Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

Ah, ok. I was wondering how you managed to build that, because when I tried it did not work, but I see you have backported also other bits and bobs. If those overwrite Base, perhaps add a warning of sorts. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

Shouldn't be anything overwriting Base...what do you think does so? On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Nux! wrote: > Ah, ok. I was wondering how you managed to build that, because when I > tried it did not work, but I see you have backported also other bits and > bobs. > If those

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 02:06:35PM +0200, hw wrote: > > If the EPEL package did too, then there could be serious problems with > > that package. However, I see that it has a > > /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/lighttpd.conf, so it is ok. > > Hm, then how come it´s so troublesome? > > I have

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

Anand Buddhdev writes: > On 05/10/2017 11:32, hw wrote: > >>> That directory isn't temporary. The files almost always are, but not >>> the directories. As I said, whatever it is you're doing, it's wrong. >>> I wouldn't continue to keep a setup like that as it's not standard

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook

On October 9, 2017 2:25:46 PM GMT+02:00, Richard wrote: >I second this. I find it rather ironic that one would try to initiate >discussion of an open source operating system and environment in a >proprietary walled off world. This seems rather antithetical to

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

Richard, I haven't checked, but I see more than wine packages in that repo, hence my thoughts about that. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Richard Grainger" > To: "CentOS mailing list"

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

Jonathan Billings writes: > On Oct 3, 2017, at 13:12, hw wrote: >> >> I´m using the packages from mariadb.org. The old version that comes in >> Centos isn´t recommended, and I need features only the newer versions >> provide. >> >> >> Lighttpd is from

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

Nux!: SRPMS published: https://harbottle.gitlab.io/wine32/7/SRPMS/ Cheers! On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Richard Grainger wrote: > Yes, I will look into getting the SRPMS up on the site (though they are > just the ones from EPEL anyway). > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:54

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook

So, there is no switch there to make the group public? It requires login now, that's what I was moaning about basically. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Kovacs" > To: "CentOS mailing list"

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

Mark Haney writes: > It's quite obvious you aren't using Centos packages. Again: lighttpd is from epel. See [1]: "EPEL packages are usually based on their Fedora counterparts and will never conflict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise Linux distributions."

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

Mark Haney writes: > On 10/04/2017 08:46 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: >> On Wednesday 04 October 2017 13:39:30 Mark Haney wrote: >>> I'll end this by saying, I hope the production servers you have don't >>> provide critical services that could jeopardize the lives of people.

Re: [CentOS] Weird bandwith behaviour (download throughput) on CentOS based gateway

Jobst Schmalenbach writes: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:57:18PM +1300, Clint Dilks > (cli...@scms.waikato.ac.nz) wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach >> wrote: >> [snip] >> Hi, >> >> Are you sure that your issue isn't

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

Ah, no, those are just wine dependencies from epel. No base updates :) On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Nux! wrote: > Richard, > > I haven't checked, but I see more than wine packages in that repo, hence > my thoughts about that. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

That's great, thanks -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Richard Grainger" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Monday, 9 October, 2017 16:07:09 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Announcement:

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

Harold Toms writes: > On 01/10/17 16:21, hw wrote: >> Hi, >> >> how can I prevent files/directories like /var/run/mariadb from being >> deleted on reboot? Lighttpd has the same problem. >> >> This breaks services and makes servers non-restartable by anyone else >> but the

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

Gordon Messmer writes: > On 10/04/2017 04:54 AM, Mark Haney wrote: >> Why is it so hard for people to understand that var/run IS NOT >> PERSISTENT and was never meant to be?  Do they not teach basic Unix >> concepts anymore? > > >

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook

On 09/10/2017 13:59, Nux! wrote: So, there is no switch there to make the group public? It requires login now, that's what I was moaning about basically. I think the point of it is that it is a Facebook group, i.e. It is a group for Facebook users who have an interest in CentOS/RHEL. If it

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

Mark Haney writes: > On 10/04/2017 08:22 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: >> On Wednesday 04 October 2017 12:54:44 Mark Haney wrote: >>> Sorry, but if you have to use packages that don't originate from CentOS >>> and they do that, then I wouldn't use them. Period.  I'd compile

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

Gary Stainburn writes: > On Tuesday 03 October 2017 18:24:01 Mark Haney wrote: >> What issue? That the PID is dropped on reboot?  What else are you >> putting in there?  I'm beginning to question whether you know what >> you're doing or not.  Lighttpd doesn't store any

Re: [CentOS] Intel turbo mode

Stephen John Smoogen writes: > On 3 October 2017 at 13:01, hw wrote: >> Stephen John Smoogen writes: >> >>> On 1 October 2017 at 11:34, hw wrote: Hi, is there a way in Centos to find out if the Intel

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

Mark Haney writes: > On 10/04/2017 04:23 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: >> >> Mark, Many Non-Centos originated packages create directories in /var/run as >> part of the install, and expect them to still exist after a reboot. >> >> They then fail when starting the service

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

Am 09.10.2017 um 17:54 schrieb Jonathan Billings: I think that the important learning points today are: 1.) CentOS7 (and any other distro that uses systemd) will have /run as a tmpfs filesystem, and /var/run points to /run on CentOS7, so even if you think this disagrees with the FHS, that's the

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

> > Best practises also involve to generally not delete files unless you can > be sure that they can be deleted. That is probably what the FHS > intended by specifying that files in /var/run must be deleted/truncated > at boot time, assuming that the programs that created them would do this >

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:32:32PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 09.10.2017 um 17:54 schrieb Jonathan Billings: > > I think that the important learning points today are: > > > > 1.) CentOS7 (and any other distro that uses systemd) will have /run as > > a tmpfs filesystem, and /var/run

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

On Mon, October 9, 2017 3:31 pm, Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:32:32PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: >> Am 09.10.2017 um 17:54 schrieb Jonathan Billings: >> > I think that the important learning points today are: >> > >> > 1.) CentOS7 (and any other distro that uses systemd)

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

On 09/10/2017 12:38, hw wrote: >> 4. Finally, if you as a sysadmin are using a package from a repo that >> isn't CentOS or EPEL, and this package is not following the CentOS >> packaging protocol for data in /run, then it is YOUR own responsibility >> to fix the package, or create your own

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

On 09/10/2017 13:54, hw wrote: Mark, > It is quite obvious that Centos causes issues because it is not > following the FHS. Stop right there. CentOS *is* following the FHS. Can you please stop this whiny complaint against CentOS, and just accept that the packages you're using are not properly

[CentOS] Samba won't start on Centos 7.3.1611

Hi folks, I've been googling for an hour on this which seems to be awfully basic. But I cannot find anything definitive. [root@centos-gig ~]# systemctl enable smb.service Failed to execute operation: Access denied [root@centos-gig ~]# setenforce 0 [root@centos-gig ~]# systemctl enable

Re: [CentOS] Samba won't start on Centos 7.3.1611

Also tried this : [root@centos-gig ~]# cat allow type=USER_AVC msg=audit(1507584974.134:166105): pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='avc: received setenforce notice (enforcing=1) exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" sauid=0 hostname=? addr=? terminal=?'

Re: [CentOS] Samba won't start on Centos 7.3.1611

On Mon, 9 Oct 2017, Alan McKay wrote: Hi folks, I've been googling for an hour on this which seems to be awfully basic. But I cannot find anything definitive. [root@centos-gig ~]# systemctl enable smb.service Failed to execute operation: Access denied [root@centos-gig ~]# setenforce 0

Re: [CentOS] Samba won't start on Centos 7.3.1611

Ug - can't believe it. [root@centos-gig ~]# rpm -qa | grep samba samba-libs-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 samba-client-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 samba-client-libs-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 samba-common-tools-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 samba-common-libs-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 samba-common-4.4.4-14.el7_3.noarch

Re: [CentOS] how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:38:41PM +0200, hw wrote: > I´m not whining, and it´s not my fault that someone came up with the > extremely stupid idea to use a ramdisk for /var/run. It´s also not my > fault that lighttpd appears not to be packaged the way it would need to > be, and the same goes for

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

Yes, works fine alongside 64 bit wine from EPEL. :) Sent from my iPhone > On 9 Oct 2017, at 02:03, Peter wrote: > > This is great, thank you very much! > > Did you make it parallel-installable to the 64 bit wine from epel? > > > Peter > > >> On 09/10/17 07:43,

Re: [CentOS] Weird bandwith behaviour (download throughput) on CentOS based gateway

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 03:05:51PM +0200, hw (h...@adminart.net) wrote: > Jobst Schmalenbach writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:57:18PM +1300, Clint Dilks > > (cli...@scms.waikato.ac.nz) wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook

I personally dislike Facebook, but even so, I think a basic requirement for any web site striving to share knowledge is to be publicly accessible to all which at the moment it is not. Search engines won't be able to crawl it, people without an account won't be able to access it. Can this be

[CentOS] SCSI block device name/multipath question

hi, i have a host with a LSI SAS 3108 RAID controller in JBOD mode with 4 SSD SATA disks. i installed oVirt node (= CentOS 7) on the first two disks configured as SW RAID 1 (in the oVirt node/CentOS installer). when i look at the device names in the running OS i get # lsscsi --scsi_id -g

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook

I second this. I find it rather ironic that one would try to initiate discussion of an open source operating system and environment in a proprietary walled off world. This seems rather antithetical to the whole intent of centos. - Richard Original Message > Date:

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook

Le 09/10/2017 à 13:14, Nux! a écrit : > I personally dislike Facebook, but even so, I think a basic > requirement for any web site striving to share knowledge is to be > publicly accessible to all which at the moment it is not. Search > engines won't be able to crawl it, people without an account

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

Yes, I will look into getting the SRPMS up on the site (though they are just the ones from EPEL anyway). On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Nux! wrote: > Hello, > > That's great, I know many people were looking for this. > > Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs? > > -- > Sent

Re: [CentOS] Announcement: 32 bit Wine repo for RHEL and CentOS 7

Hello, That's great, I know many people were looking for this. Any chance you can also publish the SRPMs? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Richard Grainger" > To: "CentOS mailing list"

Re: [CentOS-es] OT Imagen de disco

El Sábado 07/10/2017 a las 13:20, Cesar Martinez escribió: > Saludos amigos listeros espero todos se encuentren bien acudo a ustedes > para hacerles una pregunta haber si alguien tiene experiencia y me puede > orientar con esta consulta. > > Tengo un cliente en el cuál inicialmente instalé un