On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Sameer Oak sam...@gmail.com wrote:
I've HP 520 laptop. I installed CentOS 5.5 a few days back. The laptop has
some weird placing of touchpad that is frustrating me while typing.
Please advise me how to disable touchpad on CentOS 5.5.
--
Regards,
- samoak.
Are you using lvm on top of the mdraid?
If so you need to fsck the lvs not the mds.
No lvm's.
I can boot the raid system, and
cat /proc/mdstat
shows clean arrays.
The automatic fsck reported problems a while ago, and corrected them.
When I now try to run certain rsync script, I get
Jussi Hirvi schrieb:
Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
everything. But I cannot.
The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
/, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount
On 07/22/2010 10:38 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
...
I still don't know why fsck from the rescue dvd does not work.
You could try to let the rescue dvd mount the partitions.
Then you can umount them and fsck.
I don't think that the rescue disk assembles the RAID partitions
unless they are going to
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone would know the cons of running a PAE kernel...?
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those exta 700MB...
In the past, I heard that these 700MB were normally reserved for bios or
chipset
stuff...
And that running in PAE would
I'm still exploring options for a similar situation and at the moment
gluster seems to fit the requirements.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: camun camun.i...@gmail.com
after several days of searching, I have not found a definitive answer to the
problem samba Migrating from 3.0.x to 3.3.x. (Migrating from 3.0.x to 3.3.x
Can
Fail to Update passdb.tdb Correctly (bug # 6195) .
passdb.tdb break occurs in the file where the new
On Thursday 22 July 2010, John Doe wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone would know the cons of running a PAE kernel...?
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those exta 700MB...
In the past, I heard that these 700MB were normally reserved for bios or
Is there an xguest package for CentOS? I've been googling, but haven't
found one yet.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 10:13 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Is there an xguest package for CentOS? I've been googling, but haven't
found one yet.
mark
---
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/xguest/xguest.spec
John
Roll your own? Rebuild Fedora One?
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 10:30 -0400, JohnS wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 10:13 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Is there an xguest package for CentOS? I've been googling, but haven't
found one yet.
mark
---
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/xguest/xguest.spec
John
Roll
Yes!
I posted on the samba list and found that there is a patch for version
3.3. However,
the patch must be applied in the / source then be compiled. The
procedure and did not get the expected result. Do the developers forgot to
apply this patch to versions rpms??
2010/7/22 John Doe
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 07/21/2010 08:30 AM, Ski Dawg wrote:
OK, my question from all of this is what is the difference between
0600 and 0700 for a directory that is owned by root?
For a directory, there's effectively no difference because
Hey
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:07 PM, camun camun.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes!
I posted on the samba list and found that there is a patch for version
3.3. However, the patch must be applied in the / source then be
compiled. The procedure and did not get the expected result. Do the
On 7/22/2010 11:07 AM, camun wrote:
Yes!
I posted on the samba list and found that there is a patch for version
3.3. However, the patch must be applied in the / source then be
compiled. The procedure and did not get the expected result. Do the
developers forgot to apply this patch to
On 7/22/2010 3:25 AM, John Doe wrote:
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those exta 700MB...
Very few programs can use PAE to get at that extra RAM. Can the
programs you run do this?
Is your CPU 64-bit capable? That's generally a better idea than
I have an HP Server w/ a Smart Array controller I need to test. I always
used to use Inquisitor for this, but the hd tests are flaking out on the
cciss syntax and I don't have time to dig into it, the machine is essential
and I need to know whats needing to be replaced asap.
Anyone know a live cd
But it would allow other usages of that RAM. cache. Other programs with great
memory usage.
Of course, as mentioned earlier, you would have to test with your workload
whether the extra overhead is more than made up with the extra memory
availability.
On Jul 22, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Warren
I have an HP Server w/ a Smart Array controller I need to test. I always
used to use Inquisitor for this, but the hd tests are flaking out on the
cciss syntax and I don't have time to dig into it, the machine is essential
and I need to know whats needing to be replaced asap.
Anyone know a live cd
On 22/07/2010 19:07, Warren Young wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:25 AM, John Doe wrote:
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those exta 700MB...
Very few programs can use PAE to get at that extra RAM. Can the
programs you run do this?
What is a program
What is a program supposed to do to get at that extra RAM then ?
Just curious ;-)
AFAIK, it must be specifically compiled for it...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi all,
Not sure how to start but I have an automount map tripping as soon as
automount starts.
I've no services that use that mount point and am baffeled as to why
its mounted.
When I remove the map entry fro that mount point, I get complaints in /
var/log/messages from automount about
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:58 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What is a program supposed to do to get at that extra RAM then ?
Just curious ;-)
AFAIK, it must be specifically compiled for it...
---
A PAE enabled Kernel:
NO. It is dependent on the mmap() call in the program as in how the
JD,
On 22/07/10 10:25, John Doe wrote:
I was wondering if anyone would know the cons of running a PAE kernel...?
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those exta 700MB...
You should use 64 bit if possible but if you're seeing 3.2GB, it's more
likely that
On 22/07/10 18:07, Warren Young wrote:
Very few programs can use PAE to get at that extra RAM. Can the
programs you run do this?
With PAE you can utilize all of the extra RAM but each individual
program will be limited to 3GB user space, you can fit a more of them
into 16GB, still using 32
On 22/07/2010 19:58, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What is a program supposed to do to get at that extra RAM then ?
Just curious ;-)
AFAIK, it must be specifically compiled for it...
I always thought PAE is quite transparent thing for user programs. PAE
is a hardware feature and hardware
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Markus Falb wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: Markus Falb markus.f...@fasel.at
Subject: Re: [CentOS] To PAE or not to PAE...
On 22/07/2010 19:07, Warren Young wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:25 AM, John Doe wrote:
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 19:43 +0100, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
On 22/07/10 18:07, Warren Young wrote:
Very few programs can use PAE to get at that extra RAM. Can the
programs you run do this?
With PAE you can utilize all of the extra RAM but each individual
program will be limited to 3GB user
I was wondering if anyone would know the cons of running a PAE kernel...?
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those exta 700MB...
You should use 64 bit if possible but if you're seeing 3.2GB, it's more
likely that your motherboard is not capable (I have
On 7/22/2010 1:50 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
On 22/07/2010 19:58, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What is a program supposed to do to get at that extra RAM then ?
Just curious ;-)
AFAIK, it must be specifically compiled for it...
I always thought PAE is quite transparent thing for user programs. PAE
Using Sernet rpms means you should be checking with the Sernet folks. I
believe the problem may be that Centos samba looks for the tdb files in
/var/cache/samba while Sernet looks in /var/lib/samba.
Yeah Toby!
I checked in both .. / Var / lib / samba ... / Var / cache / samba ... I
left
On 22/07/2010 11:25, John Doe wrote:
Hi,
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those exta 700MB...
In the past, I heard that these 700MB were normally reserved for bios or
chipset
stuff...
I installed a 32 bit centos and with the non-pae kernel it
On Tuesday, July 20, 2010 08:08:43 pm Robert Heller wrote:
'Little' Dell PowerEdge servers with plain (non-RAID) SATA disks
appearently work that way too (same BIOS stupidity I guess). Once they
see a disk, they assume it will *always* be there. If you pull the
disk for some reason (disk
On 07/22/2010 02:39 PM Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
JD,
On 22/07/10 10:25, John Doe wrote:
I was wondering if anyone would know the cons of running a PAE kernel...?
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those exta 700MB...
You should use 64 bit if possible but
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:33 -0400, ken wrote:
On 07/22/2010 02:39 PM Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
JD,
On 22/07/10 10:25, John Doe wrote:
I was wondering if anyone would know the cons of running a PAE kernel...?
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those
On 07/22/2010 05:43 PM JohnS wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:33 -0400, ken wrote:
On 07/22/2010 02:39 PM Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
JD,
On 22/07/10 10:25, John Doe wrote:
I was wondering if anyone would know the cons of running a PAE kernel...?
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth
Has anyone successfully built a USB key for installing centos5.5 either
manually or using a tool like unetbootin?
I am trying to create one using the 64bit install DVD iso and so far the
USB either won't boot (unetbootin) or the installation aborts after I
select the iso location on the USB
On Jul 22, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
On 22/07/2010 19:07, Warren Young wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:25 AM, John Doe wrote:
I have a 4GB pc and was wondering if it was worth going the PAE way to gain
those exta 700MB...
Very few programs can use PAE to get at that extra RAM. Can
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 17:55 -0400, ken wrote:
On 07/22/2010 05:43 PM JohnS wrote:
I'm trying to catch up...
Is the 737M cached (in the output above) what is reserved for bios or
chipset...? and what is gained back through remapping?
---
The 737 is for Programs and Applications use and not
On 22/07/10 22:33, ken wrote:
Is the 737M cached (in the output above) what is reserved for bios or
chipset...? and what is gained back through remapping?
Nope, it simply means even if I had 2GB RAM, there'd be plenty I'm not
using for anything but cache - I don't do much on this laptop but
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:09:22PM -0500, David wrote:
Has anyone successfully built a USB key for installing centos5.5 either
manually or using a tool like unetbootin?
Haven't tried it for CentOS, but unetbootin hasn't worked for me for several
other distros. Not once. Not sure why I even
Hi John,
On 22/07/10 19:56, JohnS wrote:
Try about 69Gbytes What are you fiddling with? limits.conf?
I think you read my mail too quickly and wrote a reply in similar speed.
:) So did I read the original post too quickly and didn't realise he was
complaining about the memory hole...
You're
That is discouraging news.
I have been unsuccessful thus far in my attempts to create a USB
installer that doesn't depend on network access, which is one of my
requirements.
On 07/22/2010 05:26 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:09:22PM -0500, David wrote:
Has anyone
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 23:42 +0100, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
Hi John,
On 22/07/10 19:56, JohnS wrote:
Try about 69Gbytes What are you fiddling with? limits.conf?
I think you read my mail too quickly and wrote a reply in similar speed.
:) So did I read the original post too quickly and didn't
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:52:50PM -0500, David wrote:
That is discouraging news.
On the other hand, I've done USB installs of other distros that worked just
fine. But those weren't set up with unetbootin. You could probably get away
with, say, putting System Rescue Disk on a USB key, using that
On Thursday 22 July 2010 13:30:49 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have an HP Server w/ a Smart Array controller I need to test.
Also, don't forget to use the hpacucli tool (in order to get every detail on
the controller and disks. I recently discovered it and it's nice since you
can create scripts
Dear All,
I got a little problem installing rhel 4u7. I have 4 x 146Gb disk on my server.
2 x 146 with raid 1 and 2 x 146 without raid. When I installing rhel
4u7 a got 3 disk /dev/sda, /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc
The problem is, after I finish installing the os, there are another
device appears in
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
I have started to setup an rpmbuild environment but need to read some more
instructions, as when I followed the wiki I got different results - not sure
if this is due
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
The settings tab allows one to change the order of devices. Looking at the
modprobe.conf produced by this procedure yielded the following :-
snip
options snd cards_limit=8
alias snd-card-0 snd-hda-intel
options
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0545 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0545.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
f6bb1b8c71719ff90972c29558a77a8d
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0545 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0545.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
22206860ee24f4a0089dbac080108adb
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0547 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0547.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
693dcb241dbd22c17bb6fd9247acbef5
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0547 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0547.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
9619bbbf9ae0ac9d646984f9e2cce66c
I try to install Slackware 13.1 but fails, process stop on boot process,
nothing
happen when I press ENTER or F2.
I have choose Generic Kernel 2.6.25 or later with virtio.
Please advise how to install Slackware on Xen (CentOS 5.5), or should I choose
another version of Slackware?
hola a todos soy nuevo en la lista
les comento que soy nuevo en esto y tengo un server con centos y los servicios
de squid y oppenfire, me gustaria montar otros servicios para uso corporativo o
empresarial.
Att.Rodrigo Arias Cabrales
Ingeniero de Sistemas
Esp. en Alta Gerencia
Prueba drbl, me perece que te puede ser util.
http://drbl.sourceforge.net/
Simple explicacion
http://blackzigoth.wordpress.com/category/drbl/
Espero te sea de ayuda.
Atte.
Mario Ganga Castro.
2010/7/21 Jeiler Rego Romero jeiler04...@scu.jovenclub.cu
Hola listeros!
Tengo un Cliente Ligero
Muchas gracias por el apoyo, ya he hecho lo indicado ahi pero aun veo
que que se pasa mucho spam, que mas podria revisar??
El 21/07/10 11:31, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez escribió:
On 07/21/2010 11:03 AM, Alejandro Marin Maturano wrote:
Hola amigos alguien sabra de algun documento bueno
On 07/22/2010 09:19 AM, Alejandro Marin Maturano wrote:
Muchas gracias por el apoyo, ya he hecho lo indicado ahi pero aun veo
que que se pasa mucho spam, que mas podria revisar??
baja los scores, yo les bajo a 3.9 el minimo y a 5 el maximo
implementa el milter-greylist
si haces ambos, el
gracias, voy a hacer tus recomendaciones
El 22/07/10 10:04, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez escribió:
On 07/22/2010 09:19 AM, Alejandro Marin Maturano wrote:
Muchas gracias por el apoyo, ya he hecho lo indicado ahi pero aun veo
que que se pasa mucho spam, que mas podria revisar??
baja
A que otro tipo de servicios te refieres?
- Mensaje original
De: Rodrigo Arias Cabrales rodar...@yahoo.com
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Enviado: mié,21 julio, 2010 15:21
Asunto: [CentOS-es] salu2
hola a todos soy nuevo en la lista
les comento que soy nuevo en esto y tengo un server
Aprovechando el tema, estoy trabajando en la configuración de un servidor de
correos, es muy simple la verdad para lo que lo necesita la empresa es para
envió de noticias y news letter.
Entonces, quisiera saber que servicios me serian mas adecuados a mi sistema. No
precisamente para el envió
El 21/07/2010 01:47 p.m., Jeiler Rego Romero escribió:
Hola listeros!
Tengo un Cliente Ligero funcionando sobre Windows, pero quiero
montarlo sobre CentOS.
Me gustaría que me recomendaran con que podría montarlo en CentOS y la
bibliografía.
He intentado hacerlo con 2X ThinClientServer pero no
62 matches
Mail list logo
