Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm reasonably certain that a script with no shebang will run with
/bin/sh. I interpret your statement to mean that if a user is using ksh
and enters the path to such a script, it would also run in ksh. That
would only be true if you sourced
Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 09:47:24AM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 04/24/2015 03:57 AM, Pete Geenhuizen wrote:
if you leave it out the script will run in whatever environment it
currently is in.
I'm reasonably certain that a script with no
Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
#!/bin/sh
readlink /proc/$$/file
( note that that file is because I'm using FreeBSD /proc, for Linux you
may need to replace the line with something like:
readlink /proc/$$/exe
And on a platform that implements a
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
My first RH was 5, late nineties. First time I looked at linux and
installed, it was '95, and slack. (We'll ignore the Coherent that I
installed on my beloved 286 in the late 80's).
Thanks for the replies. The tool that we used for testing the security
vulnerability is Nessus.
I have glibc version 2.17-78.el7, I saw that CVE-2015-0235 (Ghost) is fixed
in this version and I want to apply patch for the vulnerbailities
CVE-2015-1472 CVE-2015-1473. Can you please help me in
Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:38:25AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Fascinating. As I'd been in Sun OS, and started doing admin work when it
became Solaris, I'd missed that bit. A question: did the license agreement
include payment, or was it just
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ah. I don't remember if I was using csh, or ksh, and didn't realize about
bash. I *think* I vaguely remember that sh seemed to be more capable than
I remembered.
If you like to check what the Bourne Shell did support in the late 1980s, I
recommend you to fetch recent
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
oh fun, just did some tests (using c6.latest). if you're in bash,
./script (sans shebang) runs it in bash. if you're in dash or csh,
./script runs it in sh.if you're in ksh, it runs it in ksh.
See my other mail.
The scripts (unless marked)
Am 26.04.2015 um 11:55 schrieb Tim li...@kiuni.de:
Hi all,
I got a message at boot:
dracut-pre-udev: libkmod: kmod_config_parse:
/etc/modprobe.d/thinkpad_battery.conf line 2: ignoring bad line starting
with 'options'
I have had this file to load modules for my thinkpad (acpi_call
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
as a whole means generally BUT allowing for exceptions.
OK, great. That clears it up then.
Maybe this helps:
The BSD license does not
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smoke grenades?
The only thing I'd like to discuss is your reason for not adding a
dual license to make your code as usable and probably as
On 04/27/2015 12:28 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Up to now, nobody could explain me how a mixture of GPL and BSD can be legal as
this would require (when following the GPL) to relicense the BSD code under GPL
in order to make the whole be under GPL.
The GPL doesn't require that you relicense any
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included
in the anaconda install. For example where the saved anaconda-ks-cfg
shows @gnome-desktop and @development, 'yum grouplist' only shows
'MATE Desktop' which was
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
The GPL is all that gives you permission to distribute. If it is
void then you have no permission at all to distribute any covered
code.
Fortunately judges know better than you
If you read the
On 04/27/2015 04:09 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
Thanks for the replies. The tool that we used for testing the security
vulnerability is Nessus.
I have glibc version 2.17-78.el7, I saw that CVE-2015-0235 (Ghost) is fixed
in this version and I want to apply patch for the vulnerbailities
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:45:16PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
But, I think that is a YUM database and not based on the RPM database,
so it is possible that you can have all the RPMs for a group installed
and not actually have it listed as installed.
At least I sometimes find myself in that
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
No, you posted some ranting misconceptions about why you don't see a
need for it. But if you actually believed any of that yourself, then
you would see there was no harm in adding a dual license to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included
in the anaconda install. For example where the saved anaconda-ks-cfg
shows
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
as a whole means generally BUT allowing for exceptions.
OK, great. That clears it up then.
Maybe this helps:
The BSD license does not permit to relicense the code, so you cannot put BSD
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted collective
work and the GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
First, I was not aware that the US had declared any part of the GPL null
Just ask US lawyers. one of them sits on the other side of the corridor of
my office, another is the well known Lawrence Rosen.
For Europe check the reasoning of the cases from Harald Welte.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
instead of the initial anaconda
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
The GPL is all that gives you permission to distribute. If it is
void then you have no permission at all to distribute any covered
code.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Yes, if you mean what is described here as 'the original 4-clause'
license, or BSD-old:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smoke grenades?
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smoke grenades?
The only thing I'd like to discuss is your reason for not adding a
dual
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Yes, if you mean what is described here as 'the original 4-clause'
license, or BSD-old:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
Do you like to
On 04/27/2015 01:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
instead of the initial anaconda install?
Yes. yum
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 08:08:49PM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
What about this:
hostnamectl set-hostname whateveryouwant
# which hostnamectl
/usr/bin/which: no hostnamectl in
(/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/root/bin)
# yum provides
On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:38 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
This is the SVr4 Bourne Shell, so you need to take into account what has been
added with Svr4:
Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom Bourne Shell?
Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:38 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
This is the SVr4 Bourne Shell, so you need to take into account what has
been
added with Svr4:
Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:51:31PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has
a GPU, or two, or more, that will work with the Folding At Home project.
I built a killer machine primarily for
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:51:31PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has
a GPU, or two, or more, that
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included
in the
On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has
a GPU, or two, or more, that will work with the Folding At Home project.
I built a killer machine primarily for contributing to the FAH effort
but the video card, NVIDIA
On 04/27/15 19:24, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:51:31PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has
a GPU, or two, or more, that will work with the Folding At Home project.
I built
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Ian barnrac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am having a weird problem which I cant figure out - so I was hoping
someone here could give me a hand.
First off the end goal is that a specific server in my network runs an
IPSEC connection to another company and I
Hi All,
I had some health issues for a few months and I barely recall dealing
with Heartbleed ... it's all just a blur. Now I'm getting back up to
speed, but I have a pair of CentOS 6.6 x86_64 + Virtualmin 4.13 GPL
servers which no longer seem to be picking up available updates.
'yum check' ran
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
I would be interested to understand why Heirloom seems to so well known and my
portability attempts seem to be widely unknown.
Not sure why it matters with a standalone application like sh, but I
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
I would be interested to understand why Heirloom seems to so well known and
my
portability attempts seem to be widely unknown.
Not sure why it
On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Heirloom added support for uname -S and for some linux ulimit extensions but
then stopped working on the code after a few months
Ah. I had no idea it was in a state of disrepair.
I see that you
I posted this to the comp.lang.tcl newsgroup, but it might relate to a
possible bug in the Mingw32 cross-build environment under CentOS 6 (or EPEL).
Forwarded Message:
From: Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com
Subject: Cross Building Tcl using Mingw32-gcc (4.9.2)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
And the problem is the GPL. I recommend you to work on making all GPL code
freely combinable with other OSS.
Of course the problem it the GPL. Glad you recognize that. It's
whole point is the
On 04/27/2015 06:43 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I started with UNOS in 1982 as my first UNIX like. UNOS in fact was
the first UNIX clone and it was a real time OS. In February 1985, I
switched to a Sunthe first Sun that made it to Europe. Jörg
Charles River UNOS was actually Tandy's first
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
You should read the GPL and get help to understand it. The GPL does not forbid
this linking. In contrary, the GPOL allows any GPLd program to be linked
against any library under and license. If this
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
4. CDDL annoys a lot of people.
The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS
enemies.
The following irritates me, I am a ?people,? and I am
Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
The schily tools act as a container to publish the current code state.
There is
no such maintained web page.
I was referring to the summary on the SourceForge page, where you just list
the contents of the package without explaining why one would
On Apr 27, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
I was referring to the summary on the SourceForge page, where you just list
the contents of the package without explaining why one would want to
download it.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
4. CDDL annoys a lot of people.
The CDDL does not annoy people, this is just a fairy tale from some OSS
enemies.
The following irritates me, I am a “people,” and I am not an OSS enemy:
Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Yes, I realize that osh is closer to the original Bourne shell. My point is
that you can?t expect people to just know, without having been told, why they
want bsh, or osh, bosh, or smake, or?
Most of these tools compete with tools that are already in
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
And the problem is the GPL. I recommend you to work on making all GPL code
freely combinable with other OSS.
Of course the problem it the GPL. Glad
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
You should read the GPL and get help to understand it. The GPL does not
forbid
this linking. In contrary, the GPOL allows any GPLd program to be
Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
instead of the initial anaconda install?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:39:30PM +0530, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
Thanks for the replies. The tool that we used for testing the security
vulnerability is Nessus.
I have glibc version 2.17-78.el7, I saw that CVE-2015-0235 (Ghost) is fixed
in this version and I want to apply patch for
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
There was no court case, but VERITAS published a modifed version of gtar where
additional code was added by binary only libraries from VERITAS. The FSF did
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted collective work and the
GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work ZFS of
course.
Which countries' copyright laws
Thanks for providing a lot of information. My first guess is that the
remote hosts you're trying to reach don't have the routes that they
require to use the IPSec tunnel. You demonstrated that server 2 has the
route it needs to reach the remote network, and that server 1 appears to
be
On 04/27/2015 02:09 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
Can you please help me in finding the right
version that has fixes for these?
Start by accessing Red Hat's CVE database:
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/
If errata have been published for a CVE entry, they will be listed along
On Mon, April 27, 2015 12:01 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:39:30PM +0530, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote:
Thanks for the replies. The tool that we used for testing the security
vulnerability is Nessus.
I have glibc version 2.17-78.el7, I saw that CVE-2015-0235 (Ghost)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
You can't distribute GPLd programs unless 'the work as a whole' is
covered by the GPL. There can't be a distinction between binary and
source since one is derived from the other.
Now you just need
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
If you combine ZFS and Linux, you create a permitted collective work and
the
GPL cannot extend it's rules to the CDDLd separate and independend work
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 12:32 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Now you just need to understand what as a whole means
Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete. And the normal
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
The GPL makes claims that are in conflict with the law because these claims
are
not amongst what the list in the law permits and that are thus void.
The GPL is all that gives you permission to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:58:08AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is there an 'after the fact' way to find what yum groups are
installed, including ones that were added with 'yum groupinstall'
instead of the initial anaconda install?
Yes. yum grouplist will tell you the groups that are currently
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Always Learning cen...@u64.u22.net wrote:
Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete. And the normal
interpretation is that it covers everything linked into the same
process at runtime unless there is an alternate interface-compatible
component
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:37 AM, carlh04...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I had some health issues for a few months and I barely recall dealing
with Heartbleed ... it's all just a blur. Now I'm getting back up to
speed, but I have a pair of CentOS 6.6 x86_64 + Virtualmin 4.13 GPL
servers
Hey Leon,
that did the trick. Thank you!
Regards
Tim
Am 27. April 2015 11:39:56 MESZ, schrieb Leon Fauster
leonfaus...@googlemail.com:
Am 26.04.2015 um 11:55 schrieb Tim li...@kiuni.de:
Hi all,
I got a message at boot:
dracut-pre-udev: libkmod: kmod_config_parse:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:47:32 +0530
Ashish Yadav wrote:
have you tried to rebuild the RPM database using below command,
# rpm --rebuilddb
Hi Ashish, and thank you for your reply. I contemplated doing that but
felt I needed to better understand the problem, first. As it happens, I
refined my
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:00 AM, carlh04...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:47:32 +0530
Ashish Yadav wrote:
have you tried to rebuild the RPM database using below command,
# rpm --rebuilddb
Hi Ashish, and thank you for your reply. I contemplated doing that but
felt I
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
You can't distribute GPLd programs unless 'the work as a whole' is
covered by the GPL. There can't be a distinction between binary and
source since
Hi,
I just installed CentOS and have been trying to change the desktop panel
background (in gnome classic) to black. How do I do this? Holding the alt
button while right-clicking on the mouse does not seem to do anything.
I do not have anything installed (other than what came with the LiveCD).
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
The GPL makes claims that are in conflict with the law because these claims
are
not amongst what the list in the law permits and that are thus void.
Can we take the license wanking off the list please? I don't think
either of the people arguing are actually lawyers, so it has no
relevance.
--
Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:21 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Can we take the license wanking off the list please? I don't think
either of the people arguing are actually lawyers, so it has no
relevance.
Relevance is not dependent on being, or not being, a lawyer. Relevance
for inclusion on the
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Always Learning cen...@u64.u22.net wrote:
Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete. And the normal
interpretation is that it covers everything linked into the same
process at runtime unless there is
I think that should be:
%post --nochroot
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com
To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS centos-virt@centos.org
Sent: Saturday, 25 April, 2015
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
For people building kickstart based environments, what would it take
to get you to put this in your ks.cfg?
%post
cp /tmp/ks.cfg /mnt/sysimage/root/ks.cfg
%end
For older releases, '%end' is not needed.
76 matches
Mail list logo
