Re: [CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 11:49 PM Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 06.01.2021 um 19:10 schrieb Kaushal Shriyan: > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:48 PM Christopher Wensink < > > cwens...@five-star-plastics.com> wrote: > > > >> Does the file have execute permissions, what is the file's permissions > >> and

Re: [CentOS] Running script before reboot or shutdown

Hi Carlos, Don't know if you ever found a solution to the problem you described below but I think I came across the concept for this that might work. I'm more of a systemd dilettante than a systemd expert but I found confirmation that this approach isn't totally hare-brained. While trying to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 7:43 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I honestly have no idea how much Tomcat is used anymore. The various places > that I worked previously or have contacts with have killed it off by moving > whatever used it to external cloud services versus JBOSS or anything else. >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

I'll be the first to admit I don't like change and arguably I'm in the wrong industry for that, but that's another matter. However I don't want to throw away years of experience with CentOS/Fedora and time invested (mine personally and my company's) learning and perfecting setups of which I

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 7:59 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > OK it looks like whatever I say is going to be taken to extremes so this > will be my last email on this. > > I am not saying Tomcat is a dead technology. It is a technology which has > certain use cases and deployments which the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 12:42, Simon Matter wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 11:17, Simon Matter > wrote: > > > >> > On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 07:50, Simon Matter > >> wrote: > > > I didn't say or mean that. My answer is that it is complicated and more > > meant that the software you expect requires

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 13:48, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 7:43 PM Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > > > I honestly have no idea how much Tomcat is used anymore. The various > places > > that I worked previously or have contacts with have killed it off by > moving > >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 2:44 PM Jamie Burchell wrote: > I'll be the first to admit I don't like change and arguably I'm in the > wrong industry for that, but that's another matter. However I don't want to > throw away years of experience with CentOS/Fedora and time invested (mine > personally and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On 1/6/21 8:01 PM, Strahil Nikolov via CentOS wrote: - No chance to "yum history undo last" as there are no older packages I've seen that mentioned as a change pretty frequently, but I don't think it is in any meaningful sense. In CentOS Stream, package versions may be rebased

Re: [CentOS] rare but repeating system crash in C7

Hi Fred, no I was asking about the auto mount and umount issue you had. Did you get it to work correctly? Simon > Simon, if you're talking about the occasional crash, I don't know, since > it > happens only occasionally. If I can make it thru six months without seeing > it, then I'll declare it

Re: [CentOS] rare but repeating system crash in C7

Simon, if you're talking about the occasional crash, I don't know, since it happens only occasionally. If I can make it thru six months without seeing it, then I'll declare it fixed. Thanks! On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:23 PM Simon Matter wrote: > Have you been able to fix the issue? > > Regards,

Re: [CentOS] dovecot option PROFILE=SYSTEM

--On Wednesday, January 06, 2021 7:08 AM -0800 david wrote: If only there had been a comment in the file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf I suggest opening an enhancement request on Bugzilla. ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

>At the moment my question possibly would have been better phrased "Why >isn't >Streama suitable platform for a production web server". It is , but expect rough edges. The differences will be : - Shorter lifetime .If you skip the first 2 minor releases -it will be shorter - No chance to "yum

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

Am 06.01.21 um 03:01 schrieb Scott Robbins: On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:31:34PM +, Jamie Burchell wrote: Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even Microsoft has gone the Apple way and just perpetually updates Windows

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:22 AM Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 1/5/21 3:39 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > And as someone mentioned, these other distributions have long great > > record of system upgrade from one release to another. CentOS has no > > record (and probably no upgrade engineered yet). In

[CentOS] fail2ban problems - not banning

Hi everyone, I've got fail2ban and firewalld set up on a C7 box, in theory protecting dovecot, exim and ssh but I'm not convinced it's doing anything. in /var/log/fail2ban.log I'm getting loads of entries such as: 2020-12-22 19:08:08,100 fail2ban.actions    [1836]: WARNING [dovecot]

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

Am 05.01.21 um 23:51 schrieb Gordon Messmer: On 1/5/21 11:32 AM, Jamie Burchell wrote: is the change a non-issue for my use-case? Probably.  For a lot of users, Stream is a drop-in replacement that's better than CentOS was, because it gets updates consistently and doesn't suffer from

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

Le 06/01/2021 à 08:48, John R. Dennison a écrit : > To be fair it was only broken because you kept it broken; you could have > backed out the CR updates and waited for the point release to go GA and > be on ABI parity with EPEL. I used the CR updates because back then the official repositories

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 6:32 PM Jamie Burchell wrote: > > Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of > destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even Microsoft has gone the Apple > way and just perpetually updates Windows 10 now. > Do you use tools like

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

We use Ansible "to a point" in that it sets up what we consider to be our preferred server (Droplet) for a specific purpose, then we deploy projects on them and tweak non-Ansible managed project configs. It's not old-school scripts and it's not quite a one-liner to deploy everything. It's

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

> Am 06.01.21 um 03:01 schrieb Scott Robbins: >> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:31:34PM +, Jamie Burchell wrote: >>> Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of >>> destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even Microsoft has gone the >>> Apple >>> way and just

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

Hmm, I see a relation here. C7Linux - 2024 C8Linux - 2021 So I assume: C6Linux - 2027 C5Linux - 2030 C4Linux - 2033 ... Interesting. On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, 21:44 Phil Perry, wrote: > On 05/01/2021 19:32, Jamie Burchell wrote: > > Hello > > > > I've recently discovered the announcement regarding

Re: [CentOS] dovecot option PROFILE=SYSTEM

--On Tuesday, January 05, 2021 7:40 PM -0800 david wrote: In examining the file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf I see the text line: ssl_cipher_list = PROFILE=SYSTEM Yet, I cannot find any documentation that explains what that causes, where the values are stored. I ask because I don't

Re: [CentOS] centos-release-stream VS centos-stream-release

On 1/6/21 8:53 AM, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > hi guys, > > do you know what to make of that? Why these tho packages? > > many thanks, L. One is designed to live in centos linux 8 extras and allow you to install upgrade from centos linux 8 to centos stream 8 .. the other is the actual release

[CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

Hi, I am running the below php, httpd and CentOS Linux version. # rpm -qa | grep php php73-mbstring-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-json-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-fpm-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-pdo-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-gd-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:31:34PM +, Jamie Burchell wrote: > Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of > destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even Microsoft has gone the Apple > way and just perpetually updates Windows 10 now. Red Hat is working on this with

Re: [CentOS] dovecot option PROFILE=SYSTEM

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Tuesday, January 05, 2021 7:40 PM -0800 david wrote: In examining the file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf I see the text line: ssl_cipher_list = PROFILE=SYSTEM Yet, I cannot find any documentation that explains what that causes, where the

Re: [CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

Does the file have execute permissions, what is the file's permissions and is it owned by the user running apache? Chris On 1/6/2021 10:13 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: Hi, I am running the below php, httpd and CentOS Linux version. # rpm -qa | grep php php73-mbstring-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 07:50, Simon Matter wrote: > >> > Am 06.01.21 um 03:01 schrieb Scott Robbins: >> >> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:31:34PM +, Jamie Burchell wrote: >> >>> Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process >> of >> >>> destroying and rebuilding every X

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

Le 06/01/2021 à 18:08, Gordon Messmer a écrit : > What I do see is that the sclo-php72-php-pecl-imagick has a dependency on > libMagickCore.so.5()(64bit), which is recorded in the rpm package.  If you > have > a package from a third party repository (either EPEL or SCLO, or others), and > it

Re: [CentOS] dovecot option PROFILE=SYSTEM

At 07:04 AM 1/6/2021, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2021, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Tuesday, January 05, 2021 7:40 PM -0800 david wrote: In examining the file /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf I see the text line: ssl_cipher_list = PROFILE=SYSTEM Yet, I cannot find any documentation

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 07:50, Simon Matter wrote: > > Am 06.01.21 um 03:01 schrieb Scott Robbins: > >> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:31:34PM +, Jamie Burchell wrote: > >>> Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a manual process of > >>> destroying and rebuilding every X years. Even

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

> On Jan 6, 2021, at 12:53 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 1/5/21 6:30 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> I was not comparing CentOS Stream with CentOS (former 10 year life cycle >> system), I was comparing CentOS Stream with Debian (and clones) LTS. > > > The original message came from a CentOS

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On 1/6/21 9:20 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Broken packages explained away are still broken packages. I'm not sure how your system got in to a broken state, though. If you have a working system, and one repo updates a package to remove a dependency of a currently working package, those

Re: [CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

Am 06.01.2021 um 19:10 schrieb Kaushal Shriyan: On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:48 PM Christopher Wensink < cwens...@five-star-plastics.com> wrote: Does the file have execute permissions, what is the file's permissions and is it owned by the user running apache? Chris Hi Chris, I have added the

Re: [CentOS] fail2ban problems - not banning

On 1/6/21 2:57 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: 2020-12-22 19:38:27,619 fail2ban.utils  [1836]: ERROR 7f119e95f7f0 -- exec: ports="0:65535"; for p in $(echo $ports | tr ", " " "); do firewall-cmd --add-rich-rule="rule family='ipv4' source address='113.110.47.81' port port='$p' protocol='tcp'

Re: [CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

Am 06.01.21 um 17:13 schrieb Kaushal Shriyan: Hi, I am running the below php, httpd and CentOS Linux version. # rpm -qa | grep php php73-mbstring-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-json-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-fpm-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-pdo-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On 1/5/21 11:31 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: No, this was an actual problem I had back in April 2020. Upgrading from CR broke imagemagick At the time, you described that problem as: I got an alert from Yum-Cron this morning: Failed to check for updates with the following error message: Failed

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 8:30 AM Jamie Burchell wrote: > > We use Ansible "to a point" in that it sets up what we consider to be our > preferred server (Droplet) for a specific purpose, then we deploy projects on > them and tweak non-Ansible managed project configs. It's not old-school > scripts

[CentOS] centos-release-stream VS centos-stream-release

hi guys, do you know what to make of that? Why these tho packages? many thanks, L. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 11:17, Simon Matter wrote: > >> > On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 07:50, Simon Matter >> wrote: >> > >> >> > Am 06.01.21 um 03:01 schrieb Scott Robbins: >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:31:34PM +, Jamie Burchell wrote: >> >> >>> Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 11:17, Simon Matter wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 07:50, Simon Matter > wrote: > > > >> > Am 06.01.21 um 03:01 schrieb Scott Robbins: > >> >> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:31:34PM +, Jamie Burchell wrote: > >> >>> Off topic for sure, but it's a shame this has to be a

Re: [CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:48 PM Christopher Wensink < cwens...@five-star-plastics.com> wrote: > Does the file have execute permissions, what is the file's permissions > and is it owned by the user running apache? > > Chris > Hi Chris, I have added the below in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf. The

Re: [CentOS] rare but repeating system crash in C7

Have you been able to fix the issue? Regards, Simon > OK, here's where I stand now: > 1. I stopped and disabled autofs. (I have 2 SMB filesystems out on the LAN > that have also been automounting with autofs, do I need to do similar > changes in fstab for them?) > 2. yes it has. > 3. none I can

Re: [CentOS-docs] wiki edit request

Is someone able to handle this? On 1/4/21 4:36 PM, Davide Cavalca wrote: Hi, I'd like to request edit access on wiki.centos.org for my account (DavideCavalca) on /SpecialInterestGroup/Hyperscale which will be used for an upcoming SIG proposal. I'd also like edit access to my user page at

Re: [CentOS-docs] wiki edit request

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 15:39, Rich Bowen wrote: > > Is someone able to handle this? > Yes. Please do not top post. Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

Re: [CentOS-docs] wiki edit request

On 1/4/21 4:36 PM, Davide Cavalca wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to request edit access on wiki.centos.org for my account > (DavideCavalca) on /SpecialInterestGroup/Hyperscale which will be used > for an upcoming SIG proposal. I'd also like edit access to my user page > at /DavideCavalca if possible.

Re: [CentOS-docs] wiki edit request

On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 17:13, Davide Cavalca wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 16:42 +, Alan Bartlett wrote: > > You should now be able to edit the wiki Hyperscale SIG page and your > > home page. > > > > Please let me (or Akemi) know if you have any problems. > > Yup it's working now, thanks!