Some may be bored with the subject - sorry...
Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2
(ns, mail, web servers, etc.).
KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6
will not be out in time for me - I guess KVM would be more mature in
CentOS
On 03/27/11 11:57, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Some may be bored with the subject - sorry...
Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2
(ns, mail, web servers, etc.).
KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6
will not be out in time for me - I
On 03/27/2011 02:57 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Some may be bored with the subject - sorry...
Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2
(ns, mail, web servers, etc.).
KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6
will not be out in time for me
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 06:59:26AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
Yes, you only *need* to reboot to pick up a new kernel. Unlike
MS-Windows, none of the other updates *require* a reboot. Note: if
Warning, though: there's a big difference between *need* and *should*.
glibc (or other widely used
What makes you think CentOS is not willing to be commercially sponsored?
(Or only work developing CentOS?)
I would LOVE to be able to do CentOS as my only job.
No one that we know of is willing to pay a full time salary for 1 or 2
or 3 people to develop CentOS. If they would pay for
Any experience with the free VMware vSphere Hypervisor?. (It was
formerly known as VMware ESXi Single Server or free ESXi.)
http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/overview.html
I would need a tutorial about that... For example, does that run without
a host OS? Can it be managed
2011/3/27 Drew drew@gmail.com:
Any experience with the free VMware vSphere Hypervisor?. (It was
formerly known as VMware ESXi Single Server or free ESXi.)
http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/overview.html
I would need a tutorial about that... For example, does that run
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote:
Any experience with the free VMware vSphere Hypervisor?. (It was
formerly known as VMware ESXi Single Server or free ESXi.)
http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere-hypervisor/overview.html
I would need a tutorial about that...
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
2011/3/27 Drew drew@gmail.com:
Any experience with the free VMware vSphere Hypervisor?. (It was
formerly known as VMware ESXi Single Server or free ESXi.)
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6
will not be out in time for me - I guess KVM would be more mature in
CentOS 6.
I have been using Xen with much success for several years, now with two
CentOS 5.5 x86_64 Dom0's,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6
will not be out in time for me - I guess KVM would be more mature in
CentOS 6.
I have been using Xen with
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
How did you get the PXE working?
I already had a PXE server for physical hosts, so I just did a
virt-install with the --pxe switch, and it worked first time. The MAC
address was pre-defined and known to the DHCP server. I installed both
Linux and
KVM was a dog in testing under CentOS and RHEL 5.x. The bridged
networking has *NO* network configuration tool that understands
how to set it up, you have to do it manually, and that's a deficit I've
submitted upstream as an RFE. It may work well with CentOS and
RHEL 6, i've not had a chance to
At Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:56:19 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 06:59:26AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
Yes, you only *need* to reboot to pick up a new kernel. Unlike
MS-Windows, none of the other updates *require* a reboot. Note: if
Warning,
At Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:36:02 +0100 (BST) CentOS mailing list
centos@centos.org wrote:
What makes you think CentOS is not willing to be commercially sponsored?
(Or only work developing CentOS?)
I would LOVE to be able to do CentOS as my only job.
No one that we know of is
On 03/27/2011 07:36 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
What makes you think CentOS is not willing to be commercially sponsored?
(Or only work developing CentOS?)
I would LOVE to be able to do CentOS as my only job.
No one that we know of is willing to pay a full time salary for 1 or 2
or 3 people
On 3/27/11 4:57 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Some may be bored with the subject - sorry...
Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2
(ns, mail, web servers, etc.).
KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6
will not be out in time for me - I
Biggest problem in free esxi is that it lacks backup vcb api, so full
image backups are almost impossible under free esxi host ..
Not true at all, I use the ghettovcb script in the console and it works fine.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Fair enough. I have no complaints with the current volunteers. I was
mainly just curious. Thanks for the reply.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
There have been a number of recent conversations on the developer list and
this list about CentOS. My
Dne 27.3.2011 17:33, Johnny Hughes napsal(a):
What the CentOS project would be interested in (from a corporate
provider) would be to hire people and allow them to do CentOS related
things.
We are not interested in being paid in addition to our current work, but
making taking care of CentOS
On 03/27/2011 07:10 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
How did you get the PXE working?
I already had a PXE server for physical hosts, so I just did a
virt-install with the --pxe switch, and it worked first time. The MAC
address was pre-defined and
What the CentOS project would be interested in (from a corporate
provider) would be to hire people and allow them to do CentOS related
things.
We are not interested in being paid in addition to our current work, but
making taking care of CentOS our only work.
There are many things
On 03/27/11 2:57 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Any experience with the free VMware vSphere Hypervisor?. (It was
formerly known as VMware ESXi Single Server or free ESXi.)
one downside to ESXi, it does not support any sort of software raid.
Normally ESX is used with a SAN, which provides all RAID
You can boot ESXi from a
small CF card, as once its booted, it doesn't touch the boot device at all.
Yes it does, there are cron jobs for config backups etc.
How does it remember config changes in a non-stateless deployment?
~ # cat /var/spool/cron/crontabs/root
#syntax : minute hour day
List,
I am putting together a sftp server and would like to use a restrictive
shell with a chroot jail. I was wondering what members of the list
thought about rssh as opposed to scponly.
Greg Ennis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Am 27.03.2011 um 21:53 schrieb Gregory P. Ennis:
List,
I am putting together a sftp server and would like to use a
restrictive
shell with a chroot jail. I was wondering what members of the list
thought about rssh as opposed to scponly.
If you use sftp, it can be chroot'ed by default
On 03/27/11 1:03 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
If you use sftp, it can be chroot'ed by default (see man-page).
(In reasonably recent version of sshd)
I gather thats a sshd somewhat newer than the one included in CentOS 5
? the only mention of chroot in man sshd is the /var/empty/sshd dir
used
Am 27.03.2011 um 22:57 schrieb John R Pierce:
On 03/27/11 1:03 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
If you use sftp, it can be chroot'ed by default (see man-page).
(In reasonably recent version of sshd)
I gather thats a sshd somewhat newer than the one included in CentOS 5
?
I don't know.
;-)
I
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jure Pečar pega...@nerv.eu.org wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:42:36 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/27/11 4:57 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Some may be bored with the subject - sorry...
Still not decided about virtualization platform for my
It's interesting that nobody so far mentioned openVZ or its commercial
version, Virtuozzo. It's different than all major virtualization players
(it's OS level virtualization, not hw level), but that makes it the only
viable option for things like mass web hosting solutions.
Try it out and
If you use sftp, it can be chroot'ed by default (see man-page).
(In reasonably recent version of sshd)
I gather thats a sshd somewhat newer than the one included in CentOS 5
? the only mention of chroot in man sshd is the /var/empty/sshd dir
used during preauthorization.
I'd be very
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:21:45 -0700
David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote:
The two things that always comes to mind when I am considering a
virtualization solution is extent of tool set/support, and the general
acceptance of the technology. For those two reasons I nearly always
implement
I've deployed Virtuozzo for a large web hosting company and found it
superior to vmware in about every aspect that mattered in a web hosting
environment.
Well.. eh. as you might know that virtuozzo/openvz does not provide kernel
isolation. Mainly this means than one kernel exploit can provide
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
I've deployed Virtuozzo for a large web hosting company and found it
superior to vmware in about every aspect that mattered in a web hosting
environment.
Well.. eh. as you might know that virtuozzo/openvz does not
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:10:45 +0200
Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
wrote:
I've deployed Virtuozzo for a large web hosting company and found it
superior to vmware in about every aspect that mattered in a web hosting
Am 27.03.2011 um 22:57 schrieb John R Pierce:
On 03/27/11 1:03 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
If you use sftp, it can be chroot'ed by default (see man-page).
(In reasonably recent version of sshd)
I gather thats a sshd somewhat newer than the one included in CentOS 5
?
I don't know.
;-)
I only
Well.. eh. as you might know that virtuozzo/openvz does not provide
kernel isolation. Mainly this means than one kernel exploit can provide
full access to all openvz/virtuozzo containers.
The same is true for solutions like vmware. Just google for all the blue
pill talks. It's a
Am 28.03.2011 um 00:20 schrieb Gregory P. Ennis:
I am running Centos 5.5. which has OpenSSH_4.3p2. I guess this
means I
am back to using rssh or scponlyc. So far I have not been able to get
either of these to work properly with chroot.
Any suggestions ?
I haven't been using
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:26:38 +0300
Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
The same is true for solutions like vmware. Just google for all the
blue pill talks. It's a theoretical risk that is small enough to be
irrelevant.
WebServers running buggy php software provides (easy) way to
Am 28.03.2011 um 00:20 schrieb Gregory P. Ennis:
I am running Centos 5.5. which has OpenSSH_4.3p2. I guess this
means I
am back to using rssh or scponlyc. So far I have not been able to get
either of these to work properly with chroot.
Any suggestions ?
I haven't been using
2011/3/28 Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de:
Am 27.03.2011 um 22:57 schrieb John R Pierce:
On 03/27/11 1:03 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
If you use sftp, it can be chroot'ed by default (see man-page).
(In reasonably recent version of sshd)
I gather thats a sshd somewhat newer than the one
I understand that vmware has much stronger marketing machine, however that
does not mean that their technology is somehow better. Their offer is a
reasonable choice for many scenarios in IT, mass web hosting is
unfortunately not one of them. As any competent admin will tell you, use
the
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I'm going to retire an old RHEL3 server and move the services to CentOS5.
In particular, the web server is giving me a headache. On the old box,
there's
a hacked-up httpd/mod_jk/tomcat setup, and CentOS is perfect for the new
box because the
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 4:57 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 03/27/11 1:03 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
If you use sftp, it can be chroot'ed by default (see man-page).
(In reasonably recent version of sshd)
I gather thats a sshd somewhat newer than the one included in CentOS 5
?
David Brian Chait wrote:
I understand that vmware has much stronger marketing machine, however that
does not mean that their technology is somehow better. Their offer is a
reasonable choice for many scenarios in IT, mass web hosting is
unfortunately not one of them. As any competent admin will
On 03/27/2011 09:00 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
On 03/27/2011 02:57 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Some may be bored with the subject - sorry...
Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2
(ns, mail, web servers, etc.).
KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose,
Am 27.03.2011 um 22:57 schrieb John R Pierce:
On 03/27/11 1:03 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
If you use sftp, it can be chroot'ed by default (see man-page).
(In reasonably recent version of sshd)
I gather thats a sshd somewhat newer than the one included in CentOS 5
?
I don't know.
;-)
I
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote:
Am 27.03.2011 um 22:57 schrieb John R Pierce:
On 03/27/11 1:03 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
If you use sftp, it can be chroot'ed by default (see man-page).
(In reasonably recent version of sshd)
I gather thats a sshd
It's been many years, but it seems that I have to receive a fax and
might have to send one too. Is there a way to do this on CentOS 5.5?
(Hope so.)
tia.
--
Anything is easy if you know how to do it.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
It's been many years, but it seems that I have to receive a fax and
might have to send one too. Is there a way to do this on CentOS 5.5?
(Hope so.)
tia.
-
Tia
We have a vsifax system on a SCO unix machine that we plan to move to
Centos. I plan to
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:18:18PM -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
We have a vsifax system on a SCO unix machine that we plan to move to
Centos. I plan to evaluate efax that is opensource on Centos before we
pay for the vsifax. You might try installing 'efax'.
You may also wish to
It has been 6 years since I set up my Linux server and have
hardly had to touch it in all of those years other than running
yum update, so I ma rusty in some of the fine details (especially
at 72).
I located a source for the php-mcrypt rpm
(php-mcrypt-5.1.6-15.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm), however,
At Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:41:10 -0400 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
It's been many years, but it seems that I have to receive a fax and
might have to send one too. Is there a way to do this on CentOS 5.5?
(Hope so.)
Presubably you also have an analog modem? Almost all analog
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Todd Cary wrote:
It has been 6 years since I set up my Linux server and have
hardly had to touch it in all of those years other than running
yum update, so I ma rusty in some of the fine details (especially
at 72).
I located a source for the php-mcrypt rpm
It has been 6 years since I set up my Linux server and have
hardly had to touch it in all of those years other than running
yum update, so I ma rusty in some of the fine details (especially
at 72).
I located a source for the php-mcrypt rpm
(php-mcrypt-5.1.6-15.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm), however,
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote:
Am 27.03.2011 um 22:57 schrieb John R Pierce:
On 03/27/11 1:03 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
If you use sftp, it can be chroot'ed by default (see man-page).
(In reasonably
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:41 PM, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
It's been many years, but it seems that I have to receive a fax and
might have to send one too. Is there a way to do this on CentOS 5.5?
(Hope so.)
tia.
There are plenty. mgetty is built-in. HylaFAX, written by Sam
Leffler,
On 3/27/2011 8:48 PM, Tom Diehl wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, Todd Cary wrote:
It has been 6 years since I set up my Linux server and have
hardly had to touch it in all of those years other than running
yum update, so I ma rusty in some of the fine details (especially
at 72).
I located a
On 3/27/2011 8:48 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
It has been 6 years since I set up my Linux server and have
hardly had to touch it in all of those years other than running
yum update, so I ma rusty in some of the fine details (especially
at 72).
I located a source for the php-mcrypt rpm
On 03/27/11 8:36 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
There are also all-in-one printers that implement faxing, but these can
function standalone -- that is the all-in-one can behave like a regular
fax machine without using a host computer at all (the HP OfficeJets can
do all of this from either their
On 03/27/11 9:17 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
I remember using rpm to do many of the same things as rpm. What
factors should one consider in deciding whether to use rpm or yum?
rpm installs .rpm files. yum finds rpm files on configured
repositories, downloads them, checks their dependencies, and
On 28/03/11 2:33 PM, Todd Cary wrote:
It has been 6 years since I set up my Linux server and have
hardly had to touch it in all of those years other than running
yum update, so I ma rusty in some of the fine details (especially
at 72).
That's not old, I've been corresponding with a 78
Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com писал(а) в своём письме Sat,
26 Mar 2011 23:16:58 +0300:
Great, go ahead: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/InstallOnExt4
Can you put a bit more text around what you are doing there (especially
why you drop to a shell to do the formatting and
Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com писал(а) в своём письме Sat,
26 Mar 2011 23:16:58 +0300:
Great, go ahead: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/InstallOnExt4
Can you put a bit more text around what you are doing there (especially
why you drop to a shell to do the formatting and
On 03/27/2011 12:20 PM, Alex/AT wrote:
Ralph Angenendtralph.angene...@gmail.com писал(а) в своём письме Sat,
26 Mar 2011 23:16:58 +0300:
Great, go ahead:http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/InstallOnExt4
Can you put a bit more text around what you are doing there (especially
why you drop
Manuel Wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro писал(а) в своём письме Sun,
27 Mar 2011 14:57:27 +0400:
I modified it a bit.
However, I fail to understand why is all this complicate procedure
needed, given that starting the installer with linux ext4 (linux
ext4dev for the centos releases prior
Alex/AT wrote on 03/27/2011 06:58 AM:
Manuel Wolfshantwo...@nobugconsulting.ro писал(а) в своём письме Sun,
27 Mar 2011 14:57:27 +0400:
I modified it a bit.
However, I fail to understand why is all this complicate procedure
needed, given that starting the installer with linux ext4 (linux
On 27 March 2011 13:33, Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
Alex/AT wrote on 03/27/2011 06:58 AM:
Manuel Wolfshantwo...@nobugconsulting.ro писал(а) в своём письме Sun,
27 Mar 2011 14:57:27 +0400:
I modified it a bit.
However, I fail to understand why is all this complicate
Oops. Did not know that. If that is the case, the the article is really
not needed.
My wetware failure is to blame here - was thinking that only came in
with RHEL6 and failed to check; however, a brief article on ext4 the
right way would still be worthwhile.
Perhaps one of the QA team
Manuel Wolfshant wrote on 03/27/2011 06:57 AM:
...
I modified it a bit.
However, I fail to understand why is all this complicate procedure
needed, given that starting the installer with linux ext4 (linux
ext4dev for the centos releases prior to 5.5, if I am not mistaken)
achieves the same
Alan Bartlett wrote on 03/27/2011 08:39 AM:
Perhaps one of the QA team would test / confirm an ext4 installation,
whilst QA'ing C-5.6 ?
Looks east . . . Wolfy ? Looks west . . . Phil ?
Doing that as we communicate. :-)
I also note that the procedure does not seem to be spelled out in the
I am running KVM guests under Redhat 6. I tried to setup a bridge
device to an interface with a vlan trunk connected to a Juniper switch.
On the KVM host, I am able to define vlans and access them via the vlan
trunk. I was not able to access a vlan from the kvm guest connected to
the bridged
On 03/27/2011 04:09 PM, Nataraj wrote:
I am running KVM guests under Redhat 6. I tried to setup a bridge
device to an interface with a vlan trunk connected to a Juniper switch.
On the KVM host, I am able to define vlans and access them via the vlan
trunk. I was not able to access a vlan
A manera personal, me alegro mucho que hayas podido solucionar dicho
percance.
Por otro lado es posible que documentes y publiques los pasos que seguiste?
Gracias.
2011/3/27 Miguel A. Velasco miguel.suscripc...@gmail.com
Hola de nuevos a todos, este fin de semana llegó el momento de lanzar un
74 matches
Mail list logo
