Re: [CentOS-docs] 답장: Anaconda Slides Transla tions

2009-01-07 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 bulmoji-cen...@yahoo.com wrote: ... I want to help making Korean translation but it seems there is no Korean directory. It is there for CentOS-6 now. It will be soon for CentOS-5, and CentOS-4. Would tell me how to? 1. Download a working copy

Re: [CentOS-docs] Merging Documentation and Help pages

2009-01-07 Thread Dag Wieers
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: Going over the wiki some more I noticed that the GettingHelp and Documentation page contain the same type of information and could be merged (and reduced) as well. Why? At the moment with the Getting Help page gone, it looks a bit

Re: [CentOS-docs] Merging Documentation and Help pages

2009-01-07 Thread Dag Wieers
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Sure, this should be possible (and we also can change the link the Tab points to). How would one assume that 'Getting Help' and Documentation are the same thing ? And I am also guessing that quite a wide angle of imagination

Re: [CentOS-docs] Merging Documentation and Help pages

2009-01-07 Thread Karanbir Singh
Dag Wieers wrote: I consolidated to Documentation because that was the most wide-spread, but a consolidation to GettingHelp was possible (as I mentioned). right, but I just feel that we should expand on the Docs page to include more content, and move Getting Help related issues away from

Re: [CentOS-docs] 답장: Anaconda Slides Trans lations

2009-01-07 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 01/07/2009 05:00 PM, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: 3. svn update 4. svn commit -m 'Update Korean Translation' If you find any problem in the process, tell me please. What's the procedure to get an account ?I would like to update the Romanian translation (and the typos I find in en..)

Re: [CentOS-docs] Merging Documentation and Help pages

2009-01-07 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: I consolidated to Documentation because that was the most wide-spread, but a consolidation to GettingHelp was possible (as I mentioned). right, but I just feel that we should expand on the Docs page to include more content, and

Re: [CentOS-docs] ??: Anaconda Slides Translati ons

2009-01-07 Thread Alain Reguera Delgado
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 01/07/2009 05:00 PM, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: 3. svn update 4. svn commit -m 'Update Korean Translation' If you find any problem in the process, tell me please. What's the procedure to get an account ?I would

Re: [CentOS-docs] ??: Anaconda Slides Translations

2009-01-07 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 01/07/2009 10:11 PM, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Manuel Wolfshant wrote: On 01/07/2009 05:00 PM, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: 3. svn update 4. svn commit -m 'Update Korean Translation' If you find any problem in the process,

Re: [CentOS-docs] 답장: Anaconda Slides Transla tions

2009-01-07 Thread bulmoji-centos
Thank you, I'll try it. --- 09/1/7 (수)에 Alain Reguera Delgado a...@ciget.cienfuegos.cu님이 쓰신 메시지: 보낸 사람: Alain Reguera Delgado a...@ciget.cienfuegos.cu 제목: Re: [CentOS-docs] 답장: Anaconda Slides Translations 받는 사람: Mail list for wiki articles centos-docs@centos.org 날짜: 2009년 1월 7일 (수요일) 오후

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0005 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 gnome-vfs2 - security update

2009-01-07 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0005 gnome-vfs2 security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0005.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/gnome-vfs2-2.2.5-2E.3.3.i386.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0005 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 gnome-vfs2 - security update

2009-01-07 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0005 gnome-vfs2 security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0005.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/gnome-vfs2-2.2.5-2E.3.3.i386.rpm

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0018 Important CentOS 3 i386 xterm - security update

2009-01-07 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0018 xterm security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0018.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/xterm-179-11.EL3.i386.rpm source:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0004 Important CentOS 3 i386 openssl - security update

2009-01-07 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0004 openssl security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0004.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/openssl096b-0.9.6b-16.49.i386.rpm

Re: [CentOS-virt] Ubuntu 8.04 DomU image from jailtime.org on CentOS 5.2 Dom0

2009-01-07 Thread Devraj Mukherjee
Further thought to my own issue, the processor in use isn't on the Xen Wiki for HVM compatible processors. That might be my issue Thanks. On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Devraj Mukherjee dev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Todd / all, Thanks again for responding to me. Interestingly the screen dump

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread hrbac.c...@seznam.cz
James Bensley napsal(a): Hey Kai, thanks for the response, I think I have found the problem; For some reason if I download the source for xCache or eAccelerator and unpack the tar ball then change to that directory and run phpize I still get the error: Cannot find autoconf. Please check

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread James Bensley
Hi David, Thanks for the reply; Yeah I have everything that is required already installed that's why I'm trying to move away from building to xCache source to using the rpm instead. I downloaded the i386 rpm package you linked to me for CentOS 4 (as I am actually running Red Hat 3.4.5-2!) but got

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread hrbac.c...@seznam.cz
James Bensley napsal(a): Hi David, Thanks for the reply; Yeah I have everything that is required already installed that's why I'm trying to move away from building to xCache source to using the rpm instead. I downloaded the i386 rpm package you linked to me for CentOS 4 (as I am actually

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread James Bensley
Hi David, Well, you should mention it first you are running RHEL 3.x. Yes, my bad, sorry about that! So you are running php 4.3.2. Package you are trying to install is built agains Centos 4 Plus php. I have php 4.4.9. Yeah I was hoping the CentOS 4 build might work on RHEL 3.4.5-2?

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread hrbac.c...@seznam.cz
James Bensley napsal(a): This brings back nothing indicating that php isn't installed but it DEFFINATLY is, however we/I/the web dev team compiled it from the source not through rpms (as I didn't actually think it was available this way?) so might it not show up for that reason? So

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread James Bensley
Hi David, Thanks for the speed reply; So everything's installed from the source rpm knows nothing about them php is needed by php-xcache-4.4.9_1.2.1-jason.1.x86_64 php-devel is needed by php-xcache-4.4.9_1.2.1-jason.1.x86_64 Try to build it with --nodeps, so it will not looup in rpm db.

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
James Bensley wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:30:30 +: php is needed by php-xcache-5.2.5_1.2.1-jason.1.x86_64 what does rpm -q php say? And, as has already been said, it's not very nice to omit OS information. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread hrbac.c...@seznam.cz
James Bensley napsal(a): I can't understand why this is though, especially since autoconf and autoheader are both listed by the rpm manage with; rpm-qa | grep auto automake-1.9.2-3 autoconf-2.59-5 So they really are there and clearly visible? What is the world coming to ay? Thanks again

Re: [CentOS] LDAP Authentication to Lotus Domino?

2009-01-07 Thread Fabian Arrotin
Charles Richards wrote: Has anybody done any authentication to Lotus Domino using LDAP? I selected LDAP options in the authconfig-tui application, per the documentation here: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-ldap-pam.html when I try to query the directory

[CentOS] Can't yum erase/install an app

2009-01-07 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I am switching the box that I did the HIPL rpm builds over to running from rpms built directly by the HIPL team (http://infrahip.hiit.fi/hipl/release/1.0.4/). I did the 'make uninstall' and then 'yum install hipl-all', but the hipl-firewall rpm did not install. Seems like I have a mess on my

Re: [CentOS] totem-xine

2009-01-07 Thread A. Kirillov
Awhile ago I've tried to rebuild fc6 totem-xine in mock but stopped short due to a large number of dependencies as I wasn't sure of the result. livna for FC6 is the totem-xine I'm using, I built all the dependencies from Fedora/livna that were not in the centos/epel repos. I actually

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread James Bensley
Hey David, Kai; Thanks for the replys. I'd get rid of PHP from source and install php-* packages. David I didn't think rpm packages for php exist, I am searching on google for some to download but I can't find any? -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GIT/MU/U dpu s: a-- C++$ U+

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
David Hrbác( wrote on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:42:44 +0100: I'd get rid of PHP from source and install php-* packages. Then he goes back to PHP 4.3.2. You *have* to use the source for xcache. I'd recommend to go the php newsgroup and ask about the phpize problem. And provide all the information

Re: [CentOS] totem-xine

2009-01-07 Thread A. Kirillov
For video - I use the totem plugin with xine backend totem. I compiled my own but I suspect that rpmforge has it. I found gstreamer backend totem to be most unsatisfactory. Could you please share some details on how to get totem-xine running on CentOS? I believe this could be

Re: [CentOS] Can't yum erase/install an app

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:39:49 -0500: I then do a 'yum install hipl-firewall' and get that it is installed and there is nothing to do then a rpm -q would show that, does it? If so: rpm -e. If it's only left in the rpm database you can remove it from the database only

Re: [CentOS] xCache install error ($PHP_AUTOCONF?)

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
b73ac94175...@mail.gmail.com James Bensley wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:43:09 +: I didn't think rpm packages for php exist, I am searching on google for some to download but I can't find any? The packages for your Red Hat are on the Red Hat servers, of course. I don't know if there are

Re: [CentOS] Bash cgi upload form

2009-01-07 Thread John Doe
From: Sean Carolan Anyone have a function or script for uploading files from a web browser with a bash script? I know this is possible to do with Perl, I'm wondering if the same is possible using only bash. Just curious here, from Sean's request info, this script would run on

Re: [CentOS] totem-xine

2009-01-07 Thread Michael A. Peters
A. Kirillov wrote: Awhile ago I've tried to rebuild fc6 totem-xine in mock but stopped short due to a large number of dependencies as I wasn't sure of the result. livna for FC6 is the totem-xine I'm using, I built all the dependencies from Fedora/livna that were not in the centos/epel repos.

Re: [CentOS] Can't yum erase/install an app

2009-01-07 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:39:49 -0500: I then do a 'yum install hipl-firewall' and get that it is installed and there is nothing to do then a rpm -q would show that, does it? If so: rpm -e. If it's only left in the rpm database you can

[CentOS] Cleaning up an RPM repository.

2009-01-07 Thread Friedrich Clausen
Hello All, At my $WORK we have lots of in-house applications used to support the services we offer to customers and we deploy these to servers as RPMS. This works well for us except we have thousands of obsolete packages in our Yum repository that need to be cleaned up. What I would like to

[CentOS] proftpd question

2009-01-07 Thread adrian kok
Hi I am using proftpd in 5.2 When I change the user from /home/userA to /ftp/userA in this file /etc/passwd eg: userA:x:502:502::/ftp/userA:/bin/bash After change this passwd file, I can't logon as ftp but ssh is fine Can you help? Thank you Send instant messages to your online friends

Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up an RPM repository.

2009-01-07 Thread William L. Maltby
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 16:23 +0100, Friedrich Clausen wrote: Hello All, At my $WORK we have lots of in-house applications used to support the services we offer to customers and we deploy these to servers as RPMS. This works well for us except we have thousands of obsolete packages in our

Re: [CentOS] proftpd question

2009-01-07 Thread Fabrice La Farina
Hello -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of adrian kok Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 4:25 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] proftpd question When I change the user from /home/userA to /ftp/userA in this

Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up an RPM repository.

2009-01-07 Thread Greg Bailey
Friedrich Clausen wrote: Hello All, At my $WORK we have lots of in-house applications used to support the services we offer to customers and we deploy these to servers as RPMS. This works well for us except we have thousands of obsolete packages in our Yum repository that need to be cleaned

Re: [CentOS] proftpd question

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Adrian kok wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:24:45 +0800 (CST): After change this passwd file, I can't logon as ftp you mean as anonymous user ftp or you cannot login *via* ftp at all? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up an RPM repository.

2009-01-07 Thread Alain PORTAL
Le mercredi 7 janvier 2009 à 16:44, William L. Maltby a écrit : rpm --erase full-versioned-package-name and run it. This rpm command erase an installed package, not a file in a directory. Regards Alain -- La version française des pages de manuel Linux http://manpagesfr.free.fr

Re: [CentOS] Video lock up

2009-01-07 Thread John
http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_x86_96.43.07.html I have the exact same card in a workstation. JohnS -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Spiro Harvey Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 3:08 PM To:

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Vandaman
Tim Nelson wrote: Hello fellow CentOS'ers- I'm trying to install a package from a not-to-be-named repository (privately operated for some proprietary software). They currently have a package I need but offer multiple versions. However, if I simply 'yum install packagename' it defaults to

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 + (GMT): Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions unless one could be an update/bugfix? So, what? Isn't he entitled to say no to an update if he knows there is a problem on his setup with it? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin,

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Les Mikesell
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 + (GMT): Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions unless one could be an update/bugfix? So, what? Isn't he entitled to say no to an update if he knows there is a problem on his setup with it? Yes,

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-7-2009 10:00 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 + (GMT): Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions unless one could be an update/bugfix? So, what? Isn't he entitled to say no to an update if he knows there is a

[CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any recommendations/opinions. Any input would be

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Tim Nelson
- Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: on 1-7-2009 10:00 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: Vandaman wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:31:36 + (GMT): Why would the admin of the un-named repo include two versions unless one could be an update/bugfix? So, what? Isn't he entitled

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 14:56 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote: Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Max Hetrick
Bo Lynch wrote: Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any recommendations/opinions.

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Ed Westphal
Bo Lynch wrote: Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any recommendations/opinions.

Re: [CentOS] Yum Issue.. Installing Older Package Version

2009-01-07 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Scott Silva wrote on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:48:03 -0800: Yes, but yum needs a little coercion to ignore that update. You would have to exclude that package after you got the older one installed so it didn't update. Of course, but this wasn't the point of V. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:28 pm, Tim Nelson wrote: - Bo Lynch bly...@ameliaschools.com wrote: Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Tim Nelson
- Bo Lynch bly...@ameliaschools.com wrote: I would say that we have around 300 users. Bo Lynch You'll definitely want to look at a multi-server setup for that. Put your mail/web services on one box and database/LDAP on another. Also, for such a large installation you may even want to

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread René Standfest
Bo Lynch schrieb am 07.01.2009 20:56: Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware style system for out staff to collaborate better. Currently we are using Squirrelmail/postfix for email. Does anyone have any

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:38 pm, Tim Nelson wrote: - Bo Lynch bly...@ameliaschools.com wrote: I would say that we have around 300 users. Bo Lynch You'll definitely want to look at a multi-server setup for that. Put your mail/web services on one box and database/LDAP on another. Also,

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009, Bo Lynch wrote: On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:38 pm, Tim Nelson wrote: ... I would have thought that this was a small install:) We probably have at the most around 200-250. I was just guessing for growth. We too opt open source. Is zimbra a resource hog? Meaning do you think it

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Scott Silva
on 1-7-2009 12:15 PM Bo Lynch spake the following: On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:23 pm, Ed Westphal wrote: Bo Lynch wrote: Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list. We are a public k-12 school and are looking to migrate to a groupware style system for out staff to collaborate better.

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
I may start a war here, but I'm going to recommend Lotus Notes / Domino as the collaborative software for you. I've had quite a bit of experience with it in a large multi-national company. It can definitely Has anyone used PHPGroupware? I've been looking at some comparisons with this and

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
You'll definitely want to look at a multi-server setup for that. Put your mail/web services on one box and database/LDAP on another. Also, for such a large installation you may even want to look at their commercially supported editions. Last time I checked (admittedly quite a while ago)

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 07.01.2009 um 22:24 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams: You'll definitely want to look at a multi-server setup for that. Put your mail/web services on one box and database/LDAP on another. Also, for such a large installation you may even want to look at their commercially supported

Re: [CentOS] monitor invidiual client (PC) network traffic to server?

2009-01-07 Thread Adrian Joian
Hello, Setup iptables rules on the server side for each client and extract the data from there, draw graphics with rrdtool. Another software that you can use is ntop. For bandwidthd grab the src rpm from a fedora 10 repo and recompile it. Best regards, Adrian Tim Nelson wrote: - mcclnx mcc

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Andrew Cotter
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 5:32 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite Am 07.01.2009 um 22:24 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Les Mikesell
Andrew Cotter wrote: My problem would be that a single machine is a single point of failure. We are looking at zimbra and using at least two machines utilizing GFS and our SAN so we can withstand a failure. Wouldn't drbl/heartbeat be less complicated for 2 machines? -- Les Mikesell

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
On Wed, January 7, 2009 6:06 pm, Andrew Cotter wrote: -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 5:32 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread John R Pierce
For a completely /different/ idea... I know several nonprofit and not-for-profit groups who coordinate their email and activities using a combination of GMail, google calendar(s) for scheduling, google apps for shared documents, and google group(s) for message board functionality. You can

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Bo Lynch
On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:59 pm, Bill Campbell wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2009, Bo Lynch wrote: On Wed, January 7, 2009 3:38 pm, Tim Nelson wrote: ... I would have thought that this was a small install:) We probably have at the most around 200-250. I was just guessing for growth. We too opt open

[CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Amos Shapira
Hello, Is there a standard programmatic way to manipulate yum configuration files, particularly the .repo files? I want to add things like priority=... per repo, or check_obsoletes=1 to the priorities plugin config. I can cook specific search/append using perl or sed but was wondering whether

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread russ
Cc$ Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Bo Lynch bly...@ameliaschools.com Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:45:22 To: CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite On Wed, January 7, 2009 6:06 pm, Andrew Cotter wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 18:54 -0500, Bo Lynch wrote: So are you required to run zimbras release of these packages? If you are forced to use them then how delayed are the releases. Are you able to use something other than amavis and clam for scanning?? We use a product called VAMS released

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Rainer Duffner
Am 08.01.2009 um 00:54 schrieb Bo Lynch: So are you required to run zimbras release of these packages? For Zimbra, yes. But honestly: how on earth would they be able to guarantee that it's working correctly in any other meaningful way? Would you like to do support for your product that

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Dnk
On 7-Jan-09, at 3:57 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: otherwise, um, if you really do want self hosting... pick your favorite email server (postfix, sendmail, etc), use cyrus imap, let your clients use any imap email app they prefer (Mozilla Thunderbird, Microsoft

Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Karanbir Singh
Amos Shapira wrote: Is there a standard programmatic way to manipulate yum configuration files, particularly the .repo files? Puppet has a yum module, which is quite capable and what I use. -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Spiro Harvey
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: [using google mail+calendar+etc] The advantages of doing it this way are no costs at all, Actually you only get 25 users for free. After that you have to pay for it. I'm using it on one of my domains and it's very very good, but too low a limit for any

[CentOS] Working - Re: Checking fan state

2009-01-07 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:39:19 -0500: Now with the new fan in, it is not turning at all, You can usually set in the BIOS if you want to use smart fan control (or what they call it) and which method (three-pin connector fans are controlled

[CentOS] Obtaining a newer Broadcomm (bcm43xx) driver for CentOS 5

2009-01-07 Thread Bart Schaefer
I'm using CentOS 5 (w/all latest updates as of 2008-01-06) on an HP laptop -- in fact, the exact laptop described here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/HP/Pavilion-ze5300_Series Ever since I switched from SHARED to OPEN authentication (and hence from using ndiswrapper to the bcm43xx

Re: [CentOS] Obtaining a newer Broadcomm (bcm43xx) driver for CentOS 5

2009-01-07 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Bart Schaefer barton.schae...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using CentOS 5 (w/all latest updates as of 2008-01-06) on an HP Err, typo, that should say 2009-01-06. D'oh. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread John R Pierce
r...@vshift.com wrote: Cc$ Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Huh??? and why did you send this, quoting 200 something lines of previous peoples quotes without a clue what you're referring to?? folks, your cellphones make LOUSY email list communications device. please stick

Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Amos Shapira
2009/1/8 Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org: Amos Shapira wrote: Is there a standard programmatic way to manipulate yum configuration files, particularly the .repo files? Puppet has a yum module, which is quite capable and what I use. Thanks to both of you. We don't use Puppet for all our

Re: [CentOS] Obtaining a newer Broadcomm (bcm43xx) driver for CentOS 5

2009-01-07 Thread Barry Brimer
I'm using CentOS 5 (w/all latest updates as of 2008-01-06) on an HP laptop -- in fact, the exact laptop described here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/HP/Pavilion-ze5300_Series Ever since I switched from SHARED to OPEN authentication (and hence from using ndiswrapper to the bcm43xx

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Spiro Harvey
Actually you only get 25 users for free. After that you have to pay for it. I'm using it on one of my domains and it's very very good, but too low a limit for any decent sized business. does that apply to nonprofits like k12/edus ? Can't answer that without making stuff up. :) Mine's not

Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 19:11, Amos Shapira amos.shap...@gmail.com wrote: I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it expects comments beginning with ;, not #. Why don't you use Python's ConfigParser? That's what yum itself actually uses (AFAIK). http://docs.python.org/library/configparser.html With

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
otherwise, um, if you really do want self hosting... pick your favorite email server (postfix, sendmail, etc), use cyrus imap, let your clients use any imap email app they prefer (Mozilla Thunderbird, Microsoft Outlook or Live Mail, etc) Agree strongly with PostFix+Cyrus. It is a

[CentOS] How to select a block in gnome-terminal or in vim

2009-01-07 Thread Xiaobo Zhu
Hi, When I connect to a Cisco router and issue the show ip interface command, the output is similar as follows: Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Ethernet0/0 192.168.12.1 YES NVRAM up up Serial0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM

Re: [CentOS] How to select a block in gnome-terminal or in vim

2009-01-07 Thread Ray Van Dolson
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:57:51AM +0800, Xiaobo Zhu wrote: Hi, When I connect to a Cisco router and issue the show ip interface command, the output is similar as follows: Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol Ethernet0/0

Re: [CentOS] How to select a block in gnome-terminal or in vim

2009-01-07 Thread Xiaobo Zhu
Many thanks and it works fine. Cheers, Xiaobo On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:57:51AM +0800, Xiaobo Zhu wrote: Hi, When I connect to a Cisco router and issue the show ip interface command, the output is similar as

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Max Hetrick
Rainer Duffner wrote: For Zimbra, yes. But honestly: how on earth would they be able to guarantee that it's working correctly in any other meaningful way? Would you like to do support for your product that relies on a dozen or more external other products (that aren't maintained in most

Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite

2009-01-07 Thread Max Hetrick
René Standfest wrote: We have running at the moment eGroupWare, but we plan to migrate to SOGo (http://sogo.opengroupware.org) in the next two months (we had some annoying problems with eGW in the past). It has a really cool Webfrontend (looks like Thunderbird with Lightning) and has a really

Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Amos Shapira
2009/1/8 Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 19:11, Amos Shapira amos.shap...@gmail.com wrote: I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it expects comments beginning with ;, not #. Why don't you use Python's ConfigParser? That's what yum itself actually uses (AFAIK).

Re: [CentOS] How to select a block in gnome-terminal or in vim

2009-01-07 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 09:57 +0800, Xiaobo Zhu wrote: Will anyone please tell me how to select text in block instead of line, so that I can get the IP address on all interface, in gnome-terminal as well as in vim. Hold down Ctrl to select a block in gnome-terminal. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams

Re: [CentOS] How to select a block in gnome-terminal or in vim

2009-01-07 Thread Thomas Iverson
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 09:57 +0800, Xiaobo Zhu wrote: Will anyone please tell me how to select text in block instead of line, so that I can get the IP address on all interface, in gnome-terminal as well as in

[CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Amos Shapira wrote: I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it expects comments beginning with ;, not #. and | sed -e 's...@^#@;@g' cannot cure that bad habit on generated files or an input stream? [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ cat - END | sed -e 's...@^#@;@g' one two#two

Re: [CentOS] Scriptable way to edit yum .repo files?

2009-01-07 Thread Amos Shapira
2009/1/8 R P Herrold herr...@centos.org: On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Amos Shapira wrote: I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it expects comments beginning with ;, not #. and | sed -e 's...@^#@;@g' cannot cure that bad habit on generated files or an input stream? Possibly, but then I'll