From: arsh...@gmail.com arsh...@gmail.com
arsh...@gmail.com wants to follow you.
Ah, automated address book pilfering... Such a great innovation...
Would you like to SPAM all your contacts... Yes/No?
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Joseph L. Brunner
j...@affirmedsystems.com wrote:
Is it under some type of ddos attack?
What's running on this machine? In front of it?
A DDOS attack seems unlikely, though I suppose it's possible. Sitting
between the lagging machine and the Internet is a
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
All those in favor of unceremoniously dumping arsh...@gmail.com from the
listserv, say aye.
On 2014-10-09 6:08 pm, arsh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
arsh...@gmail.com wants to follow you.
** Is arsh...@gmail.com you friend? **
If Yes please follow the link below:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:43 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Most people forget that DRDB is a 'clustered' storage that creates a new
block device on top of existing block devices, over the network.
There are issues like SPLIT BRAIN and a possible data inconsistency,
should
On Fri, October 10, 2014 7:09 am, Mike Burger wrote:
All those in favor of unceremoniously dumping arsh...@gmail.com from the
listserv, say aye.
Yes, please (I was sure moderators/list owners already did it...)
Valeri
On 2014-10-09 6:08 pm, arsh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
arsh...@gmail.com
Aye
(Sent from iPhone, so please accept my apologies in advance for any spelling or
grammatical errors.)
On Oct 10, 2014, at 7:09 AM, Mike Burger mbur...@bubbanfriends.org wrote:
All those in favor of unceremoniously dumping arsh...@gmail.com from the
listserv, say aye.
On 2014-10-09
Hello everyone -
Update on this: I did some more searching and discovered that OpenNIC is
intended to replace the normal top-level DNS servers. It's not just a simple
forwarder. I changed my forwarders to AlternateDNS.
After two days I no longer get either of the checkhints messages
Hello List
I have a Bootable USB stick that we use to Boot our servers and then install
CentOS,
PostgreSQL and our SW thru a Kickstart script.
It works like a charm but now we are thinking of going Virtual and prepping
Virtual CentOS servers under VMware ESXi.
However, to have the same Boot
On 10/10/2014 01:09 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
All those in favor of unceremoniously dumping arsh...@gmail.com from the
listserv, say aye.
rather than further promoting spam, as you are doing here - for list
moderation requests, contact the list owner address instead.
--
Karanbir Singh
On 2014-10-10 10:07 am, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 10/10/2014 01:09 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
All those in favor of unceremoniously dumping arsh...@gmail.com from
the
listserv, say aye.
rather than further promoting spam, as you are doing here - for list
moderation requests, contact the list
On 10/10/2014 03:16 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
On 2014-10-10 10:07 am, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 10/10/2014 01:09 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
All those in favor of unceremoniously dumping arsh...@gmail.com from the
listserv, say aye.
rather than further promoting spam, as you are doing here - for
ctrl-d to settings，than you can see the CDROM, choose to use the ISO image file.
Sent from my Windows Phone
发件人: Steve Clarkmailto:scl...@netwolves.com
发送时间: 2014/10/10 21:42
收件人: CentOS mailing listmailto:centos@centos.org
主题: [CentOS] turn bootable USB into
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:45 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
When someone is saying they are looking into hiring hitman for me I'm
not only questioning sanity of them (and we know many examples when
majority is nasty), but also sanity of person who claims that.
The harsh reality of life is
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 14:22 -0400, Digimer wrote:
Change is good.
Change is inevitable in life. Virtually everything changes including the
eventual decline of our sun. Not sure about atomic weights or the value
of Pi (3.142) or E=mc² Perhaps they break the rule that everything
changes.
Being
On Fri, October 10, 2014 10:46 am, Always Learning wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 14:22 -0400, Digimer wrote:
Change is good.
Change is inevitable in life. Virtually everything changes including the
eventual decline of our sun. Not sure about atomic weights or the value
of Pi (3.142) or
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:51 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
Systemd should be been much more widely discussed with the general
Linux / Red Hat and clones community. I am sure beneficial improvements
would have been proposed and, hopefully, implemented prior to Red
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:05 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
It is about fundamental approach. We always modularize things: split into
smaller subunits each of the last doing its smaller task. This allows to
make smaller things work reliably, and test these smaller things more
comprehensively.
On Thu, October 9, 2014 21:11, John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/9/2014 6:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
BTW, the whole idea of antivirus is flawed. It is based on enumerate
bad. You can't, as one never knows what will be invented in a future.
I agree, but I don't know what else you can put in the
Looks like I need my tin foil hat…..
On Oct 10, 2014, at 11:19 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
On Thu, October 9, 2014 21:11, John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/9/2014 6:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
BTW, the whole idea of antivirus is flawed. It is based on enumerate
bad. You
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 15:58 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:04:49PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
b) What assurance do I have that whoever I chose won't wind up with the
same problem, given that, as I mentioned, a dozen years ago, they were
blocking a good
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 08:09 -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
All those in favor of unceremoniously dumping arsh...@gmail.com from the
listserv, say aye.
Aye.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Sorry if this question has been asked many times before.
On a new CentOS 7 system, when I create files they end up with strange
permissions. For example, as root:
[root@server ~]# umask
[root@server ~]# touch a
[root@server ~]# ls -l a
-r--r- 1 root root 0 Oct 10 11:45 a
As a regular
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:19 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, October 9, 2014 21:11, John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/9/2014 6:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
BTW, the whole idea of antivirus is flawed. It is based on enumerate
bad. You can't, as one never knows what will be invented in a
Really, you have some URL’s to back up the paranoia ?
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:19 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, October 9, 2014 21:11, John R Pierce wrote:
On 10/9/2014 6:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
BTW, the
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
It is about fundamental approach. We always modularize things: split into
smaller subunits each of the last doing its smaller task. This allows to
make smaller things work reliably, and test these smaller things more
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:29:27 +0100
Karanbir Singh wrote:
( not
sure if this was real spam or someone just importing a collected address
book.. )
A google search tells me that this infoaxe thing is a MS Windows virus that
somehow affects MS Windows installations through facebook. Therefore,
On Fri, October 10, 2014 12:01 pm, William Woods wrote:
Really, you have some URLs to back up the paranoia ?
Well, that's the problem with closed source systems (Which MS Windows is
and commercial antiviruses for it are). One can claim something and there
is no way to prove it is right or it
Change the umask in the .bash_profile for root.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
Sorry if this question has been asked many times before.
On a new CentOS 7 system, when I create files they end up with strange
permissions. For example, as root:
So claim made, nothing to back it up. Got it.
all I need to say is…BASH , OpenSSL…..
I am sure there are more.
But really, if you are going to claim something, at least be willing to back up
what you claim is that asking to much ?
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Valeri Galtsev
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Hal Wigoda wrote:
Change the umask in the .bash_profile for root.
Since the umask is already set to , I don't see how changing it
will make any difference.
Besides, I _did_ change it by hand, just before the start of the
example.
And lastly, changing root's
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:01 -0500, William Woods wrote:
Really, you have some URL’s to back up the paranoia ?
That suggests I've been around a lot longer than you and appear, with
some subjects, to know a little more than you. Many things happened when
the Internet was in its infancy and
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:17 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:29:27 +0100
Karanbir Singh wrote:
( not
sure if this was real spam or someone just importing a collected address
book.. )
A google search tells me that this infoaxe thing is a MS Windows virus that
somehow
I doubt you have been around longer than me, but not the point, nice
distraction though.
I know quite well about google/Mozilla, yawn, old news, but if you are
unwilling (or unable) to back up
what you claim then I have no choice but to call out a BS’er.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Always
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:21 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, October 10, 2014 12:01 pm, William Woods wrote:
Really, you have some URL’s to back up the paranoia ?
Well, that's the problem with closed source systems (Which MS Windows is
and commercial antiviruses for it are). One can
Oh as a side note, that suggests nothing other than back up what you claim.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:01 -0500, William Woods wrote:
Really, you have some URL’s to back up the paranoia ?
That suggests I've been
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:33 -0500, William Woods wrote:
So claim made, nothing to back it up. Got it.
You obviously didn't. Perhaps one day you may discover what others know
today.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
___
CentOS mailing list
I've noticed that some systems don't have redhat-lsb or even
redhat-lsb-core installed and as a side effect, the ocsinventory agent
reports them as 'linux' instead of Centos with the release version.
Also, where it is installed and ocsinventory does pick up the name, it
doesn't include Centos
I see, so you can’t back up your claim….ok.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:33 -0500, William Woods wrote:
So claim made, nothing to back it up. Got it.
You obviously didn't. Perhaps one day you may discover what others
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:52 -0500, William Woods wrote:
I doubt you have been around longer than me, but not the point, nice
distraction though.
I know quite well about google/Mozilla, yawn, old news, but if you are
unwilling (or unable) to back up
what you claim then I have no choice
And you can make all the claims you want, without being willing to back them up.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:52 -0500, William Woods wrote:
I doubt you have been around longer than me, but not the point, nice
On Fri, October 10, 2014 12:33 pm, William Woods wrote:
So claim made, nothing to back it up. Got it.
all I need to say is
BASH , OpenSSL
..
Nice examples. One-sided though. All software has bugs. You prefer
security through obscurity (closed source, and you have to _trust_ the
vendor of
Not at all, and please don’t tell me what I prefer, All I prefer is that
people try to be homiest, you are right all software has bugs, but to imply in
any way that
open source is better is a misnomer.
I use open source, closed source, whatever tool fits the job, I don’t belong
to any specific
On Fri, October 10, 2014 1:07 pm, William Woods wrote:
Not at all, and please dont tell me what I prefer, All I prefer is that
people try to be homiest, you are right all software has bugs, but to
imply in any way that
open source is better is a misnomer.
I use open source, closed source,
Then we are pretty much in agreement here, regarding the claims made
by the other member of the list, I do think if you are going to make a
claim and state it as if it is fact, you should back it up
On Oct 10, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
On Fri,
On 10/10/2014 11:19 AM, 沈焕标 wrote:
ctrl-d to settings，than you can see the CDROM, choose to use the ISO image file.
Sent from my Windows Phone
发件人: Steve Clarkmailto:scl...@netwolves.com
发送时间: 2014/10/10 21:42
收件人: CentOS mailing listmailto:centos@centos.org
On 8 October 2014 17:18, Igal @ getRailo.org i...@getrailo.org wrote:
On 10/8/2014 9:13 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Someone had mentioned on this list the following RedHat Enterprise 7 (and
as you know CentOS is binary replica of RedHat Enterprise with replaced
art work):
On 10/10/2014 11:44 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
Keep in mind CentOS is a rebuild of RHEL so any resources for RHEL are
applicable to CentOS.
I'm not sure if any EL7 books have been written yet (as it's fairly new and
the Red Hat certifications have only just started being updated).
In the
On 10/10/2014 12:55 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I've noticed that some systems don't have redhat-lsb or even
redhat-lsb-core installed and as a side effect, the ocsinventory agent
reports them as 'linux' instead of Centos with the release version.
Also, where it is installed and ocsinventory
On Fri, October 10, 2014 1:30 pm, William Woods wrote:
Then we are pretty much in agreement here, regarding the claims made
by the other member of the list, I do think if you are going to make a
claim and state it as if it is fact, you should back it up
Well, I know what claim you mean
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello List
I have a Bootable USB stick that we use to Boot our servers and then install
CentOS,
PostgreSQL and our SW thru a Kickstart script.
It works like a charm but now we are thinking of going Virtual and prepping
Virtual CentOS servers under
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Alan Stern wrote:
Sorry if this question has been asked many times before.
On a new CentOS 7 system, when I create files they end up with strange
permissions. For example, as root:
[root@server ~]# umask
[root@server ~]# touch a
[root@server ~]# ls -l a
-r--r- 1
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:05:19AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
We had this modular system V
boot until recently. We lost it. We got iPhone, with whatever you can get
in App store instead. And not all of us are pleased by this change. And,
BTW, there was one of the posts of MS Windows big fan
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Mike wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Alan Stern wrote:
Sorry if this question has been asked many times before.
On a new CentOS 7 system, when I create files they end up with strange
permissions. For example, as root:
[root@server ~]# umask
[root@server
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:05:19AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
We had this modular system V
boot until recently. We lost it. We got iPhone, with whatever you can get
in App store instead. And not all of us are
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:37:01PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
A simple 'ps uf -p 1' on a couple of machines shows about 10x the
resident memory use and 5x virtual on Centos 7 vs. 5.x. And yet, the
programs that it started don't show any improvement for the extra
cost.
So, the extra memory is
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:05:19 -0500 (CDT)
Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
It is about fundamental approach. We always modularize things: split
into smaller subunits each of the last doing its smaller task. This
allows to make smaller things work reliably, and test these smaller
On 10/10/2014 1:13 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
It appears to me that much of bashing of systemd is just FUD.
...
But people simply refuse to understand
it (or never even bother to learn the details), and keep bashing
systemd for making the distinction between disabling and masking a
service.
Once upon a time, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com said:
I don't really see how systemd violates the do one thing and do it
well philosophy.
systemd (as PID 1) is not necessarily the problem. The problem IMHO is
the systemd _project_ that appears to have a severe case of scope creep.
They
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:13:13PM +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
It appears to me that much of bashing of systemd is just FUD. One of
the typical misconceptions is the disable vs. mask for services ---
despite appearances, the systemd disable does *exactly* the same
thing that SYSV disable
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com said:
I don't really see how systemd violates the do one thing and do it
well philosophy.
systemd (as PID 1) is not necessarily the problem. The problem IMHO is
the
I think… we were just threatened by the list owner.
;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)
--
Nate Duehr
denverpi...@me.com
On Oct 9, 2014, at 17:06, Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The recent anti-social content on the list including threats and
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Mike wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Alan Stern wrote:
Sorry if this question has been asked many times before.
On a new CentOS 7 system, when I create files they end up with strange
permissions. For example, as root:
If this is a server - is it possible your raid card battery died?
We have seen issuers where the BBWC fails and the box crawls
The only other thing on the hardware side that comes to mind is actual bad
sectors if this is not a raided virtual drive.
From the OS side can you keep the box up long
I've curious about where and how Centos 7 gets its ntp configuration from.
When I installed the operating system, I went through this page and told it to
use network time, as shown:
http://media.if-not-true-then-false.com/2014/07/06-centos-7-date-and-time-748x560.png
I just discovered that i
Frank Cox wrote:
I've curious about where and how Centos 7 gets its ntp configuration from.
When I installed the operating system, I went through this page and told it
to use network time, as shown:
http://media.if-not-true-then-false.com/2014/07/06-centos-7-date-and-time-748x560.png
I
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Joseph L. Brunner
j...@affirmedsystems.com wrote:
If this is a server - is it possible your raid card battery died?
It is a server, but a home file server. The raid card has no battery
backup, and in fact has been flashed to pure HBA mode. Actual
RAID'ing is
To Paul and William,
Did either of you think to crack open your laptop cases and check for
embedded key logging hardware on the MB.. it could be in there... that
tiny mislabeled capacitor near the USB bus would be a good hiding
place... or have you been blindly typing away on those keyboards
On 10/10/2014 2:31 PM, Chris Pemberton wrote:
To Paul and William,
Did either of you think to crack open your laptop cases and check for
embedded key logging hardware on the MB.. it could be in there... that
tiny mislabeled capacitor near the USB bus would be a good hiding
place... or have
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:17:16 +0200
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
Maybe You have installed chrony instead of ntp.
Apparently so. I see that /var/lib/chrony/drift is dated just a few minutes
ago, so that must be the answer.
I have a line in /etc/chrony.conf that's commented out as follows:
#log
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 13:07 -0500, William Woods wrote:
I know its kinda hard for people to accept someone on a centos mailing list
would
use closed source, I am sorry some of you purists are offended.
I thought the entire Centos project was Open Source. If that is
correct, what attraction
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 10.10.2014 um 22:38 schrieb Les Mikesell:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com said:
I don't really see how systemd violates
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 16:31 -0500, Chris Pemberton wrote:
Did either of you think to crack open your laptop cases and check for
embedded key logging hardware on the MB.. it could be in there... that
tiny mislabeled capacitor near the USB bus would be a good hiding
place... or have you
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 05:33:22PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
What happens to ownership of a DVD or audio device when a different
user logs in at the console - even if some other remote user wants to
access them? The magic is more about ConsoleKit and PolicyKit than
specifically systemd
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 03:36:00PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:17:16 +0200
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
Maybe You have installed chrony instead of ntp.
Apparently so. I see that /var/lib/chrony/drift is dated just a few minutes
ago, so that must be the answer.
I have
Whats your mailing address, I will send you some
more tinfoil.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 16:31 -0500, Chris Pemberton wrote:
Did either of you think to crack open your laptop cases and check for
embedded key logging
I have CentOS 7 installed with GUI (Gnome 3.8.4) and I'm trying to
follow the guide at
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/System_Administrators_Guide/s1-users-configui.html
it speaks of System Administration from the GUI or
system-config-users from the
On 11 October 2014 03:01, Igal @ getRailo.org i...@getrailo.org wrote:
I have CentOS 7 installed with GUI (Gnome 3.8.4) and I'm trying to
follow the guide at
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/System_Administrators_Guide/s1-users-configui.html
it
Perhaps RHEL/CentOS 7 are something different, however, they just change a
little, their base used are similar. On a gnome desktop, if you want to add a
shortcut to the desktop, you can reference xxx.desktop in
/usr/share/application/ , than write some similar xxx. desktop which you
prefer
On 10/10/2014 7:08 PM, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
On 11 October 2014 03:01, Igal @ getRailo.org i...@getrailo.org wrote:
I have CentOS 7 installed with GUI (Gnome 3.8.4) and I'm trying to
follow the guide at
Thanks Bill,
I couldn't really do it the way you suggested but after I read your
email I looked for the Desktop folder and just added a link there, and I
can see it on the desktop.
Igal
On 10/10/2014 7:26 PM, 沈焕标 wrote:
Perhaps RHEL/CentOS 7 are something different, however, they just change
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 08:11:50PM -0700, Igal @ getRailo.org wrote:
On 10/10/2014 7:08 PM, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
On 11 October 2014 03:01, Igal @ getRailo.org i...@getrailo.org wrote:
I have CentOS 7 installed with GUI (Gnome 3.8.4) and I'm trying to
follow the guide at
On 10/10/2014 14:41, Nathan Duehr wrote:
I think… we were just threatened by the list owner.
;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)
Help! Help, I'm being repressed!
You saw im! Dint you see him repressin' me?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi,
I hereby would like to ask for write permissions to the CentOS wiki.
I've just created a new account. My username is Karol Babioch [1].
I mainly want to help with German translations, as I've spotted some
typos and inaccuracies, but I'm also glad to help out with anything else.
On top of
your *FirstnameLastname* username = johnwebb
the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) = security
the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s) = ?
We also encourage you to request and to maintain a personal homepage =
requesting
___
85 matches
Mail list logo
