Hi all,
Let's say I activate password expiration for every account (including
root) for every 90 days.
I understand that cronjob for root will fail when the password expires.
The question is, if I setup a cronjob every 90 days to renew the root
password like: echo diFficulT123 | passwd --stdin
On 06/22/2011 11:46 PM, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
I mean at second 1 on the 90th day, which will run first?
- The cronjob to renew the password
- Or the password expiration, thus preventing the cronjob from running.
just setup the password renewing job to run one minute earlier
or
don't expire
On Thursday 23 Jun 2011 07:46:01 Fajar Priyanto wrote:
I understand that cronjob for root will fail when the password expires.
AFAIK, account does not need to have a password at all for cron to work.
Apart from that if you're going to automatically reset root's password you may
as well just
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Michael Gliwinski
michael.gliwin...@henderson-group.com wrote:
On Thursday 23 Jun 2011 07:46:01 Fajar Priyanto wrote:
I understand that cronjob for root will fail when the password expires.
AFAIK, account does not need to have a password at all for cron to
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
As Les wrote in another branch of the thread, search clause is if you
try name without a domain.
I think it's slightly more subtle and possibly more annoying than that.
Say you have a machine called foo.mydomain.com
By default (if you don't
Can you avoid the bar.baz.domain.com.domain.com by searching for
bar.baz.domain.com.
(note trailing dot)
??
On Thu, June 23, 2011 11:06, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
As Les wrote in another branch of the thread, search clause is if you
try name
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Giles Coochey wrote:
Can you avoid the bar.baz.domain.com.domain.com by searching for
bar.baz.domain.com.
(note trailing dot)
??
Hmm, good suggestion, that I'd not considered, Thanks. It does appear to
clear that up (down to two lookups from three: an and an A).
On Thu, June 23, 2011 11:53, John Hodrien wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Giles Coochey wrote:
Can you avoid the bar.baz.domain.com.domain.com by searching for
bar.baz.domain.com.
(note trailing dot)
??
Hmm, good suggestion, that I'd not considered, Thanks. It does appear to
clear that up
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Giles Coochey wrote:
Yes, I'm sure it will depend on the implementation, the trailing dot was
somewhat an educated guess from previous ISC BIND dig tool use. :-)
As for both the A and record, I think you will have that until IPv4
is fully deprecated by IPv6 and no
On Thu, June 23, 2011 12:07, John Hodrien wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Giles Coochey wrote:
Yes, I'm sure it will depend on the implementation, the trailing dot was
somewhat an educated guess from previous ISC BIND dig tool use. :-)
As for both the A and record, I think you will have
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Giles Coochey wrote:
Well, if you have access to the source, you can probably modify some
constants to disable particular protocols, or there may be compile time
options already - it would be nice to disable automatically on runtime if
the host does not have a IPv6
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Fajar Priyanto
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 22:23
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Year in log files
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:18 AM, lists-centos
Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Fajar Priyanto
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 22:23
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Year in log files
On Thu, Jun 23,
did something similar recently...
dhcpd.conf
--
class VMware { match if ( substring(hardware,1,3) = 00:50:56 ); }
subnet 10.1.1.224 netmask 255.255.255.240 {
#other subnet specific stuff here
pool { allow
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to be
re-assured that there are not currently any major issues before
starting a new project that looks like it will be using ext4.
I've previously been using xfs but the software for this project
requires ext3/ext4.
I'm always
On Thursday 23 June 2011 19:16:37 PJ wrote:
I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to be
re-assured that there are not currently any major issues before
starting a new project that looks like it will be using ext4.
I've previously been using xfs but the software for
I was trying to do some performance testing between using iSCSI on the
host as a diskfile to a guest vs the VM guest using the iSCSI device
directly.
However, in the process of trying to establish a baseline performance
figure, I started increasing the MTU settings on the PCI-express NICs
with
On 06/23/2011 01:28 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
I was trying to do some performance testing between using iSCSI on the
host as a diskfile to a guest vs the VM guest using the iSCSI device
directly.
However, in the process of trying to establish a baseline performance
On 6/24/11, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
Realtek NICs are known to be some of the poorest interfaces available. A
quality Intel or Broadcom NIC will set you back very little in terms of
cost. Just replace it and be done. :)
I was afraid that might be the case (already had two Intel
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Does anybody know of a proven solution or is the Realtek chip itself
irrevocably broken/bugged that anything above the default 1500 will
simply not work?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 06/23/2011 06:29 AM, Steven Tardy wrote:
did something similar recently...
dhcpd.conf
--
class VMware { match if ( substring(hardware,1,3) = 00:50:56 ); }
subnet 10.1.1.224 netmask 255.255.255.240 {
#other
PJ writes:
I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to be
re-assured that there are not currently any major issues before
starting a new project that looks like it will be using ext4.
I've previously been using xfs but the software for this project
requires
Just another happy camper here. We have ext4 for some high-volume servers
and have experienced no operational problems.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Original Message -
I was trying to do some performance testing between using iSCSI on the
host as a diskfile to a guest vs the VM guest using the iSCSI device
directly.
However, in the process of trying to establish a baseline performance
figure, I started increasing the MTU
Tim Nelson wrote:
- Original Message -
I was trying to do some performance testing between using iSCSI on the
host as a diskfile to a guest vs the VM guest using the iSCSI device
directly.
However, in the process of trying to establish a baseline performance
figure, I started
- Original Message -
I can not say I had any problems with Realtek NIC's. I operate a small
WISP and I am active in StarOS wireless network reouter community.
Most
of us there agree that when you have problems with NICS like 3Com or
even Intel, you can always use Realtek NIC's for
Hi all,
I have a CentOS 5.6 xen domU that is used for hosting several Apache
virtual hosts that use MySQL.
Lately, this domU has been having performance issues and I've noticed
web pages loaded from this server opening slower than usual.
When I run 'top' I see mysqld constantly consuming 10-60%
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Marian Marinov m...@yuhu.biz wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 19:16:37 PJ wrote:
I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to be
re-assured that there are not currently any major issues before
starting a new project that looks like it will
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM, PJ pauljer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Marian Marinov m...@yuhu.biz wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 19:16:37 PJ wrote:
I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to be
re-assured that there are not currently any
On Thursday 23 June 2011 22:31:28 PJ wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Marian Marinov m...@yuhu.biz wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 19:16:37 PJ wrote:
I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to be
re-assured that there are not currently any major issues before
On Thursday 23 June 2011 22:41:50 PJ wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM, PJ pauljer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Marian Marinov m...@yuhu.biz wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 19:16:37 PJ wrote:
I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Marian Marinov m...@yuhu.biz wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 22:41:50 PJ wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM, PJ pauljer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Marian Marinov m...@yuhu.biz wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 19:16:37 PJ wrote:
On Jun 23, 2011, at 12:16 PM, PJ wrote:
I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to be
re-assured that there are not currently any major issues before
starting a new project that looks like it will be using ext4.
I've previously been using xfs but the software for
On 6/23/2011 12:16 PM, PJ wrote:
I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to be
re-assured that there are not currently any major issues before
starting a new project that looks like it will be using ext4.
I've previously been using xfs but the software for this
On Friday, June 24, 2011 01:20 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
First bottleneck was discovering the max MTU allowed on these is 7K
instead of 9K but googling seems to indicate that the RTL8168B is only
capable of 4K frames.
Yeah, the 8168C goes up to 7k. Some 8168B go up to 6k.
I assumed 4K
I love Centos. Have in on my data centre servers, my home servers, my
laptop and my netbook. Yes there are serious and continuing security
concerns relating to Gnome and KDE but they are not Centos.
Currently running 5.6 and would like a two set DVD of that version.
However none of the mirrors
P.S.
Johnny,
Thank you for Seahorse. Much appreciated.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Currently running 5.6 and would like a two set DVD of that version.
However none of the mirrors offer pure DVDs only Torrent versions which
involve the possibility of bits being tampered with and things leaving
my servers without explicit knowledge and authority.
None of the CD / DVD sellers
Hi,
On Friday, June 24, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Always Learning wrote:
[ ... ]
Currently running 5.6 and would like a two set DVD of that version.
However none of the mirrors offer pure DVDs only Torrent versions which
involve the possibility of bits being tampered with and things leaving
my
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 18:00 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Currently running 5.6 and would like a two set DVD of that version.
However none of the mirrors offer pure DVDs only Torrent versions which
involve the possibility of bits being tampered with and things leaving
my servers without
Hi Edo,
Currently running 5.6 and would like a two set DVD of that version.
However none of the mirrors offer pure DVDs only Torrent versions which
involve the possibility of bits being tampered with and things leaving
my servers without explicit knowledge and authority.
None of the
We have a single 27TB partition (35 x 1TB drives as RAID5+0 in an HP MDS600),
just formatted it xfs and had no problems with it so far.
It's used as scratch space so not too concerned about performance.
--Russell
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
On Friday 24 June 2011 04:34:20 Smithies, Russell wrote:
We have a single 27TB partition (35 x 1TB drives as RAID5+0 in an HP
MDS600), just formatted it xfs and had no problems with it so far. It's
used as scratch space so not too concerned about performance.
--Russell
I have compared the
On 6/23/11 8:44 PM, Marian Marinov wrote:
I have compared the performance of both XFS and Ext4. And since I use those
big machines for backups, for me the write performance was very important.
XFS was almost twice slower.
Twice slower? At what kind of operations? I don't think any filesystem
Thank you. I note your reservation as long as you get the
original .torrent file from a reliable source. I don't know what this
exactly means.
I prefer virgin copies.
right now, you get that virgin copy off one or another of the centos
mirrors, and check its md5 against the master copy
On Thursday 23 June 2011 20:23, Always Learning wrote:
Currently running 5.6 and would like a two set DVD of that version.
However none of the mirrors offer pure DVDs only Torrent versions
which involve the possibility of bits being tampered with and things
leaving my servers without explicit
Exept I cant create a new page ;/
You are not allowed to edit this page.
I've tried to follow the pattern and user this url:
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/BrazilianPortuguese?action=edit
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Manuel Wolfshant
wo...@nobugconsulting.rowrote:
On 06/23/2011 02:54 PM, Lucas do Amaral - Linux Sys. Admin (IFCE) wrote:
Exept I cant create a new page ;/
You are not allowed to edit this page.
I've tried to follow the pattern and user this url:
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/BrazilianPortuguese?action=edit
You
On 18.6.2011 20:19, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
Hello
I've created the first version of the ReleaseNotes page for CentOS
6.0 in the wiki. As usual, corrections / additions / translations are
welcome.
I found one minor issue
In section 2. Introduction
Welcome to the CentOS 6.0 release.
On 23 June 2011 18:02, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/19/11, Manuel Wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro wrote:
On 06/18/2011 10:47 PM, Cody Jackson wrote:
Section 6.3:
Even as an inexperienced CentOS user we can use your help sounds a
bit like the release team is
On 6/24/11, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote:
Thank you for the comment. I have made a note to examine that section
and adjust it, appropriately, in due course.
(Can anyone lend me a 30 hour day, please?)
Sorry, a request that you sent could not be delivered to one or more
of its
-
Your FirstnameLastname username;
LucasSaboya
-
The proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s);
translate the release notes and some other stuff to brazilian portuguese
- The proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s)
At this point, just the release notes
Am 23.06.11 20:19, schrieb Lucas do Amaral - Linux Sys. Admin (IFCE):
*
Your FirstnameLastname username;
LucasSaboya
*
The proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s);
translate the release notes and some other stuff to brazilian portuguese
I gave you access for the
On 06/23/2011 07:28 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
On 18.6.2011 20:19, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
Hello
I've created the first version of the ReleaseNotes page for CentOS
6.0 in the wiki. As usual, corrections / additions / translations are
welcome.
I found one minor issue
In section 2.
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0/BrazilianPortuguese?action=show
and we're done :)
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Manuel Wolfshant
wo...@nobugconsulting.rowrote:
On 06/23/2011 07:28 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
On 18.6.2011 20:19, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
Hello
Le 22/06/2011 23:12, R P Herrold a écrit :
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
The problem with RHEL6/CentOS6 is that Redhat bought
Qumranet (the KVM company) and decided to only ship
KVM host support in RHEL6.
RHEL6/CentOS6 runs as Xen VM though, so you can use
RHEL5/CentOS5 Xen
On 06/22/2011 11:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
The problem with RHEL6/CentOS6 is that Redhat bought
Qumranet (the KVM company) and decided to only ship
KVM host support in RHEL6.
RHEL6/CentOS6 runs as Xen VM though, so you can use
RHEL5/CentOS5 Xen
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:12:27PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
The sources that will become CentOS 6 will run xen.org
virtualization as a dom0, and KVM may be excluded
You said what?
Could one of the CentOS devs please confirm that you are going to
be breaking the binary/feature
Le 23/06/2011 17:16, R P Herrold a écrit :
I did not say the CentOS project was ** going to ship **
xen; I said:
The sources that will become CentOS 6 ** will run **
xen.org virtualization as a dom0, and KVM ** may be **
excluded
CentOS proper at the 6 level will ship KVM
On 06/23/2011 06:28 PM, Alain Péan wrote:
Le 23/06/2011 17:16, R P Herrold a écrit :
I did not say the CentOS project was ** going to ship **
xen; I said:
The sources that will become CentOS 6 ** will run **
xen.org virtualization as a dom0, and KVM ** may be **
excluded
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Alain Péan wrote:
I must say that the meaning of your message is not clear for me. What is
the difference for you between The sources that will become CentOS 6,
and CentOS proper ? What do you have in mind ? Why KVM may be excluded ?
for reasons out of scope here, CentOS
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
Without implying that I can read his mind, I guess he meant People with
enough skills will be able to tweak C6 to use xen as Dom0
Wolfie beat me to the post by eight seconds, it seems
Yes, it appears that he can read my mind
-- Russ herrold
Le 23/06/2011 17:49, R P Herrold a écrit :
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Alain Péan wrote:
I must say that the meaning of your message is not clear for me. What is
the difference for you between The sources that will become CentOS 6,
and CentOS proper ? What do you have in mind ? Why KVM may be
On 06/23/2011 06:54 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
Russ if you have time can you elaborate more about why you are
continuing to go down the Xen path, I for one would love to hear the
why's and what for. I can understand the hardware requirements, and I
know xen is generally going to be faster but
Le 23/06/2011 18:04, Manuel Wolfshant a écrit :
I'll give you my reasons :
- existing infra, setup and knowledge
- RH gave up promoting xen because it was acquired by a competitor, not
because it was not good ( or worse ) than kvm
I think there was another very good reason why Red Hat chose
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Tom Bishop wrote:
Russ if you have time can you elaborate more about why you are continuing to
go down the Xen path, I for one would love to hear the why's and what for.
I can understand the hardware requirements, and I know xen is generally
going to be faster but my
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Alain Péan wrote:
I must add that, due to the fact Dom0 has been included in recent Kernel
3.0 tree, it will certainly be possible in future releases of RHEL, then
CentOS, to choose either Xen or KVM as virtualization solution.
perhaps, but this is in part a LKML
Thank You Russ and Manuel Wolfshant, I don't know you well enough to call
you wolfy ;), for your comments, greatly appreciated. I support my home
stuff and a small install at my church. Since Redhats' decision to go KVM
and since my install will be Centos I was/have been migrating over to
Hola Ricardo y Walter.
Les agradezco por su respuesta.
Como recién estoy dentro del mundo Linux y de CentOS es nuevo para mí.
Si me pueden orientar sobre estos temas se los voy agradecer o que me digan
de donde puedo sacar información concreta sobre estos temas.
Les cuento que los servicios
2011/6/23 Luciano Andrés Chiarotto lachiaro...@gmail.com:
Si me pueden orientar sobre estos temas se los voy agradecer o que me digan
de donde puedo sacar información concreta sobre estos temas.
Les cuento que los servicios que tienen de autenticación es un NIS y NFS.
Este tutorial
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 22:53 -0500, ces can wrote:
no adivino ,
nosotros tampoco.
saludos
From: di...@gridshield.net
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:36:22 -0600
To: centos-es@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Aun con los problema en cron
2011/6/22 Carlos Jara Alva
Hola Eduardo.
Muchas gracias por tu respuesta.
Ahora me voy a poner a leer lo que vos me recomendas.
Saludos
--
_(@^@)__
Luciano Andres Chiarotto
Técnico Universitario en Microprocesadores
El saber es la parte principal de la felicidad.
Sócrates
Hola todos:
con una duda estoy tratando de hacer un nat con iptables pero el script que
consigui no funciona me marca un error con uno de los comandos si alguien
podria decirme si estoy escribiendo bien o si ese comando esta mal o en
donde la estoy regando estaria muy agradecido.
el comando que
la segunda instruccion deberia ser
*iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT*
El 23 de junio de 2011 11:22, Mario Villela Larraza
mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola todos:
con una duda estoy tratando de hacer un nat con iptables pero el script que
consigui no funciona me marca un error con
2011/6/23 Mario Villela Larraza mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com:
Hola todos:
con una duda estoy tratando de hacer un nat con iptables pero el script que
consigui no funciona me marca un error con uno de los comandos si alguien
podria decirme si estoy escribiendo bien o si ese comando esta mal
Estuve viendo el link que te recomendo Eduardo, no esta mal pero no todo lo
que quieres hacer.
Esta lo inicial para poder autenticarte desde cualquier equipo, solo falta
el automounter de las carpetas de los usuarios.
Saludos
El 23 de junio de 2011 09:56, Luciano Andrés Chiarotto
El día 23 de junio de 2011 10:52, Mario Villela Larraza
mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com escribió:
Hola todos:
con una duda estoy tratando de hacer un nat con iptables pero el script que
consigui no funciona me marca un error con uno de los comandos si alguien
podria decirme si estoy
Hola Walter.
El link me sirvío, me puedo autenticar de cualquier nodo, ahora lo que vos
me comentas no me queda claro, si vos me podes orientar o decir donde puedo
encontrar material para solucionar esa parte te lo voy agradecer.
Saludos Luciano
El 23 de junio de 2011 13:28, Walter Cervini
2011/6/23 Luciano Andrés Chiarotto lachiaro...@gmail.com:
Hola Walter.
El link me sirvío, me puedo autenticar de cualquier nodo, ahora lo que vos
me comentas no me queda claro, si vos me podes orientar o decir donde puedo
encontrar material para solucionar esa parte te lo voy agradecer.
hola amigos
no he podido instalar centos 5.6 en un ml 370 g3 con raid 1 con dos discos
duros de 300 y raid 5 con 4 discos duros de 72.
el raid es por hardware atraves de tarjeta
me colaboran porfavor
Att.Rodrigo Arias Cabrales
Ingeniero de Sistemas
Esp. en Alta Gerencia
Hola Rodrigo,
necesitamos más datos, estás usando una o dos controladoras ¿?
El sistema en que raid lo quieres instalar ¿?
Cuál es el primer raid que carga cuando enciendes el server ¿?
Durante el proceso de instalación ves los raids ¿?
etc etc etc =)
un saludo!!!
2011/6/23 Rodrigo Arias
Tambien es valido lo que comenta Eduardo, pero si al momento del arranque no
hay conexion de red, tendra problemas.
Walter Cervini
[image: Twitter] http://twitter.com/@v0lp Latest tweet: @azra3l_1210 donde
la montaste, pc o tel movil
Follow @@v0lp http://twitter.com/@v0lp
83 matches
Mail list logo
