-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 04/02/2012 18:39, Boris Epstein a écrit :
Hello Laurent,
Thanks! Very useful info, I never even heard of MooseFS and it
sounds very nice.
One question: what happens if you lose your master server in their
designation? Or is it possible
On Saturday 04 February 2012 19:18, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want to
Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
What is RAID0+1?
Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
For a RAID 0+1, drives are first combined into multiple level 0 RAIDs
that are themselves treated as single drives to be combined into a
single RAID 1.
Phil
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov
wrote:
Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
What is RAID0+1?
Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
For a RAID 0+1, drives are first combined into multiple level 0 RAIDs
that are
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 17:15 -0700, Larry Martell wrote:
Just installed mysql on centos 6.2. When I try to start it with service I get:
#service mysqld start
MySQL Daemon failed to start.
Starting mysqld: [FAILED]
Nothing at all is written to the
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Digimer wrote:
On 02/04/2012 06:15 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know if it is possible to construct a cloud of sorts out of
several CentOS machines so as to enable a VM (or several VM's) that would
run on top of that cloud and have failover
On 02/05/2012 04:37 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Phil Schaffnerphilip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov
wrote:
Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
What is RAID0+1?
Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
For a RAID 0+1, drives are first
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Tait Clarridge t...@taiter.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 17:15 -0700, Larry Martell wrote:
Just installed mysql on centos 6.2. When I try to start it with service I
get:
#service mysqld start
MySQL Daemon failed to start.
Starting mysqld:
On 02/05/2012 10:17 AM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Saturday 04 February 2012 19:18, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jim Wildman j...@rossberry.com wrote:
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Digimer wrote:
On 02/04/2012 06:15 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know if it is possible to construct a cloud of sorts out of
several CentOS machines so as to enable a VM
On 02/03/2012 05:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Searching the web I only found about creating a file
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to
explicitely list what ports will be bridged.
Where is it configured?
For reference:
As far as I know, bridged
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Tait Clarridge t...@taiter.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 17:15 -0700, Larry Martell wrote:
Just installed mysql on centos 6.2. When I try to start it with service I
get:
On 02/05/12 1:22 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
clone(child_stack=0,
flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD,
child_tidptr=0xb7746b98) = 17017
wild guess says, its forking itself, and THAT process invokes
/etc/init.d/mysqld
--
john r pierceN 37, W
On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
What is RAID0+1?
Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
For a RAID 0+1, drives are first combined into multiple level 0 RAIDs
that are
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 5, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov
wrote:
Boris Epstein wrote on 02/04/2012 11:57 AM:
What is RAID0+1?
Nested RAID. Paraphrasing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID :
For a
On 02/05/12 2:42 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
What you are saying seems to make sense actually. I wonder how much a RAID6
with a few spares would make sense. If we are talking a large number of
disks then RAID 6 + 2 spares means overpaying only for 5 disks. Not a lot
if the total number of them
On Feb 5, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
What you are saying seems to make sense actually. I wonder how much a RAID6
with a few spares would make sense. If we are talking a large number of
disks then RAID 6 + 2 spares means overpaying only for 5 disks. Not a lot
On 02/05/12 3:24 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
It might be easier to do the striping in software cause that's a zero
over-head operation and it makes the hardware RAID easier to setup, maintain
and can make rebuilds less painful depending on the controller.
I just tried a bunch of combinations on a
On 02/06/2012 12:33 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 02/05/12 3:24 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
It might be easier to do the striping in software cause that's a zero
over-head operation and it makes the hardware RAID easier to setup, maintain
and can make rebuilds less painful depending on the
On 02/05/12 3:49 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
What about Software RAID 10 (far)? It gives 2 x read speed and 1 x write
speed (speed of single HDD).
we use raid10 for all our database servers. often as many as 20 disks
in a single raid set.
--
john r pierceN
On 02/04/2012 07:53 AM, Robert Spangler wrote:
snip
DEVICE=eth#
ONBOOT=yes
BRIDGE=br#
/snip
Thank you so much, Robert.
That is the thing I wanted to do.
For the record, in Debian world, it's
auto br0
iface br0 inet static
address 192.168.0.10
network 192.168.0.0
---
snip
centos 6 host, centos 6 virtual machine.
Network connection from outside server disappears in regards to the
virtual server.
snip
---
Tested the heck out of it.
Further testing shows the network unreachable, even if network restarted
in host.
22 matches
Mail list logo
