Re: [CentOS] Dedup (again)

2011-09-16 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org wrote: The OP was asking http://www.opendedup.org/ How is it? Hmm opendedup requires java which I'm not allowed to use. :( ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 to 5.7 upgrade

2011-09-16 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:04 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 to 5.7 upgrade For us, it's breaking an ssh-restrict script we use with

Re: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution

2011-09-16 Thread Michael Simpson
On 15 September 2011 19:58, James Nguyen ja...@callfire.com wrote On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:02 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: James Nguyen ja...@callfire.com So the premise for this question is that I setup an exclude=*.i368,*.i686 in my yum.conf. While doing a yum update I

Re: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution

2011-09-16 Thread B.J. McClure
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:01 +0100, Michael Simpson wrote: On 15 September 2011 19:58, James Nguyen ja...@callfire.com wrote On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:02 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: James Nguyen ja...@callfire.com So the premise for this question is that I setup an

Re: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution

2011-09-16 Thread Khusro Jaleel
On 15/09/11 10:02, John Doe wrote: What about using multilib_policy=best instead? JD This is what I do as well and it's worked well on many different machines now. i386/i686 packages are not automatically pulled in anymore, it automatically selects the right arch (x86_64).

Re: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution

2011-09-16 Thread Michael Simpson
There is a 64 bit flashplayer now that seems to work fine on 5.x and 6.x.  This is an old link so not sure if it's still good. http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_square.html Sorry for continuing the OT but i don't want some poor sod finding the above in google The 10square plugin

Re: [CentOS] Safely Remove Disk on LVM

2011-09-16 Thread Theo Band
On 09/16/2011 05:03 AM, Muhammad Panji wrote: Dear All, I plan to replace an error disk that is part of an LV. from LVM how-to it could be done with using pvmove to move all PE from old disk to new disk.But the howto also said that pvmove is slow. Anyone has experience using pvmove on 2TB

Re: [CentOS] fdisk on centos 6

2011-09-16 Thread Steve Clark
On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do the same thing? Scott - thanks I just tried -cu and same result. jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution

2011-09-16 Thread Stephen Cox
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Michael Simpson mikie.simp...@gmail.com wrote: There is a 64 bit flashplayer now that seems to work fine on 5.x and 6.x.  This is an old link so not sure if it's still good. http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_square.html Sorry for continuing the

[CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-16 Thread Janez Kosmrlj
The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications for all centos releases except for centos6. Is there a reason why or did the site maintainers just forget about it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-16 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications for all centos releases except for centos6. Is there a reason why or did the site maintainers just forget about it. The Centos web site needs updating. Perhaps

Re: [CentOS] Dedup (again)

2011-09-16 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: ZFS, ZFS, ZFS ___ Hi Christopher. Thanks for your hint. I'm testing it now on Centos. So far it's awesome!! ___

Re: [CentOS] fdisk on centos 6

2011-09-16 Thread Jerry Geis
On 09/16/2011 06:59 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do the same thing? Scott - thanks I just tried -cu and same result. jerry ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Update request

2011-09-16 Thread Drew
Step-1, get the major security stuff into 6.0/cr/. Step-3, Profit. ;-) -- Drew This started out as a hobby and spun horribly out of control. -Unknown ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] fdisk on centos 6

2011-09-16 Thread Steve Clark
On 09/16/2011 08:10 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: On 09/16/2011 06:59 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do the same thing? Scott - thanks I just tried -cu and same result. jerry

Re: [CentOS] fdisk on centos 6

2011-09-16 Thread Jerry Geis
On 09/16/2011 08:37 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 09/16/2011 08:10 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: On 09/16/2011 06:59 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 09/15/2011 06:03 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I think the fdisk in 6 tries to align on 4k boundaries. Does fdisk -c do the same thing? Scott - thanks I just tried

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread m . roth
Kahlil Hodgson wrote: On 16/09/11 08:22, Sebastiano Pilla wrote: Based on what I'm seeing, I do not think that yum is downloading a corrupt sqlite database, rather than it is creating a corrupt database all by itself. I have however no definite confirmation of this and I would like to have

Re: [CentOS] Dedup (again)

2011-09-16 Thread m . roth
Fajar Priyanto wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org wrote: The OP was asking http://www.opendedup.org/ How is it? Hmm opendedup requires java which I'm not allowed to use. :( Hey, like that's a bad thing? g mark

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 to 5.7 upgrade

2011-09-16 Thread m . roth
Sorin Srbu wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:04 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 to 5.7 upgrade For us, it's breaking an ssh-restrict

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread sebastiano
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:15:23 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Has anyone in this thread - I may have missed some posts last night - suggested yum reinstall yum? This wasn't suggested yet, so I've tried it and it fails in the same way (not unexpectedly, I would say): [root@picard ~]# yum

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread m . roth
sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote: On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:15:23 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Has anyone in this thread - I may have missed some posts last night - suggested yum reinstall yum? This wasn't suggested yet, so I've tried it and it fails in the same way (not unexpectedly, I would

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread m . roth
sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote: On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:15:23 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Has anyone in this thread - I may have missed some posts last night - suggested yum reinstall yum? This wasn't suggested yet, so I've tried it and it fails in the same way (not unexpectedly, I would

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread William Hooper
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:18 AM, sebasti...@datafaber.net wrote: [snip] So either several mirrors all have the same corrupted file, or my box is generating a corrupted file each time. I would tend towards the second hypothesis, since other people have successfully updated their 5.6

[CentOS] CentOS 6.0 Heartbeat missing logd??

2011-09-16 Thread Ken Dechick
Hello list, Working on migrating my existing High-Availability setups from CentOS 5.3 to 6.0, both x86_64. I generally setup a fairly simple 2 node active/passive cluster using DRBD , Heartbeat, and Pacemaker. Use these clusters to run our proprietary Medical software plus a few key services

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/16/11, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote: C1 c1ref c1customer (code) c1quantity (integers only) c1price (in cents) c1discount (2 decimal places held as integers) c1catalogue (code) c1date

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread m . roth
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: On 9/16/11, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote: C1 c1ref c1customer (code) c1quantity (integers only) snip then do a query: select c1quantity, c1price, c1discount from c1 where c1customer = 'joebloggs' and c1date like '10%'

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread sebastiano
I've finally managed to update one of my boxes to 5.7. I did it in a very roundabout way, which however confirms that at least in my boxes there's something wrong in the way yum creates the sqlite databases. I've basically followed the guide at http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreateLocalMirror

Re: [CentOS] Safely Remove Disk on LVM

2011-09-16 Thread Devin Reade
--On Friday, September 16, 2011 10:03:39 AM +0700 Muhammad Panji sumodi...@gmail.com wrote: I plan to replace an error disk that is part of an LV. I realize that this doesn't help you in this case, but if you are in the future able to put LVM on top of a RAID1/5/6 device it makes the process a

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread Alain Péan
Le 16/09/2011 17:26, sebasti...@datafaber.net a écrit : Many thanks to all the people on the list who have suggestions and advice, particularly to Alain Péan who pointed me in the right direction. You are welcome, but I don't know how my suggestions lead you to the idea to setup a local repo

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/15/11 12:51 PM, Always Learning wrote: that data is normalized, there is no redundant data in any of those tables, they are connected by the relations defined via the references ('foreign keys'). I would not design my orders database exactly like you have. once again, you completely

Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of sebasti...@datafaber.net Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 11:27 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum segmentation fault updating from 5.6 to 5.7 I've finally managed to

[CentOS] OT : ARIN Apologies .....

2011-09-16 Thread Always Learning
For those who use Centos and have problems with ARIN, here is today's apology from ARIN's Chief Engineer Andy Newton posted on ARIN-Tech. Follow-ups, if any, off-list please. Thank you. Paul -- All, We appreciate your patience and willingness to work with

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread Always Learning
Golly Gosh, here we go again. On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:10 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: On 09/15/11 12:51 PM, Always Learning wrote: I would not design my orders database exactly like you have. once again, you completely miss the point, and go off on a tangent explaining how YOU do

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread John R. Dennison
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:18:24PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: The point is I write programmes for pleasure. Naturally as an always learning individual, I appraise others' methods and when they seem advantageous and relevant I am likely to use them. The point is that absolutely none of

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread m . roth
Always Learning wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:10 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: On 09/15/11 12:51 PM, Always Learning wrote: snip When IBM introduced its Structured Query Language many years ago, it seemed like a helpful facility for end-users who could, using SQL, access they own data fairly

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread m . roth
John R. Dennison wrote: On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:18:24PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: The point is I write programmes for pleasure. Naturally as an always learning individual, I appraise others' methods and when they seem advantageous and relevant I am likely to use them. The point is

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 16:28 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: As a point of information, it *was* intended for -managers- to get reports themselves, rather than waiting weeks, or months, for a program to be written. Another cure for the software backlog. Heh. Heh. Heh I'm thinking of

[CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-16 Thread Thomas Dukes
Just got my Lenovo TS130 with a Xeon E3-1225 Processor, 4GB RAM, blah, blah, blah.. It won't boot CentOS 6.0 64 bit, Scientific Linux 64 bit 6.1, but will boot 32 bit CentOS 6.0. Any ideas? Otherwise, its going back to Amazon Monday and I'm done. Will keep my 5.7 Centos boxes until they rot!

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-16 Thread Ned Slider
On 09/16/2011 01:00 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications for all centos releases except for centos6. Is there a reason why or did the site maintainers just forget about it.

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-16 Thread Digimer
On 09/16/2011 09:52 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote: Just got my Lenovo TS130 with a Xeon E3-1225 Processor, 4GB RAM, blah, blah, blah.. It won't boot CentOS 6.0 64 bit, Scientific Linux 64 bit 6.1, but will boot 32 bit CentOS 6.0. Any ideas? Otherwise, its going back to Amazon Monday and I'm

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-16 Thread Always Learning
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 02:54 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: On 09/16/2011 01:00 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications for all centos releases except for centos6. Is there a

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-16 Thread Ned Slider
On 09/17/2011 03:23 AM, Always Learning wrote: On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 02:54 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: On 09/16/2011 01:00 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Janez Kosmrlj wrote: The page http://www.centos.org/product.html has product specifications for all centos

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-16 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 21:52 -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote: Just got my Lenovo TS130 with a Xeon E3-1225 Processor, 4GB RAM, blah, blah, blah.. It won't boot CentOS 6.0 64 bit, Scientific Linux 64 bit 6.1, but will boot 32 bit CentOS 6.0. Any ideas? Otherwise, its going back to Amazon

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-16 Thread Always Learning
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 03:32 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: As I said above, this isn't something people can volunteer for - only a very select few have the appropriate privileges to perform the task. There are trust issues. However, you can file a bug report against the website. What is the

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-16 Thread Digimer
On 09/16/2011 10:36 PM, Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 21:52 -0400, Thomas Dukes wrote: Just got my Lenovo TS130 with a Xeon E3-1225 Processor, 4GB RAM, blah, blah, blah.. It won't boot CentOS 6.0 64 bit, Scientific Linux 64 bit 6.1, but will boot 32 bit CentOS 6.0. Any

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-16 Thread Kenneth Godee
Email Lenovo support and ask about RedHat 6.0 support for the TS130 The Lenovo TS130 is not listed on Redhat 6.0 system Certified list. https://hardware.redhat.com/list.cgi?product=Red+Hat+Hardware+Certificationquicksearch=Lenovo There are some notes on other think servers, maybe that would

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-16 Thread Ned Slider
On 09/17/2011 03:44 AM, Always Learning wrote: On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 03:32 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: As I said above, this isn't something people can volunteer for - only a very select few have the appropriate privileges to perform the task. There are trust issues. However, you can file a

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-16 Thread John R Pierce
On 09/16/11 7:36 PM, Craig White wrote: Xeon processor? sounds old Xeon E3 is a server/workstation version of the latest sandy bridge processors, also known as core i-series -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-16 Thread Always Learning
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 04:06 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: There is an ongoing Website V2 sub-project that has been running for some time: http://wiki.centos.org/WebsiteVer2 http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/websitever2/ Can't see any new web site on the latter URL. I'm not a Flash user by choice.

[CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-16 Thread R P Herrold
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote: However, you can file a bug report against the website. What is the point in 'complaining' by filing a BUG report when it is conspicuously evident the existing web person(s) can not cope because they have insufficient time or have died or have

[CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-16 Thread R P Herrold
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote: Can't see any new web site on the latter URL. I'm not a Flash user by choice. Perhaps the Centos web site should be simple, practical, helpful in preference to emulating the very latest presentation gimmicks ? A larger font size will be useful for

Re: [CentOS-virt] Slightly OT: Centos KVM Host/Guest functions and LVM considerations

2011-09-16 Thread Eric Shubert
On 09/14/2011 09:51 AM, Jeff Boyce wrote: Greetings - I will be getting a new server for my company in the next few months and am trying to get a better understanding of some of the basic theoretical approaches to using Centos KVM on a server. I have found plenty of things to read that

Re: [CentOS-virt] Slightly OT: Centos KVM Host/Guest functions and LVM considerations

2011-09-16 Thread Ed Heron
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 10:46 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: ... Now, take all of your ideal logical servers (and the networking which ties them all together), and make them VMs on your host. I've done this, and these are the VMs I presently have (the list is still evolving): .) net (IPCop

Re: [CentOS-virt] Slightly OT: Centos KVM Host/Guest functions and LVM considerations

2011-09-16 Thread Eric Shubert
On 09/16/2011 11:11 AM, Ed Heron wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 10:46 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: ... Now, take all of your ideal logical servers (and the networking which ties them all together), and make them VMs on your host. I've done this, and these are the VMs I presently have (the list is

Re: [CentOS-virt] Slightly OT: Centos KVM Host/Guest functions and LVM considerations

2011-09-16 Thread Ed Heron
I've been considering this type of setup for a distributed virtualization setup. I have several small locations and we would be more comfortable having a host in each. I was nervous about running the firewall as a virtual machine, though if nobody screams bloody murder, I'll start exploring

Re: [CentOS-virt] Slightly OT: Centos KVM Host/Guest functions and LVM considerations

2011-09-16 Thread Eric Shubert
On 09/16/2011 01:10 PM, Ed Heron wrote: I've been considering this type of setup for a distributed virtualization setup. I have several small locations and we would be more comfortable having a host in each. I was nervous about running the firewall as a virtual machine, though if

[CentOS-es] yum install imapsync - dependencias

2011-09-16 Thread Diego Sanchez
Estimados. Nuevamente tengo problemas con yum ¬¬ A la hora de instalar (o intentar) imapsync para migrar a un cliente de hosting, recibo estos errores de dependencias. Me falta agregar algun repositorio? Tengo los defaults de CentOS, epel y ahora rpmforge, pero las dependencias continuan

Re: [CentOS-es] yum install imapsync - dependencias

2011-09-16 Thread Aland Laines
Estimado Diego en esta pagina puedes descargar todo lo que le hace falta a tu centOS para que funcione el imapsync... http://pkgs.org/centos-5-rhel-5/epel-i386/imapsync-1.452-1.el5.noarch.rpm.html Saludos de Perú. Aland Laines Calonge El viernes 16 de septiembre de 2011, Diego Sanchez