que por eso me
aparecen duplicados.
Así pues no sé si es correcto considerar
Mario Villela Larraza escribió:
Échale un vistazo a este link espero te sirva
http://www.tail-f.com.ar/2008/12/23/sistemas-operativos/gnu-linux/instalar-bind-en-linux.html
El 8 de abril de 2009 7:43, Angel Daniel Martínez
daniel.marti...@maxcom.com mailto:daniel.marti...@maxcom.com
Instala CentOS 5.3 en lugar de 5.1. Es muy factible que se resuelva el
problema.
El mié, 08-04-2009 a las 09:23 -0400, John Drummond Aravena
(ADM-Planning) escribió:
Cambié de Debian a CentOS pero resulta que al instalar CentOs 5.1 no
muestra el puntero del mouse.
atte
89 matches
Mail list logo
