Re: [CentOS] SNMP monitoring options

2011-04-13 Thread Peter Hinse
Am 13.04.2011 04:33, schrieb Keith Keller: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:23:19AM +1000, Bob Hepple wrote: We looked at a number of monitoring systems before closing on (community version) Opsview. The main other contender we looked at was zenoss - I have to admit I was biased due to previous use

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/13/11, Brandon Ooi brand...@gmail.com wrote: centos 5 can expand raid 0/1/5. just not 6. 10 is just layered 0/1 so you can expand it. centos 6 will be able to expand raid6 as it was a feature in 2.6.20 or something. This is where I'm getting confused. I had been reading up on mdadm,

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.comwrote: On 4/12/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: But, our RAID10 is setup as a stripe of mirrors, i.e. sda1 sdb1 - md0, sdc1 + sdd1 -md1, then sde1 + sdf1 -md2, and finally md0 + md1 + md2 are stripped. The

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Matthew Feinberg
Thank you everyone for the advice and great information. From what I am gathering XFS is the way to go. A couple more questions. What partitioning utility is suggested? parted and fdisk do not seem to be doing the job. Raid Level. I am considering moving away from the raid6 due to possible

[CentOS] CentOS 5.6 and php53 packages

2011-04-13 Thread Alexander Farber
Hello fellow CentOS users, until now I was using CentOS 5.5 with php 5.3 through this file: # grep -v ^# /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Testing.repo [c5-testing] name=CentOS-5 Testing baseurl=http://dev.centos.org/centos/$releasever/testing/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Feinberg Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 9:29 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations Hardware or software raid. Is there an advantage

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/13/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: I haven't had problems doing it this way yet. Thanks for the confirmation. Could you please outline the general steps to expand an existing RAID 10 with another RAID 1 device? I'm trying to test this out but unfortunately being the noob that I am,

Re: [CentOS] changing column widths in top?

2011-04-13 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Simon Matter wrote: Htop looks interesting and I might try it on one of our other servers but on this one I only see the first 60 CPUs. I strongly recommend http://nmon.sourceforge.net/pmwiki.php for such things. I have put my current src rpm here

Re: [CentOS] problems in centos-5.6

2011-04-13 Thread Farkas Levente
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:15, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Farkas Levente wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:36:15 +0200: these shouldn't have to be there (they are from older release): they are not there, check the official repo, rsyncing without delete flag? they are there. may be

Re: [CentOS] Kerberos/LDAP authentication no more working in 5.6 ?

2011-04-13 Thread Alain Péan
Le 13/04/2011 11:35, John Hodrien a écrit : On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Alain Péan wrote: Le 12/04/2011 22:03, John Hodrien a écrit : On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Alain Péan wrote: Indeed, nothing fails now. I want my users to authenticate against Active directory, and it works, and I would like them to

Re: [CentOS] Kerberos/LDAP authentication no more working in 5.6 ?

2011-04-13 Thread John Hodrien
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Alain Péan wrote: Hi John, There are only two realms I mentionned, LAB-LPP.LOCAL, and TEST-LPP.LOCAL. I am currently doing test with the latter, and indeed, pc-2003-test is the AD DC, so the KDC for TEST-LPP.LOCAL. The fdqn is also pc-2003-test.test-lpp.local. 'kinit

Re: [CentOS] Kerberos/LDAP authentication no more working in 5.6 ?

2011-04-13 Thread Alain Péan
Le 13/04/2011 12:03, John Hodrien a écrit : On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Alain Péan wrote: Hi John, There are only two realms I mentionned, LAB-LPP.LOCAL, and TEST-LPP.LOCAL. I am currently doing test with the latter, and indeed, pc-2003-test is the AD DC, so the KDC for TEST-LPP.LOCAL. The fdqn is

Re: [CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.

2011-04-13 Thread Mister IT Guru
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 22:23 -0400, Peter A wrote: On Monday, April 11, 2011 10:12:15 PM Antaryami Khuda wrote: I see um twitter dag's want to start his own RHEL rebuild. Dag how much monies you do need? I make contribution of 5.000 rupee if other join. Ant This is really

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 and php53 packages

2011-04-13 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/13/2011 08:59 AM, Alexander Farber wrote: Do you think it is safe to remove /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Testing.repo yes, and run yum update again or will my Drupal 7 site burn and die? You should be fine. the php53 is now in the main distro. The testing packages were put into the Testing

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

2011-04-13 Thread Phil Schaffner
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/11/2011 06:58 AM: Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ). More like 72 hours and still no 5.6/os/SRPMS/ in evidence. Did the valve not get turned on? Phil

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 and php53 packages

2011-04-13 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/13/2011 02:59 AM, Alexander Farber wrote: Hello fellow CentOS users, until now I was using CentOS 5.5 with php 5.3 through this file: # grep -v ^# /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Testing.repo [c5-testing] name=CentOS-5 Testing

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

2011-04-13 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 04/13/2011 11:51 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/11/2011 06:58 AM: Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ). More like 72 hours and still no 5.6/os/SRPMS/ in evidence. Did the

Re: [CentOS] audio recorder compatibility

2011-04-13 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
ken wrote: As a confirmed Linux guy, I'd want to offload the audio files in some format that Linux can read/play natively. I've read a sketchy suggestion that there's a Linux app or utility to do a translation from WMA, http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/127583, but I always like to keep

Re: [CentOS] problems in centos-5.6

2011-04-13 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/13/2011 04:45 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:15, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote: Farkas Levente wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:36:15 +0200: these shouldn't have to be there (they are from older release): they are not there, check the official repo,

[CentOS] php53 and eacclerator

2011-04-13 Thread Geoff Galitz
Hi. There does not seem to be a php53-eaccelerator in standard Centos yum channels, from what I can see. That is a mainstay for us. Has anyone found that any particular php53-eacclerator from other locations play well with it? Thanks. ___

Re: [CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...

2011-04-13 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/12/2011 08:09 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote: Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of the question. RHEL 4 updates must be painstakingly

[CentOS] update fuzzed display -- how to probe and force driver updates

2011-04-13 Thread David McGuffey
Did a yum update on a CentOS 5.5 box at home when I got back from a business trip. Update seemed to run without errors, but after a reboot, the display is grainy and the colors are not true. Have spent nearly all my time over the last couple of years working at the network and virtualization

[CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-13 Thread Mailing List
Hi, I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right time on the machine. This is with / without ntp. I have attempted various scenario's

Re: [CentOS] Kerberos/LDAP authentication no more working in 5.6 ?

2011-04-13 Thread John Hodrien
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Alain Péan wrote: I'll try know, with the change in /etc/krb5.conf (validate = false), if it works now. It won't (or at least it shouldn't). Validate is essential as it confirms that the KDC providing the TGT to the user is the same KDC that you registered with when you

Re: [CentOS] php53 and eacclerator

2011-04-13 Thread Rainer Traut
Hi. There does not seem to be a php53-eaccelerator in standard Centos yum channels, from what I can see. That is a mainstay for us. Has anyone found that any particular php53-eacclerator from other locations play well with it? Thanks. Hi Geoff, I have rebuild the one from remi's repo with

Re: [CentOS] php53 and eacclerator

2011-04-13 Thread Raj kumar
ok -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Traut Sent: 13 April 2011 17:57 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] php53 and eacclerator Hi. There does not seem to be a php53-eaccelerator in standard Centos yum

Re: [CentOS] Kerberos/LDAP authentication no more working in 5.6 ?

2011-04-13 Thread Alain Péan
Le 13/04/2011 14:05, John Hodrien a écrit : On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Alain Péan wrote: I'll try know, with the change in /etc/krb5.conf (validate = false), if it works now. It won't (or at least it shouldn't). Validate is essential as it confirms that the KDC providing the TGT to the user is

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 04:00 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: With today's CPU-performance and RAM available, software raids are not a problem to power. That depends. Software raid is fine for raid1 and raid0. If you want raid5 or raid6, you have to use hardware raid with bbu cache that

Re: [CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...

2011-04-13 Thread Calvin Webster
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 02:09 +0100, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote: Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of the question. RHEL 4 updates must be

Re: [CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...

2011-04-13 Thread Calvin Webster
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:11 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 04/12/2011 08:09 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote: Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is

Re: [CentOS] php53 and eacclerator

2011-04-13 Thread Ilyas --
Hi! If you need you can get php53 source rpm from next URL http://yum.aclub.net/pub/linux/centos/5/umask/SRPMS/ there is php53 with suhosin patch, php-fpm support, suhosin extension, eaccelerator support etc (see other php\* packages). I'm using this packages on several production servers.

Re: [CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

2011-04-13 Thread Phil Schaffner
Karanbir Singh wrote on 04/13/2011 06:54 AM: They are definitely in there, just slow. Must be vanishingly slow. :-) Just checked half a dozen tier 1 mirrors and none has src.rpm files in .../5.6/os/SRPMS/ There are some in 5.6/updates/SRPMS/. Phil

[CentOS] SQL*Plus output as PDF [Linux]

2011-04-13 Thread Sven Aluoor
Hi folks I generate with SQL*Plus a CSV file. How to convert this to PDF? Or more generally: how to get SQL*Plus output to PDF on Linux? cheers Sven ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Ross Walker
On Apr 13, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 04:00 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: With today's CPU-performance and RAM available, software raids are not a problem to power. That depends. Software raid is fine for raid1 and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 and php53 packages

2011-04-13 Thread Alexander Farber
Thank you for the replies and the new release ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] php53 and eacclerator

2011-04-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
We use APC since upgrading to php52 as there weren't any eaccelerator rpms available anymore. Haven't seen much difference. I'd be interested to know if anyone did a comparison. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] problems in centos-5.6

2011-04-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Farkas Levente wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:45:07 +0200: they are there. may be you should have to check it again:-) you are right, I didn't get it with yum list. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] php53 and eacclerator

2011-04-13 Thread Rainer Traut
Am 13.04.2011 14:28, schrieb Raj kumar: ok -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Traut Sent: 13 April 2011 17:57 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] php53 and eacclerator Hi. There does not seem to be a

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 06:49:08 PM Drew wrote: Where can I get an enterprise-class 2TB drive for $100? Commodity SATA isn't enterprise-class. I can get Seagate's Constellation ES series SATA drives in 1TB for $125. 2TB will run me around $225. Yeah, those are reasonable near-line

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:18 PM, Ross Walker wrote: On Apr 13, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Christopher Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 04:00 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: With today's CPU-performance and RAM available, software raids are not a problem to

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 07:00:26 PM compdoc wrote: I've had good luck with green, 5400 rpm Samsung drives. They don't spin down automatically and work fine in my raid 5 arrays. The cost is about $80 for 2TB drives. And that's a good price point for a commodity drive; not something I would

Re: [CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project. [FLUFF]

2011-04-13 Thread m . roth
Ross Walker wrote: On Apr 12, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:34 AM, Ross Walker wrote: On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Dag Wieersd...@wieers.com wrote: On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Keith Keller wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at

[CentOS] Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box

2011-04-13 Thread Kaushal Shriyan
Hi, I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box. *Its not detected.* Details are as below :- [root@asterisk ~]# lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 Host Bridge (rev 01) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc

[CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi all, I would like to monitor the power consumption of my server. What I am looking for is: * a simple monitoring device that would measure the power consumption of 1 server * a way to get the consumption reading from that device to my centos server (via usb / wlan / whatever works) Any

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread Rafa Griman
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Peter Peltonen peter.pelto...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I would like to monitor the power consumption of my server. What I am looking for is: * a simple monitoring device that would measure the power consumption of 1 server * a way to get the consumption

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread aly . khimji
Peter, I have never done it directly of a servers PSU, however I am sure it can be done via SNMP or on a lower level via a management interface(iLO, B/RSA, etc..). However I have done it from a good APC PDU that had SNMP monitoring for all kinds of power aspects. Hope that helps. Aly

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Chan Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:45 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations While we are at it, disks being directly connected to

Re: [CentOS] [OT] SQL*Plus output as PDF [Linux]

2011-04-13 Thread Trutwin, Joshua
I generate with SQL*Plus a CSV file. How to convert this to PDF? Or more generally: how to get SQL*Plus output to PDF on Linux? Marked as Off Topic. I would do this: sqlplus SET MARKUP HTML ON SPOOL foo.html SELECT * FROM emp; SPOOL OFF Quit sqlplus and use htmldoc to convert foo.html to

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi, On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:26 PM, aly.khi...@gmail.com wrote: I have never done it directly of a servers PSU, however I am sure it can be done via SNMP or on a lower level via a management interface(iLO, B/RSA, etc..). However I have done it from a good APC PDU that had SNMP monitoring

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:32 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Chan Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 3:45 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System

Re: [CentOS] SQL*Plus output as PDF [Linux]

2011-04-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
why do you think this should be asked here? Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [OT] SQL*Plus output as PDF [Linux]

2011-04-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/13/2011 9:34 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote: I generate with SQL*Plus a CSV file. How to convert this to PDF? Or more generally: how to get SQL*Plus output to PDF on Linux? Marked as Off Topic. I would do this: sqlplus SET MARKUP HTML ON SPOOL foo.html SELECT * FROM emp; SPOOL OFF

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread compdoc
The biggest issue isn't the spindown. Google 'WDTLER' and see the other, bigger, issue. In a nutshell, TLER (Time-Limited Error Recovery; see https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/TLER ) allows the drive to not try to recover soft errors quite as long. The error recovery time can

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread compdoc
I would like to monitor the power consumption of my server. What I am looking for is: How about an external device? I own one of those killawatt devices. You can program in your local power cost, and it displays how much it actually costs to run the server. (along with lots of other info)

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread Peter Peltonen
Hi, On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:11 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote: How about an external device? I own one of those killawatt devices. You can program in your local power cost, and it displays how much it actually costs to run the server. (along with lots of other info) An external

[CentOS] Expanding RAID 10 array, WAS: 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/13/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: to expand the array :) I haven't had problems doing it this way yet. I finally figured out my mistake creating the raid devices and got a working RAID 0 on two RAID 1 arrays. But I wasn't able to add another RAID 1 component to the array with the

[CentOS] (no subject)

2011-04-13 Thread Kevin Thorpe
Hi all, I've got a bit of an issue with reinstalling a server. I can get the installer to boot off a memory stick made with unetbootin, but I can't seem to find the installation files on the stick. I have hda, sda and sdb but none are acceptable install media. How do I mount the USB stick

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote: There is no compelling reason to tamper with a system that works that I have seen so far. Is there any amount of elapsed time that will convince you otherwise? I'll refrain from calling this passage of time a delay, since that would imply some sort of

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

2011-04-13 Thread Eero Volotinen
2011/4/13 Kevin Thorpe kevin.tho...@pibenchmark.com: Hi all,        I've got a bit of an issue with reinstalling a server. I can get the installer to boot off a memory stick made with unetbootin, but I can't seem to find the installation files on the stick. I have hda, sda and sdb but none

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
I'm not aware of an IPMI command that shows current power consumption. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-13 Thread Mailing List
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote: Hi, I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right time on the machine. This is with /

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread John Hodrien
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Kai Schaetzl wrote: I'm not aware of an IPMI command that shows current power consumption. That entirely depends on the system as far as I'm aware. Dell R610 will give you this information from ipmitool sdr: Current 1| 0.28 Amps | ok Current 2|

Re: [CentOS] Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box

2011-04-13 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box. Its not detected. Details are as below :- I have seen these type of cards detected as something else. Its also been ages since I used asterisk anyway, I use FreeSWITCH now and as you

Re: [CentOS] Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box

2011-04-13 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kaushal Shriyan kaushalshri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box. Its not detected. Details are as below :- Sounds like a hardware problem. I'm running CentOS 5.5

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

2011-04-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/13/2011 10:22 AM, Kevin Thorpe wrote: Hi all, I've got a bit of an issue with reinstalling a server. I can get the installer to boot off a memory stick made with unetbootin, but I can't seem to find the installation files on the stick. I have hda, sda and sdb but none are

[CentOS] CentOS on SSDs...

2011-04-13 Thread John Doe
Hi, I was just wondering if there are specific steps to take to install CentOS on SSDs... By example, no swap partition? Format with a flash fs? Sysctl parameters? Thx, JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread aly . khimji
Peter, The ones I used were from APC and are under the product line of Metered Rack PDU, u can find them on the apc website. Here are a few product numbers from that line(APC7800,801,802) they all have web, snmp (u can graph with MRTG, or whatever), Telnet access, etc.. they start at about

Re: [CentOS] Monitoring power consumption

2011-04-13 Thread Tom Diehl
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Peter Peltonen wrote: Hi, On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:11 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote: How about an external device? I own one of those killawatt devices. You can program in your local power cost, and it displays how much it actually costs to run the server.

Re: [CentOS] Expanding RAID 10 array, WAS: 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Ross Walker
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/13/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: to expand the array :) I haven't had problems doing it this way yet. I finally figured out my mistake creating the raid devices and got a working RAID 0 on two

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote: There is no compelling reason to tamper with a system that works that I have seen so far. Is there any amount of elapsed time that will convince you otherwise? I'll refrain from calling this passage of

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread Radu Gheorghiu
On 04/13/2011 07:55 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote: There is no compelling reason to tamper with a system that works that I have seen so far. Is there any amount of elapsed time that will convince you otherwise?

Re: [CentOS] CentOS on SSDs...

2011-04-13 Thread Jim Angell
On 04/13/2011 10:28 AM, John Doe wrote: Hi, I was just wondering if there are specific steps to take to install CentOS on SSDs... By example, no swap partition? Format with a flash fs? Sysctl parameters? Thx, JD ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-13 Thread Rob Kampen
Mailing List wrote: On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote: Hi, I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right time on the machine.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS on SSDs...

2011-04-13 Thread Jim Nelson
On 4/13/2011 12:28 PM, John Doe wrote: Hi, I was just wondering if there are specific steps to take to install CentOS on SSDs... By example, no swap partition? Format with a flash fs? Sysctl parameters? Thx, JD We're running an nginx frontend on SSDs right now - don't bother with things

Re: [CentOS] Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box

2011-04-13 Thread Nicolas Ross
I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box. Its not detected. Details are as below :- Sounds like a hardware problem. I'm running CentOS 5.5 with three Sangoma cards and Asterisk. The one is showing up as a A200 card

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

2011-04-13 Thread Phil Schaffner
Kevin Thorpe wrote on 04/13/2011 11:22 AM: ... It's probably something simple I'm missing. http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/13/2011 11:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: People have a choice. They can use CentOS or they can use something else. Or they can try to convince the project not to follow the Whitebox example of not matching resources to the task. There is no time limit that we would go past where I would

Re: [CentOS] SNMP monitoring options

2011-04-13 Thread aurfalien
On Apr 12, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Keith Keller wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:23:19AM +1000, Bob Hepple wrote: We looked at a number of monitoring systems before closing on (community version) Opsview. The main other contender we looked at was zenoss - I have to admit I was biased due to

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/13/2011 12:28 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 4/13/2011 11:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: People have a choice. They can use CentOS or they can use something else. Or they can try to convince the project not to follow the Whitebox example of not matching resources to the task. There is

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread Phil Schaffner
Johnny Hughes wrote on 04/13/2011 12:55 PM: CentOS is ... right now ... deployed on 29% of web servers on the Internet that use Linux. That 28.9% is down from the high of 33.5% in Oct. 2010 or a 13.8% decrease. http://w3techs.com/technologies/history_details/os-linux Phil

Re: [CentOS] SNMP monitoring options

2011-04-13 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Well, Nagios is more for outage/alerts were I was looking more for trending. Thats why I was originally using Cacti w/Nagios plugin. There are plenty of graphing/trending addons for Nagios, I moved to Icinga and use PNP4Nagios with it. ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] SNMP monitoring options

2011-04-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/13/2011 12:39 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: We looked at a number of monitoring systems before closing on (community version) Opsview. The main other contender we looked at was zenoss - I have to admit I was biased due to previous use of and liking of nagios. So, if I already have a

Re: [CentOS] SNMP monitoring options

2011-04-13 Thread aurfalien
On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: Well, Nagios is more for outage/alerts were I was looking more for trending. Thats why I was originally using Cacti w/Nagios plugin. There are plenty of graphing/trending addons for Nagios, I moved to Icinga and use PNP4Nagios with it.

Re: [CentOS] SNMP monitoring options

2011-04-13 Thread Baird, Josh
I'd give ZenOSS a try if I were you. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:50 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] SNMP monitoring options On 4/13/2011 12:39 PM,

Re: [CentOS] SNMP monitoring options

2011-04-13 Thread aurfalien
On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 4/13/2011 12:39 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: We looked at a number of monitoring systems before closing on (community version) Opsview. The main other contender we looked at was zenoss - I have to admit I was biased due to previous use

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/13/2011 12:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: OK, if you are going to use that as an example, please tell me how many of those people made that choice knowing that updates were going to be months behind upstream. There's certainly nothing on the project web site to imply that. How about I

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread m . roth
Radu Gheorghiu wrote: On 04/13/2011 07:55 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote: snip There is no time limit that we would go past where I would allow people who I do not know and trust to commit items into the CentOS

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread aurfalien
On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 4/13/2011 12:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: OK, if you are going to use that as an example, please tell me how many of those people made that choice knowing that updates were going to be months behind upstream. There's certainly

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread Brunner, Brian T.
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: Radu Gheorghiu wrote: On 04/13/2011 07:55 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote: snip There is no time limit that we would go past where I would allow people who I do not know and trust

Re: [CentOS] yum update - missing dependencies

2011-04-13 Thread Dvorkin, Asya
It looks like you are using OpenAFS packages built for a specific kernel - in this case the 5.5 kernel-2.6.18-194.26.1.el5. My guess would be that in updating to 5.6, yum has automatically removed that older kernel. You need to get kmod-openafs packages that match the version of your currently

Re: [CentOS] Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box

2011-04-13 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote: I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box. Its not detected. Details are as below :- Sounds like a hardware problem. I'm running CentOS 5.5 with

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

2011-04-13 Thread Kevin Thorpe
It's probably something simple I'm missing. http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey I started from there and used unetbootin which has always worked for me before. The boot works but it can't find the RPMS which are definitely on the stick. bah!

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread m . roth
Brunner, Brian T. wrote: centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: Radu Gheorghiu wrote: On 04/13/2011 07:55 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 04/13/2011 10:24 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 4/12/2011 5:40 PM, R P Herrold wrote: snip There is no time limit that we would go past where I would allow people who

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/13/2011 1:01 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: How many INSTALLS of CentOS do you still choose to have? I think you know the answer for CentOS 6. I haven't deployed any new services on CentOS since the 5.4 release, and am generally losing to the guy who favors SUSE here - and even the

Re: [CentOS] Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box

2011-04-13 Thread Kaushal Shriyan
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote: I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box. Its not detected. Details

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread aurfalien
On Apr 13, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 4/13/2011 1:01 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote: How many INSTALLS of CentOS do you still choose to have? I think you know the answer for CentOS 6. I haven't deployed any new services on CentOS since the 5.4 release, and am generally

Re: [CentOS] audio recorder compatibility

2011-04-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/12/2011 5:12 PM, ken wrote: I'm shopping for a small/tiny audio recorder, the kind for recording in a class, interviews, etc... not really music, just voice. Per usual, a lot of these write their audio files in some Windows format, e.g., WMA. As a confirmed Linux guy, I'd want to

Re: [CentOS] CentOs 5.6 and Time Sync

2011-04-13 Thread Mailing List
On 4/13/2011 1:08 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: there are two other 238 kernels - do they show the same behavior? I will install kernel-2.6.18-238.5.1.el5.centos.plus and let the list know how it goes. I totally forgot that there was a Plus repo. I actually had it disabled. Brian.

Re: [CentOS] Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box

2011-04-13 Thread Nicolas Ross
Hi I get anaconda.log:23:07:59 DEBUG : ignoring driverless device Sangoma Technologies Corp. A200/Remora FXO/FXS Analog AFT card Linux asterisk 2.6.18-194.11.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 10 19:05:06 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux lspci | grep sangoma does not return anything Please

Re: [CentOS] Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box

2011-04-13 Thread m . roth
Kaushal Shriyan wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Nicolas Ross rossnick-li...@cybercat.ca wrote: I have Sangoma A101DE 1 Port E1/T1 With Hardware Echo Cancellation ( PCI Express ) Card installed on the box.

  1   2   >