[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0715 CentOS 5 x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-ati Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0715
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0715.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
236d22c871a93d27bef49f12e394cb2d xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.6.3-3.27.el5_5.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
7e45d2fabb3c8f46c014afdc39f4b757 xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.6.3-3.27.el5_5.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0715 CentOS 5 i386 xorg-x11-drv-ati Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0715
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0715.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
e84c3e9c215431f4002d177a70e04b68 xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.6.3-3.27.el5_5.1.i386.rpm
Source:
7e45d2fabb3c8f46c014afdc39f4b757 xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.6.3-3.27.el5_5.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0712 CentOS 5 x86_64 perl Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0712
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0712.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
3bed17cb47beee0b411cb95cda8edbe3 perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm
e8a310722df79be050af527862598142 perl-suidperl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
f2f05fcee0cac84f078151062e39d320 perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2010:0712 CentOS 5 i386 perl Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0712
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0712.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7e375cefe264020b716c39ed2d234ae2 perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.i386.rpm
9053936d0b0f171e74dc3ea4597b2816 perl-suidperl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.i386.rpm
Source:
f2f05fcee0cac84f078151062e39d320 perl-5.8.8-32.el5_5.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 mikmod - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720 mikmod security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mikmod-devel-3.1.6-23.el3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update mikmod Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpXq6faenLbh.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 mikmod - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720 mikmod security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-devel-3.1.6-23.el3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update mikmod Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpqXys4OI5YJ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 mikmod - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720 mikmod security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mikmod-devel-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update mikmod Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgplNgctNUw69.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 mikmod - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720 mikmod security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-devel-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update mikmod Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpQBNCJotdV1.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] Pruebas iniciales todo un fracaso
On 09/28/2010 06:14 PM, José Lara wrote: Ernesto, cuando le doy al link que dice como poner los repositorios de dag el link esta roto, puedes mandarme las indicaciones por esta via? ya está corregido el repo en el sitio, revisale de nuevo saludos epe ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] iptables con interfaces virtuales
buenos dias listeros Mi consulta es. Tengo mi firewall trabajando muy bien pero en mi LAN e puesto otra red y la quiero alojar en la misma interface como VIRTUAL para no comprar otra tarjeta. eth0 -- 192.168.2.2/24--- al router eth1 -- 192.168.210.1/24 --- LAN eth1:0 -- 192.168.205.1/24 --- LAN (SE QUIERE AGREGAR) ## REGLAS DE FIREWALL iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -s 195.168.210.1/24 -i eth1 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.210.0/24 -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.210.0/24 -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.210.0/24 -i eth1 -p udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.210.0/24 -i eth1 -j DROP iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.210.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE iptables -A INPUT -s 0/0 -p tcp --dport 1:1024 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -s 0/0 -p udp --dport 1:1024 -j DROP iptables -A INPUT -s 0/0 -p tcp --dport 1 -j DROP ## intente ponerle asi iptables -A INPUT -s 195.168.205.1/24 -i eth1:0 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.205.0/24 -i eth1:0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT pero me salen errores de estas lineas ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] iptables con interfaces virtuales
2010/9/29 Roberto Panta Arcos roberto_pa...@hotmail.com: buenos dias listeros Mi consulta es. Tengo mi firewall trabajando muy bien pero en mi LAN e puesto otra red y la quiero alojar en la misma interface como VIRTUAL para no comprar otra tarjeta. -snip- intente ponerle asi iptables -A INPUT -s 195.168.205.1/24 -i eth1:0 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.205.0/24 -i eth1:0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT pero me salen errores de estas lineas Si eliminas la cláusula -i eth1:0 de las últimas líneas debería quedar funcionando tu política. Fíjate que en algunos lugares aparece 195.168.X.X, me parece que no es la dirección que has elegido (y estaría mal de ser así porque no se trata de una dirección privada). -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] iptables con interfaces virtuales
disculpen... iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.205.1/24 -i eth1:0 -j ACCEPT probe tu consejo ... ya no sale error pero tmabien el forwarder pero no hay conexion si no es mucha molestia ... como deberia estar las reglas para q haya conexion de la lam a la red q va al router?? From: eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:30:50 -0300 To: centos-es@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] iptables con interfaces virtuales 2010/9/29 Roberto Panta Arcos roberto_pa...@hotmail.com: buenos dias listeros Mi consulta es. Tengo mi firewall trabajando muy bien pero en mi LAN e puesto otra red y la quiero alojar en la misma interface como VIRTUAL para no comprar otra tarjeta. -snip- intente ponerle asi iptables -A INPUT -s 195.168.205.1/24 -i eth1:0 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.205.0/24 -i eth1:0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT pero me salen errores de estas lineas Si eliminas la cláusula -i eth1:0 de las últimas líneas debería quedar funcionando tu política. Fíjate que en algunos lugares aparece 195.168.X.X, me parece que no es la dirección que has elegido (y estaría mal de ser así porque no se trata de una dirección privada). -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] iptables con interfaces virtuales
2010/9/29 Roberto Panta Arcos roberto_pa...@hotmail.com: disculpen... iptables -A INPUT -s 192.168.205.1/24 -i eth1:0 -j ACCEPT probe tu consejo ... ya no sale error pero tmabien el forwarder pero no hay conexion si no es mucha molestia ... como deberia estar las reglas para q haya conexion de la lam a la red q va al router?? Disculpa pero no comprendo bien lo que dices. No estoy seguro de cuál es el efecto que estás viendo. El router que mencionas en tu pregunta anterior, es el firewall o te refieres a otro equipo? Calculo que te refieres a otro equipo que te comunica con el resto de Internet, más allá de la eth0 del firewall, y posiblemente a través de la dirección 192.168.2.1. Si esto es así, me parece que lo que te falta es tratar a la interfaz virtual nueva al mismo nivel que la eth1 en las reglas de iptables (por ejemplo, agregando una regla de masquerading para lo que venga por esa interfaz virtual y se dirija al exterior se mapee en postrouting a la dirección 192.168.2.2). El hecho de compartir una interfaz de hardware no le agrega ni le quita nada como interfaz; por lo que a ella respecta puedes olvidarte de que coexiste con eth1 y tienes que tratarla de la misma manera que a la eth1 en iptables, a nivel de rutas, etc. Por el mismo motivo, todos los hosts situados sobre la nueva red 192.168.205.0/24 deberían tener direcciones sobre esa red aunque compartan el cableado con la anterior LAN, y su gateway por defecto debería ser 192.168.205.1. SIn lo cual no podrá salir ningún tráfico de esa LAN. -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Ayuda: Resolución pantalla invaria ble a 800x600
Hola Por más que intento cada vez que uso Centos tengo que ajustar la resolución de mi monitor, se mantiene siempre fija a 800x600. Tengo una tarjeta Nvidia Gforce Serie 700, he actualizado los drivers y nada de nada, no tengo ni la más mínima idea de lo que esta pasando. Me las he apañado guardando una copia del Xorg.conf, editando el que esta mal y reiniciando, pero ya estoy un poco cansado de lo mismo. Cualquier ayuda será bien apreciada Gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] qemu
I can say The qemu from rpmforge.net contains the --curses options but not the one in the centos repo -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Doe Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:04 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] qemu From: mattias m...@mjw.se i have tryed it but qemu says cant load /dev/kqemu or something Again, did you try -curses (and not --curses)...? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Mailman - searchable archive
On 29.9.2010 8.29, cpol...@surewest.net wrote: Hello Jussi, If searching on a local archive on your host consider grepmail. Hei, There should be a web interface - sorry for not saying this before. I am looking for a web app where people can search the archive (which is in mbox format), and the app would return matching emails. The interface should be easy enough for non-geeks. - Jussi -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hi...@greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] qemu
No i can start qemu but no network I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it My start line qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MegaRAID Storage Manager on CentOS 5.5?
Ross Walker wrote: Which version of MSM? Is the Framework service running? I have it running on a headless server and run the GUI from a management station and can log in without a problem. I've worked out what the problem was - I didn't have shadow passwords enabled ... once I'd changed to using shadow passwords, I could log in fine ... There was no mention of shadow passwords being a requirement in the docs. James Pearson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] qemu
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:39 AM, mattias m...@mjw.se wrote: No i can start qemu but no network I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it My start line qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no I have something running along these lines, maybe it can help - There are several things to check up when it comes to qemu networking /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 eth0 /sbin/ifconfig br0 10.0.2.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 up /sbin/route add -net 10.0.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 br0 /sbin/route add default gw 10.0.2.1 br0 /usr/sbin/tunctl -b -u $USER /sbin/ifconfig tap0 up /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 tap0 /sbin/iptables -I RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i br0 -j ACCEPT /usr/bin/qemu -hda $DISK -no-acpi -m 2000 \ -nographic -daemonize \ -net nic,macaddr=52:54:00:11:22:33 \ -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] qemu
I have it work now a ip from my isps dhcp server But verry slow Xen are much faster -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:20 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] qemu On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:39 AM, mattias m...@mjw.se wrote: No i can start qemu but no network I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it My start line qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no I have something running along these lines, maybe it can help - There are several things to check up when it comes to qemu networking /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 eth0 /sbin/ifconfig br0 10.0.2.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 up /sbin/route add -net 10.0.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 br0 /sbin/route add default gw 10.0.2.1 br0 /usr/sbin/tunctl -b -u $USER /sbin/ifconfig tap0 up /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 tap0 /sbin/iptables -I RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i br0 -j ACCEPT /usr/bin/qemu -hda $DISK -no-acpi -m 2000 \ -nographic -daemonize \ -net nic,macaddr=52:54:00:11:22:33 \ -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Mailman - searchable archive
On 9/28/2010 11:30 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: Opinions? Maybe there are better software solutions for this - I hope. On 29.9.2010 3.49, M. Milanuk wrote: markmail.org works pretty well for searching, as does gmane.org... with gmane having the added benefit of providing a bi-directional mail2news gateway so you can read post mailing lists as newsgroups, plus you can browse and post from their web interface. Hm, markmail.org does not seem to work for this, as our mailing list archive is not public. They might accept restricted-access lists, but probably for a fee... I am looking for a free solution. -- Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * Finland Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms) jussi.hi...@greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
Hello all, I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS filesystem as specified in the subject line. The filesystem will be used to store an extremely large number of files (in the tens of millions). Due to its extremely large size, would there be any non-standard XFS build/configuration options I should consider? Thanks. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] logwatch question
LostSon wrote: Yes I did run newaliases and still no joy Mark Van Bogart mark.vanbog...@gmail.com wrote: Did you run 'newaliases' after editing /etc/aliases? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:27 AM, lostson lost...@lostsonsvault.org wrote: Hello A few weeks ago I started having problems with my system email or specifically my logwatch reports showing up in my inbox. I got most of those issues figued out except one now when i get an email from my system it has a title of this Cron r...@localhost run-parts /etc/cron.daily with this message /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch: Recipient names must be specified http://linuxhelp.blogspot.com/2005/06/sendmail-versatile-mail-server.html Look for Check if sendmail is identifying your station's hostname correctly: HTH Mário ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
Hello, I'm using the latest CentOS with phpBB 3.0.x + postgreSQL + sendmail (relayed through gmail.com) - all those programs working fine, with no big modifications of the CentOS defaults (i.e. SELinux is on). Now I'm struggling with the seemingly simple problem, that when I put an .html file into /var/www/html/ then Apache won't serve it. In the browser I see: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /Alex.html on this server. Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) Server at Port 80 In the /var/log/httpd/error_log (I've set LogLevel debug) I only see: [error] [client 10.216.40.68] (13)Permission denied: access to /Alex.html denied [error] [client 10.216.40.68] (13)Permission denied: access to /Alex.html denied The other filetypes like crossdomain.xml and index.php or hello-world.php are served just fine. Also, if I move my *.html files under /var/www/html/test/ - then they are served ok. The permissions are ok in my book: # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php -r--r--r-- 1 rootroot 599 Sep 29 15:49 Alex.html -rw-r--r-- 1 afarber afarber 33 Jul 29 11:32 hello-world.php -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot5631 Jun 27 09:38 index.php # ls -ald / /var /var/www /var/www/html drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 Sep 29 15:54 / drwxr-xr-x 22 root root 4096 Jun 22 15:25 /var drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Sep 29 11:45 /var/www drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 4096 Sep 29 15:59 /var/www/html # cat /var/www/html/.htaccess (installed by phpBB) Files config.php Order Allow,Deny Deny from All /Files Files common.php Order Allow,Deny Deny from All /Files # /usr/sbin/getsebool -a | grep http allow_httpd_anon_write -- off allow_httpd_bugzilla_script_anon_write -- off allow_httpd_cvs_script_anon_write -- off allow_httpd_mod_auth_pam -- off allow_httpd_nagios_script_anon_write -- off allow_httpd_prewikka_script_anon_write -- off allow_httpd_squid_script_anon_write -- off allow_httpd_sys_script_anon_write -- off httpd_builtin_scripting -- on httpd_can_network_connect -- off httpd_can_network_connect_db -- off httpd_can_network_relay -- off httpd_can_sendmail -- on httpd_disable_trans -- off httpd_enable_cgi -- on httpd_enable_ftp_server -- off httpd_enable_homedirs -- on httpd_read_user_content -- off httpd_rotatelogs_disable_trans -- off httpd_ssi_exec -- off httpd_suexec_disable_trans -- off httpd_tty_comm -- on httpd_unified -- on httpd_use_cifs -- off httpd_use_nfs -- off I've looked into /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf and conf.d/ files... Does anybody know what is wrong, how to find out? Regards Alex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
Now I'm struggling with the seemingly simple problem Sometimes simple problems have simple solutions! For example: # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php -r--r--r-- 1 rootroot 599 Sep 29 15:49 Alex.html -rw-r--r-- 1 afarber afarber 33 Jul 29 11:32 hello-world.php -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot5631 Jun 27 09:38 index.php Why is Alex.html only readable and the php files readable *and* writable? Did you try making the php files *only readable* and see what happens? This may not be relevant to the problem, but I have observed in Ubuntu that the apache server by default likes to make files it serves executable. Not sure why, just a simple observation. Hope this helps, Rob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
hi Boris, On 09/29/2010 02:00 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS I dont have any specific hints for you - but when you are done, a page in the centos wiki would be nice to have, with challenges and options you had to work through along with any recommendations! thanks in advance. :) - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
Alexander Farber wrote: Hello, I'm using the latest CentOS with phpBB 3.0.x + postgreSQL + sendmail (relayed through gmail.com) - all those programs working fine, with no big modifications of the CentOS defaults (i.e. SELinux is on). Now I'm struggling with the seemingly simple problem, that when I put an .html file into /var/www/html/ then Apache won't serve it. SNIP I've looked into /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf and conf.d/ files... Does anybody know what is wrong, how to find out? Regards Alex Did you possibly use mv to put the file in that directory? If so, it will not always set the file context properly. You can tell if you will check to see if SELinux is active (run getenforce and see if it returns Enforcing) and use the -Z switch to ls to see the file context of the problem files. If the context is not httpd_sys_content_t or something similar you need to fix the context. Fixing it is easy, just run restorecon: restorecon -rv /var/www/html This will walk down the directory tree and fix up the file contexts, giving you a message about the files it changes. Of course, if it isn't an SELinux problem, this won't help. -- Jay Leafey - jay.lea...@mindless.com Memphis, TN smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html and vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio rob.delvecc...@gmail.com wrote: # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php -r--r--r-- 1 root root 599 Sep 29 15:49 Alex.html -rw-r--r-- 1 afarber afarber 33 Jul 29 11:32 hello-world.php -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5631 Jun 27 09:38 index.php Why is Alex.html only readable and the php files readable *and* writable? Did you try making the php files *only readable* and see what happens? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
Alexander Farber wrote: Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html and vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio rob.delvecc...@gmail.com wrote: # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php -r--r--r-- 1 root root 599 Sep 29 15:49 Alex.html -rw-r--r-- 1 afarber afarber 33 Jul 29 11:32 hello-world.php -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5631 Jun 27 09:38 index.php Why is Alex.html only readable and the php files readable *and* writable? Did you try making the php files *only readable* and see what happens? What's the entry in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf for /var/www/html? You say that this stuff is in /var/www/html/test/ - is apache configured to let it be seen? The error message you give sounds like apache configuration. Oh, right - are you using http, or https? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Transferring system to new drive
On Thursday, September 16, 2010 01:43:19 pm Timothy Murphy wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: When a server simply has to have minimal downtime, LVM is worth its LoC in gold for this use. What do you mean by no downtime? What exactly do you do? Is it documented anywhere? Sorry for the delay; been too busy to read CentOS mailing list. By 'no downtime' I mean moving to a new disk while the system is running. I did this with a Fedora 12 SPARC (beta) system (Sun Enterprise 6500 with 18 CPUs and 20GB of RAM, two diffSCSI channels to a D1000 SCSI storage shelf, six 36GB 10KRPM SCSI drives in each half of the D1000) a while back; the F12 SPARC beta has some real install issues that only work out right when you don't do anything custom. So the root filesystem went to a single drive when I really wanted it on a RAID 6 MD. The procedure I used is documented in the LVM HOWTO ( http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ ), specifically see section 13.5.2. In my case the target physical volume was /dev/md0 which was separately built with mdadm by hand. This won't get /boot; but that's fairly safe to copy while mounted. Essentially you can set up the new disk's partitions, dd over the MBR boot code and the other areas your boot loader needs, copy over everything in /boot to the new boot partition, since /boot can't be on LVM with GRUB 1, then make the new physical volume on the new drive and add it to the volume group that contains your root filesystem. Do note that if you have swap on a logical volume, you have to deactivate it before the pvmove or the kernel will panic. The pvmove from one physical volume to the other uses the power of LVM to make this 'just work' like an EMC Clariion would work when doing LUN migrations between RAID groups. It does take a while, and the system will be slower while pvmove is doing its thing, but the only downtime required will be when you reboot to boot off of the new /boot partition. But pvmove is a MOVE, not a copy, so the data is gone from the source drive when you're done; that can be a downside in some use cases. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote: Hello all, I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS filesystem as specified in the subject line. The filesystem will be used to store an extremely large number of files (in the tens of millions). Due to its extremely large size, would there be any non-standard XFS build/configuration options I should consider? I have created and tested filesystems larger than 25T using xfs on CentOS-5 (64-bit). I did not use any non-standard options. Do not attempt this on a 32-bit box. However, given the size of the device I assume that this is a raid of some sort. You'll want to make sure to run mkfs.xfs with the proper stripe parameters to get the alignment right. Also, you may want to make sure your LVM or partition table is properly aligned. Even with the above done right you may get worse performance than expected since lots of small files typically reads like terrible performance. Finally I'd suggest you fill the filesystem and read it back (verifying what you wrote). This is, imho, a reasonable level of paranoia. /Peter Thanks. Boris. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
Alexander Farber sent a missive on 2010-09-29: Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html and vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio rob.delvecc...@gmail.com wrote: # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php -r--r--r-- 1 root root 599 Sep 29 15:49 Alex.html -rw-r--r-- 1 afarber afarber 33 Jul 29 11:32 hello-world.php -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5631 Jun 27 09:38 index.php Why is Alex.html only readable and the php files readable *and* writable? Did you try making the php files *only readable* and see what happens? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi. Can you show the output of ls -laZ please? This will show the selinux context information for the files - the error is usually to do with the context of the files. Rgds S. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Jay Leafey wrote: Fixing it is easy, just run restorecon: restorecon -rv /var/www/html Is there any received wisdom about when it is more appropriate to use restorecon directly instead of the fixfiles wrapper? I tend to use fixfiles, but I haven't really thought it through. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote: Can you show the output of ls -laZ please? This will show the selinux context information for the files - the error is usually to do with the context of the files. Hello and thanks for your reply. The SELinux stuff is new for me. Yes I have moved that Alex.html from my home dir and (the 1st one fails): # ls -laZ /var/www/html/Alex.html -r--r--r-- root root system_u:object_r:user_home_t/var/www/html/Alex.html # ls -laZ /var/www/html/test/Alex.html -r--r--r-- root root user_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t /var/www/html/test/Alex.html # ls -laZ /var/www/html/index.php -rw-r--r-- root root user_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t /var/www/html/index.php # ls -laZ /var/www/html/hello-world.php -rw-r--r-- afarber afarber user_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t /var/www/html/hello-world.php I'm using http, not https. And /usr/sbin/getenforce prints Enforcing. I didn't know that there were additional attributes for the files. And I don't know how to stop/start SELinux (it is not a service in /etc/init.d, right?) but I'd like to keep SELinux running, since all other programs I've listed seem to cope okay with it. Regards Alex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
At Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:13:14 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Nope this doesn't help. I've tried both 444 and 644 for Alex.html and vice versa: 444 and 644 for the .php and .xml files. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Rob Del Vecchio rob.delvecc...@gmail.com wrote:  # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php -r--r--r-- 1 root   root   599 Sep 29 15:49 Alex.html -rw-r--r-- 1 afarber afarber  33 Jul 29 11:32 hello-world.php -rw-r--r-- 1 root   root   5631 Jun 27 09:38 index.php Why is Alex.html only readable and the php files readable *and* writable?  Did you try making the php files *only readable* and see what happens? What is the mode on the directory? What is the ownership of the directory? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
- Original Message - | On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote: | Hello all, | | I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS | filesystem as specified in the subject line. The filesystem will be | used to | store an extremely large number of files (in the tens of millions). | Due to | its extremely large size, would there be any non-standard XFS | build/configuration options I should consider? | | I have created and tested filesystems larger than 25T using xfs on | CentOS-5 | (64-bit). I did not use any non-standard options. Do not attempt this | on a | 32-bit box. | | However, given the size of the device I assume that this is a raid of | some | sort. You'll want to make sure to run mkfs.xfs with the proper stripe | parameters to get the alignment right. Also, you may want to make sure | your | LVM or partition table is properly aligned. | | Even with the above done right you may get worse performance than | expected | since lots of small files typically reads like terrible | performance. | | Finally I'd suggest you fill the filesystem and read it back | (verifying what | you wrote). This is, imho, a reasonable level of paranoia. | | /Peter | | Thanks. | | Boris. | | ___ | CentOS mailing list | CentOS@centos.org | http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos On my 30+TB file systems all I've done is mkfs.xfs with stripe and width parameters and they are very speedy. I've not done anything on the LVM side and see no performance issues, but perhaps I need to investigate that some more. :\ -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca MSN : subatomic_s...@hotmail.com Does your OS has a man 8 lart? http://www.xinu.nl/unix/humour/asr-manpages/lart.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 67, Issue 9
: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 mikmod -security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 20100929094744.ga15...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720 mikmod security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mikmod-devel-3.1.6-23.el3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update mikmod Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20100929/6cfa9567/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 6 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:48:48 +0200 From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 mikmod -security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 20100929094848.gb15...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720 mikmod security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-devel-3.1.6-23.el3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-23.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update mikmod Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20100929/cdabf098/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 7 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:49:49 +0200 From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 mikmod -security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 20100929094949.gc15...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720 mikmod security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mikmod-devel-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update mikmod Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20100929/265672e9/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 8 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:51:17 +0200 From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0720 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 mikmod -security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 20100929095117.gd15...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2010:0720 mikmod security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0720.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/mikmod-devel-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/mikmod-3.1.6-33.el4_8.1.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update mikmod Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20100929/dccba76a
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote: - Original Message - | On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote: | Hello all, | | I have just configured a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 machine to support an XFS | filesystem as specified in the subject line. The filesystem will be | used to | store an extremely large number of files (in the tens of millions). | Due to | its extremely large size, would there be any non-standard XFS | build/configuration options I should consider? | | I have created and tested filesystems larger than 25T using xfs on | CentOS-5 | (64-bit). I did not use any non-standard options. Do not attempt this | on a | 32-bit box. | | However, given the size of the device I assume that this is a raid of | some | sort. You'll want to make sure to run mkfs.xfs with the proper stripe | parameters to get the alignment right. Also, you may want to make sure | your | LVM or partition table is properly aligned. | | Even with the above done right you may get worse performance than | expected | since lots of small files typically reads like terrible | performance. | | Finally I'd suggest you fill the filesystem and read it back | (verifying what | you wrote). This is, imho, a reasonable level of paranoia. | | /Peter | | Thanks. | | Boris. | | ___ | CentOS mailing list | CentOS@centos.org | http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos On my 30+TB file systems all I've done is mkfs.xfs with stripe and width parameters and they are very speedy. I've not done anything on the LVM side and see no performance issues, but perhaps I need to investigate that some more. :\ -- James A. Peltier Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca MSN : subatomic_s...@hotmail.com Does your OS has a man 8 lart? http://www.xinu.nl/unix/humour/asr-manpages/lart.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks James! I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as mine resides on a logical volume residing on a hardware-controlled RAID 6 device (i.e., one slice as far as the OS is concerned). Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as mine resides on a logical volume residing on a hardware-controlled RAID 6 device (i.e., one slice as far as the OS is concerned). 25 TB on a single volume, not distributed? Huh, let me know how long that takes to check the first time something sh!ts the bed and instead of some amount of a distributed portion of the data drops out of users reach, it *all* does:) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Transferring system to new RAID drive
Is there a document with instructions for this? I've had smartd warnings that a hard disk in my server is sick, so I am installing a new drive (in addition to the old). Not to hijack a thread but on a similiar note. I have a Centos 4.x server with a 500G sata drive working fine except for disk I/O issues at peak times. I have copied it to a new drive before using 'dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=16384' in middle of night offline. I did that in past because 'smartctl -a /dev/sda' did not work on the old drive. Is there a way to copy it to a hardware RAID 1 array of two drives in a similiar way? If so what not too expensive 2 port hardware raid controller do you reccommend and how do you do it? Thanks. Matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Transferring system to new RAID drive
Is there a way to copy it to a hardware RAID 1 array of two drives in a similiar way? The same way? The underlying OS knows nothing of the physical geometry behind a hardware raid controller. Find out what dev it is, sd? and do what you did, so long as it's exactly the same size or bigger. If so what not too expensive 2 port hardware raid controller do you reccommend and how do you do it? 2 port? never seen one, but I like LSI's... jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
On 30/09/10 12:43 AM, Alexander Farber wrote: Hello, I'm using the latest CentOS with phpBB 3.0.x + postgreSQL + sendmail (relayed through gmail.com) - all those programs working fine, with no big modifications of the CentOS defaults (i.e. SELinux is on). [SNIP Does anybody know what is wrong, how to find out? Yep, it's SELinux picking up that the files have been moved or copied to that directory. Run this command: restorecon -R /var/www/html The pages should load after that. Regards, Ben signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as mine resides on a logical volume residing on a hardware-controlled RAID 6 device (i.e., one slice as far as the OS is concerned). 25 TB on a single volume, not distributed? Huh, let me know how long that takes to check the first time something sh!ts the bed and instead of some amount of a distributed portion of the data drops out of users reach, it *all* does:) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos it is a single logical volume, spread over 16 physical disks controlled by a hrdware RAID controller. Dunno - we have a similar setup in two other machines (smaller disks, same idea), been going strong for over 3 years now. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote: On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote: | However, given the size of the device I assume that this is a raid of | some | sort. You'll want to make sure to run mkfs.xfs with the proper stripe | parameters to get the alignment right. Also, you may want to make sure | your | LVM or partition table is properly aligned. ... I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as mine resides on a logical volume residing on a hardware-controlled RAID 6 device (i.e., one slice as far as the OS is concerned). That is why you need to consider it. If the device is aligned on stripe size (chunk size * (number of drives - 2 for raid6 parity)) and the filesystem is made aware it can put stuff (files, metadata, etc.) so that a minimum of stripes are touched (less I/O done). /Peter Boris. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se wrote: On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote: On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:53 AM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote: | However, given the size of the device I assume that this is a raid of | some | sort. You'll want to make sure to run mkfs.xfs with the proper stripe | parameters to get the alignment right. Also, you may want to make sure | your | LVM or partition table is properly aligned. ... I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as mine resides on a logical volume residing on a hardware-controlled RAID 6 device (i.e., one slice as far as the OS is concerned). That is why you need to consider it. If the device is aligned on stripe size (chunk size * (number of drives - 2 for raid6 parity)) and the filesystem is made aware it can put stuff (files, metadata, etc.) so that a minimum of stripes are touched (less I/O done). /Peter Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Well, you are interfering with the hardware RAID controller which copies around and stripes data as it sees fit. I am not sure with this many levels of abstraction I can gain any measurable performance improvement by adjusting the XFS to the controller's hypothetical behaviour. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
Alexander Farber sent a missive on 2010-09-29: On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote: Can you show the output of ls -laZ please? This will show the selinux context information for the files - the error is usually to do with the context of the files. Hello and thanks for your reply. The SELinux stuff is new for me. Yes I have moved that Alex.html from my home dir and (the 1st one fails): # ls -laZ /var/www/html/Alex.html -r--r--r-- root root system_u:object_r:user_home_t /var/www/html/Alex.html You can see here that the context is incorrect for the file to be served by apache. You can change it using: chcon user_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t /var/www/html/Alex.html with no quotes. This will change the file to the specific context needed. You can also use restorecon -R as others have mentioned # ls -laZ /var/www/html/test/Alex.html -r--r--r-- root root user_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t /var/www/html/test/Alex.html # ls -laZ /var/www/html/index.php -rw-r--r-- root root user_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t /var/www/html/index.php # ls -laZ /var/www/html/hello-world.php -rw-r--r-- afarber afarber user_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t /var/www/html/hello-world.php I'm using http, not https. And /usr/sbin/getenforce prints Enforcing. You can use setenforce 0 without the quotes to disable selinux from the command line till next reboot or until you issue setenforce 1 - this is useful for testing as is looking at /var/log/audit/audit.log and also using commands such as audit2why and audit2allow (I strongly recommend reading at least the man pages and also such websites as http://www.nsa.gov/research/selinux/docs.shtml (google selinux)) I didn't know that there were additional attributes for the files. And I don't know how to stop/start SELinux (it is not a service in /etc/init.d, right?) but I'd like to keep SELinux running, since all other programs I've listed seem to cope okay with it. I recommend that you keep selinux running and enforcing and that you spend some time learning it. It is very useful. The config files are located here: /etc/selinux and you can set selinux to be disabled or if you want permissive i.e. it will not stop you or others doing things but will report on the violations. Have fun S. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote: On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se wrote: On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Boris Epstein wrote: ... I am wondering if I need to worry about stripe and width though as mine resides on a logical volume residing on a hardware-controlled RAID 6 device (i.e., one slice as far as the OS is concerned). That is why you need to consider it. If the device is aligned on stripe size (chunk size * (number of drives - 2 for raid6 parity)) and the filesystem is made aware it can put stuff (files, metadata, etc.) so that a minimum of stripes are touched (less I/O done). ... Well, you are interfering with the hardware RAID controller which copies around and stripes data as it sees fit. I am not sure with this many levels of abstraction I can gain any measurable performance improvement by adjusting the XFS to the controller's hypothetical behaviour. You are a bit mistaken. The raid controller does not copy data around as it sees fit. It stores data on each disk in chunk-size'ed pieces. It then stripes this across all drives giving you a stripe-size'ed piece of chunk size times the number of data drives. Typical chunck sizes are 16, 32, 64, 128 and 256 KiB. If you created your raid-set with, say, 128 KiB chunk size and 16 physical drives this will give you a stripe size of: 128 * (16 - 2) = 1792 KiB Having the filesystem align its stuctures to this can (of course depending on work load) make a huge difference. But you won't be able to do this if your device isn't already aligned (unaligned use of partitions and/or LVM). Then again, for other workloads the effect could be insignificant. YMMV. /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
Simon Billis wrote: Alexander Farber sent a missive on 2010-09-29: On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote: snip You can use setenforce 0 without the quotes to disable selinux from the command line till next reboot or until you issue setenforce 1 - this is useful for testing as is looking at /var/log/audit/audit.log and also using commands such as audit2why and audit2allow (I strongly recommend reading at least the man pages and also such websites as http://www.nsa.gov/research/selinux/docs.shtml (google selinux)) Yeah, and the sealert messages in /var/log/messages *sometimes* help, and other times are garbage. (Yes, I filed a bug with the sealert team: for some things, it 100% repeatably keeps telling me that I should set httpd_unified to on... when it's been on for months. Obviously, they missed a condition, and fall through to an incorrect default.) I didn't know that there were additional attributes for the files. And I don't know how to stop/start SELinux (it is not a service in /etc/init.d, right?) but I'd like to keep SELinux running, since all other programs I've listed seem to cope okay with it. I recommend that you keep selinux running and enforcing and that you spend some time learning it. It is very useful. The config files are located here: /etc/selinux and you can set selinux to be disabled or if you want permissive i.e. it will not stop you or others doing things but will report on the violations. *bleah* to selinux. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Forbidden: can't access *.html files in /var/www/html
On 30/09/10 3:21 AM, Simon Billis wrote: You can use setenforce 0 without the quotes to disable selinux from the command line till next reboot or until you issue setenforce 1 - this is useful for testing as is looking at /var/log/audit/audit.log and also using commands such as audit2why and audit2allow (I strongly recommend reading at least the man pages and also such websites as http://www.nsa.gov/research/selinux/docs.shtml (google selinux)) In addition to that URL, this document (which I didn't see listed, probably due to the publication date) looks very useful: http://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/os/redhat/rhel5-guide-i731.pdf I'd second reading as much as possible on SELinux before diving into it, as there are more than a few gotchas. Especially when enabling and disabling it and knowing when a reboot is necessary when enabling or re-enabling it. Regards, Ben signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 01:25:11 pm Peter Kjellstrom wrote: You are a bit mistaken. The raid controller does not copy data around as it sees fit. It stores data on each disk in chunk-size'ed pieces. It then stripes this across all drives giving you a stripe-size'ed piece of chunk size times the number of data drives. [Snip math] Then again, for other workloads the effect could be insignificant. YMMV. For a simple RAID controller I can see some benefit. However, in my case the 'RAID controller' is on SAN, consisting of three EMC Clariion arrays: a CX3-10c, a CX3-80, and a CX700. The EMC Navisphere/Unisphere tools allow LUN migration across RAID groups; I could very well take a LUN from a RAID1/0 with 16 drives to a RAID5 with 9 drives to a RAID6 with 10 drives to a RAID6 with 16 drives and have different stripe sizes. Further, since this is all being accessed through VMware ESX, I'm limited to 2TB LUNs anyway, even using raw device mappings, which I do, but for a different reason; LVM to the rescue to get this: [r...@backup-rdc ~]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 37G 18G 18G 50% / /dev/sda1 99M 26M 69M 28% /boot /dev/mapper/dasch--backup-volume1 21T 19T 2.6T 88% /opt/backups tmpfs1006M 0 1006M 0% /dev/shm /dev/mapper/dasch--rdc-cx3--80 23T 19T 4.2T 82% /opt/dasch-rdc [r...@backup-rdc ~]# Yeah, the output of pvscan is pretty long (it has been longer, and seeing things like /dev/sdak1 is strange). Using XFS at the moment. The two volume groups are on two different arrays; one is on the CX700 and the other on the CX3-80, and they're physically separated at two locations on-campus, with single-mode 4Gb/s FC ISL's between switches. They're soon to be connected to different VMware ESX hosts; the dual fibre-channel connect was so the initial sync time would be reasonable. I looked through all the performance optimization howtos for XFS that I could find, but then realized how futile that would be with these 'RAID controllers' and their massive caches (our CX3-80 SP's have 8GB of RAM each; the shared write cache and the variable-sized read cache, which I have set up for a rather large size on our CX3-80: 3GB on each SP for read, and 2GB for write; the CX700 has 4GB (actually 3968MB) split 1GB read 2GB write); the benchmarks that I did (that I can't release due to both EMC and VMware's EULAs' prohibitions) showed that the performance differences with alignment versus without were insignificant with these 'RAID controllers'. But for something inside the server, like a 3ware 9500 or similar, it might be worthwhile to align to stripe size, since that is a fixed constant for the logical drives that controller exports. And Peter is very right: YMMV depending upon workload. Our load for this system is, as can be inferred from the name of the machine, backups of a raw data set that are processed once and then archived. I/O's per second isn't even on the radar for this workload; throughput, on the other hand, is. And man these Clariions are fast. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Transferring system to new RAID drive
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:13:52 pm Matt wrote: Is there a way to copy it to a hardware RAID 1 array of two drives in a similiar way? If so what not too expensive 2 port hardware raid controller do you reccommend and how do you do it? 3ware 9500S; can be had used and NOS (New Old Stock) on eBay cheap, and has great Linux support. Performance isn't stellar, but is adequate. I'm looking right now at a 'buy it now' on an 8 port for $59 free shipping. I see an older 8006-2LP (used) with a starting bid of $9.99. I am using one I got a couple of years ago NOS off eBay; it's the 4 port 9500S, and it has been in production for two years at this point. You can clone the single drive to a RAID logical drive just as if the RAID was a single drive. You just need to make sure the 3ware's drivers are in your initrd; either put the module there before the clone or using a live boot CD. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [Slightly OT] Open Source Development + Tools - Book/Resource?
Thank you all for the valuable suggestions! --Tim - Jim Davis jda...@lbto.org wrote: There's a review just now on Slashdot of a book that covers autoconf and friends... - Bill Campbell cen...@celestial.com wrote: My first recommendation is always Kernighan and Pike's ``Unix Programming Environment'', ancient but still excellent. Another is ``GNU Autoconf, Automake, and Libtool'' by Vaughan, Elliston, Tromey, and Taylor. - Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org wrote: There is an excellent series of articles on the Pedantic Programmer blog. http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=185 http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=186 http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=187 http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=188 http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=189 http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=192 http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=196 http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=199 http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=201 http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=208 - Kahlil Hodgson kahlil.hodg...@dealmax.com.au wrote: http://books.slashdot.org/story/10/09/27/1612236/Autotools ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] logwatch question
Quoting Mário Barbosa mplbarb...@clix.pt: LostSon wrote: Yes I did run newaliases and still no joy Mark Van Bogart mark.vanbog...@gmail.com wrote: Did you run 'newaliases' after editing /etc/aliases? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:27 AM, lostson lost...@lostsonsvault.org wrote: Hello A few weeks ago I started having problems with my system email or specifically my logwatch reports showing up in my inbox. I got most of those issues figued out except one now when i get an email from my system it has a title of this Cron r...@localhost run-parts /etc/cron.daily with this message /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch: Recipient names must be specified http://linuxhelp.blogspot.com/2005/06/sendmail-versatile-mail-server.html Look for Check if sendmail is identifying your station's hostname correctly: Well a few weeks ago after updating, my logwatch reports just stopped, i had some permission problems and other such things. So last night what i did was yum remove sendmail logwatch then i reinstalled them and was gettting the error logwatch cannot execute sendmail -t turns out that in the /usr/share/--- logwatch.conf its says mailer = sendmail -t but that kicks in the error so in etc/logwatch/logwatch.conf if you add mailer = /usr/sbin/sendmail -t then the error goes away and logwatch reports start flowing back to my inbox like normal so that fixed my error and all is well now. Talking with people last night they said it was weird probably that a symlink was pointing to where it should be. Weird thing was i did a fresh install on my laptop while working on my main machine last night and was getting the exact same issue on a fresh install. but again applying this fix made it work fine. So the question is now is, is it a logwatch issue or a sendmail issue and if so where and how to fix it. I'm gonna write up a full bug report hopefully tonight and look upstream as well to see if there are any bugs filed with RH about this as well. LostSon http://lostsonsvault.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] qemu
On Sep 29, 2010, at 7:23 AM, mattias m...@mjw.se wrote: I have it work now a ip from my isps dhcp server But verry slow Xen are much faster -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:20 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] qemu On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:39 AM, mattias m...@mjw.se wrote: No i can start qemu but no network I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it My start line qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no I have something running along these lines, maybe it can help - There are several things to check up when it comes to qemu networking /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br0 /sbin/ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 eth0 /sbin/ifconfig br0 10.0.2.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 up /sbin/route add -net 10.0.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 br0 /sbin/route add default gw 10.0.2.1 br0 /usr/sbin/tunctl -b -u $USER /sbin/ifconfig tap0 up /usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 tap0 /sbin/iptables -I RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i br0 -j ACCEPT /usr/bin/qemu -hda $DISK -no-acpi -m 2000 \ -nographic -daemonize \ -net nic,macaddr=52:54:00:11:22:33 \ -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no Look for the kqemu kernel module. Even with that kvm and xen are much faster. I'd only use qemu if I needed to emulate a different architecture like PPC and even then only to test endianness. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS on a 25 TB device
On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 01:25:11 pm Peter Kjellstrom wrote: You are a bit mistaken. The raid controller does not copy data around as it sees fit. It stores data on each disk in chunk-size'ed pieces. It then stripes this across all drives giving you a stripe-size'ed piece of chunk size times the number of data drives. [Snip math] Then again, for other workloads the effect could be insignificant. YMMV. For a simple RAID controller I can see some benefit. However, in my case the 'RAID controller' is on SAN, consisting of three EMC Clariion arrays: a CX3-10c, a CX3-80, and a CX700. The EMC Navisphere/Unisphere tools allow LUN migration across RAID groups; I could very well take a LUN from a RAID1/0 with 16 drives to a RAID5 with 9 drives to a RAID6 with 10 drives to a RAID6 with 16 drives and have different stripe sizes. Further, since this is all being accessed through VMware ESX, I'm limited to 2TB LUNs anyway, even using raw device mappings, which I do, but for a different reason; LVM to the rescue to get this: [r...@backup-rdc ~]# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 37G 18G 18G 50% / /dev/sda1 99M 26M 69M 28% /boot /dev/mapper/dasch--backup-volume1 21T 19T 2.6T 88% /opt/backups tmpfs1006M 0 1006M 0% /dev/shm /dev/mapper/dasch--rdc-cx3--80 23T 19T 4.2T 82% /opt/dasch-rdc [r...@backup-rdc ~]# Yeah, the output of pvscan is pretty long (it has been longer, and seeing things like /dev/sdak1 is strange). Using XFS at the moment. The two volume groups are on two different arrays; one is on the CX700 and the other on the CX3-80, and they're physically separated at two locations on-campus, with single-mode 4Gb/s FC ISL's between switches. They're soon to be connected to different VMware ESX hosts; the dual fibre-channel connect was so the initial sync time would be reasonable. I looked through all the performance optimization howtos for XFS that I could find, but then realized how futile that would be with these 'RAID controllers' and their massive caches (our CX3-80 SP's have 8GB of RAM each; the shared write cache and the variable-sized read cache, which I have set up for a rather large size on our CX3-80: 3GB on each SP for read, and 2GB for write; the CX700 has 4GB (actually 3968MB) split 1GB read 2GB write); the benchmarks that I did (that I can't release due to both EMC and VMware's EULAs' prohibitions) showed that the performance differences with alignment versus without were insignificant with these 'RAID controllers'. But for something inside the server, like a 3ware 9500 or similar, it might be worthwhile to align to stripe size, since that is a fixed constant for the logical drives that controller exports. And Peter is very right: YMMV depending upon workload. Our load for this system is, as can be inferred from the name of the machine, backups of a raw data set that are processed once and then archived. I/O's per second isn't even on the radar for this workload; throughput, on the other hand, is. And man these Clariions are fast. For sequential IO you won't notice any impact from misalignment, but for random IO it could be a 25-33% loss. I'm sure EMC has white papers posted on aligning volumes for Exchange/SQL as well as VMware. The 8GB cache only goes so far... Get enough server connections or a couple of sequential IO hogs like yours and cache effect disappears quickly. Often the misalignment starts at the initiator and travels to the target, initiator needs to read two blocks because it is off by one sector, but then the target needs to read two chunks because one of those blocks crosses a chunk, and so on. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Transferring system to new RAID drive
Is there a way to copy it to a hardware RAID 1 array of two drives in a similiar way? The same way? The underlying OS knows nothing of the physical geometry behind a hardware raid controller. Find out what dev it is, sd? and do what you did, so long as it's exactly the same size or bigger. Would going from a single 500G sata to two 500G sata drives in hardware raid 1 work? Just wandering if some space will be lost using raid 1? Matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Acronis True Image or Clonezilla
on 9-28-2010 5:53 PM Timothy Murphy spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: I should have admitted that there is a Windows partition on the old disk. It came with the machine, but I never use it. However, I would like to save it if possible, as there seem to be some operations on this computer (HP ProLiant M110), eg updating the BIOS, which seem to require Windows to be running. All the HP servers I have are fully update able from linux... I don't have a M110, but I have several ML350's Sorry, I was talking nonsense. I have two servers (in different locations), both running CentOS-5.5. One is an HP ProLiant, but the one with the bad disk is actually a Dell PowerEdge T105. The information that came with this explicitly warns against using Linux to update the BIOS. (The machine actually came with a curious mixture of Windows and Linux, in the form of a partial RedHat Enterprise system.) Also the Western Digital disk software all seems to assume the the machine is running under Windows. (Admittedly it didn't tell me anything more than smart under CentOS.) If you really NEED windows for systems like this there is a tool out there to make a complete windows environment that boots from a CD or USB key... ubcd4win.com That way you can have the server clean and still use the tools ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Transferring system to new RAID drive
Would going from a single 500G sata to two 500G sata drives in hardware raid 1 work? Just wandering if some space will be lost using raid 1? Again like I said: The same or bigger. Often HW raid controllers coerce the size of a drive down a gig or so slightly different drives can all work together. Likely the answer is no... Although dd can work fine, it's far from the only tool do what you want. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Mailman - searchable archive
On 9/29/10 5:40 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: On 9/28/2010 11:30 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: Opinions? Maybe there are better software solutions for this - I hope. On 29.9.2010 3.49, M. Milanuk wrote: markmail.org works pretty well for searching, as does gmane.org... with gmane having the added benefit of providing a bi-directional mail2news gateway so you can read post mailing lists as newsgroups, plus you can browse and post from their web interface. Hm, markmail.org does not seem to work for this, as our mailing list archive is not public. They might accept restricted-access lists, but probably for a fee... I am looking for a free solution. Sorry, I thought you meant 'this' mailing list... http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Aorg.centos.centos+type%3Ageneral Didn't catch that you meant a private mailing list archive. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
