Guys,
please I have no luck with this. I have 2 ISPS. I have working
configuration with ip route a 2 routing tables in a way, that matching
local subnet uses second provider while all the others are using the
first one - main.
The main problem I am having is, that I am unable to reach my router
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:22:23 +0100
Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de wrote:
http://www.pfsense.org/
What do you think?
Running in production since 0.9 or so. 1Gbit of traffic, carp failover,
multiple vlans, all kinds of VPN, etc.
I have to think hard to come up
Anyone have experience with this laptop running C5 5.4 32 or 64-bit?
Any known problems/issues?
Thanks.
Scott
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Dear All
I want to add yum to my CentOS 5.2 so I downloaded the rpm package from
the www.pbone.net . But I didn't have success in installing it so please let
me know if there is another way to accomplish this job ?
Thank you in advance
___
CentOS mailing
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:44:16AM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I want to add yum to my CentOS 5.2 so I downloaded the rpm package from
the www.pbone.net . But I didn't have success in installing it so please let
me know if there is another way to accomplish this job ?
Thank you in
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:44:16AM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I want to add yum to my CentOS 5.2 so I downloaded the rpm package from
the www.pbone.net . But I didn't have success in installing it so
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:44:16AM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I want to add yum to my CentOS 5.2 so I downloaded the rpm package from
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:44:16AM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:03 AM, hadi motamedi motamed...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply . But for unknown reasons the yum is not available on
my CentOS .
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# more /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# yum
-bash: yum: command not found
Can
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:44:16AM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I want to add yum to my CentOS 5.2 so I downloaded the rpm package from
the www.pbone.net . But I didn't have success in installing it so please let
me know if there is another way to accomplish this job ?
1)
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Thanks for your reply . But for unknown reasons the yum is not available on
my CentOS .
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# more /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
This is irrelevant. /etc/redhat-release is a text file and
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:23 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Thanks for your reply . But for unknown reasons the yum is not available
on
my CentOS .
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# more /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:31:53PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Please find below :
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-5-2.el5.centos
And you conveniently left out the kernel revision that would
be returned by the second part of the command I gave you,
On Dec 1. the drivers are available on the Supplementary channel
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1624.html
Any chance to get them for CentOS?
Sebastian
2009/10/22 carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 04:14:00PM +0200, Sebastian Marten wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:45 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:31:53PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Please find below :
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-5-2.el5.centos
And you conveniently left out the kernel revision
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:31:53PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Please find below :
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-5-2.el5.centos
And you conveniently left out the kernel revision that would
be returned by the second part of the
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 07:54:06AM -0500, mark wrote:
Wonder if someone was trying to remove yum-updatesd, and got all of yum.
Possibly. But one would need to either use -y or answer
yes at the are you really silly enough to want me to do
this? yum prompt.
On 23/12/09 12:51, Sebastian wrote:
On Dec 1. the drivers are available on the Supplementary channel
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1624.html
Any chance to get them for CentOS?
the official centos policy is to only build freely distributable sources
published from upstream on that
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:52:50PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
Sorry . Here is the complementary data :
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# uname -a
Linux mss-1.iwv 2.6.18-92.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jun 10 18:49:47 EDT 2008 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux
Oh, and before I forget.
Update that box. It's
On Dec 22, 2009, at 10:14 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
Also, for random IO the opposite is true, the rotational latency is
significantly smaller on the inner tracks than the outer tracks, so
random OPs perform better there.
um, most all hard disks are
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:12:16PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org
wrote:
On
If memory serves me correctly I was told CentOS 4.x was based on
Fedora Core 3. So when finding a rpm I always looked for one for
Fedora Core 3 and then it seemed to install ok on CentOS 4. Is CentOS
5 the same way and if so what Core is it based on?
Matt
Matt wrote:
If memory serves me correctly I was told CentOS 4.x was based on
Fedora Core 3. So when finding a rpm I always looked for one for
Fedora Core 3 and then it seemed to install ok on CentOS 4. Is CentOS
5 the same way and if so what Core is it based on?
Matt
If memory serves me correctly I was told CentOS 4.x was based on
Fedora Core 3. So when finding a rpm I always looked for one for
Fedora Core 3 and then it seemed to install ok on CentOS 4. Is CentOS
5 the same way and if so what Core is it based on?
No to both. CentOS 4 was RHEL 4; 5 is
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 09:37 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
snip
I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity
-Ross
That was my thought. However, I think most are missing the boat on this.
I have always looked at the
On Wednesday 23 December 2009 14:51:23 Matt wrote:
If memory serves me correctly I was told CentOS 4.x was based on
Fedora Core 3. So when finding a rpm I always looked for one for
Fedora Core 3 and then it seemed to install ok on CentOS 4. Is CentOS
5 the same way and if so what Core is it
Hello,
Is anyone running a software package called FAI for Fully Automatic
Installation on a CentOS server? I was wondering if there were any
issues to running it?
Thanks.
Dave.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server. I
need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
filesystem do you recommends me to reach maximum performance: xfs, ext3, ext4,
gfs2
??
Thanks.
--
CL Martinez
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Wednesday 23 December 2009 14:51:23 Matt wrote:
If memory serves me correctly I was told CentOS 4.x was based on
Fedora Core 3. So when finding a rpm I always looked for one for
Fedora Core 3 and then it seemed to install ok on CentOS 4. Is CentOS
5 the same way
carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server.
I need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
filesystem do you recommends me to reach maximum performance: xfs, ext3,
ext4, gfs2
??
Am Mittwoch, den 23.12.2009, 16:46 +0100 schrieb David Mehler:
Hello,
Is anyone running a software package called FAI for Fully Automatic
Installation on a CentOS server? I was wondering if there were any
issues to running it?
Thanks.
Dave.
Afiak thats the debian way for automatic installs
Les Mikesell wrote:
carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server.
I need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
filesystem do you recommends me to reach maximum performance: xfs, ext3,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:47 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server. I
need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
filesystem do you recommends me to reach
Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:47 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server.
I need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
filesystem do you
carlopmart wrote:
Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:47 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have installed a centOS 5.4 server to use as a home NAS server.
I need
to use large files (8GB minimum) inside of it to serve via iSCSI services.
Which
On 12/23/2009 07:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity
no, I'm not. most HD's ('green drives' complicate this some) spin at
a constant RPM, so the
Hi all,
Does anybody know where those permissions are controlled? I've looked
in /etc/udev and everywhere else I could think of and thus far I have
seen not a hint...
Thanks in advance for all your help.
Boris.
___
CentOS mailing list
Timo Schoeler wrote:
On 12/23/2009 07:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity
no, I'm not. most HD's ('green drives' complicate this some) spin at
a
With LVMs you'd of course lose the flexibility of file-backed targets
and the ability to do sparse files are you're intending..
dd if=/dev/zero of=iqn.2009-12.com.mydomain:storage.disk01.foo.foo
bs=1 count=0 seek=16G
LVM was my first option and performance it is very very good with iSCSI,
Kwan Lowe wrote:
With LVMs you'd of course lose the flexibility of file-backed targets
and the ability to do sparse files are you're intending..
dd if=/dev/zero of=iqn.2009-12.com.mydomain:storage.disk01.foo.foo
bs=1 count=0 seek=16G
LVM was my first option and performance it is very very
The donation page does not seem up to date:
*Monetary*
CentOS is currently reviewing our cash donation program. If you are
looking to make a cash dontation to the CentOS Project, please check
back here after August 15th, 2009.
I sent an email to the webmaster but did not get a reply. I
On 23/12/09 22:55, Jerry Geis wrote:
The donation page does not seem up to date:
*Monetary*
CentOS is currently reviewing our cash donation program. If you are
looking to make a cash dontation to the CentOS Project, please check
back here after August 15th, 2009.
I sent an email to the
I actually prefer backing up LVMs.. I use the snapshot feature which
means I can backup a live volume. Works well.
But I can't use snapshot feature because under these lvm partitions there are
ZFS,
NTFS and so on filesystems that linux can't access ...
Not sure that I'm understanding.. The
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:50 PM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Kwan Lowe wrote:
I actually prefer backing up LVMs.. I use the snapshot feature which
means I can backup a live volume. Works well.
But I can't use snapshot feature because under these lvm partitions there are
ZFS,
On Dec 23, 2009, at 1:29 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity
no, I'm not. most HD's ('green drives' complicate this some)
spin at
a
CentOS 5.3 has been running fairly good except for a slow ethernet
connection so I thought I would upgrade to CentOS 5.4 to see if that
improved things. I had previously changed fstab and menu.lst to use UUID
instead of LABEL in order to insulate myself from partition label
changes I wanted to
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Edward Diener eldie...@tropicsoft.com wrote:
CentOS 5.3 has been running fairly good except for a slow ethernet
connection so I thought I would upgrade to CentOS 5.4 to see if that
improved things. I had previously changed fstab and menu.lst to use UUID
On 12/23/2009 08:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
On 12/23/2009 07:29 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
I think you might be confusing CAV with CLV of optical drives.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_Angular_Velocity
no, I'm not. most HD's ('green
Timo Schoeler wrote:
But these days, nothing should ever be reading from swap, although you
might write a bit there. If it does, buy some more RAM instead of
worrying about disk performance.
Sure, absolutely no question; *but* in the (ancient) times it was
important, it was 'nice'
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:45 PM, fred smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.uswrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:12:16PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:03:58PM +, hadi motamedi wrote:
On
hadi motamedi wrote:
...
package yum-arch-2.2.2-2.el5.kb is already installed
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# whereis yum
yum:
[r...@mss-1 tmp]#
try...
# rpm -V yum
if the package is intact, there should be no output (after a few seconds
of thinking), otherwise it will list anything thats
I tried for the other engaged rpm packages one-by-one . But at last , only
the following one remained as unresolved :
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -Uvh yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
warning: yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm: Header V3 DSA
signature: NOKEY, key ID
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org wrote:
I tried for the other engaged rpm packages one-by-one . But at last ,
only
the following one remained as unresolved :
[r...@mss-1 tmp]# rpm -Uvh
yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
warning:
2009/12/22 Milos Blazevic milos.blaze...@sbb.rs:
OK then, I'll take your sillence as an approval of the manual and remove
the DRAFT tag and move it to *Making Wireless work on your laptop (or
desktop)
*So if anyone has any final suggestions or comments I'd be happy to hear
it before this
OK then, I'll take your sillence as an approval of the manual and remove
the DRAFT tag and move it to *Making Wireless work on your laptop (or
desktop)
*So if anyone has any final suggestions or comments I'd be happy to hear
it before this goes official.
Sorry, for not testing sooner.
I
2009/12/22 Rolando Arteaga Lamar roly08...@cha.jovenclub.cu:
Hola listeros, necesito implementar este script en mi trabajo. Este
script
es para cambiar la contraseña via web al servidor squid. Yo compilo el
programa, pero cuando trato de instalarlo me da un error es el
siquiente.
Gustavo Riego wrote:
Necesito saber por favor como compartir una carpeta en centos con winxp
O sea te refieres compartir un DIRECTORIO en CentOS para que un Windows
XP lo pueda leer??
uno tiene que hacer preguntas bien hechas... o al menos bien redactadas.
Un buen manual para esto aqui:
Saludos:
Tengo un problema con xen, lo que pasa es que tengo servidores
paravirtualizados dentro de un servidor HP PRoliant ML350 tiene 3 GB de memoria
estos servidores estan por lo menos como 3 meses sin apagar(me refiero a los
paravirtualizados especificamente) pero cuando los reinicio
Saludos:
Tengo un problema con xen, lo que pasa es que tengo servidores
paravirtualizados dentro de un servidor HP PRoliant ML350 tiene 3 GB de memoria
estos servidores estan por lo menos como 3 meses sin apagar(me refiero a los
paravirtualizados especificamente) pero cuando los reinicio se
59 matches
Mail list logo
