On 05/12/2011 02:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
But at that time there should only be one point release on the table,
instead of two point releases and one major release. Is everyone
forgetting that 4.9, 5.6 and 6.0 were all out at the same time?
As far as users know, all work on 6.0 was postponed
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 05/12/2011 02:05 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
But at that time there should only be one point release on the table,
instead of two point releases and one major release. Is everyone
forgetting that 4.9, 5.6 and 6.0 were all
Good morning, We are trying to figure out how to properly provide adresss
hints to mmap on 32-bit Centos 5.5. Does any documentation exist about to how
to provide address hints to mmap on 32-bit Centos 5.5? If so, where can we find
this documentation.
In order to understand mmap better,
On 15 May 2011 12:45, Frank Chang frank_chan...@hotmail.com wrote:
In order to understand mmap better, we decided to try to find the
Centos 5.5 source code for mmap.c. We already installed the kernel source
You should be looking at glibc source code.
On 15 May 2011 12:58, Hakan Koseoglu
You should be looking at glibc source code.
Scratch that, i'm talking rubbish
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi List,
I am looking for 1U firewall hardware, any ideas? Something like that
(http://www.applianceshop.eu/index.php/firewalls/opnsense/opnsense-pfsense-ghz-19-appliance-1.html)
but at least with 5GBit nics and more memory.
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi List,
I am looking for 1U firewall hardware, any ideas? Something like that
(http://www.applianceshop.eu/index.php/firewalls/opnsense/opnsense-pfsense-ghz-19-appliance-1.html)
but at least with 5GBit nics and more
A perhaps stupid question from a newby
Why 4.9 is out in a so long time frame after 5.0?
5.6 -- CentOS - 4/8/11SL - (Soon) --
same time frame (1 of 3)
5.5 -- CentOS - 5/14/10 SL - 5/19/10
5.4 -- CentOS - 10/21/9 SL -
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 16:35, Michel Donais don...@telupton.com wrote:
A perhaps stupid question from a newby
Why 4.9 is out in a so long time frame after 5.0?
5.6 -- CentOS - 4/8/11 SL - (Soon) --
same time frame (1 of 3)
5.5 -- CentOS -
On 05/15/2011 08:41 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 16:35, Michel Donais don...@telupton.com wrote:
A perhaps stupid question from a newby
Why 4.9 is out in a so long time frame after 5.0?
5.6 -- CentOS - 4/8/11SL - (Soon) --
same time frame (1 of
2011/5/15 Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi List,
I am looking for 1U firewall hardware, any ideas? Something like that
On 05/15/2011 03:52 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Gordon Messmeryiny...@eburg.com wrote:
As far as users know, all work on 6.0 was postponed to get 5.6 done. At
the time of 5.6's release, it was the only release the team was working
on. Work on 5 should have been
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
No, I'm not. Neither I nor Dag, as far as I saw, brought SL into the
conversation at all. The question is not whether CentOS can build
releases in less time than SL, or even a reasonable amount of time. The
question
You can use something like this Atom 525 dual core motherboard:
http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/NF99.html
Or this Atom C550 dual core board:
http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/NC9C.html
With the AD3INLAN-G daughterboard:
http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/Daughter_Board.html
This will give you 5
On 5/15/2011 5:26 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
You can use something like this Atom 525 dual core motherboard:
http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/NF99.html
Or this Atom C550 dual core board:
http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/NC9C.html
With the AD3INLAN-G daughterboard:
pci is a shared bus with a max of 2 gigabits. you'll see a gigabit but
never see two or more.
I am aware of that. But as I said it depends on your particular needs in
*concurrent* traffic. Although it cannot sustain simultaneous Gigabit
debits on all interfaces, i can sustain Gigabit
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:38 PM, William Warren
hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:
On 5/15/2011 5:26 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
You can use something like this Atom 525 dual core motherboard:
http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/NF99.html
Or this Atom C550 dual core board:
pci is a shared bus with a max of 2 gigabits. you'll see a gigabit but
never see two or more.
I am aware of that. But as I said it depends on your particular needs in
*concurrent* traffic. Although it cannot sustain simultaneous Gigabit
debits on all interfaces, i can sustain Gigabit bursts
I would defiantly stick with PCIe for 5 NICs. Additionally Realtek
NICs don't offer the best performance and their drivers are hit or
miss. The Supermicro board has Intel PCIe NICs onboard and a PCIe
expansion slot. This should give you full performance depending on the
Atom processor. It
The daughterboard I pointed to contains Intel 3 Gigabit chips.
Ooops, I meant *3 Intel Gigabit chips*.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
pci is a shared bus with a max of 2 gigabits. you'll see a gigabit but
never see two or more.
I am aware of that. But as I said it depends on your particular needs in
*concurrent* traffic. Although it cannot sustain
On 05/15/2011 02:23 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
Obviously I missed the part where I (or someone) said (or claimed)
that 6.1 could be done in a month.
Well, that is where this branch of the thread began.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-May/111443.html
Ljubomir Ljubojevic began the
I'm assuming the OP is trying to save money. A firewall with 5xGbe
interfaces is going to thousands of dollars.
I was assuming the same. That's why I suggested the Jetway solution. I
is economic and works very well in many scenarios.
Not, of course, if you need *concurrent* Gigabit access on
I was assuming the same. That's why I suggested the Jetway solution. I
is economic and works very well in many scenarios.
Not, of course, if you need *concurrent* Gigabit access on several
interfaces. I stress *concurrent*
I built one of these to connect several vlans to a 24Mbit ADSL
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
I was assuming the same. That's why I suggested the Jetway solution. I
is economic and works very well in many scenarios.
Not, of course, if you need *concurrent* Gigabit access on several
interfaces. I stress
Does it have to be 1RU ?
These are excellent;
http://routerboard.com/index.php?showProduct=90
5 GIGABIT etc
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote:
Hi List,
I am looking for 1U firewall hardware, any ideas? Something like that
(
Sorry wrong URL;
I was trying to point you to the RB750G model in particular.
http://routerboard.com/pricelist.php?showProduct=90
Cheers.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Brian McKerr bmck...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it have to be 1RU ?
These are excellent;
Does it have to be 1RU ?
This one is 1U:
http://routerboard.com/pricelist.php?showProduct=98
13 Gigabit ports
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I'm a big fan of Sonicwall have a look at what they offer ... price not
too bad either
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.ptwrote:
Does it have to be 1RU ?
This one is 1U:
http://routerboard.com/pricelist.php?showProduct=98
13 Gigabit ports
On 05/15/11 5:00 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
http://routerboard.com/pricelist.php?showProduct=98
13 Gigabit ports
note 10 of those ports are on ethernet switches, so the actual router
probably only has 5 ethernet ports, 3 dedicated and 2 switch groups of 5
ports each.
also note this doesn't
On 05/15/2011 05:12 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/15/2011 02:23 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
Obviously I missed the part where I (or someone) said (or claimed)
that 6.1 could be done in a month.
Well, that is where this branch of the thread began.
On 05/15/2011 05:56 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 05/15/11 5:00 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
http://routerboard.com/pricelist.php?showProduct=98
13 Gigabit ports
note 10 of those ports are on ethernet switches, so the actual router
probably only has 5 ethernet ports, 3 dedicated and 2 switch
On 05/12/2011 02:31 PM, Craig White wrote:
Apparently my company will potentially need to put in some servers for Asia
and is hoping to find a highly reliable data center in either Singapore or
Hong Kong if anyone has recommendations.
Thanks
You might check out the forums on
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
Look at wikipedia's page describing CentOS. They include a column for
the delay between the upstream release and CentOS's. For the 5 series,
it looks like:
Release Delay
5 28d
5.1 25d
5.2 34d
5.3
Hello,
I've got apache running on a centos 5.6 machine. All of my users have
a umask of 077 set in /etc/bashrc. I'm now wanting to give several of
them permission to write to a web area so they can place content
visible to the web server. I've got two groups webdev1 and webdev2
which I want one to
I have a CentOS virtual private server from 1and1.com If I checkout or
pull something from a repository, it will contain an autogen.sh file
Running this and then configure seems to work. However, when I run make
I get a lot of error messages from libtool saying that such and such a
command
On 05/15/2011 11:32 PM, John J. Boyer wrote:
I have a CentOS virtual private server from 1and1.com If I checkout or
pull something from a repository, it will contain an autogen.sh file
Running this and then configure seems to work. However, when I run make
I get a lot of error messages from
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:32:24PM -0500, John J. Boyer wrote:
I have a CentOS virtual private server from 1and1.com If I checkout or
pull something from a repository, it will contain an autogen.sh file
Running this and then configure seems to work. However, when I run make
I get a lot of
señores sigo en la pelea no me rindo! , resulta que me conseguí otro
cacharro para hacer el filtro de contenido con
squid+dansguardian+havp+shorewall , tengo las dos interfaces de red ,
todo funciona perfecto seteando el proxy manual en cada equipo ,
excepto haciéndolo con proxy transparente pues
has activado ipforward en tu shorewall?
César D. Cruz Arrunátegui
- Mensaje original -
De: troxlinux xserverli...@gmail.com
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Enviados: Domingo, 15 de Mayo 2011 16:01:36 GMT -05:00 Colombia
Asunto: [CentOS-es] peleandome shorewall+dansguardian+squid+havp
verifica que tu archivo de politicas que la zona loc hacia net este en DROP,
normalmente esta en accept.
César
- Mensaje original -
De: troxlinux xserverli...@gmail.com
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Enviados: Domingo, 15 de Mayo 2011 16:01:36 GMT -05:00 Colombia
Asunto: [CentOS-es]
Hola Amigos
tengo el siguiente escenario:
Postfix 2.5.6 y actualmente estoy usando autenticación con sasl, Necesito
que ciertos usuarios de mi lan puedan enviar correos a ciertos correos
externos. Por ejemplo:
*j...@midominio.com *
pueda enviar correos a:
*miempr...@gmail.com,
El día 15 de mayo de 2011 16:03, César CRUZ ARRUNATEGUI
cc...@mail.ipd.gob.pe escribió:
verifica que tu archivo de politicas que la zona loc hacia net este en DROP,
normalmente esta en accept.
Si asi lo tengo y el ip_Forwarding esta on , según la documentación es
para que navegue sin problema
On 5/12/11 3:19 PM, Santi Saez wrote:
El 11/05/2011 22:48, Diego Chacon escribió:
Hola Diego, bienvenido! :)
He estado investigando como ser notificado de las actualizacion de
seguridad en los servidores.
A manera de ejemplo, en Debian utilizaba la herramienta cron-apt, la
cual yo podia
On 5/13/11 3:56 AM, Oscar Osta Pueyo wrote:
Hola,
2011/5/12 Santi Saezsantis...@woop.es:
El 11/05/2011 22:48, Diego Chacon escribió:
Hola Diego, bienvenido! :)
He estado investigando como ser notificado de las actualizacion de
seguridad en los servidores.
A manera de ejemplo, en Debian
45 matches
Mail list logo
