Dear Russ.
I would personally welcome such a Documentation (if it's maintained,
of course) as I agree with you if you are saying that there is no
howto available covering nearly all aspects of the RPM build process.
I wonder what in the world, which is material, you think is ** not **
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Alan Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/07/2008, Filipe Brandenburger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that none of these articles are about building RPMs anyway, one
is a kind of FAQ on Yum and RPM and the second one is on building your
own kernel.
On 19/07/2008, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Alan Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 18/07/2008, Filipe Brandenburger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that none of these articles are about building RPMs anyway, one
is a kind of FAQ on Yum and RPM and
Dear Ralph.
Go ahead: You have to create pages like that:
http://wiki.centos.org/de/TipsAndTricks/FooBar?action=edit
as you would be redirected to the english page automagically, otherwise.
Should I name the translated pages like the original ones, e.g.
TipsAndTricks/CDtoDVDMedia or should
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 07:54, Alan Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/07/2008, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, when I want to assess if a new Wiki page is worth writing, I base
it on the past record and see if that article would have helped if
existed. Here, I picked up some
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Russ.
I wonder what in the world, which is material, you think is
** not ** covereed between the Ed Bailey, and the Eric
Foster-Johnson, the GuruLabs resources (each down those
links).
I am speaking about the CentOS Wiki and nothing more. I
Hi Russ.
I wonder what in the world, which is material, you think is ** not **
covereed between the Ed Bailey, and the Eric Foster-Johnson, the GuruLabs
resources (each down those links).
I am speaking about the CentOS Wiki and nothing more. I think pages like
the Yum and RPM page should
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Alan Bartlett wrote:
Have you replied to Russ Herrold's comment? Perhaps I missed it.
No, but others did and I agree with their comments.
I think it would have been polite of you to have responded to Russ'
comments. (Speaking as an Englishman.)
Polite to one side, as
Dear Russ.
thanks for this detailed explanation of your point of view. I agree on
that it does not make much sense to just duplicate content from other
resources, but to restructure the existing pages.
A CentOS channel member pointed out a variance from an RFC form, and I fixed
on the spot,
Administrador RRAsociados wrote:
Hola,
Soy novato en Linux y quisiera hacerles una pregunta sobre metodología.
Quisiera actualizar un servidor web CentOs en producción y me pregunto
cual es la forma adecuada de hacerlo. Me refiero a actualizacines de
seguridad.
hola rafael
actualizo con
2008/7/20 Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Administrador RRAsociados wrote:
Hola,
Soy novato en Linux y quisiera hacerles una pregunta sobre metodología.
Quisiera actualizar un servidor web CentOs en producción y me pregunto
cual es la forma adecuada de hacerlo. Me refiero a
Hola:
Por lo general deberias observar en que afecta la actualizacion a tu
servidor, un ejemplo de esto son los servidores de bases de datos de
oracle, donde un actualizacion puede ser catastrofica, mas aun cuando
se involucran librerias y/o kernel.
Aun a riesgo de ofender a los centoseros
*Walter Cervini*
Movil: 0424 1542250
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:06 PM, O. T. Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola:
Por lo general deberias observar en que afecta la actualizacion a tu
servidor, un ejemplo de esto son los servidores de bases de datos de
oracle, donde un actualizacion
Hola amigos de la lista
Bueno esto mas que una consulta es un comentario, instale un CENTOS 5 y en
el corre un SAMBA, bueno por el tamaño de usuarios no habilitamos ldap.
samba corre solo con usuarios creados en el sistema, pero alguien empezo a
crear o edito a mano el passwd y la herramienta de
Hi, I'm new to CentOS and I want to install CentOS 5.2 on an intel computer to
use it as a server.
I downloaded the CentOS 5.2 DVD iso i386 and did the md5sum, burned the DVD and
everything was Ok but when I try to boot the server with the DVD, it simply
does nto boot, like if nothing were in
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
checkout the bugtracker..this is a long running issue. The issue stems
from newer servers/computers using sata optical drives.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm new to CentOS and I want to install CentOS 5.2 on an intel computer to
use it as a server.
I downloaded the CentOS 5.2 DVD iso i386
Hi CentOS List,
I was wondering if the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is still being looked
after. I submitted a request to have my on-line store added about a
month ago but heard nothing back. Have recently resubmitted my request
and, although I haven't waited all that long, I thought I would ask the
Yes but Linus could be guest speaker at LinuxChix, Bill has to pay for
his women ;-)
That is why Bill Gates is a billionaire, and Linus Torvalds isn't.
And who is the happier, I wonder?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Well to start, I'm not that new to CentOS, but I've never used yum
except to keep things up to date, but after reading a lot of articles, I
started adding software I'd never used before, and unfortunately, the
most up to date versions came from repositories which I thought were all
the same.
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Martyn Hare wrote:
Yes but Linus could be guest speaker at LinuxChix, Bill has to pay for
his women ;-)
hey now -- she worked in tech too -- a product manager for
MSFT's 'Bob' product (clippy on steroids) ... oh, hmmm, so he
_did_ indirectly pay for ...
Never mind --
For ages I have been keeping docs and notes in Public Folders inside an
Exchange server
and want to move this out to a more modern facility that allows tagging and
searching via
a web interface for keywords so I can keep all my notes more organized.
Anyone have any personal recos for the
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:38:02 -0600
Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For ages I have been keeping docs and notes in Public Folders
inside an Exchange server and want to move this out to a more
modern facility that allows tagging and searching via a web
interface for keywords so I can
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 10:38 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
For ages I have been keeping docs and notes in Public Folders inside an
Exchange server
and want to move this out to a more modern facility that allows tagging and
searching via
a web interface for keywords so I can keep all my
Am 19.07.2008 um 19:01 schrieb Craig White:
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 10:38 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
For ages I have been keeping docs and notes in Public Folders
inside an Exchange server
and want to move this out to a more modern facility that allows
tagging and searching via
a web
dokuwiki works pretty good. All flat files - easy to migrate to a new
server. For an individual, works well.
quote
DokuWiki is a standards-compliant, simple-to-use wiki which allows
users to create rich documentation repositories. It provides an
environment for individuals, teams and
Hello,
is someone using Plone on CentOs 5.2?
What is the best way to install lastest version? Using their unified
installer?
Thanks in advance!
D.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
dnk wrote:
dokuwiki works pretty good. All flat files - easy to migrate to a new
server. For an individual, works well.
Second on dokuwiki. The markup language is simpler and more logical than
most, and it's very easy to do monospaced command-line examples and the
like (just indent a couple of
Dan Halbert wrote:
dnk wrote:
dokuwiki works pretty good. All flat files - easy to migrate to a new
server. For an individual, works well.
Second on dokuwiki. The markup language is simpler and more logical
than most, and it's very easy to do monospaced command-line examples
and the like
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Sam Drinkard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well to start, I'm not that new to CentOS, but I've never used yum except to
keep things up to date, but after reading a lot of articles, I started
adding software I'd never used before, and unfortunately, the most up to
And it's got a lot of helpful plugins.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I am running CentOS 5 on a dual-dual-core Intel machine, and I am seeing
a load average of between 0.35 and 0.50 while the machine is idle, i.e.
no processes appear to be running.
Both top and uptime report the same thing. Looking at top, I cannot see
any processes that are using CPU time except
listmail wrote:
snip
Are you running X ... how many processes (on average are running).
Running X and logged in with applets and such, I have this:
===
top - 17:18:49 up 4:13, 3 users, load average: 0.15, 0.27, 0.32
Tasks: 153 total,
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:21:44 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote
listmail wrote:
snip
Are you running X ... how many processes (on average are running).
Running X and logged in with applets and such, I have this:
===
top - 17:18:49 up
Replying to my own post as a follow-up. I just checked
another machine that
I am burning in with CentOS 5.2, and it has the same
problem: load average
~0.4 when idle. Both of these machines have Supermicro
X7DBN motherboards,
but one is running a single quad-core CPU (Intel Xeon) and
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:04:17 -0700 (PDT), Mark Pryor wrote
Replying to my own post as a follow-up. I just checked
another machine that
I am burning in with CentOS 5.2, and it has the same
problem: load average
~0.4 when idle. Both of these machines have Supermicro
X7DBN motherboards,
however booting from the cd's of 5.x works fine.
William Warren wrote:
checkout the bugtracker..this is a long running issue. The issue stems
from newer servers/computers using sata optical drives.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm new to CentOS and I want to install CentOS 5.2 on an intel
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:28:55 -0400, Dan Halbert wrote
listmail wrote:
it has the same problem: load average 0.4 when idle.
If you disconnect or shut down the NIC(s), does that make any difference?
Good suggestion. Disconnecting the Ethernet cables from the NICs did not
make a difference.
--- On Sat, 7/19/08, listmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: listmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Load Average ~0.40 when idle
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Saturday, July 19, 2008, 4:27 PM
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:04:17 -0700 (PDT), Mark Pryor wrote
listmail wrote:
Good suggestion. Disconnecting the Ethernet cables from the NICs did not
make a difference. However, shutting down the interfaces (e.g ifdown eth0,
ifdown eth1) did cut the load average down to nothing (0.00).
So it wasn't actual traffic, but something that the interfaces were
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:32:42 -0400, Dan Halbert wrote
You mentioned these are Supermicro X7DBN boards. They use the Intel
(ESB2/Gilgal) 82563EB Dual-Port Gigabit Ethernet Controller. There's
an open bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403121,
e1000: issues with Intel
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 16:54 -0700, listmail wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:28:55 -0400, Dan Halbert wrote
listmail wrote:
it has the same problem: load average 0.4 when idle.
If you disconnect or shut down the NIC(s), does that make any difference?
Good suggestion. Disconnecting the
OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're
supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no
longer enough.
TIA
John Hinton
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 15:27 -0400, John Hinton wrote:
OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're
supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no
longer enough.
are you opening both tcp and udp?
Craig
Just compiled a kernel. And I have hid-debug enabled. Whenever I move
the mouse or type anything on the keyboard I get all action messages
on the console. How can I disable this?
TIA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:10 PM, David Hláčik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
is someone using Plone on CentOs 5.2?
What is the best way to install lastest version? Using their unified
installer?
Thanks in advance!
I think the plone website prefers using the rpms for plone from
Fedora...
2008/7/19 Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:10 PM, David Hláčik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
is someone using Plone on CentOs 5.2?
What is the best way to install lastest version? Using their unified
installer?
Thanks in advance!
I think the plone
47 matches
Mail list logo
