On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:06:25PM -0700, Wes James wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Clint Dilks clint.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The most likely answer is that your interface is not enabled.
Try someting like
cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1
Then only file
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been using CentOS on my laptop for a few days now and it works
great! Great work-around for the Fedora GNOME 3 debacle.
But I'm starting to miss Google Chrome pretty seriously. Firefox is
just not what it once
On 11/21/2013 11:16 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
If the Chromium builds that Johnny packaged still work, those are what you'll
want to use.
There may be a more recent source than is detailed here however:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-June/135238.html
If the Chromium builds that Johnny packaged still work, those are what you'll
want to use.
There may be a more recent source than is detailed here however:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2013-June/135238.html
http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2013/install-chromium-on-centos-
On 2013-11-21 @14:41 zulu, Wes James scribed:
It is with the script on this page:
http://chrome.richardlloyd.org.uk/
It grabs the missing libs then installs chrome.
Be aware some on this list consider that script criminal.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/centos/msg139107.html
I used it to
I have set up user quotas on an ext4 filesystem. It does not appear that
the quota system is being updated, except when I manually run quotacheck.
More detail: I run warnquota -s from a script in /etc/cron.daily. I
noticed that no one had received an over quota message in a long time.
Using
On 21.11.2013 06:24, Michael B Allen wrote:
I have been using CentOS on my laptop for a few days now and it works
great! Great work-around for the Fedora GNOME 3 debacle.
But I'm starting to miss Google Chrome pretty seriously. Firefox is
just not what it once was. It's slow. Spell check is
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Michael B Allen iop...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been using CentOS on my laptop for a few days now and it works
great! Great work-around for the Fedora GNOME 3 debacle.
But I'm starting to miss Google Chrome pretty seriously. Firefox is
just not what it once
Hi all
a question, you has installed centos with Virtual Box ?? I had the same
problem, but I changed the configuration de virtual box you see this
http://rodrigopichinual.blogspot.com/2013/04/asignar-ip-estatica-centos.html
there, I do explain how to assign ip static on centos (with
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 11/20/2013 7:40 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Might this have something to do with the following boot message?:
Starting virt-who: Traceback (most recent call last):
...
random
How to get postfix working on CentOS 6 and Comcast. Recently, they've
changed their policies regards email relay and require authentication
even to send email. (they no longer use IP address ranges, presumably in
an attempt to curb outgoing SPAM)
I didn't see an updated howto anywhere on the
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Rodrigo Pichiñual Norin
rodrigo.pichin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
a question, you has installed centos with Virtual Box ?? I had the same
problem, but I changed the configuration de virtual box you see this
Stay out of udev if you can. It's often overwritten by component
addition and manipulation MTU is parsed, and overridden, by options in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-[device]. I find it much safer to
read and manage there, and if new devices are added or replaced, the
behavior is dominated
Hi,
I seem to lack a vnet to bridge device.
When I go to change my interface on the VM using the GUI, I do not see
an option for Host device vnet# (Bridge 'br6')
Instead I see host device eth6 (Bridge 'br6') So before creating one via;
brctl addif...
Let me explain my config;
On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Digimer wrote:
I'm not sure what you are asking.
You should not see the vnetX devices from the VM (or even the VM's
definition file). They're created as needed to link the VM's interface
to the bridge. Think of them as simple network cables.
Some of the
On 21/11/13 17:32, aurfalien wrote:
On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Digimer wrote:
I'm not sure what you are asking.
You should not see the vnetX devices from the VM (or even the VM's
definition file). They're created as needed to link the VM's interface
to the bridge. Think of them as
On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 21/11/13 17:32, aurfalien wrote:
On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Digimer wrote:
I'm not sure what you are asking.
You should not see the vnetX devices from the VM (or even the VM's
definition file). They're created as needed to link the VM's
On 21/11/13 17:42, aurfalien wrote:
On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 21/11/13 17:32, aurfalien wrote:
On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Digimer wrote:
I'm not sure what you are asking.
You should not see the vnetX devices from the VM (or even the VM's
definition file).
On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Digimer wrote:
The 'vnetX' number doesn't relate to the interface, bridge or anything
else. The vnetX number is a simple sequence that increments each time a
VM is started. So don't think that you need 'vnet6'... it can be anything.
The 'brctl show' output from
I was under the impression that the relevant MTU settings were on the
*node's* local ifcfg-eth* configurations. Did something change with
KVM internal networking in the last year?
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
The problem is that there are no ifcfg-vnetX config
On 21/11/13 18:20, aurfalien wrote:
On Nov 21, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Digimer wrote:
The 'vnetX' number doesn't relate to the interface, bridge or anything
else. The vnetX number is a simple sequence that increments each time a
VM is started. So don't think that you need 'vnet6'... it can be
This is int4eresting stuff. I do note that the virt-manager tool,
and NetworkManager, give *no* insight and detailed management
sufficient to resolve this stuff. Note also that dancing through all
the hoops to get this working, end-to-end, is one of the big reasons
that most environments refuse
It's not so much hard as it is knowing all the hops in your network. If
anything along the chain has a low MTU, the whole route is effectively
reduced.
On 21/11/13 20:20, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
This is int4eresting stuff. I do note that the virt-manager tool,
and NetworkManager, give *no*
What you do in the VMs does not impact the hosts, so I didn't speak to
that. Having the bridge, interfaces, switches and vnets at 9000 (for
example) doesn't immediately enable large frames in the virtual servers.
It simply means that all of the links between the VM and other devices
on the network
I wrote this last year. I've found no other description that lays out
the difficulties of KVM bridges, tagged VLAN's, and pair bonding.
https://wikis.uit.tufts.edu/confluence/display/TUSKpub/Configure+Pair+Bonding,+VLANs,+and+Bridges+for+KVM+Hypervisor
I'm not working for that university
Humm ... puedes hacer con una ip real u homologada hacer nat hacia varios
dominios alojados en tu lan interna virtualhost en apache, siempre y cuando
tus dns o tu dns externo pueda resolverte esos dominios y enviarlos tanto
los n dominios al mismo puerto 80 u otro siempre y cuando lo hayas
¿no deberias cambir a alguna de las aplicaciones el puerto?
Me imagino que si desde afuera solcito
www.dominio.com:80
va a canalizar, por el NAT hacia uno y solo una aplicacion
si una de ellas la cambias entonces podras hacer nat hacia el otro
servidor
www.dominio.com:1003
(es solo una idea)
Yo te recomiendo el manual de Alcance Libre, muy bueno y Joel se esmeró en
hacer un documento bien escalable. Yo lo uso como referencia para cualquier
distro, incluido Debian.
http://www.alcancelibre.org/staticpages/index.php/17-como-apache-webvirtual
Suerte,
David
El 21 de noviembre de 2013
Hola amigos después de esperar que los dns se refresquen ya estan
respondiendo al servidor pero no me funciona se redirecciona igual al
primer sitio loq ue hice fue
1.- Cree esta regla
$IPTABLES -A PREROUTING -t nat -i $EXTERNALIF -p tcp -d
www.dominio_original.com --dport 80 \
Lo mas basico es:
NameVirtualHost tu_ip_interno:80
VirtualHost tu_ip_interno o *:80
DocumentRoot /var/www/html/sitio2
ServerName www.midominio.com
# Aqui otras opciones
/VirtualHost
VirtualHost *:80
DocumentRoot /var/www/html/sitioN
ServerName www.midominioN.com
# otras opciones
Gracias al parecer creo que el vhost esta mal configurado podrian enviarme por
favor como seria las lineas del vhost la ruta que puse es /var/www/html/sitio2
Cabe recalcar que no tengo um vhost para el sitip master ya que este hace nat
al servidor windows
Gracias nuevamente
--
Saludos
César
32 matches
Mail list logo
