Re: [CentOS] get pdftk into (or from) a repo

On 05/11/2017 06:49 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 11.05.2017 um 22:26 schrieb ken : pdftk used to be in a repo... or maybe it still is, but I don't know which one. Anyone know? an old one is in the "dead" rpmforge repo. At

Re: [CentOS] get pdftk into (or from) a repo

> Am 11.05.2017 um 22:26 schrieb ken : > > pdftk used to be in a repo... or maybe it still is, but I don't know which > one. Anyone know? > an old one is in the "dead" rpmforge repo. -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] strange system outage

Am 11.05.2017 um 20:30 schrieb Larry Martell: On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Larry Martell wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 02:40:04PM -0400, Larry Martell wrote: I have a CentOS 7 system

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 speedstep CPU support

On 05/11/2017 05:38 PM, Darr247 wrote: Here's mine. Interesting differences: If you disable Intel Speedstep in the BIOS it should lock the CPU to its fastest speed, but you lose power saving during idle. Thanks for the suggestion. I still recall that in CentOS 5.x there was speedstep

Re: [CentOS] get pdftk into (or from) a repo

On 05/11/2017 07:07 PM, ken wrote: On 05/11/2017 06:49 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 11.05.2017 um 22:26 schrieb ken : pdftk used to be in a repo... or maybe it still is, but I don't know which one. Anyone know? an old one is in the "dead" rpmforge repo. At

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 speedstep CPU support

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 8:18 AM, ken wrote: > Currently I don't actually need more speed. This is already a fairly peppy > laptop... like right now the load is about 2%. If it was any lower, I could > almost turn this machine off and still run everything. :) Ah but >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster : > > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel > > shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about > > Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake > > has the current EL6 variant support for it? > > Any experience? Feedback would be

[CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake has the current EL6 variant support for it? Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, LF ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster : > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster : >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >>

Re: [CentOS] Basic authentication - maybe off topoc

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 07:56:00AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > Hi - I am using CentOS 7.3 and trying to receive basic authentication. > > I run a command liked: curl -X POST -u jerry:pw > http://192.168.1.8/inbound.cgi > > When I use printenv in the cgi I do not see the user and password

[CentOS] Basic authentication - maybe off topoc

Hi - I am using CentOS 7.3 and trying to receive basic authentication. I run a command liked: curl -X POST -u jerry:pw http://192.168.1.8/inbound.cgi When I use printenv in the cgi I do not see the user and password anywhere. Isn't it supposed to be there in an environment variable like

Re: [CentOS] TLSv1.3 support?

On 5/11/2017 1:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 5/11/2017 1:13 PM, Walter H. wrote: will the next update of CentOS 6 (6.10) have TLSv1.3 support? A) Ask Red Hat, I see no date for RHEL 6 update 10 yet. update 9 released 6 or 8 weeks ago, so its likely 3-4 months before update 10

Re: [CentOS] strange system outage

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Larry Martell wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Jonathan Billings > wrote: >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 02:40:04PM -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >>> I have a CentOS 7 system that I run a home grown python daemon

Re: [CentOS] Basic authentication - maybe off topoc

>Is this a 'curl' question, a 'How do you write CGI?' question or a >general question about how HTTP works? Hi Jonathan, This was just a general question on why I'm not seeing what I expected. I'm using CentOS 7.3, I have written CGI for years (not using user & pass), I've used http for years -

Re: [CentOS] Basic authentication - maybe off topoc

> Date: Thursday, May 11, 2017 14:53:28 -0400 > From: Jerry Geis > >> Is this a 'curl' question, a 'How do you write CGI?' question or a >> general question about how HTTP works? > > Hi Jonathan, > > This was just a general question on why I'm not seeing what I >

[CentOS] get pdftk into (or from) a repo

pdftk used to be in a repo... or maybe it still is, but I don't know which one. Anyone know? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

On 05/11/2017 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster : Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster : https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about Intel Core

[CentOS] TLSv1.3 support?

Hello, will the next update of CentOS 6 (6.10) have TLSv1.3 support? Thanks, Walter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] TLSv1.3 support?

On 5/11/2017 1:13 PM, Walter H. wrote: will the next update of CentOS 6 (6.10) have TLSv1.3 support? A) Ask Red Hat, I see no date for RHEL 6 update 10 yet. update 9 released 6 or 8 weeks ago, so its likely 3-4 months before update 10 releases. B) afaik, TLS v1.3 hasn't even been

Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird Regression

Maybe this is not very helpful to you, but I run Thunderbird 52 on CentOS 7, and it is as good as always. I'm not using RAID on home directory. Yan > On May 10, 2017, at 8:16 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > Has anyone else noticed a 10X slowing of the time it takes

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

> Here's mine. Interesting differences: If you disable Intel Speedstep in the BIOS it should lock the CPU to its fastest speed, but you lose power saving during idle. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:48 PM, ken wrote: > On 05/11/2017 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: > >> Am