Am 04.12.2015 um 03:12 schrieb Earl A Ramirez :
> After installing and enabling the centos-release-cr repo on my CentOS 7.1
> laptop; I ran yum clean all and yum update. Yum complained about gstreamer1
> dependencies that is caused by epel repo; therefore, I excluded it
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Leon Fauster wrote:
Any pointers on how to get the login screen?
What about the gstreamer1 stuff, are all necessary
libraries (linkage) in place? Especially for the EPEL
stuff.
You *need* to upgrade the gstreamer libraries or you break gnome (which breaks
gdm).
On 03/12/15 13:58, Greg Bailey wrote:
> Those who care about the upstream version knew that this was derived
> from RHEL 7.0. Those who don't care about upstream versions but want to
> track monthly rebuilds of cloud images, etc., could distinguish between
> "1406" and (for example) "1407". But
On 03/12/15 16:47, Duncan Brown wrote:
>> Did you rebuild initrd after removing the kmod packages?
>>
> Yes, and no change
is it possible to get a bug report at bugs.centos.org with as much
detail as possible, so we can try to reproduce ( and atleast document
and manage it that way ).
thanks
On 04/12/15 15:01, James Hogarth wrote:
>> In CentOS7 I have added two zones using firewall-cmd, each for
>> different ports/services and interfaces when I try to --add-source to
>> the second zone with an IP that is already in the first I am getting an
>> 'Error: ZONE_CONFLICT' message. Am I
On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 09:41 +, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Leon Fauster wrote:
>
> >> Any pointers on how to get the login screen?
> >
> > What about the gstreamer1 stuff, are all necessary
> > libraries (linkage) in place? Especially for the EPEL
> > stuff.
>
> You *need* to
On 4 December 2015 at 14:18, Colin Coles wrote:
> Hi,
> In CentOS7 I have added two zones using firewall-cmd, each for
> different ports/services and interfaces when I try to --add-source to
> the second zone with an IP that is already in the first I am getting an
> 'Error:
On 12/03/15 20:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Dec 3, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
That is my main complaint about parallelized boot. My brain is only
capable to deal with serial sequence of events, and which next event is
deterministically predictable
Hi,
In CentOS7 I have added two zones using firewall-cmd, each for
different ports/services and interfaces when I try to --add-source to
the second zone with an IP that is already in the first I am getting an
'Error: ZONE_CONFLICT' message. Am I trying to do something illogical or
is this a
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 08:02:28AM -0500, mark wrote:
> No, *you* don't understand what we're saying: pre-systemd, if the o/p saw
> that one stmt before the panic, they could look at what the system was doing
> *sequentially*, and so have an idea what it was failing on. With systemd's
>
On Thu, December 3, 2015 14:50, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
. . .
>> That is my main complaint about parallelized boot. My brain is
>> only capable to deal with serial sequence of events, and which
>> next event is deterministically predictable from previous. As
>> with fatal
On 12/04/2015 08:02 AM, mark wrote:
No, *you* don't understand what we're saying: pre-systemd, if the o/p
saw that one stmt before the panic, they could look at what the system
was doing *sequentially*, and so have an idea what it was failing on.
With systemd's parallelism, we have no clue,
On 04/12/2015 19:17, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Em 03-12-2015 14:46, Duncan Brown escreveu:
Here is a couple of pictures,
http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
Any use?
Of some. It's failing on ftrace initialization while allocating
memory, but can't know the
On 04/12/2015 12:03, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 03/12/15 16:47, Duncan Brown wrote:
Did you rebuild initrd after removing the kmod packages?
Yes, and no change
is it possible to get a bug report at bugs.centos.org with as much
detail as possible, so we can try to reproduce ( and atleast
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:06:14PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> i dont see it being dropped, on my completely updated machine i still
> see the fully qualified numbering in /etc/centos-release ( as an example ) ?
I know this is a big, confused thread, but the main complaint is that
the website
Em 03-12-2015 14:46, Duncan Brown escreveu:
Here is a couple of pictures,
http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
Any use?
Of some. It's failing on ftrace initialization while allocating memory,
but can't know the real reason. It can be just lack of memory or any
Buen día,
Actualmente cuento con 3 servidores Dell R710 con CentOs7, estos servidores
los utilizo para el hosting de paginas de Internet, actualmente uso el
sistema cPanel/WHM.
Cada servidor tiene sistema Operativo y el software de cPanel de manera
independiente, actualmente pago las 3
Encontré el link que tenía en favoritos.
Te dejo esto, nunca llegué a probarlo
http://blog.secaserver.com/2012/12/high-availability-cpanel-mysql-cluster/
(En inglés)
El viernes, 4 de diciembre de 2015, Diego Sanchez
escribió:
> CPanel no soporta cluster para los sitios.
> Si
CPanel no soporta cluster para los sitios.
Si soporta DNS en cluster y algunas pocas configuraciones más por ahora.
Tal vez sea posible, pero seguramente manoseando mucho cPanel...y no creo
que el soporte lo cubra
PD; ando buscando lo mismo... desde hace 5 años..
El viernes, 4 de diciembre de
19 matches
Mail list logo