On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 21:39 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote:
I believe auditctl could help:
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Security_Guide/sec-Defining_Audit_Rules_and_Controls.html
Hi,
I have a question about this vulnerability. Could someone please help me
which packages i should upgrade in Centos 6 to fix this vulnerability? I
don't want to perform upgrade of whole system with yum upgrade.
--
Best Regards,
*Alexander Danilov*
On 05/28/14 23:03, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Ok well the permissions change happened again! And this time I was able to
capture some output thanks to your helpful tip on how to handle the
situation.
However I'm not sure how to interpret the output I got and was wondering if
I could have some help
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Danilov
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 7:14
Hi,
I have a question about this vulnerability. Could someone
please help me
Google can help.
https://www.google.com/search?q=CVE-2014-0196 gives you
On 05/28/2014 10:52 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
I didn't do that, but what I did do was download a nightly build
for Fedora 21, a live CD image, burn it to a disc and boot that.
One would think it has a recent kernel (I neglected to look while
it was running to find out what kernel it was).
so I
On 05/29/2014 07:04 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Danilov
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 7:14
Hi,
I have a question about this vulnerability. Could someone
please help me
Google can help.
https://www.google.com/search?q=CVE-2014-0196 gives you
On 05/28/2014 02:26 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/28/2014 3:00 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/28/2014 1:29 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/27/2014 5:38 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Until recently, I had a
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/28/2014 02:26 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/28/2014 3:00 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/28/2014 1:29 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/27/2014 5:38 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
snip
29.05.2014 16:59, Johnny Hughes ?:
snip
Just in case my previous mail was not clear enough on this:
Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata
relevant to your system have been applied.
That is what every single Red Hat Security Update says ... and so then
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 07:12:24AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/28/2014 10:52 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
I didn't do that, but what I did do was download a nightly build
for Fedora 21, a live CD image, burn it to a disc and boot that.
One would think it has a recent kernel (I neglected to
On 05/29/2014 08:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/28/2014 02:26 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/28/2014 3:00 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/28/2014 1:29 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014, John R Pierce wrote:
On 05/29/2014 10:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
I was under the impression that the OP actually doesn't want it visible to
the world, isn't intending to browse or email via it, but that it was for
*only* inside. IF that is the case, he'd have
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 05/29/2014 10:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
I was under the impression that the OP actually doesn't want it visible
to the world, isn't intending to browse or email via it, but that it was
for *only* inside. IF
Hey, folks,
I'm working on finding some new compute nodes. What I'm looking for is
a 64 core box, with room enough for a lot of RAM. I can get it from
Dell, or HP (bleah! a 4U box), but I need to have three quotes, y'know.
We've gotten a lot from Penguin in the past, but they're all
On 29 May 2014 16:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, folks,
I'm working on finding some new compute nodes. What I'm looking for is
a 64 core box, with room enough for a lot of RAM. I can get it from
Dell, or HP (bleah! a 4U box), but I need to have three quotes, y'know.
We've gotten a lot
Andrew Holway wrote:
On 29 May 2014 16:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm working on finding some new compute nodes. What I'm looking for
is a 64 core box, with room enough for a lot of RAM. I can get it from
Dell, or HP (bleah! a 4U box), but I need to have three quotes, y'know.
We've
On 05/29/2014 11:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 05/29/2014 10:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
I was under the impression that the OP actually doesn't want it visible
to the world, isn't intending to browse or email
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I agree. But I do need a third quote, though I suppose I could get a
reseller along with Dell and the HP. I was sort of looking for anther
vendor that's got 64 cores in 1U (the Dell's 2U).
If you are looking for density, shouldn't you
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 05/29/2014 11:21 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 05/29/2014 10:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/29/2014 08:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
I was under the impression that the OP actually doesn't want it
visible to the world, isn't
On 05/29/2014 12:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I agree. But I do need a third quote, though I suppose I could get a
reseller along with Dell and the HP. I was sort of looking for anther
vendor that's got 64 cores in 1U (the Dell's 2U).
I'm not sure if this is helpful to anyone else and I can't
decide if it's mildly clever or just a stupid pet trick, really.
I recently decided to reinstall my work laptop with
centos. as part of the install I used an 8g
sandisk USB drive; it's roughly the size of a
wireless mouse receiver. I put
My modem/router is a PK5001Z from CenturyLink.
IIRC a tech support person told me that it uses ppp internally.
With regard to security,
I would prefer to trust Windows or the modem/router as little as possible,
hence the desire to connect the Windows box to the main box.
I would like to be able
On 05/28/2014 03:27 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/28/2014 12:00 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I want the second computer to not have its own global IP address.
It will at least occasionally run Windows.
I'd prefer not to assume that Windows will
not try to fetch an IP address behind my back.
zep wrote:
On 05/29/2014 12:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I agree. But I do need a third quote, though I suppose I could get a
reseller along with Dell and the HP. I was sort of looking for anther
vendor that's got 64 cores in 1U (the
Michael Hennebry wrote:
My modem/router is a PK5001Z from CenturyLink.
IIRC a tech support person told me that it uses ppp internally.
With regard to security,
I would prefer to trust Windows or the modem/router as little as possible,
hence the desire to connect the Windows box to the main
On 05/29/2014 01:09 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Choice of terminology is pretty important; Cisco's consistent (if a
bit awkward) four-way terminology for NAT (inside local, inside
global, outside local, outside global;...
See the Cisco whitepaper entitled Enabling Enterprise Multihoming with
Cisco
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Michael Hennebry
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
My modem/router is a PK5001Z from CenturyLink.
IIRC a tech support person told me that it uses ppp internally.
The thing looks like a typical NAT router to me. Are you sure you are
getting public IP
zep wrote:
On 05/29/2014 12:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I agree. But I do need a third quote, though I suppose I could get a
reseller along with Dell and the HP. I was sort of looking for anther
vendor that's got 64 cores in 1U (the
On the last, Dell's hard to beat. Sun/Oracle ranks under none of the
above So
If you can find someone selling these puppies in the US Intel server
platforms are rather nice:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/server-systems/server-board-s4600lh-lt-systems.html
On 5/29/2014 8:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I agree. But I do need a third quote,
Lenovo ?
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Andrew Holway wrote:
On the last, Dell's hard to beat. Sun/Oracle ranks under none of the
above So
If you can find someone selling these puppies in the US Intel server
platforms are rather nice:
Look nice... but trying to google someone selling *servers* with the board
isn't getting me anywhere. I happened across the Asus RS927, but that,
after much looking, turns out to only do 32 cores max. Got a clue on
models of *server*, from anyone, that uses the Intel board?
Intel® Server
John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/29/2014 8:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I agree. But I do need a third quote,
Lenovo ?
The only rackmounts I see from their site are dual processor. I'll need
four - mostly, I see 16-core CPUs in our systems, though some have 12-core
(or the weird 10-core). The Asus
On 5/29/2014 10:48 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
On the last, Dell's hard to beat. Sun/Oracle ranks under none of the
above So
If you can find someone selling these puppies in the US Intel server
platforms are rather nice:
On 5/29/2014 11:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/29/2014 8:46 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I agree. But I do need a third quote,
Lenovo ?
The only rackmounts I see from their site are dual processor. I'll need
four - mostly, I see 16-core CPUs in our systems,
Andrew Holway wrote:
Look nice... but trying to google someone selling *servers* with the
board isn't getting me anywhere. I happened across the Asus RS927, but
that,
after much looking, turns out to only do 32 cores max. Got a clue on
models of *server*, from anyone, that uses the Intel
John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/29/2014 11:34 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/29/2014 8:46 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I agree. But I do need a third quote,
Lenovo ?
The only rackmounts I see from their site are dual processor. I'll need
four - mostly, I see 16-core CPUs
Does anyone have any preferred *vendors* - as I say, we used to like
Penguin. Silicon Mechanics? AVADirect? I'm just throwing out names here
I've run into while googling.
How many of these are you after?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Andrew Holway wrote:
Does anyone have any preferred *vendors* - as I say, we used to like
Penguin. Silicon Mechanics? AVADirect? I'm just throwing out names here
I've run into while googling.
How many of these are you after?
The budget's limited - maybe one, maybe two, but next year,
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Andrew Holway wrote:
Does anyone have any preferred *vendors* - as I say, we used to like
Penguin. Silicon Mechanics? AVADirect? I'm just throwing out names here
I've run into while googling.
How many of these are you after?
The budget's limited - maybe one, maybe
serious HPC.
As opposed to silly HPC? Molecular dynamics huh. Those memory loving SOBs
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Andrew Holway wrote:
serious HPC.
As opposed to silly HPC? Molecular dynamics huh. Those memory loving SOBs
Protein folding, among other things.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Protein folding, among other things.
Doesn't that stuff parallelise? Quad socket boxes are pretty rare in HPC
nowadays as the amount of memory available in a dual socket box is so high.
Infiniband?
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
Andrew Holway wrote:
Protein folding, among other things.
Doesn't that stuff parallelise? Quad socket boxes are pretty rare in HPC
nowadays as the amount of memory available in a dual socket box is so
high.
Infiniband?
Not on this. But the code's written with parallelization - it uses
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
As a comparison, the Penguins that we got a couple-three years ago were in
the $11k range, and were 1U Supermicros. The Dell and HP I'm looking at
are about $13k, so that's around where I'm looking.
HP blades pop up with a list price
On 5/29/2014 1:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:13 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
As a comparison, the Penguins that we got a couple-three years ago were in
the $11k range, and were 1U Supermicros. The Dell and HP I'm looking at
are about $13k, so that's around where I'm
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 03:35:01PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Andrew Holway wrote:
serious HPC.
As opposed to silly HPC? Molecular dynamics huh. Those memory loving SOBs
Protein folding, among other things.
the FoldingAtHome project? with that much horsepower you must be
kicking
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 07:12:24AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/28/2014 10:52 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
I didn't do that, but what I did do was download a nightly build
for Fedora 21, a live CD image, burn it to a disc and boot that.
One would think it has a recent kernel (I neglected to
OK, I have installed CentOS 6.5 on this beast using parted to make GPT
partitions (royal PIA, but done). The machine has three 500G SATA disks with
4K sector sizes.
Partitioned with three partions for each of the main disks:
sda1 = FAT32 = /boot/efi
sdb1 = FAT32 = (not presently mounted, but
We switched from HP to Fujitsu a couple of years ago, and couldn't be
happier. Look into their RX line, I think the RX500 and RX900 (iirc) do
4 and 8 socket.
digimer
On 29/05/14 11:26 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, folks,
I'm working on finding some new compute nodes. What I'm looking
I'd also recommend Fujitsu. If you're desperate there is the SGI H2106-G7
in 2U size.
On May 29, 2014 8:52 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
We switched from HP to Fujitsu a couple of years ago, and couldn't be
happier. Look into their RX line, I think the RX500 and RX900 (iirc) do
4 and 8
On 5/29/2014 6:00 PM, Evan Rowley wrote:
I'd also recommend Fujitsu. If you're desperate there is the SGI H2106-G7
in 2U size.
the SGI stuff I've seen has been rebranded Supermicro boxes/boards.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the
--On Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:43:16 PM -0400 zep zgreenfel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure if this is helpful to anyone else and I can't
decide if it's mildly clever or just a stupid pet trick, really.
[...]
I put /boot, / and /usr on
the USB drive, set encrypted partitions for
swap,
Every time I update my system with clamav, it doesn't restart and freshclam no
longer works, because of a permission issue on the log directory. Each time I
update clamav I have to search the Internet to figure out what there is to do.
That NEVER helps so I try different combinations on user
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0569
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0569.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
El 28/05/2014 17:22, James Dean escribió:
Amigos... les cuento...
tengo un centos con internet vía eth0 el cual hace NAT sin problemas..
pero necesito que un cliente de mi lan (192.168.7.11) salga por una VPN
(ppp0) ...
entonces aplique :
(en el Server)
- echo 10 vpn
Gracias,era eso.
Saludos.
2014-05-28 20:40 GMT+02:00 New Route Inc newro...@gmail.com:
Saludos,
Evidentemente el error esta en el redireccionamiento.
Tomado de los comentarios:
*Bantonia*
Small modification, line 1471, added two spaces, one before each of the 2's
to give ' 2/dev/null'
Francesc :
Gracias por tu respuesta, te respondo...
el cliente 192.168.7.11 (radxa) tiene acceso a la red Local (192.168.7.0),
pero no al otro extremo de la VPN
El responsable de levantar la VPN es el Server Centos
Mi intención es que radxa salga a internet por la VPN (ppp0) [es decir,
salir por
El 29/05/2014 17:55, James Dean escribió:
Francesc :
Gracias por tu respuesta, te respondo...
el cliente 192.168.7.11 (radxa) tiene acceso a la red Local (192.168.7.0),
pero no al otro extremo de la VPN
El responsable de levantar la VPN es el Server Centos
Mi intención es que radxa salga a
2014-05-29 12:25 GMT-04:00 Francesc Guitart fguit...@gmx.com:
El 29/05/2014 17:55, James Dean escribió:
Francesc :
Gracias por tu respuesta, te respondo...
el cliente 192.168.7.11 (radxa) tiene acceso a la red Local
(192.168.7.0),
pero no al otro extremo de la VPN
El responsable
ufff...
hice todo y no pude ingresar al cliente 192.168.4.2 para poder hacer las
pruebas...
luego aplique 'ip rule del from 192.168.4.0/28 table vpn' y
posteriormente 'ip rule add from 192.168.4.2 table vpn' y pude acceder al
cliente.
desde radxa no pude acceder a internet, al ejecutar en radxa
Si la ip esta en lista negra no hay nada que hacer, si no lo esta manda el
reclamo al servicio de hotmail, ellos tienen un correo de soporte y lo
solucionan a mi me paso igual,
Saludos,
El 29 de mayo de 2014, 17:08, David González Romero dgrved...@gmail.com
escribió:
Saludos Lista:
Hoy
Ese es el problema de alquilar hosting o vps compartidos, algun p...
siempre hace spam y hotmail te coloca esa ip en la lista negra, yo tengo un
alquilado un hosting con el mismo problema, envie un tiket a hotmail con la
ip del hosting y la desbanearon pero a la semana la volvieron a colocar en
la
64 matches
Mail list logo
