Re: [CentOS] Gnome boot problem (again :-) )

On 25/11/17 12:09, vychytraly . wrote: Hello friends I was using EL7 on gnome 3 for few months without any problem. Even 2 hours ago I had the computer (Laptop running on Nvidia-Prime) turned on and everything was working without flaw. But when I turned on the computer few minutes ago, I got

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On 28 November 2017 at 16:06, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 11/28/2017 08:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney wrote: >>> On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: With a few exceptions, I see most admins

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 153, Issue 7

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

Hi Joseph, > On 28. Nov 2017, at 14:06, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single rolling > release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things just work between > point releases. On the other hand I see the

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

On 11/28/2017 11:04 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:> I was always unimpressed with> persistence of attempts to make more secure (less pickable) cylinder cased> locks (precision, multi-level, pins at a weird locations/angles). Whereas> there exists "disk based design" (should I say Abloy?), which with

Re: [CentOS] C 7, lockd issue

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > I thnk I posted this last week, but to refresh your minds (for Americans, > after all the turkey): two C7 boxes, updated. box 1 is exporting > directories; box 2 is not running nfs. From box 1, every minute, I get > <...> kernel: lockd: server fred.local not

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On 11/29/2017 05:14 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 28 November 2017 at 16:06, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 11/28/2017 08:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney wrote: On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:

[CentOS] C 7, lockd issue

I thnk I posted this last week, but to refresh your minds (for Americans, after all the turkey): two C7 boxes, updated. box 1 is exporting directories; box 2 is not running nfs. From box 1, every minute, I get <...> kernel: lockd: server fred.local not responding, timed out Now, on box 2, fred

[CentOS] Perl fun part 2

I figured this needed it's own thread, so apologies for spamming the list. Along with the /usr/share/perl5 issues (which I did kinda fix with a manual copy of the directory from another box), we're having an issue with SystemD (go figure) stopping the radiator service, but failing to unbind

Re: [CentOS] Perl fun part 2

> Along with the /usr/share/perl5 issues (which I did kinda fix with a > manual copy of the directory from another box), we're having an issue > with SystemD (go figure) stopping the radiator service, but failing to > unbind the ports (1645/1646). It's complaining about 'killproc' not >

Re: [CentOS] Missing /usr/share/perl5 in C7

On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 12:28 -0500, Mark Haney wrote: > I'm under a bit of a crunch here, so any immediate help would be > appreciated. We kickstart our customer boxes and have started migrating > to CentOS 7. We're running Radiator 4.6 1 (I know, but bear with me) > and we just deployed our

[CentOS] Missing /usr/share/perl5 in C7

I'm under a bit of a crunch here, so any immediate help would be appreciated. We kickstart our customer boxes and have started migrating to CentOS 7. We're running Radiator 4.6 1 (I know, but bear with me) and we just deployed our first radius box to a customer to be turned up today. (I know,

Re: [CentOS] Missing /usr/share/perl5 in C7

Mark Haney wrote: > On 11/29/2017 01:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Mark Haney wrote: > >>> >>> Any idea what happened? >> >> No idea what could have happened, but if it were me, I wouldn't copy >> anything - I'd yum reinstall instantly. You have no idea what *else* is >> missing. >> >>

[CentOS] C7 and docker storage

Was working on docker on a server, and on startup, I see Nov 29 10:58:27 dockerd-current: time="2017-11-29T10:58:27.612849959-05:00" level=warning msg="devmapper: Usage of loopback devices is strongly discouraged for production use. Please use `--storage-opt dm.thinpooldev` or use `man docker` to

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. > Casale > Sent: den 30 november 2017 01:25 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > -Original Message- > From:

Re: [CentOS] Failed attempts

On 28/11/17 06:02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Pete Biggs wrote: On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 12:10 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: - don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. (Things get a lot quieter when you do that, but it comes with it's own problems and don't get complacent because someone will find

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eckel Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:21 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > While that may seem a bit strange insofar as

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:26 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > Seriously, some of the RHEL-boxes we use,

Re: [CentOS] Missing /usr/share/perl5 in C7

On 11/29/2017 01:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Mark Haney wrote: Any idea what happened? No idea what could have happened, but if it were me, I wouldn't copy anything - I'd yum reinstall instantly. You have no idea what *else* is missing. Thinking about it... you might consider verifying

Re: [CentOS] Perl fun part 2

Once upon a time, Mark Haney said: > Along with the /usr/share/perl5 issues (which I did kinda fix with a > manual copy of the directory from another box), we're having an > issue with SystemD (go figure) stopping the radiator service, but > failing to unbind the ports

Re: [CentOS] Missing /usr/share/perl5 in C7

Mark Haney wrote: > I'm under a bit of a crunch here, so any immediate help would be > appreciated. We kickstart our customer boxes and have started migrating > to CentOS 7. We're running Radiator 4.6 1 (I know, but bear with me) > and we just deployed our first radius box to a customer to be

Re: [CentOS] Missing /usr/share/perl5 in C7

On 30/11/17 08:40, Mark Haney wrote: > On 11/29/2017 01:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Mark Haney wrote: > >>> >>> Any idea what happened? I'd say at best (and likely) a botched install, at worst something more malicious. >> No idea what could have happened, but if it were me, I wouldn't

Re: [CentOS-es] Servidor Web Centos7

Gracias con eso veré como se hace la instalación y lo afinare sin usar el panel, Slds. El mar., 28 nov. 2017 a las 10:05, Henry Rosado () escribió: > No se si te sirve cwp7 que ya trae esos proxys inversos > > El 27 nov. 2017 20:36, "Wilmer Arambula"