Re: [CentOS] Bare metal vs. virtualization: Proxmox + Ceph + CentOS ?

2021-03-14 Thread Mauricio Tavares
How many extra servers can you add to your setup? If I were in your shoes, I would consider building a file server/NAS with fast connection to your server(s). Then share the data to your services to the server (NFS?), export the disk (iscsi) or some combination of both. I hope someone can correct

Re: [CentOS] Expand XFS filesystem on CentOS Linux release 8.2.2004 (Core)

2021-03-14 Thread Strahil Nikolov via CentOS
True.I wiped a VM this way , years ago. Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 20:05, Simon Matter wrote: > I'm constantly using fdisk on GPT and everything has been fine. > Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov That's only true in recent times, because in the past fdisk didn't

Re: [CentOS] Expand XFS filesystem on CentOS Linux release 8.2.2004 (Core)

2021-03-14 Thread Strahil Nikolov via CentOS
I'm constantly using fdisk on GPT and everything has been fine. Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 15:30, Simon Matter wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to expand xfs filesystem /dev/nvme0n1p2 which is 7.8G and > occupy the remaining free disk space of 60GB? > >

Re: [CentOS] Expand XFS filesystem on CentOS Linux release 8.2.2004 (Core)

2021-03-14 Thread Simon Matter
> I'm constantly using fdisk on GPT and everything has been fine. > Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov That's only true in recent times, because in the past fdisk didn't support GPT at all. Back then you had to use tools like parted. Simon > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 15:30, Simon Matter > wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Expand XFS filesystem on CentOS Linux release 8.2.2004 (Core)

2021-03-14 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 07:05:37PM +0100, Simon Matter wrote: > > I'm constantly using fdisk on GPT and everything has been fine. > > Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov > > That's only true in recent times, because in the past fdisk didn't support > GPT at all. Back then you had to use tools like

Re: [CentOS] Bare metal vs. virtualization: Proxmox + Ceph + CentOS ?

2021-03-14 Thread Valeri Galtsev
> On Mar 14, 2021, at 5:42 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS > wrote: > > Am 14.03.21 um 07:13 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: >> >> Now here’s the problem: it took me three and a half days of intense work to >> restore everything and get everything running again. Three and a half days of >> downtime is

Re: [CentOS] Bare metal vs. virtualization: Proxmox + Ceph + CentOS ?

2021-03-14 Thread Simon Matter
> Am 14.03.21 um 07:13 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: >> >> Now here’s the problem: it took me three and a half days of intense work >> to >> restore everything and get everything running again. Three and a half >> days of >> downtime is quite a stretch. >> > > What was the real problem? Why did you need

Re: [CentOS] Bare metal vs. virtualization: Proxmox + Ceph + CentOS ?

2021-03-14 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
Am 14.03.21 um 07:13 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: Now here’s the problem: it took me three and a half days of intense work to restore everything and get everything running again. Three and a half days of downtime is quite a stretch. What was the real problem? Why did you need days to restore from

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-14 Thread John Plemons
Sounds like you need to use a dual layer DVD disc, it is double the capacity. john On 3/14/2021 9:13 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing front ends

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-14 Thread Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS
On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 21:31 -0400, John Plemons wrote: > Sounds like you need to use a dual layer DVD disc, it is double the > capacity. John, Wrong answer. The server's optical drive doesn't support double-layer disks. The CentOS developers made a mistake on their DVD iso, and they need to fix

[CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-14 Thread Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS
I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing front ends I've ever seen. Could anyone familiar with it please file a bug on my behalf? Particulars: "CentOS 7.9.2009 DVD iso image too large" ISO image:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-14 Thread Valeri Galtsev
> On Mar 14, 2021, at 8:13 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS > wrote: > > I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking > system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing > front ends I've ever seen. Could anyone familiar with it please file a > bug

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7-x86_64-dvd-2009.iso is too big for DVD blanks

2021-03-14 Thread Valeri Galtsev
> On Mar 14, 2021, at 8:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > >> On Mar 14, 2021, at 8:13 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS >> wrote: >> >> I need help from someone experienced with the CentOS bug tracking >> system. I gotta say it is one of the most complicated and imposing >> front

Re: [CentOS] remote disk decryption on centos?

2021-03-14 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 3/12/21 1:51 PM, ept8e...@secmail.pro wrote: Hi I was reading about how unlock encrypted root partition from remote (unattended). I'd like asking what is compatible way for this in centos and commonly used by administrators? What's your threat model?  Are you trying to protect the system

Re: [CentOS] Dual WAN on EL8 desktop.

2021-03-14 Thread Gordon Messmer
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:30 PM Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > What is ideal is the bandwidth of two connections and half bandwidth > when one link is down. That may not be *generally* possible. You can load-balance your network streams (connections), so that you'll utilize the bandwidth of two